An Intergenerational Program with Benefits


Illustrates how the director and teachers of a child care program and the staff of a residential nursing home facility collaborated to develop, implement, and evaluate an onsite intergenerational program. Describes program goals; recruitment plan; elder, staff, and teacher orientation; options for intergenerational activities; and program benefits. Article provides resources and suggestions for groups planning intergenerational programs. Preschool children (n = 38) who participated in the study were interviewed and asked a key question, “What do old people do?” Prior to participation in the program, 50% of the children responded with negative descriptors; after participating in the program for 1 year, all of the children responded with positive descriptors. Children’s responses provide evidence that intergenerational programs can promote positive attitudes toward elders.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. Administration on Aging (2005). Statistics on the Aging Population. Retrieved December 10, 2006 from:

  2. Bales, S., Eklund, S., & Siffin, C. (2000). Children’s perceptions of elders before and after a school-based intergenerational program. Educational Gerontology, 26, 677–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Erikson, E. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Generations United (2002). The benefits of intergenerational programs. Retrieved December 10, 2006 from:

  5. James, J. Y., & Kromanski, L. M. (1999). Positive intergenerational picture books for young children. Young Children, 54(3), 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jantz, R. K., Seefeldt, C., Galper, A., & Serlock, K. (1977). Children’s attitudes toward the elderly. Social Education, 41, 518–523.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaplan, M., & Larkin, E. (2004). Launching intergenerational programs in early childhood settings: A comparison of explicit intervention with an emergent approach. Early Childhood Education Journal, 31(3), 157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuehne, V. (2003a). The state of our art: Intergenerational program research and evaluation: Part one. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1(1), 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuehne, V. (2003b). The state of our art: Intergenerational program research and evaluation: Part two. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1(2), 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Larkin, E., & Newman, S. (2001). Benefits of intergenerational staffing in preschools. Educational Gerontology, 27(5), 373–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis, L. (2002). Intergenerational programs that really work. Caring for the Ages, 3(8), 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McGuire, S. L. (2003). Growing up and growing older: Books for young readers. Childhood Education, 79(3), 145–149.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rosebrook, V., & Larkin, E. (2003). Introducing standards and guidelines: A rationale for defining the knowledge, skills and dispositions of intergenerational practice. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1(1), 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Seefeldt, C., Warman, B., Jantz, R. K., & Galper, A. (1990). Young and old together. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine L. Holmes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holmes, C.L. An Intergenerational Program with Benefits. Early Childhood Educ J 37, 113–119 (2009).

Download citation


  • Intergenerational programs
  • Intergenerational activities
  • Young and old serving together
  • Child care
  • Long-term care