Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 195–201 | Cite as

Hands-on and Kinesthetic Activities for Teaching Phonological Awareness

  • Audrey C. Rule
  • C. Jolene Dockstader
  • Roger A. Stewart
Article

Object box and environmental print card activities and kinesthetic/oral activities used in two before school programs for Title 1 students are presented for teaching phonological awareness concepts to students in primary grades. A small program evaluation study in which the two experimental groups made similar improvements and larger gains than a control group indicates that the materials are effective for teaching phonological awareness to students at risk of failure in reading.

Keywords

early childhood primary grades phonological awareness object box kinesthetic research before-school program environmental print 

References

  1. Adams M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball E. W. (1997). Phonological awareness: Implications for whole language and emergent literacy programs. Topics in Language Disorders 17: 14–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brownell M. T., Walther-Thomas C. (1999). Candace Bos: Informed, flexible teaching—A key to successful readers. Intervention in School & Clinic 34: 309–314Google Scholar
  4. Chall J. S. (1967/1983). Learning to read: The great debate. New York: McGraw-Hill Book CompanyGoogle Scholar
  5. Ehri L. C., Wilce L. S. (1979). Does word training increase or decrease interference in a stoop task?. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 27: 352–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glaser D. (1999). Every child can read: Activities to teach phonological awareness. Boise, ID: The Lee David Pesky Center for Learning EnrichmentGoogle Scholar
  7. International Reading Association. (2003). Using multiple methods of beginning reading instruction: A position statement of the International Reading Association. Retrieved January 3, 2005, from http://www.reading.org/downloads/positions/ps1033_mutiple_methods.pdfGoogle Scholar
  8. Liberman I. Y., Shankweiler D. P., Liberman A. M. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In: Shankweiler D. P., Liberman I. Y., (eds) Phonology and reading disability: Solving the puzzle (IARLD Monograph Series) (pp. 1–31). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
  9. National Institute of Child Health & Human Development. (April 13, 2000). National reading panel reports combination of teaching phonics, word sounds, giving feedback on oral reading most effective ways to teach reading. http://www.nichd.nih.gov/new/releases/nrp.htm Google Scholar
  10. National Institute of Child Health & Human Development. (2000). Understanding why children succeed or fail at reading. http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/readbro.htm Google Scholar
  11. Robertson C., Salter W. (1997). The Phonological Awareness Test. East Moline, IL: LinguiSystems, IncGoogle Scholar
  12. Rule A. C. (2001a). Environmental Print Activities for Language and Thinking Skills. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing CoGoogle Scholar
  13. Rule A. C. (2001b). Hands-on Materials for Teaching Phonological Awareness and Phonics. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing CoGoogle Scholar
  14. Siegel L. S. (1993). Phonological processing deficits as the basis of a reading disability [Special Issue: Phonological processes and learning disability]. Developmental Review 13: 246–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stahl S. A., Duffy-Hester A. M., Stahl K. A. D. (1998). Everything you wanted to know about phonics (but were afraid to ask). Reading Research Quarterly 33: 338–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stanovich K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological core variable difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities 21: 590–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Torgesen J. K., Wagner R. K., Rashotte C. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities 5: 276–286Google Scholar
  18. Wagner R., Torgesen J. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skill Psychological Bulletin 101: 192–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Audrey C. Rule
    • 1
  • C. Jolene Dockstader
    • 2
  • Roger A. Stewart
    • 3
  1. 1.Curriculum and Instruction State University of New York at OswegoOswegoUSA
  2. 2.Jerome Middle SchoolJerome School DistrictJeromeUSA
  3. 3.Literacy DepartmentBoise State UniversityBoiseUSA

Personalised recommendations