The aim of this study was to determine whether the Frequency with which parents read to their children, Preschool Exposure and the initial Age that students “who are economically at-risk” were first exposed to significant literacy activities at home or in a preschool setting affected their reading grades. Students “who are economically at-risk,” for the scope of this study, are those students whose family incomes qualify them to receive either free or reduced lunches. The criteria set forth by the United States Department of Agriculture’s School Lunch Program and Child Nutrition Web site (United States Department of Agriculture, 2005) was used to determine whether families were qualified to receive reductions in the price of their school meals. Parents of students from six southeast Alabama schools were selected to participate in the study. All six schools administered the Questioning, Understanding, Enriching, Seeking and Thinking (QUEST) program for gifted or academically successful students. The subjects were 84 parents/families with public school children who are economically at-risk and participated in the QUEST program. Data were gathered using a questionnaire developed by the researcher. Instructional implications for this research study are to (1) improve reading instruction for economically at-risk students within our nation’s elementary schools; (2) equip parents with teaching tools and theories for providing critical pre-reading skills to their young children and (3) to provide sound research for teacher educators to base their instruction to preservice teachers preparing to teach students who are economically at-risk.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alario A. J., Golova N., High P. C., Rodriguez M., Vivier P. M. (1999). Literacy promotion for Hispanic families in a primary care setting: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 103(5): 993–994
Anderson S. A., (2000). How parental involvement makes a difference in reading. Reading Improvement 37(2): 61–85
Bafile, C. (2005). Gifted class shares its ‘QUESTS.’ Education World Online. Internet Available. http://www.educationworld.org/a_curr/webwizard013.shtml
Bailey L. B., (2004). Interactive homework for increasing parent involvement and student reading achievement. Childhood Education 81(1): 36–40
Barbour A. C., (1998). Home literacy bags promote family involvement. Childhood Education 75(2): 1–75
Bonilla, C., Goss, A., & Lauderdale, K. (1999). Students at-risk: poverty, depression, and the demise of the traditional family. ED430198
Bracey G. W., (1996). SES and involvement Phi Delta Kappan 78(2): 169–170
Bryant W. K., Osterbacka E., Zick C. D., (2001). Mothers’ employment, parental involvement, and the implications for intermediate child outcomes. Social Science Research 30(1): 25–50
Campbell F. A., Ramey C. T., (1995). Cognitive and school outcomes for high-risk African American students at middle adolescents: Positive effects of early intervention. American Educational Research Journal32: 743–772
Christiansen J., Howard M., (1997). Protective factors to enhance the resilience and school for at-risk students. Intervention in School and Clinic 33(2): 86–89
Elias M., Hoover H., Poedubicky V., (1997). Computer facilitated counseling for at-risk students in a social problem solving “lab”. Elementary School Guidance & Counseling 31: 293–309
Feiler A., (2005). Linking home to school literacy in an inner city reception class. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 5(2): 131–149
Freppon P. A., McIntyre E., (1999). A comparison of young children learning to read in different settings. The Journal of Educational Research 92(4): 206–235
Genisio M. H., (1998). What goes on at home? Conversations with three families that link love to literacy. Reading Teacher 52(4): 96–99
Hiebert E. H., Pearson P. D., (2000). Building on the past, bridging to the future: A research agenda for the center for the improvement of early reading achievement. The Journal of Educational Research 93(3): 133–162
Hoffman, E. P. (1993). Essays on the economics of cducation. ED367761. Identification of QUEST Students. www.pcboe.net/quest/indentification.htm
Madrigal, P., Cubillas, C., Yaden, D. B. Tam, A., & Brassell, D. (1999). Creating a book loan program for inner city Latino families (CIERA Report No. 2–003). Ann Arbor, MI: CIERA
Marjoribanks K., Walberg H. J., Bargen M. (1975). Mental abilities: sibling constellation and social class correlates. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 14: 109–116
Maughan S., (2000). Readers for early readers. Publishers Weekly 247(21): 40–47
North S., (2000). Establishing the foundation of literacy for preschool children: the role of the young peoples service librarian. Australasian Public Libraries and Information Services 13(2): 1–10
Pianta R. C., Walsh D., (1996). High-risk children in the schools: creating sustaining relationships Routledge New York
Piirto J., (1999). Talented adults and children: their development and education 2 Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Sanacore J., (1994). Treat at-risk learners as well as we treat all learners. Journal of Reading 38(3): 238–242
Silvern S. B., (Ed.). (1991). Advances in reading/language research: Vol. 5. Literacy through family, community and school interactions JAI Greenwich, CT
U.S. Department of Agriculture: School Lunch Program (2005) www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/Lunch/Governance/Notices/00–01ieg.html
van Kleeck, Stahl S. A., Bauer E. B., (2003) (Eds.). On reading books to children: parents and teachers Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, NJ 95–113
Villas-Boas A., (1998). The effects of parental involvement in homework on student achievement in Portugal and Luxembourg. Childhood Education 74(6): 367–371
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bailey, L.B. Examining Gifted Students Who Are Economically At-Risk to Determine Factors that Influence Their Early Reading Success . Early Childhood Educ J 33, 307–315 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-006-0058-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-006-0058-2