Abstract
Crossings between roads and streams can negatively affect fish, especially when culverts prevent free movement along the stream. Understanding this effect is essential to design structures that can mitigate the impact of roads on fishes. Here, we used a capture-recapture study and multi-state open population models to investigate the influence of a culvert on the movement probability of the armored catfish Rineloricaria aequalicuspis, a small benthic species (maximum total body length ca. 190 mm) endemic to streams in southern Brazil. Additionally, we tested whether environmental variables and body size affect movement probability through the culvert. Fish sampling and environmental data collection were carried out during 2016 and 2017, both in a stream section crossed by a road and in the adjacent free-flowing stream sections upstream and downstream. Movement probability was higher within free stream sections than through the culvert. Water depth in the culvert positively influenced movement probability, whereas body size was not related to movement through the road-stream crossing. Our results indicate that the culvert hinders free movement of R. aequalicuspis and that approximately 30 cm of water depth inside the culvert results in an eightfold increase in passage probability. These results extend the evidence that culverts affect fish movement in streams, even for non-migratory, relatively small species adapted to environments with natural obstacles. This indicates the need to design road-stream crossings that are more favorable to fish movement, especially in streams crossed by roads at multiple sites.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
References
Abell R, Thieme ML, Revenga C et al (2008) Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. Bioscience 58:403–414. https://doi.org/10.1641/b580507
Albanese B, Angermeier PL, Dorai-Raj S (2004) Ecological correlates of fish movement in a network of Virginia streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:857–869. https://doi.org/10.1139/F04-096
Amtstaetter F, O’Connor J, Borg D et al (2017) Remediation of upstream passage for migrating Galaxias (Family: Galaxiidae) through a pipe culvert. Fish Manag Ecol 24:186–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12211
Anderson GB, Freeman MC, Freeman BJ et al (2012) Dealing with uncertainty when assessing fish passage through culvert road crossings. Environ Manage 50:462–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9886-6
Benton PD, Ensign WE, Freeman BJ (2008) The effect of road crossings on fish movements in small Etowah basin streams. Southeast Nat 7:301–310. https://doi.org/10.1656/1528-7092(2008)7[301:teorco]2.0.co;2
BCMF – British Columbia Ministry of Forests (2012) Fish-stream crossing guidebook, revision edited. British Columbia, Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations, B.C. Ministry of Environment, and Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Victoria
Blank MD (2010) Safe passages for fish and other aquatic species. In: Beckman JP, Clevenger AP, Huisjer MP, Hilty JA (eds) Safe passages: highways, wildlife, and habitat connectivity. IslandPress, Washington, pp 75–96
Bolger DT, Morrison TA, Vance B et al (2012) A computer-assisted system for photographic mark-recapture analysis. Methods Ecol Evol 3:813–822. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00212.x
Booth MT, Flecker AS, Hairston NG (2014) Is mobility a fixed trait? Summer movement patterns of catostomids using pit telemetry. Trans Am Fish Soc 143:1098–1111. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028487.2014.892534
Bouska WW, Paukert CP (2010) Road crossing designs and their impact on fish assemblages of great plains streams. Trans Am Fish Soc 139:214–222. https://doi.org/10.1577/t09-040.1
Bowler DE, Benton TG (2005) Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 80:205–225. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793104006645
Brejão GL, Teresa FB, Gerhard P (2020) When roads cross streams: fish assemblage responses to fluvial fragmentation in lowland Amazonian streams. Neotrop Icthyol 18:e200031. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2020-0031
Burford DD, McMahon TE, Cahoon JE, Blank M (2009) Assessment of trout passage through culverts in a large Montana drainage during summer low flow. N Am J Fish Manag 29:739–752. https://doi.org/10.1577/m07-175.1
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference. Springer, New York
Castro-Santos T (2004) Quantifying the combined effects of attempt rate and swimming capacity on passage through velocity barriers. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:1602–1615. https://doi.org/10.1139/F04-094
CDFG – California Departament of Fish and Game (2002) Culvert criteria for fish passage. Resources Agency, California
Cormack ARM (1964) Estimates of survival from the sighting of marked animals. Biometrika 51:429–438
Dala-Corte RB, De Fries L (2018) Inter and intraspecific variation in fish body size constrains microhabitat use in a subtropical drainage. Environ Biol Fish 101:1205–1217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-018-0769-4
Dala-Corte RB, Moschetta JB, Becker FG (2016) Photo-identification as a technique for recognition of individual fish: a test with the freshwater armored catfish Rineloricaria aequalicuspis Reis & Cardoso, 2001 (Siluriformes: Loricariidae). Neotrop Ichthyol 14:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-20150074
David BO, Tonkin JD, Taipeti KWT, Hokianga HT (2014) Learning the ropes: mussel spat ropes improve fish and shrimp passage through culverts. J Appl Ecol 51:214–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12178
De Fries L, Camana M, Hartz SM, Becker FG (2022) Heterogeneous movement by a small non-migratory stream fish. Environ Biol Fish 105:1873–1885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-021-01194-5
Diebel MW, Fedora M, Cogswell S, O’Hanley JR (2014) Effects of road crossings on habitat connectivity for stream-resident fish. River Res Appl 30:132–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra
Dingle H (2014) Migration: the biology of life on the move. Oxford University Press, London
DNIT – Departamento Nacional de Infra-estrutura de Transportes (2006) Manual de drenagem de rodovias, 2nd edn. Departamento Nacional de Infra-Estruturas de Transportes, Rio de Janeiro
DNIT- Departamento Nacional de Infra-estrutura de Transportes (2009) Pontes e viadutos rodoviários – Estruturas de concreto armado - Especificação de serviço. Departamento Nacional de Infra-estrutura de Transportes, Rio de Janeiro
Fausch DK, Torgersen CE, Baxter CV, Li HW (2002) Landscapes to riverscapes: bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. Bioscience 52:483. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0483:ltrbtg]2.0.co;2
Favaro C, Moore JW, Reynolds JD, Beakes MP (2014) Potential loss and rehabilitation of stream longitudinal connectivity: fish populations in urban streams with culverts. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 71:1805–1816. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2014-0199
Fernandez DR, Agostinho AA, Bini LM (2004) Selection of an experimental fish ladder located at the dam of the Itaipu binacional, Paraná river, Brazil. Braz Arch Biol Technol 47:579–586. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132004000400012
Fernandez DR, Agostinho AA, Bini LM, Gomes LC (2007) Environmental factors related to entry into and ascent of fish in the experimental ladder located close to Itaipu dam. Neotrop Ichthyol 5:153–160. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-62252007000200009
Ficke AD, Myrick CA, Jud N (2011) The swimming and jumping ability of three small great plains fishes: implications for fishway design. Trans Am Fish Soc 140:1521–1531. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028487.2011.638579
Flores AM (2017) Avaliação regional da pressão ambiental de estradas sobre riachos no Rio Grande do Sul. Dissertation, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
FOC – Fisheries and Oceans Canada (2015) Guidelines for the design of fish passage for culverts in Nova Scotia. Fisheries Protection Program, Maritimes Region
Gerking SD (1959) The restricted movement of fish populations. Biol Rev 2:221–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1959.tb01289.x
Gibson RJ, Haedrich RL, Wernerheim CM (2005) Loss of fish habitat as a consequence of inappropriately constructed stream crossings. Fisheries 30:10–17. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(2005)30[10:lofhaa]2.0.co;2
Goerig E, Bergeron NE, Castro-Santos T (2017) Swimming behaviour and ascent paths of brook trout in a corrugated culvert. River Res Appl 33:1463–1471. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3187
Goerig E, Castro-Santos T (2017) Is motivation important to brook trout passage through culverts? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 74:885–893. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2016-0237
Goerig E, Castro-Santos T, Bergeron NÉ (2015) Brook trout passage performance through culverts. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 73:94–104. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2015-0089
Hoffman R, Dunham J (2007) Fish-movement ecology in high-gradient headwater streams: its relevance to fish passage restoration through stream culvert barriers. U.S Geological Survey, OFR 2007–1140, Reston. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20071140
Johnson GE, Pearson WH, Southard SL, Mueller RP (2012) Upstream movement of juvenile coho salmon in relation to environmental conditions in a culvert test bed. Trans Am Fish Soc 141:1520–1531. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028487.2012.699013
Jolly GM (1965) Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration- stochastic model. Biometrika 52:225–247. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.1-2.225
Jones PE, Champneys I, Vevers J, Börger L, Svendsen JC, Consuegra S, Jones J, Leanis CG (2021) Selective effects of small barriers on river-resident fish. J Appl Ecol 00:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.138/5
Kemp PS, O’Hanley JR (2010) Procedures for evaluating and prioritising the removal of fish passage barriers: a synthesis. Fish Manag Ecol 17:297–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2400.2010.00751.x
Kondratieff MC, Myrick CA (2006) How high can brook trout jump? a laboratory evaluation of brook trout jumping performance. Trans Am Fish Soc 135:361–370. https://doi.org/10.1577/t04-210.1
Lucas MC, Baras E (2001) Migration of freshwater fishes. Blackwell Science, Oxford
Mahlum S, Cote D, Wiersma YF et al (2014) Evaluating the barrier assessment technique derived from FishXing software and the upstream movement of brook trout through road culverts. Trans Am Fish Soc 143:39–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028487.2013.825641
Makrakis S, Castro-Santos T, Makrakis MC et al (2012) Culverts in paved roads as suitable passages for Neotropical fish species. Neotrop Ichthyol 10:763–770. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252012000400009
Mariano JR, Makrakis MC, Kashiwaqui EAL et al (2012) Longitudinal habitat disruption in Neotropical streams: fish assemblages under the influence of culverts. Neotrop Ichthyol 10:771–784. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252012000400010
Mazzoni R, Pinto MP, Iglesias-Rios R, Costa R (2018) Fish movement in an atlantic forest stream. Neotrop Ichthyol 16:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-20170065
Mitsuo Y, Ohira M, Tsunoda H, Yuma M (2013) Movement patterns of small benthic fish in lowland headwater streams. Freshw Biol 58:2345–2354
Mozzaquattro LB, Dala-Corte RB, Becker FG, Melo AS (2020) Effects of spatial distance, physical barriers, and habitat on a stream fish metacommunity. Hydrobiologia 847:3039–3054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-020-04309-8
Nathan R, Getz WM, Revilla E et al (2008) A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:19052–19059. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800375105
Nislow KH, Hudy M, Letcher BH, Smith EP (2011) Variation in local abundance and species richness of stream fishes in relation to dispersal barriers: implications for management and conservation. Freshw Biol 56:2135–2144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02634.x
Noonan MJ, Grant JWA, Jackson CD (2012) A quantitative assessment of fish passage efficiency. Fish Fish 13:450–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00445.x
Norman JR, Hagler MM, Freeman MC, Freeman BJ (2009) Application of a multistate model to estimate culvert effects on movement of small fishes. Trans Am Fish Soc 138:826–838. https://doi.org/10.1577/t08-156.1
Oldani NO, Baigún CRM, Nestler JM, Goodwin RA (2007) Is fish passage technology saving fish resources in the lower La Plata river basin? Neotrop Ichthyol 5:89–102. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-62252007000200002
Ottburg F, Blank M (2015) Solutions to the impacts of roads and other barriers on fish and fish habitat. In: Ree RVD, Smith DJ, Grilo C (eds) Handbook of road ecology. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118568170.ch45
Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, New York
Peterson JT, Thurow RF, Guzevich JW (2004) An evaluation of multipass electrofishing for estimating the abundance of stream-dwelling salmonids. Trans Am Fish Soc 133:462–475. https://doi.org/10.1577/03-044
Peterson NP, Simmons RK, Cardoso T, Light JT (2013) A probabilistic model for assessing passage performance of coastal cutthroat trout through corrugated metal culverts. N Am J Fish Manag 33:192–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/02755947.2012.750633
Petty JT, Grossman GD (2004) Restricted movement by mottled sculpin (Pisces: Cottidae) in a southern Appalachian stream. Freshw Biol 49:631–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01216.x
Poplar-Jeffers IO, Petty JT, Anderson JT et al (2009) Culvert replacement and stream habitat restoration: implications from brook trout management in an Appalachian watershed, U.S.A. Restor Ecol 17:404–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00396.x
Pradel R, Wintrebert CMA, Gimenez O (2003) A proposal for a goodness-of-fit test to the Arnason-Schwarz multisite capture-recapture model. Biometrics 59:43–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-0420.00006
Prenosil E, Koupal K, Grauf J et al (2016) Swimming and jumping ability of 10 great plains fish species. J Freshw Ecol 31:123–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2015.1048539
Radinger J, Wolter C (2014) Patterns and predictors of fish dispersal in rivers. Fish Fish 15:456–473 https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12028
Rahel FJ, McLaughlin RL (2018) Selective fragmentation and the management of fish movement across anthropogenic barriers. Ecol Appl 28:2066–2081. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1795
Rasmussen JE, Belk MC (2017) Individual movement of stream fishes: linking ecological drivers with evolutionary processes. Rev Fish Sci Aquac 25:70–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2016.1232697
Reis RE, Cardoso AR (2001) Two new species of Rineloricaria from southern Santa Catarina and northeastern Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Ichthyol Explor Freshw 12:319–332
Schlosser IJ (1991) Stream fish ecology: a landscape perspective: land use, which influences the terrestrial-aquatic interface, can affect fish populations and their community dynamics. Bioscience 41:704–712. https://doi.org/10.2307/1311765
Seber AGAF (1965) A note on the multiple-recapture census. Biometrika 52:249–259
Skalski GT, Gilliam JF (2000) Modeling diffusive spread in a heterogeneous population: a movement study with stream fish. Ecology 81:1685–1700. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1685:MDSIAH]2.0.CO;2
Timm A, Higgins D, Stanovick J et al (2017) Quantifying fish habitat associated with stream simulation design culverts in northern wisconsin. River Res Appl 33:567–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3117
Tsuboi J, Morita K, Koseki Y et al (2020) Spatial covariation of fish population vital rates in a stream network. Oikos 129:924–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.07169
Wang L, Lyons J, Kanehl P (2003) Impacts of urban land cover on trout streams in Wisconsin and Minnesota. Trans Am Fish Soc 132:825–839
Warren ML, Pardew MG (1998) Road crossings as barriers to small-stream fish movement. Trans Am Fish Soc 127:637–644. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1998)127%3c0637:rcabts%3e2.0.co;2
Williams BK, Nichols JD, Conroy MJ (2002) Analysis and management of animal populations. Academic Press, San Diego
Webb PW (1975) Hydrodynamics and energetics of fish propulsion. Bull Fish Res Board Can 190:1–159
Wheeler AP, Angermeier PL, Rosenberger AE (2005) Impacts of new highways and subsequent landscape urbanization on stream habitat and biota. Rev Fish Sci 13:141–164
White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46:37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063659909477239
White GC, Kendall WL, Barker RJ (2006) Multistate survival models and their extensions in program MARK. J Wildl Manage 70:1521–1529. https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1521:msmate]2.0.co;2
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank A. Flores, A. Luza, C. Jacobi, C. Pott, E. Mello, F. Rodrigues, M. Dalmolin, P. Paludo, R. Dala-Corte and T. Guimarães for their assistance with fieldwork. We thank V. Debastiani for help with scripting in R, and I. Brack and M. Abadie for help with Mark statistical software. A. Kindel, F. Z. Teixeira, I. P. Coelho, R. Dala-Corte, R. M. Silvano, R. Mazzoni and U. H. Schulz provided helpful suggestions to an earlier version of the manuscript. Fish sampling was done according to the ethics committee protocol (CEUA-UFRGS; # 35291). L. De Fries received a grant from CAPES.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in the study involving fish were permitted by Ministério do Meio Ambiente—MMA, Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade—ICMBIO, Sistema de Autorização e Informação da Biodiversidade—SISBIO, collecting permit #10650, in the name of Fernando Gertum Becker. This research was also approved by the ethics committee protocol of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (CEUA-UFRGS; #35291).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
De Fries, L., Camana, M., Guimarães, M. et al. Road crossings hinder the movement of a small non-migratory stream fish. Environ Biol Fish 106, 1295–1311 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-023-01416-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-023-01416-y