Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of study design and movement behavior on performance of open population spatial Cormack-Jolly-Seber models: application to acoustic telemetry technology

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatial Cormack-Jolly-Seber (CJS) models are appealing for analyzing mark-recapture data from electronic tagging studies with fixed receiver arrays due to their ability to accommodate detections on multiple receivers for estimating apparent survival, detection probabilities, individual activity centers, and home range sizes. However, spatial CJS models assume movement and detection processes that may not be met by electronic tagging studies, especially those involving acoustic telemetry technology. To evaluate the sensitivity of spatial CJS models to underlying assumptions, we simulated acoustic telemetry detection histories in a riverine system using two movement processes, one based on movement around activity centers and another using stepwise movement with detections based on an individual’s proximity to a receiver during tag transmission. For each movement process, we evaluated a range of life history and movement parameters and four receiver spacings (configurations) to determine how study design influenced model performance. Simulated detection histories were assessed with spatial CJS models to determine how well model estimates matched known values. When the movement process matched model assumptions, the model performed well across investigated scenarios. However, under a stepwise movement process, convergence was low for all parameters, and variability between activity centers was positively biased. When individuals were undetected for several time steps, activity center estimates tended to drift to gaps in receiver arrays, which could lead to inaccurate conclusions about space use. Decreasing receiver spacing reduced drifting of activity center estimates; therefore, when a stepwise movement behavior is expected, decreasing receiver spacing may improve reliability of activity center estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data were simulated for this study, and simulation code is available as supplementary material.

Code availability

Code used to simulate and model the data are available as supplementary material.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Andrew Royle and Nathan Hostetter for the technical advice on initial model development and two anonymous reviewers for feedback on the manuscript. Additionally, we thank Charles Belinsky and the Michigan State University High Performance Computing Center and the Institute for Cyber-Enabled Research for the support that made this work possible. This manuscript is contribution 2022-09 of the Michigan State University Quantitative Fisheries Center.

Funding

Funding was provided by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and supporting partners of the Quantitative Fisheries Center, which includes Michigan State University, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Great Lakes Fishery Commission, and several Council of Lake Committee fishery management agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to study conception, study design, study implementation, and manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason L. Fischer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fischer, J.L., Brenden, T.O. & Nathan, L.R. Influence of study design and movement behavior on performance of open population spatial Cormack-Jolly-Seber models: application to acoustic telemetry technology. Environ Biol Fish 105, 2027–2043 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-022-01276-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-022-01276-y

Keywords

Navigation