Abstract
As anthropogenic noise increases globally, there is an urgent need to understand how noise impacts ecological communities. Recent literature shows both terrestrial and aquatic species exhibit myriad responses to noise, including physiological stress, higher mortality, and habitat avoidance. Most studies focus on the responses of single species from terrestrial or marine habitats, with fewer examining freshwater systems and implications for trophic relationships. We used a laboratory study to investigate whether highland stonerollers (Campostoma spadecium), an algivorous freshwater fish, avoid recreational boat noise and thus graze preferentially in quieter areas. For seven groups of eight fish, we recorded the tank position (near, mid, far) of individual fish relative to a speaker playing intermittent boat noise (noise trials) and a mock speaker playing no noise (quiet trials) over a 3-day period. After each trial, we measured the proportion of algae grazed from tiles placed in each section of the tank. Our results show that fish did not avoid the noise speaker compared to fish near the mock speaker in the near section of the tank, but they were found in higher proportions in the quietest section of the tank (mid) during noise trials. There was no difference in the amount of algae consumed in any section when comparing quiet to noisy trials. Thus, our study did not indicate that recreational boat noise elicited clear avoidance behavior or impacted algal coverage. However, these results should be interpreted cautiously since sensitivity to noise pollution varies according to stimulus and species, and these results represent only one species from one geographic location.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Data is available upon request from the authors.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Amoser S, Wysocki LE, Ladich F (2004) Noise emission during the first powerboat race in an Alpine lake and potential impact on fish communities. J Acoust Soc Am 116:3789–3797. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1808219
Barber JR, Crooks KR, Fristrup KM (2010) The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends Ecol Evol 25:180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.002
Barber JR, Burdett CL, Reed SE, Warner KA, Formichella C, Crooks KR, Theobald DM, Fristrup KM (2011) Anthropogenic noise exposure in protected natural areas: estimating the scale of ecological consequences. Landsc Ecol 26:1281–1295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9646-7
Becker A, Whitfield AK, Cowley PD, Järnegren J, Næsje TF (2013) Does boat traffic cause displacement of fish in estuaries? Mar Pollut Bull 75:168–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.07.043
Blum MJ, Neely DA, Harris PM, Mayden RL (2008) Molecular systematics of the cyprinid genus Campostoma (Actinopterygii: Cypriniformes): disassociation between morphological and mitochondrial differentiation. Copeia 2008:360–369. https://doi.org/10.1643/CI-06-093
Bracciali C, Campobello D, Giacoma C, Sara G (2012) Effects of nautical traffic and noise on foraging patterns of Mediterranean damselfish (Chromis chromis). PLoS ONE 7:e4058. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040582
Brumm H (ed) (2013) Animal communication and noise, vol 2. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Butler JM, Maruska KP (2021) Noise during mouthbrooding impairs maternal care behaviors and juvenile development and alters brain transcriptomes in the African cichlid fish Astatotilapia burtoni. Genes Brain Behav 20:e12692. https://doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12692
Buxton RT, McKenna MF, Mennitt D, Fristrup K, Crooks K, Angeloni L, Wittemyer G (2017) Noise pollution is pervasive in US protected areas. Science 356:531–533. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah4783
Buxton RT, McKenna MF, Mennitt D, Brown E, Fristrup K, Crooks KR, Angeloni LM, Wittemyer G (2019) Anthropogenic noise in US national parks–sources and spatial extent. Front Ecol Environ 17:559–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2112
Cashner RC, Matthews WJ, Marsh-Matthews E, Unmack PJ, Cashner FM (2010) Recognition and redescription of a distinctive stoneroller from the Southern Interior Highlands. Copeia 2010:300–311. https://doi.org/10.1643/CI-08-051
Center for Conservation Bioacoustics (2019) Raven Pro: interactive sound analysis software (Version 1.6.1) [Computer software]. The Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca. Available from http://ravensoundsoftware.com/
Codarin A, Wysocki LE, Ladich F, Picciulin M (2009) Effects of ambient and boat noise on hearing and communication in three fish species living in a marine protected area (Miramare, Italy). Mar Pollut Bull 58:1880–1887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.07.011
Devictor V, Julliard R, Jiguet F (2008) Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation. Oikos 117:507–514
Evans-White M, Dodds WK, Gray LJ, Fritz KM (2001) A comparison of the trophic ecology of the crayfishes (Orconectes nais (Faxon) and Orconectes neglectus (Faxon)) and the central stoneroller minnow (Campostoma anomalum (Rafinesque)): omnivory in a tallgrass prairie stream. Hydrobiologia 462:131–144. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013182100150
Evans-White MA, Dodds WK, Whiles MR (2003) Ecosystem significance of crayfishes and stonerollers in a prairie stream: functional differences between co-occurring omnivores. J North Am Benthol Soc 22:423–441. https://doi.org/10.2307/1468272
Ferrari MC, McCormick MI, Meekan MG, Simpson SD, Nedelec SL, Chivers DP (2018) School is out on noisy reefs: the effect of boat noise on predator learning and survival of juvenile coral reef fishes. Proc Royal Soc B 285:20180033. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.0033
Fowler JF, Taber CA (1985) Food habits and feeding periodicity in two sympatric stonerollers (Cyprinidae). Am Midl Nat 113:217–224. https://doi.org/10.2307/2425567
Francis CD, Barber JR (2013) A framework for understanding noise impacts on wildlife: an urgent conservation priority. Front Ecol Environ 11:305–313. https://doi.org/10.1890/120183
Francis CD, Newman P, Taff BD, White C, Monz CA, Levenhagen M, Petrelli AR, Abbott LC, Newton J, Burson S, Cooper CB, Fristrup KM, McClure CJW, Mennitt D, Giamellaro M, Barber JR (2017) Acoustic environments matter: synergistic benefits to humans and ecological communities. J Environ Manage 203:245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.041
Friebertshauser RJ, Holt DE, Johnston CE, Smith MG, Mendonça MT (2020) Investigating impacts of and susceptibility to rail noise playback across freshwater fishes reveals counterintuitive response profiles. Conserv Physiol 8:coaa089. https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coaa089
Gelwick FP, Matthews WJ (1992) Effects of an algivorous minnow on temperate stream ecosystem properties. Ecology 73:1630–1645. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940016
Gelwick FP, Matthews WJ (1997) Effects of algivorous minnows (Campostoma) on spatial and temporal heterogeneity of stream periphyton. Oecologia 112:386–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050324
Graham AL, Cooke SJ (2008) The effects of noise disturbance from various recreational boating activities common to inland waters on the cardiac physiology of a freshwater fish, the largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Aquat Conserv 18:1315–1324. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.941
Holles S, Simpson SD, Radford AN, Berten L, Lecchini D (2013) Boat noise disrupts orientation behaviour in a coral reef fish. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 485:295–300. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10346
Holt DE, Johnston CE (2011) Can you hear the dinner bell? Response of cyprinid fishes to environmental acoustic cues. Anim Behav 82:529–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.06.004
Holt DE, Johnston CE (2015) Traffic noise masks acoustic signals of freshwater stream fish. Biol Conserv 187:27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.004
IBM Corp (2016) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. IBM Corp, Armonk
Jenkins JA, Bart HL Jr, Bowker JD, Bowser PR, MacMillan JR, Nickum JG, Rose JD, Sorensen PW, Whitledge GW (2014) Guidelines for the use of fishes in research. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society
Jerem P, Mathews F (2021) Trends and knowledge gaps in field research investigating effects of anthropogenic noise. Conserv Biol 35:115–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13510
Knudsen FR, Enger PS, Sand O (1992) Awareness reactions and avoidance responses to sound in juvenile Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. J Fish Biol 40:523–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1992.tb02602.x
Kunc HP, McLaughlin KE, Schmidt R (2016) Aquatic noise pollution: implications for individuals, populations, and ecosystems. Proc Royal Soc B 283:20160839. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.0839
Lynch E, Joyce D, Fristrup K (2011) An assessment of noise audibility and sound levels in US National Parks. Landsc Ecol 26:1297–1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9643-x
Matthews WJ, Stewart AJ, Power ME (1987) Grazing fishes as components of North American stream ecosystems: effects of Campostoma anomalum. In: Heins DC (ed) Matthews WJ. Community and evolutionary ecology of North American stream fishes. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, pp 128–135
McCauley RD, Fewtrell J, Popper AN (2003) High intensity anthropogenic sound damages fish ears. J Acoust Soc Am 113:638–642. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1527962
McCormick MI, Fakan EP, Nedelec SL, Allan BJ (2019) Effects of boat noise on fish fast-start escape response depend on engine type. Sci Rep 9:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43099-5
Meador MR, Coles JF, Zappia H (2005) Fish assemblage responses to urban intensity gradients in contrasting metropolitan areas: Birmingham, Alabama and Boston, Massachusetts. Am Fish Soc Symp 47:409–423. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70027324
Mickle MF, Higgs DM (2018) Integrating techniques: a review of the effects of anthropogenic noise on freshwater fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 75:1534–1541. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2017-0245
Nichols TA, Anderson TW, Širović A (2015) Intermittent noise induces physiological stress in a coastal marine fish. PLoS ONE 10:e0139157. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139157
Pieniazek RH, Mickle MF, Higgs DM (2020) Comparative analysis of noise effects on wild and captive freshwater fish behaviour. Anim Behav 168:129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.08.004
Power ME, Matthews WJ, Stewart AJ (1985) Grazing minnows, piscivorous bass, and stream algae: dynamics of a strong interaction. Ecology 66:1448–1456. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938007
Power ME, Stewart AJ, Matthews WJ (1988) Grazer control of algae in an Ozark mountain stream: effects of short-term exclusion. Ecology 69:1894–1898. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941166
Putland RL, Merchant ND, Farcas A, Radford CA (2017) Vessel noise cuts down communication space for vocalizing fish and marine mammals. Glob Chang Biol 24:1708–1721. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13996
Quinn JW, Kwak TJ (2003) Fish assemblage changes in an Ozark river after impoundment: a long-term perspective. Trans Am Fish Soc 132:110–119. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(2003)132%3C0110:FACIAO%3E2.0.CO;2
Radford AN, Kerridge E, Simpson SD (2014) Acoustic communication in a noisy world: can fish compete with anthropogenic noise? Behav Ecol 25:1022–1030. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru029
Rountree RA, Juanes F, Bolgan M (2020) Temperate freshwater soundscapes: a cacophony of undescribed biological sounds now threatened by anthropogenic noise. PLoS ONE 15:e0221842. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221842
Schanke KL, Yamashita T, Gagen CJ (2017) Reduced gene flow in two common headwater fishes in the Ouachita Mountains: a response to stream drying and in-stream barriers. Copeia 105:33–42. https://doi.org/10.1643/CG-16-429
Scholik AR, Yan HY (2001) Effects of underwater noise on auditory sensitivity of a cyprinid fish. Hear Res 152:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00213-6
Scholik AR, Yan HY (2002) Effects of boat engine noise on the auditory sensitivity of the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas. Environ Biol Fishes 63:203–209. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014266531390
Shannon G, McKenna MF, Angeloni LM, Crooks KR, Fristrup KM, Brown E, Warner KA, Nelson MD, White C, Briggs J, McFarland S, Wittemyer G (2016) A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife. Biol Rev 91:982–1005. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12207
Simpson SD, Radford AN, Nedelec SL, Ferrari MCO, Chivers DP, McCormick MI, Meekan MG (2016) Anthropogenic noise increases fish mortality by predation. Nat Commun 7:10544. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10544
Slabbekoorn H, Bouton N, van Opzeeland I, Coers A, ten Cate C, Popper AN (2010) A noisy spring: the impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish. Trends Ecol Evol 25:419–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.04.005
Swihart RK, Gehring TM, Kolozsvary MB, Nupp TE (2003) Responses of ‘resistant’ vertebrates to habitat loss and fragmentation: the importance of niche breadth and range boundaries. Divers Distrib 9:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00158.x
Tumlison R, Robison HW (2018) Distribution of the highland stoneroller (Campostoma spadiceum) in southern Arkansas. JAAS 72:184–186. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol72/iss1/33
Voellmy IK, Purser J, Flynn D, Kennedy P, Simpson SD, Radford AN (2014) Acoustic noise reduces foraging success in two sympatric fish species via different mechanisms. Anim Behav 89:191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.12.029
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to D Lynch of the Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission for assisting in field collections of the fish subjects, and J Steward and M Stephenson of Hendrix College, who helped design the approaches for the acoustic playback and recording, respectively. Finally, thank you to A Turner, A Monroe, and B Turkal, who assisted with field work and laboratory setup.
Funding
Funding was provided by the Arkansas Academy of Sciences and Hendrix College Department of Biology and Health Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Claire E Turkal and Maureen R McClung conceived and designed the project. Claire E Turkal, Maureen R McClung, and Trystin F Anderson conducted field work, maintained the fish populations, and ran experiments. Claire E Turkal and Maureen R McClung analyzed data and prepared the initial manuscript. All authors reviewed drafts of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The care and use of experimental animals complied with animal welfare laws, guidelines, and policies as approved by the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission (Arkansas State Collection Permit No. 012620181) and Hendrix College’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC Protocol No. S1117).
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
The authors give consent for publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turkal, C.E., Anderson, T.F. & McClung, M.R. Highland stonerollers (Campostoma spadecium) do not clearly avoid recreational boat noise or preferentially graze algae in quieter areas. Environ Biol Fish 104, 1005–1016 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-021-01135-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-021-01135-2