Skip to main content
Log in

Highland stonerollers (Campostoma spadecium) do not clearly avoid recreational boat noise or preferentially graze algae in quieter areas

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As anthropogenic noise increases globally, there is an urgent need to understand how noise impacts ecological communities. Recent literature shows both terrestrial and aquatic species exhibit myriad responses to noise, including physiological stress, higher mortality, and habitat avoidance. Most studies focus on the responses of single species from terrestrial or marine habitats, with fewer examining freshwater systems and implications for trophic relationships. We used a laboratory study to investigate whether highland stonerollers (Campostoma spadecium), an algivorous freshwater fish, avoid recreational boat noise and thus graze preferentially in quieter areas. For seven groups of eight fish, we recorded the tank position (near, mid, far) of individual fish relative to a speaker playing intermittent boat noise (noise trials) and a mock speaker playing no noise (quiet trials) over a 3-day period. After each trial, we measured the proportion of algae grazed from tiles placed in each section of the tank. Our results show that fish did not avoid the noise speaker compared to fish near the mock speaker in the near section of the tank, but they were found in higher proportions in the quietest section of the tank (mid) during noise trials. There was no difference in the amount of algae consumed in any section when comparing quiet to noisy trials. Thus, our study did not indicate that recreational boat noise elicited clear avoidance behavior or impacted algal coverage. However, these results should be interpreted cautiously since sensitivity to noise pollution varies according to stimulus and species, and these results represent only one species from one geographic location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Data is available upon request from the authors.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to D Lynch of the Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission for assisting in field collections of the fish subjects, and J Steward and M Stephenson of Hendrix College, who helped design the approaches for the acoustic playback and recording, respectively. Finally, thank you to A Turner, A Monroe, and B Turkal, who assisted with field work and laboratory setup.

Funding

Funding was provided by the Arkansas Academy of Sciences and Hendrix College Department of Biology and Health Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Claire E Turkal and Maureen R McClung conceived and designed the project. Claire E Turkal, Maureen R McClung, and Trystin F Anderson conducted field work, maintained the fish populations, and ran experiments. Claire E Turkal and Maureen R McClung analyzed data and prepared the initial manuscript. All authors reviewed drafts of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maureen R. McClung.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The care and use of experimental animals complied with animal welfare laws, guidelines, and policies as approved by the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission (Arkansas State Collection Permit No. 012620181) and Hendrix College’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC Protocol No. S1117).

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The authors give consent for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 776 KB)

Supplementary file2 (PDF 97.9 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turkal, C.E., Anderson, T.F. & McClung, M.R. Highland stonerollers (Campostoma spadecium) do not clearly avoid recreational boat noise or preferentially graze algae in quieter areas. Environ Biol Fish 104, 1005–1016 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-021-01135-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-021-01135-2

Keywords

Navigation