Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sound production of the banded Sculpin, Cottus carolinae

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of sound in social interactions has been documented in several species of sculpin and may be used to convey information concerning species identity, intent, or fitness. Sound production may be a particularly important mode of communication in sculpin due to their nocturnal behavior and construction of nests in rock cavities where the efficacy of visual cues may be diminished. In this study, we describe acoustic signals produced during conspecific behavioral interactions in Cottus carolinae, and compare signal characteristics to the only other known sounds producers in the genus Cottus including C. gobio, C. rhenanus, C. perifretum, C. bairdii, and C. paulus. Sounds were produced during nocturnal encounters between cavity residents and intruders, and consisted of pulsatile signals that were arranged into pulse trains with remarkably long pulse intervals of approximately 1 s, as well as tonal sounds in which the periodicity was increased to approximately 60 Hz. We found no relationship between fish standard length and pulse instantaneous frequency or total pulse train duration, but did find a positive correlation between fish standard length and pulse duration, as well as position of pulse interval within the pulse train. We found that C. carolinae pulse train structure differed significantly from that of other published sculpin species, and that C. carolinae produce tonal sounds; a characteristic unique within the genus Cottus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akamatsu T, Okumura T, Novarini N, Yan HY (2002) Empirical refinements applicable to the recording of fish sounds in small tanks. J Acoust Soc Am 112:3073–3079

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amorim MCP (2006) Diversity of sound production in fish. In: Ladich F, Collin SP, Moller P, Kapoor BG (eds) Communication in fishes. Springer-Verlag, Wien, pp 1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Amorim MCP, McCracken ML, Fine ML (2002) Metabolic costs of sound production in the oyster toadfish, Opsanus tau. Can J Zool 80(5):830–838

    Google Scholar 

  • Amorim MCP, Simões JM, Fonseca PJ, Turner GF (2008) Species differences in courtship acoustic signals among five Lake Malawi cichlid species (Pseudotropheus spp.). J Fish Biol 72(6):1355–1368

    Google Scholar 

  • Amorim MCP, Simões JM, Mendonça N, Bandarra NM, Almada VC, Fonseca PJ (2010) Lusitanian toadfish song reflects male quality. J Exp Biol 213:2997–3004

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barber SB, Mowbray WH (1956) Mechanism of sound production in the sculpin. Science 124(3214):219–220

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boschung HT, Mayden RL (2004) Fishes of Alabama. The Smithsonian Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury J. W, Vehrencamp S. L (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer, Massachusetts pp 279–315

  • Casaretto L, Hawkins AD (2002) Spawning behaviour and the acoustic repertoire of haddock. Bioacoustics 12:250–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Colleye O, Ovidio M, Salmon A, Parmentier E (2013) Contribution to the study of acoustic communication in two Belgian river bullheads (Cottus rhenanus and C. perifretum) with further insight into the sound-producing mechanism. Front Zool 10:71

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Connaughton MA, Taylor MH, Fine ML (2000) Effects of fish size and temperature on weakfish disturbance calls: implications for the mechanism of sound generation. J Exp Biol 203(9):1503–1512

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craddock JE (1965) Some aspects of the life history of the banded sculpin, Cottus carolinae carolinae, in Doe Run, Meade County, Kentucky. Dissertation, University of Louisville

  • Crawford JD, Cook AP, Heberlein AS (1997) Bioacoustic behavior of African fishes (Mormyridae): potential cues for species and individual recognition in Pollimyrus. J Acoust Soc Amer 102:1200–1212

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz A, Lombarte A (2004) Otolith size and its relationship with colour patterns and sound production. J Fish Biol 65(6):1512–1525

    Google Scholar 

  • Downhower JF, Brown L (1980) Mate preferences of female mottled sculpins, Cottus bairdi. Anim Behav 28(3):728–734

    Google Scholar 

  • dos Santos M, Modesto T, Matos RJ, Grober MS, Oliveira RF, Canario A (2000) Sound production by the Lusitanian toadfish, Halobatrachus didactylus. Bioacoustics 10:309–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Edds-Walton PL, Mangiamele LA, Rome LC (2002) Variations of pulse repetition rate in boatwhistle sounds from oyster toadfish Opsanus tau around Waquoit Bay, Massachusetts. Bioacoustics 13(2):153–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine ML (1978) Seasonal and geographical variation of the mating call of the oyster toadfish Opsanus tau L. Oecologia 36(1):45–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fine ML, Burns NM, Harris TM (1990) Ontogeny and sexual dimorphism of sonic muscle in the oyster toadfish. Can J Zool 68(7):1374–1381

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine ML, Ladich F (2003) Sound production, spine locking and related adaptations. Catfishes 1:249–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine ML, Waybright TD (2015) Grunt variation in the oyster toadfish Opsanus tau: effect of size and sex. PeerJ 3:e1330. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1330

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest TG, Miller GL, Zagar JR (1993) Sound propagation in shallow water: implications for acoustic communication by aquatic animals. Bioacoustics 4(4):259–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhard AE, Perkin JS (2017) Assessing riverscape-scale variation in fish life history using banded sculpin (Cottus carolinae). Environ Biol Fish 100(11):1397–1410

    Google Scholar 

  • Goto A (1993) Male mating success and female mate choice in the river sculpin, Cottus nozawae (Cottidae). Environ Biol Fish 37(4):347–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallacher LE (1974) The comparative morphology of extrinsic gasbladder musculature in the scorpionfish genus Sebastes (Pisces: Scorpaenidae). Proc Calif Acad Sci 40:59–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman LM, Tavolga WN (1980) The communication systems of cetaceans. In: Herman LM (ed) Cetacean Behavior: Mechanisms and Functions. Wiley, New York, pp 149–210

  • Hill GL, Fine ML, Musick JA (1987) Ontogeny of the sexually dimorphic sonic muscle in three sciaenid species. Copeia:708–713

  • Kasumyan AO (2008) Sounds and sound production in fishes. J Ichthyol 48(11):981–1030

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierl N. C (2009) The Roles of Acoustic and Visual Signals in the Reproductive Behavior of the Federally Threatened Pygmy Sculpin, Cottus paulus, (Cottidae). Masters Thesis, Auburn University

  • Kierl NC, Johnston CE (2010) Sound production in the pygmy sculpin Cottus paulus (Cottidae) during courtship and agonistic behaviours. J Fish Biol 77:1268–1281

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kihslinger RL, Klimley AP (2002) Species identity and the temporal characteristics of fish acoustic signals. J Comp Psychol 116:210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinziger AP, Wood RM, Neely DA (2005) Molecular systematics of the genus Cottus (Scorpaeniformes: Cottidae). Copeia 2005(2):303–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochvil H (1978) Der bau des lautapparates vom knurrenden gurami (Trichopsis vittatus Cuvier & Valenciennes)(Anabantidae, Belontiidae). Zoomorphologie 91(1):91–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladich F (1989) Sound production by the river bullhead, Cottus gobio L. (Cottidae, Teleostei). J Fish Biol 35:531–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladich F (2017) Acoustic communication in fishes: temperature plays a role. Fish Fish 19:598–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladich F, Fine ML (2006) Sound-generating mechanisms in fishes: a unique diversity in vertebrates. Communication in fishes 1:3–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugli M, Pavan G, Torricelli P (2004) The response of the male freshwater goby to natural and synthetic male courtship sound playback following exposure to different female sexual stimuli. Ethol Ecol Evol 16(1):55–70

    Google Scholar 

  • May-Collado LJ, Agnarsson I, Wartzok D (2007) Phylogenetic review of tonal sound production in whales in relation to sociality. BMC Evol Biol 7:136

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell S, Poland J, Fine ML (2008) Does muscle fatigue limit advertisement calling in the oyster toadfish Opsanus tau? Anim Behav 76(3):1011–1016

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris D (1954) The reproductive behaviour of the river bullhead (Cottus gobio L.), with special reference to the fanning activity. Behaviour:1–32

  • NatureServe (2013) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/202652/15361487. Accessed 04 December 2019

  • Page LM, Burr BM (2011) Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico, 2nd edn. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Papes S, Ladich F (2011) Effects of temperature on sound production and auditory abilities in the striped Raphael catfish Platydoras armatulus (family Doradidae). PLoS One 6(10):e26479

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips E, Kilambi RV (1996) Food habits of four benthic fish species (Etheostoma spectabile, Percina caprodes, Noturus exilis, Cottus carolinae) from Northwest Arkansas streams. Southwest Nat 41(1):69–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Rountree R. A, Goudey C. A, Hawkins A. D, Luczkovich J. J, Mann D. A (2003) Listening to fish: passive acoustic applications in marine fisheries. Sea Grant digital oceans, Massachusetts Institute of Technology sea Grant College program, special report MITSG 03–01, Cambridge

  • Savage T (1963) Reproductive behavior of the mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdi Girard. Copeia 1963:317–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller F, Kratochvil H (1981) Lautbildung bei Fischen. Biol Unserer Zeit 11(2):43–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorson RF, Fine ML (2002) Crepuscular changes in emission rate and parameters of the boat whistle advertisement call of the gulf toadfish, Opsanus beta. Environ Biol Fish 63:321–331

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Geological Survey (2016) National Water Information System data available on the world wide web. USGS Water Data for the Nation. http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/. Accessed 23 October 2019

  • Weston DE (1967) Sound propagation in the presence of bladder fish. In: Albers VM (ed) Underwater acoustics. Plenum, New York, pp 55–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Whang A, Janssen J (1994) Sound production through the substrate during reproduction in the mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdi (Cottidae). Environ Biol Fish 40:141–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson B, Batty RS, Dill LM (2004) Pacific and Atlantic herring produce burst pulse sounds. Proc R Soc Lond B (Suppl) 271:S95–S97

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeyl JN, Malavasi S, Holt DE, Noel P, Lugli M, Johnston CE (2016) Convergent aspects of acoustic communication in darters, Sculpins, and gobies. In: Sisneros JA (ed) Fish hearing and bioacoustics. Springer, Cham, pp 93–120

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Jenna Crovo, Heath Haley, Jeff Zeyl, and the many other members of the lab who assisted with collection and care of animals throughout this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Columbus State University, 31907, Columbus, Georgia

    Daniel E. Holt

  2. School of Fisheries and Allied Aquaculture, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA

    Ryan J. Friebertshauser & Carol E. Johnston

Authors
  1. Daniel E. Holt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ryan J. Friebertshauser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carol E. Johnston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel E. Holt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of Auburn University (Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Permit number 2017–3126).

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holt, D.E., Friebertshauser, R.J. & Johnston, C.E. Sound production of the banded Sculpin, Cottus carolinae. Environ Biol Fish 103, 299–311 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-020-00964-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-020-00964-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation