Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 101, Issue 5, pp 791–798 | Cite as

Disturbance-driven changes in fish assemblages caused by a sudden increase in salinity in a perennial desert stream

  • Carolyn A. Trombley
  • Thomas B. Hardy
  • Astrid N. Schwalb
Article

Abstract

Disturbance is a key factor in structuring fish assemblages in rivers; characterizing reactions to disturbance is especially important in systems containing endangered species due to their vulnerability to extinction. A natural disturbance event occurred in the Virgin River in 1985, when normal flow patterns changed due to the appearance of a sinkhole upstream of the hot saline Pah Tempe Springs. This led to abnormally elevated levels of temperature and salinity that propagated downstream. We examined changes in fish assemblages at five sites in a 21 km reach downstream from the hot springs in the mainstem Virgin River, which were monitored monthly (with the exception of 1 site monitored biannually) between 1984 and 1987. Specifically, we compared the responses of the different fish species in space and time. Of the six native species investigated, speckled dace, spinedace, and the endangered woundfin experienced declines in abundance at sites closest to the disturbance. In contrast, Virgin River chub, another endangered species, experienced increases in abundance in sites nearest the disturbance, and desert sucker and flannelmouth sucker showed no change. Redundancy analysis confirmed that changes in assemblage structure were significant. Differential responses to the disturbance appeared to correlate with differences in feeding ecology, with insectivores being the most affected group. In terms of recovery, species with higher abundances in neighboring sites experienced faster recoveries than those with lower abundances. This study characterizes disturbance reactions in the Virgin River, and emphasizes the susceptibility of rare species to natural disturbances and subsequent depression of recolonization rates.

Keywords

Recovery Hot springs Woundfin Virgin River Diet Metacommunity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the following people/groups: Karl Cottenie, Terry Hickman, the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, the Woundfin Recovery Team, and the Washington County Water Conservancy District who funded the monitoring.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

References

  1. Albanese B, Angermeier P, Peterson J (2009) Does mobility explain variation in colonization and population recover among stream fishes? Freshw Biol 54:1444–1460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey PCE, Boon PI, Blinn DW, Williams WD (2006) Salinisation as an ecological perturbation to rivers, streams and wetlands of arid and semi-arid regions. In: Kingsford R (ed) Ecology of desert rivers. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 280–314Google Scholar
  3. Berezina NA (2003) Tolerance of freshwater invertebrates to changes in water salinity. Russ J Ecol 34:296–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown BL, Swan CM, Auerbach DA, Campbell Grant EH, Hitt NP, Maloney KO, Patrick C (2011) Metacommunity theory as a multispecies, multiscale framework for studying the influence of river network structure on riverine communities and ecosystems. BioOne 30:310–327Google Scholar
  5. Cañedo-Argüelles M, Rieradevall M (2010) Disturbance caused by freshwater releases of different magnitude on the aquatic macroinvertebrate communities of two coastal lagoons. Estuar Coast Shelf S 88(2):190–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2010.03.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheek CA, Taylor CM (2016) Salinity and geomorphology drive long-term changes to local and regional fish assemblage attributes in the lower Pecos River, Texas. Ecol Freshw Fish 25(3):340–351.  https://doi.org/10.1111/eff.12214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Paula Silva PH, McBride S, de Nys R, Paul NA (2008) Integrating filamentous ‘green tide’ algae into tropical pond-based aquaculture. Aquaculture 284(1-4):74–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.07.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Detenbeck NE, DeVore PW, Niemi GJ, Lima A (1992) Recovery of temperate-stream fish communities from disturbance: a review of case studies and synthesis of theory. Enviro Management 16(1):33–53.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393907 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Erős T, Takács P, Czeglédi I, Sály P, Specziár A (2015) Taxonomic- and trait-based recolonization dynamics of a riverine fish assemblage following a large-scale human-mediated disturbance: the red mud disaster in Hungary. Hydrobiologia 758:31–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fagan WF, Unmack PJ, Burgess C, Minckley WL (2002) Rarity, fragmentation, and extinction risk in desert fishes. Ecology 83(12):3250–3256.Google Scholar
  11. Google (2017) Retrieved from https://caltopo.com/m/3H1T
  12. Greger PD, Deacon JE (1988) Food partitioning among fishes of the Virgin River. Copeia 1988(2):314–323.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1445871 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hardy TB, Addley RC, Deacon JE, Deacon Williams C (2003) An assessment of potential limiting factors of native fish species in the Virgin River between Pah Tempe and the Washington fields diversion. Published report for the Virgin River Resource Management and Recovery ProgramGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoover Z, Weissgerber JN, Pollock MS, Chivers DP, Ferrari MCO (2013) Sub-lethal increases in salinity affect reproduction in fathead minnows. Sci Total Environ 463-464:334–339.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.046 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Horn HS (1966) Measurement of “overlap” in comparative ecological studies. Am Nat 100(914):419–424.  https://doi.org/10.1086/282436 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kefford BJ, Dalton A, Palmer CG, Nugegoda D (2004) The salinity tolerances of eggs and hatchlings of selected aquatic macroinvertebrates in south-east Australia and South Africa. Hydrobiologia 517(1-3):179–192.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000027346.06304.bc CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kubach KM, Scott MC, Bulak JS (2011) Recovery of a temperate riverine fish assemblage from a major diesel oil spill. Freshw Biol 56(3):503–518.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02517.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Larson ER, Magoulick DD, Turner C, Laycock KH (2009) Disturbance and species displacement: different tolerances to stream drying and desiccation in a native and an invasive crayfish. Freshw Biol 54(9):1899–1908.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02243.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Linton LR, Davies RW, Wrona FJ (1981) Resource utilization indices: an assessment. J Anim Ecol 50(1):283–292.  https://doi.org/10.2307/4045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Matthews WJ, Marsh-Matthews E, Cashner RC, Gelwick F (2013) Disturbance and trajectory of change in stream fish community over four decades. Oecologia 173(3):955–969.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2646-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Miyazono S, Patiño R, Taylor CM (2015) Desertification, salinization, and biotic homogenization in a dryland river ecosystem. Sci Total Environ 511:444–453CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2016a) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2:3–4 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan Google Scholar
  23. Oksanen J, Smith T, Bedward M (2016b) Dissimilarity indices for community ecologists. http://cc.oulu.fi/~jarioksa/softhelp/vegan/html/vegdist.html
  24. Piller KR, Geheber AD (2015) Black liquor and the hangover effect: fish assemblage recovery dynamics following a pulse disturbance. Ecology and Evolution 5(12):2433–2444.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1530 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Poff NL, Zimmerman JK (2010) Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshw Biol 55(1):194–205.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02272.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria https://www.R-project.org/ Google Scholar
  27. Stoll S, Sundermann A, Lorenz AW, Kail J, Haase P (2013) Small and impoverished regional species pools constrain colonization of restored river reaches by fishes. Freshw Biol 58:664–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Taylor CM, Warren ML Jr (2001) Dynamics in species composition of stream fish assemblages: environmental variability and nested subsets. Ecology 82(8):2320–2330.Google Scholar
  29. Toepfer C, Barton M (1992) Influence of salinity on the rates of oxygen consumption in two species of freshwater fishes, Phoxinus erythrogaster (family Cyprinidae), and Fundulus catenatus (family Fundulidae). Hydrobiologia 242(3):149–154.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00019963 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. United States Fish & Wildlife Service (2016). Endangered Species. https://www.fws.gov/endangered/
  31. Vörösmarty CJ, Dork S (2000) Anthropogenic disturbance of the terrestrial water cycle. Bioscience 50(9):753–765.Google Scholar
  32. Walters AW, Post DM (2008) An experimental disturbance alters fish size structure but not food chain length in streams. Ecology 89(12):3261–3267.  https://doi.org/10.1890/08-0273.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Wickham H, Chang W (2016) An implementation of the grammar of graphics. R package version 2(0):1Google Scholar
  34. Wolda H (1981) Similarity indices, sample size, and diversity. Oecologia 50(3):296–230.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00344966 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolyn A. Trombley
    • 1
  • Thomas B. Hardy
    • 2
  • Astrid N. Schwalb
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada
  2. 2.Biology DepartmentTexas State UniversitySan MarcosUSA

Personalised recommendations