Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 100, Issue 12, pp 1587–1600 | Cite as

Size-mediated control of perch–midge coupling in Lake Erie transient dead zones

  • Daisuke GotoEmail author
  • James J. Roberts
  • Steven A. Pothoven
  • Stuart A. Ludsin
  • Henry A. Vanderploeg
  • Stephen B. Brandt
  • Tomas O. Höök


Transient ecosystem-level disturbances such as oxygen depletion (hypoxia) in aquatic systems modulate species distributions and interactions. In highly eutrophic systems, hypoxic areas (“dead zones”) have expanded around the world, temporarily preventing many demersal predators from accessing their food resources. Here, we investigate how yellow perch (Perca flavescens), an exploited, cool-water mesopredator, interact with their dominant invertebrate prey in benthic habitat–non-biting midge (chironomid) larvae–as bottom-water hypoxia develops in central Lake Erie (United States–Canada) during summer. We apply linear mixed-effects models to individual-level data from basin-wide field surveys on size-based interactions between perch and midge larvae under varying habitat conditions and resource attributes. We test if 1) midge populations (larval body size and density) differ among habitat states (unstratified normoxia, stratified normoxia, and stratified hypoxia); and 2) size-based perch–midge interactions (predator–prey mass ratio or PPMR) differ among habitat states with varying temperature and midge density. Midge populations remained highly abundant after bottom-water oxygen depletion. Despite their high densities, midge larvae also maintained their body size in hypoxic water. In contrast, perch on average consumed relatively smaller (by up to ~64%) midges (higher PPMR) in warmer and hypoxic water, while prey size ingested by perch shrunk less in areas with higher midge density. Our analysis shows that hypoxia-tolerant midges largely allow perch to maintain their consumer–resource relationships in contracted habitats through modified size-mediated interactions in dead zones during summer, revealing plasticity of their trophic coupling in the chronically perturbed ecosystem.


Food web Trait-mediated Foraging Body size Great Lakes Hierarchical modeling 



We thank all those who provided lab, field, or data management support, including the captains and crew of the R/V Laurentian and R/V Lake Guardian, Anne Clites, Marco Constantini, Hal Gunder, Darryl Hondorp, Sean Sisler, Joann Calvaletto, Theodore Bambakidis, Anna Belyeava, Grace Milanowski, Megan Miner, and Chris Rae. This work was supported by the NOAA Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research grant (No. NA07OAR432000) with samples and experiments conducted as part of the International Field Years on Lake Erie (IFYLE) program, supported primarily by NOAA-GLERL, the US EPA Great Lakes National Program Office, and the National Sea Grant College Program. This manuscript is NOAA-GLERL contribution # xxxx and EcoFore Lake Erie publication No. 1863.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human participants and animal study

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.


  1. Abrahams MV, Mangel M, Hedges K (2007) Predator–prey interactions and changing environments: who benefits? Philos Trans R Soc, B 362(1487):2095–2104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aday DD, Rutherford DA, Kelso WE (2000) Field and laboratory determinations of hypoxic effects on RNA-DNA ratios of bluegill. Am Midl Nat 143(2):433–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baird D, Christian RR, Peterson CH, Johnson GA (2004) Consequences of hypoxia on estuarine ecosystem function: energy diversion from consumers to microbes. Ecol Appl 14(3):805–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes C, Maxwell D, Reuman DC, Jennings S (2010) Global patterns in predator–prey size relationships reveal size dependency of trophic transfer efficiency. Ecology 91(1):222–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Belore M, et al. (2016) Report of the Lake Erie Yellow Perch Task Group
  6. Benndorf J, Böing W, Koop J, Neubauer I (2002) Top-down control of phytoplankton: the role of time scale, lake depth and trophic state. Freshw Biol 47(12):2282–2295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blumenshine SC, Lodge DM, Hodgson JR (2000) Gradient of fish predation alters body size distributions of lake benthos. Ecology 81(2):374–386Google Scholar
  8. Brandt SB et al (2011) Does hypoxia reduce habitat quality for Lake Erie walleye (Sander vitreus)? A bioenergetics perspective. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 68(5):857–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brante A, Hughes RN (2001) Effect of hypoxia on the prey-handling behaviour of Carcinus maenas feeding on Mytilus edulis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 209:301–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Breitburg D (2002) Effects of hypoxia, and the balance between hypoxia and enrichment, on coastal fishes and fisheries. Estuaries 25(4):767–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Breitburg D et al (2009) Nutrient enrichment and fisheries exploitation: interactive effects on estuarine living resources and their management. Hydrobiologia 629(1):31–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brodersen KP, Quinlan R (2006) Midges as palaeoindicators of lake productivity, eutrophication and hypolimnetic oxygen. Quat Sci Rev 25(15):1995–2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brose U et al (2006) Consumer–resource body-size relationships in natural food webs. Ecology 87(10):2411–2417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF, Hodgson JR (1985) Cascading trophic interactions and lake productivity. Bioscience 35(10):634–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Costantini M, Ludsin SA, Mason DM, Zhang X, Boicourt WC, Brandt SB (2008) Effect of hypoxia on habitat quality of striped bass (Morone saxatilis) in Chesapeake Bay. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 65(5):989–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Craig JK, Crowder LB, Henwood TA (2005) Spatial distribution of brown shrimp (Farfantepenaeus aztecus) on the northwestern Gulf of Mexico shelf: effects of abundance and hypoxia. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62(6):1295–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dewson ZS, James AB, Death RG (2007) A review of the consequences of decreased flow for instream habitat and macroinvertebrates. J N Am Benthol Soc 26(3):401–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diaz RJ, Rosenberg R (2008) Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science 321(5891):926–929CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Diehl S (1992) Fish predation and benthic community structure: the role of omnivory and habitat complexity. Ecology 73(5):1646–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Djemali I, Guillard J, Yule DL (2017) Seasonal and diel effects on acoustic fish biomass estimates: application to a shallow reservoir with untargeted common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Mar Freshw Res 68(3):528–537Google Scholar
  21. Domenici P, Claireaux G, McKenzie DJ (2007) Environmental constraints upon locomotion and predator–prey interactions in aquatic organisms: an introduction. Phil Trans R Soc B 362:1929–1936Google Scholar
  22. Eby LA, Crowder LB (2002) Hypoxia-based habitat compression in the Neuse River estuary: context-dependent shifts in behavioral avoidance thresholds. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59(6):952–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Emmerson MC, Raffaelli D (2004) Predator–prey body size, interaction strength and the stability of a real food web. J Anim Ecol 73(3):399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frank KT, Petrie B, Fisher JA, Leggett WC (2011) Transient dynamics of an altered large marine ecosystem. Nature 477(7362):86–89CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gopalan G, Culver DA, Wu L, Trauben BK (1998) Effects of recent ecosystem changes on the recruitment of young-of-the-year fish in western Lake Erie. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55(12):2572–2579. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goto D, Wallace WG (2010) Bioenergetic responses of a benthic forage fish (Fundulus heteroclitus) to habitat degradation and altered prey community in polluted salt marshes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67(10):1566–1584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goto D, Wallace WG (2011) Altered feeding habits and strategies of a benthic forage fish (Fundulus heteroclitus) in chronically polluted tidal salt marshes. Mar Environ Res 72(1):75–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Goto D, Hamel MJ, Hammen JJ, Rugg ML, Pegg MA, Forbes VE (2015) Spatiotemporal variation in flow-dependent recruitment of long-lived riverine fish: Model development and evaluation. Ecological Modelling 296:79–92Google Scholar
  29. Goto D, Lindelof K, Fanslow DL, Ludsin SA, Pothoven SA, Roberts JJ, Vanderploeg HA, Wilson AE, Höök TO (2012) Indirect consequences of hypolimnetic hypoxia on zooplankton growth in a large eutrophic lake. Aquatic Biology 16 (3):217–227Google Scholar
  30. Heithaus MR, Frid A, Wirsing AJ, Worm B (2008) Predicting ecological consequences of marine top predator declines. Trends Ecol Evol 23(4):202–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Holt RD (1977) Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. Theor Popul Biol 12(2):197–229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Irving EC, Liber K, Culp JM (2004) Lethal and sublethal effects of low dissolved oxygen condition on two aquatic invertebrates, Chironomus tentans and Hyalella azteca. Environ Toxicol Chem 23(6):1561–1566CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ives AR, Cardinale BJ, Snyder WE (2005) A synthesis of subdisciplines: predator–prey interactions, and biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Ecol Lett 8(1):102–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson PC (2014) Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth's R2GLMM to random slopes models. Methods Ecol Evol 5(9):944–946CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Keister JE, Houde ED, Breitburg DL (2000) Effects of bottom-layer hypoxia on abundances and depth distributions of organisms in Patuxent River, Chesapeake Bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 205:43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kolar CS, Rahel FJ (1993) Interaction of a biotic factor (predator presence) and an abiotic factor (low oxygen) as an influence on benthic invertebrate communities. Oecologia 95(2):210–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kornijów R (1997) The impact of predation by perch on the size-structure of Chironomus larvae—the role of vertical distribution of the prey in the bottom sediments, and habitat complexity Shallow Lakes’ 95. Springer, p 207–213Google Scholar
  38. Kramer DL (1987) Dissolved oxygen and fish behavior. Environ Biol Fish 18(2):81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kraus RT et al (2015) Dynamic hypoxic zones in Lake Erie compress fish habitat, altering vulnerability to fishing gears 1. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 72(6):797–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Layman CA, Quattrochi JP, Peyer CM, Allgeier JE (2007) Niche width collapse in a resilient top predator following ecosystem fragmentation. Ecol Lett 10(10):937–944CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Levy DA (1990) Sensory mechanism and selective advantage for diel vertical migration in juvenile sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47(9):1796–1802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Long WC, Seitz RD (2008) Trophic interactions under stress: hypoxia enhances foraging in an estuarine food web. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 362:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lotze HK, Milewski I (2004) Two centuries of multiple human impacts and successive changes in a North Atlantic food web. Ecol Appl 14(5):1428–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lotze HK, Coll M, Dunne JA (2011) Historical changes in marine resources, food-web structure and ecosystem functioning in the Adriatic Sea, Mediterranean. Ecosystems 14(2):198–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ludsin SA et al (2009) Hypoxia-avoidance by planktivorous fish in Chesapeake Bay: implications for food web interactions and fish recruitment. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 381:S121–S131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Macciusi F, Baker RL (1991) Prey behaviour and size-selective predation by fish. Freshw Biol 25(3):533–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Magnuson JJ, Beckel AL, Mills K, Brandt SB (1985) Surviving winter hypoxia: behavioral adaptations of fishes in a northern Wisconsin winterkill lake. Environ Biol Fish 14(4):241–250. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mehner T (2012) Diel vertical migration of freshwater fishes–proximate triggers, ultimate causes and research perspectives. Freshw Biol 57(7):1342–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mesa MG, Poe TP, Gadomski DM, Petersen JH (2005) Are all prey created equal? A review and synthesis of differential predation on prey in substandard condition. J Fish Biol 45(sA):81–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Michalak AM et al (2013) Record-setting algal bloom in Lake Erie caused by agricultural and meteorological trends consistent with expected future conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(16):6448–6452CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Mistri M (2004) Predatory behavior and preference of a successful invader, the mud crab Dyspanopeus sayi (Panopeidae), on its bivalve prey. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 312(2):385–398. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4(2):133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nakazawa T, Ushio M, Kondoh M (2011) Scale dependence of predator–prey mass ratio: determinants and applications. Adv Ecol Res 45:269–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Neuenfeldt S, Andersen KH, Hinrichsen HH (2009) Some Atlantic cod Gadus morhua in the Baltic Sea visit hypoxic water briefly but often. J Fish Biol 75(1):290–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Österblom H et al (2007) Human-induced trophic cascades and ecological regime shifts in the Baltic Sea. Ecosystems 10(6):877–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Panis L, Goddeeris B, Verheyen R (1996) On the relationship between vertical microdistribution and adaptations to oxygen stress in littoral Chironomidae (Diptera). Hydrobiologia 318(1–3):61–67. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Persson L (1986) Temperature-induced shift in foraging ability in two fish species, roach (Rutilus rutilus) and perch (Perca fluviatilis): implications for coexistence between poikilotherms. J Anim Ecol 55:829–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pihl L, Baden SP, Diaz RJ, Schaffner LC (1992) Hypoxia-induced structural changes in the diet of bottom-feeding fish and crustacea. Mar Biol 112(3):349–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pothoven SA, Vanderploeg HA, Ludsin SA, Höök TO, Brandt SB (2009) Feeding ecology of emerald shiners and rainbow smelt in central Lake Erie. J Great Lakes Res 35(2):190–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Wiseman WJJ (2002) Gulf of Mexico hypoxia, AKA The Dead Zone. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:235–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rahel FJ, Kolar CS (1990) Trade-offs in the response of mayflies to low oxygen and fish predation. Oecologia 84(1):39–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Rahel FJ, Nutzman JW (1994) Foraging in a lethal environment: fish predation in hypoxic waters of a stratified lake. Ecology 75:1246–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Roberts JJ, Höök TO, Ludsin SA, Pothoven SA, Vanderploeg HA, Brandt SB (2009) Effects of hypolimnetic hypoxia on foraging and distributions of Lake Erie yellow perch. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 381(S1):S132–S142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Roberts JJ, Grecay PA, Ludsin SA, Pothoven SA, Vanderploeg HA, HööK TO (2012) Evidence of hypoxic foraging forays by yellow perch (Perca flavescens) and potential consequences for prey consumption. Freshw Biol 57(5):922–937. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Roseman EF, et al. (2008) Ecology and international governance of Lake Erie’s percid fisheries. International governance of fisheries ecosystems: learning from the past, finding solutions for the future American Fisheries Society, Bethesda Maryland:145–169Google Scholar
  66. Rucinski DK, Beletsky D, DePinto JV, Schwab DJ, Scavia D (2010) A simple 1-dimensional, climate based dissolved oxygen model for the central basin of Lake Erie. J Great Lakes Res 36(3):465–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Scarbro BLB (2014) The physiological and behavioral responses of yellow perch to hypoxia. PhD Dissertation. The University of ToledoGoogle Scholar
  68. Scavia D et al (2014) Assessing and addressing the re-eutrophication of Lake Erie: central basin hypoxia. J Great Lakes Res 40(2):226–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schindler DE, Scheuerell MD (2002) Habitat coupling in lake ecosystems. Oikos 98(2):177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schmitz OJ, Krivan V, Ovadia O (2004) Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol Lett 7(2):153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Seibel BA (2011) Critical oxygen levels and metabolic suppression in oceanic oxygen minimum zones. J Exp Biol 214(2):326–336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Seitz RD, Marshall L, Hines A, Clark K (2003) Effects of hypoxia on predator-prey dynamics of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus and the Baltic clam Macoma balthica in Chesapeake Bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 257:179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shin P, Cheung P, Yang F, Cheung S (2005) Intermittent exposure to reduced oxygen levels affects prey size selection and consumption in swimming crab Thalamita danae Stimpson. Mar Pollut Bull 51(8):1003–1009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van Der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 64(4):583–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Taylor DL, Eggleston DB (2000) Effects of hypoxia on an estuarine predator-prey interaction: foraging behavior and mutual interference in the blue crab Callinectes sapidus and the infaunal clam prey Mya arenaria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 196:221–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Taylor JC, Rand PS (2003) Spatial overlap and distribution of anchovies (Anchoa spp.) and copepods in a shallow stratified estuary. Aquat Living Resour 16(3):191–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Taylor JC, Rand P, Jenkins J (2007) Swimming behavior of juvenile anchovies (Anchoa spp.) in an episodically hypoxic estuary: implications for individual energetics and trophic dynamics. Mar Biol 152(4):939–957. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vander Zanden MJ, Vadeboncoeur Y (2002) Fishes as integrators of benthic and pelagic food webs in lakes. Ecology 83(8):2152–2161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vanderploeg HA et al (2009) Hypoxic zones as habitat for zooplankton in Lake Erie: refuges from predation or exclusion zones? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 381:S108–S120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Willis S, Winemiller K, Lopez-Fernandez H (2005) Habitat structural complexity and morphological diversity of fish assemblages in a Neotropical floodplain river. Oecologia 142(2):284–295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Woodward G, Warren P (2007) Body size and predatory interactions in freshwaters: scaling from individuals to communities. In: Hildrew AG, Raffaelli DG, Ronni Edmonds-Brown R (eds) Body Size - TheStructure and Function of Aquatic Ecosystems, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 98–117Google Scholar
  82. Wu L, Culver DA (1992) Ontogenetic diet shift in Lake Erie age-0 yellow perch (Perca flavescens): a size-related response to zooplankton density. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49(9):1932–1937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zhang H et al (2009) Hypoxia-driven changes in the behavior and spatial distribution of pelagic fish and mesozooplankton in the northern Gulf of Mexico. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 381:S80–S91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zuur A, Ieno EN, Walker N, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. SpringerGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daisuke Goto
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author return OK on get
  • James J. Roberts
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • Steven A. Pothoven
    • 6
  • Stuart A. Ludsin
    • 7
    • 8
  • Henry A. Vanderploeg
    • 7
  • Stephen B. Brandt
    • 7
    • 9
  • Tomas O. Höök
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for LimnologyUniversity of Wisconsin–MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Cooperative Institute for Limnology and Ecosystems ResearchUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  4. 4.USGS Fort Collins Science CenterFort CollinsUSA
  5. 5.Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation BiologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  6. 6.Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory Lake Michigan Field StationNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationMuskegonUSA
  7. 7.Great Lakes Environmental Research LaboratoryNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationAnn ArborUSA
  8. 8.Aquatic Ecology Laboratory, Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal BiologyThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  9. 9.Department of Fisheries and WildlifeOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations