Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 100, Issue 5, pp 611–616 | Cite as

Potential consequences of angling on nest-site fidelity in largemouth bass

  • William M. Twardek
  • Aaron D. Shultz
  • Julie E. Claussen
  • Steven J. Cooke
  • Jeffrey A. Stein
  • Jeffrey B. Koppelman
  • Frank J. S. Phelan
  • David P. PhilippEmail author
Article

Abstract

Breeding site fidelity has evolved in many vertebrate taxa, suggesting both that site selection has an important influence on fitness potential and that the decision to reuse a nesting site is related to the individual’s prior nesting success at that location. For a species that provides parental care, such as the Largemouth Bass Micropterus salmoides, catch-and-release angling impacts individual nesting success and fitness through physiological disturbance and by removing the nest-guarding male from its brood, thereby allowing temporary access to eggs and hatchlings by brood predators. To assess the impact of catch-and-release angling on nest site fidelity, we compared the consequences of angling on individually marked (i.e., with passive integrated transponders) nest-guarding male Largemouth Bass in Ontario. An extremely high degree of nest site fidelity in year two was observed for males that were angled only once during year one (87% within 10 m of the previous year’s nest), 96.7% of which remained on the nest and completed parental care activities. There was significantly lower fidelity in year two, however, for males that were angled multiple times during year one (27% within 10m of the previous year’s nest), only 5.6% of which remained on the nest and completed parental care activities. This observed difference suggests that angling nesting bass may cause them to avoid previously used nest sites and instead search for alternative sites during future reproductive seasons. This human-induced impact on nest site choice may impact the future reproductive success of those Largemouth Bass.

Keywords

Largemouth bass Nest site fidelity Angling 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank A. Zolderdo, D. Algera, J. L. Monoghan, and E. Cooke for assistance in the field as well as the staff from the Queen’s University Biological Station. Funding was provided by NSERC (USRA to W. Twardek and DG to S. Cooke) with financial assistance from the Federal Aid in Sportfish Restoration Project F69R to J. A. Stein. All research was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care as administered by Carleton University and Queen’s University (B-15-08).

References

  1. Barthel BL, Cooke SJ, Svec JH, Suski CD, Bunt CM, Phelan FJS, Philipp DP (2008) Divergent life histories among smallmouth bass Micropterus dolomieu inhabiting a connected river-lake system. J Fish Biol 73:829–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartlett JA, Ward MP, Landsman SJ, Epifanio JM (2010) Nest-site fidelity in parental male bluegill Lepomis macrochirus: spatial patterns and the influence of prior mating success. J Fish Biol 77:890–906CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackmer AL, Ackerman JT, Nevitt GA (2004) Effects of investigator disturbance on hatching success and nest-site fidelity in a long-lived seabird, Leach’s storm-petrel. Biol Conserv 116:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown JA (1984) Parental care and the ontogeny of predator-avoidance in two species of centrarchid fish. Anim Behav 32:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown JA (1985) The adaptive significance of behavioural ontogeny in some. centrarchid fishes. Environ Biol Fish 13:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown C, Laland K, Krause J (2011) Fish cognition and behavior. Wiley, Oxford, 344pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooke SJ, Philipp DP, Schreer JF, McKinley SR (2000) Locomotory impairment of nesting male largemouth bass following catch-and-release angling. N Am J Fish Manag 20:968–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooke SJ, Philipp DP, Wahl DH, Weatherhead PJ (2006) Energetics of parental care in six syntopic centrarchid fishes. Oecologia 148:235–249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Feldheim KA, Gruber SH, Dibattista JD, Babcock EA, Kessel ST, Hendry AP, Pikitch EK, Ashley MV, Chapman DD (2014) Two decades of genetic profiling yields first evidence of natal philopatry and long-term fidelity to parturition sites in sharks. Mol Ecol 23:110–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gross MR (2005) The evolution of parental care. Q Rev Biol 80:37–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gross ML, Kapuscinski AR (1997) Reproductive success of smallmouth bass estimated and evaluated from family-specific DNA fingerprints. Ecology 78:1424–1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haas CA (1998) Effects of prior nesting success on site fidelity and breeding dispersal: an experimental approach. Auk 98:929–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanson KC, Cooke SJ, Suski CD, Philipp DP (2007) Effects of different angling practices on post-release behaviour of nest guarding male black bass, Micropterus spp. Fish Manag Ecol 14:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kieffer JD, Colgan PW (1992) The role of learning in fish behaviour. Rev Fish Biol Fish 2:125–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. King JR, Withler RE (2005) Male nest site fidelity and female serial polyandry in lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus, Hexagrammidae). Mol Ecol 14:653–660CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kubacki MR (1992) The effectiveness of a closed season for protecting nesting largemouth and smallmouth bass in southern Ontario. Master's Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  17. Kubacki MF, Phelan FJS, Claussen JE, Philipp DP (2002) How well does a closed season protect spawning bass in Ontario? Black bass: ecology, conservation and management. American Fisheries Society, 31:379–386Google Scholar
  18. Laland KN, Brown C, Krause J (2003) Learning in fishes: from three-second memory to culture. Fish Fish 4:199–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. MacCrimmon HR, Robbins WH (1975) Distribution of the black basses of North America. In: Stroud RH, Clepper H (eds) Black bass biology and management. Sport Fishing Institute, Washington, pp 56–66Google Scholar
  20. Philipp DP, Toline CA, Philipp DBF, Phelan FJS (1997) The impact of catch-and-release angling on the reproductive success of smallmouth bass and largemouth bass. N Am J Fish Manag 17:557–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Piper WH (2011) Making habitat selection more “familiar”: a review. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1329–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Powell LA, Frasch LL (2000) Can nest predation and predator type explain variation in dispersal of adult birds during the breeding season? Behav Ecol 11:437–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ridgway MS (1989) The parental response to brood size manipulation in smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu). Ethology 80:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ridgway MS, Goff GP, Keenleyside MHA (1989) Courtship and spawning behaviour in smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu). Am Midl Nat 122:209–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ridgway MS, MacLean JA, MacLeod JC (1991) Nest-site fidelity in a centrarchid fish, the smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu). Can J Zool 69:3103–3105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schlossberg S (2009) Site fidelity of shrubland and forest birds. Condor 111:238–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stein JA, Philipp DP (2015) Quantifying brood predation in largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) associated with catch-and-release angling of nesting males. Environ Biol Fish 98:145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Steinhart GB, Dunlop ES, Ridgway MS, Marschall EA (2008) Should I stay or should I go? optimal parental care decisions of a nest-guarding fish. Evol Ecol Res 10:351–371Google Scholar
  29. Suski CD, Philipp DP (2004) Factors affecting the vulnerability to angling of nesting male largemouth and smallmouth bass. Trans Am Fish Soc 133:1100–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Suski CD, Svec JH, Ludden JB, Phelan FJS, Philipp DP (2003) The effect of catch-and-release angling on the parental care of smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu). Trans Am Fish Soc 132:210–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Switzer PV (1993) Site fidelity in predictable and unpredictable habitats. Evol Ecol 7:533–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Warner RR (1988) Traditionality of mating-site preferences in a coral reef fish. Nature 335:719–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Warren ML (2009) Centrarchid identification and natural history. In: Cooke SL, Philipp DP (eds) Centrarchid fishes: diversity, biology, and conservation. Wiley, New York, pp 375–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Waters SD, Noble RL (2004) Spawning season and nest site fidelity of largemouth bass in a tropical reservoir. N Am J Fish Manag 24:1240–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zuckerman ZC, Philipp DP, Suski CD (2014) The influence of brood loss on nest abandonment decisions in largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides. J Fish Biol 84:1863–1875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • William M. Twardek
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Aaron D. Shultz
    • 4
    • 5
  • Julie E. Claussen
    • 4
    • 5
  • Steven J. Cooke
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • Jeffrey A. Stein
    • 4
    • 5
  • Jeffrey B. Koppelman
    • 4
  • Frank J. S. Phelan
    • 2
  • David P. Philipp
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of BiologyQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  2. 2.Queen’s University Biological StationElginCanada
  3. 3.Fish Ecology & Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental ScienceCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  4. 4.Fisheries Conservation FoundationChampaignUSA
  5. 5.Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research InstituteUniversity of IllinoisChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations