Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A kinematic investigation into the feeding behavior of the Goliath grouper Epinephelus itajara

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goliath grouper Epinephelus itajara suffered significant overfishing in the United States until they were protected from harvest in 1990. As the population recovers, interactions between Goliath grouper and anglers have increased, and are often reported to management agencies as complaints after grouper predation upon hooked fish. Goliath grouper are generally characterized as opportunistic predators capable of consuming a wide variety of prey types; however, minimal data are available regarding the prey capture behavior of this species. Kinematic analyses of adult Goliath grouper feeding events demonstrated the capacity of individuals to modulate feeding behavior based upon the mobility and position of ‘prey’ items. Mobile epibenthic food (tethered swimming fish) elicited larger maximum gapes, faster times to food capture, shorter times to mouth closing, and more rapid total bite durations than food items that were not moving (cut dead bait). Feeding sequences involving mobile food items were characterized by a significantly higher degree of ram feeding behavior, while immobile food elicited primarily suction feeding and were preceded by a slower and closer approach to the food item prior to the onset of mouth opening. The findings are discussed in light of predation upon angled species and demonstrate the ability of Goliath grouper to adjust their feeding strategy based upon prey type and condition. This behavior likely allows for the exploitation of a wide variety of prey and provides an expansive dietary breadth for these opportunistic predators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander RMN (1967) Functional Design in Fishes. Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergert BA, Wainwright PC (1997) Morphology and kinematics of prey capture in the syngnathid fishes Hippocampus erectus and Syngnathus floridae. Mar Biol 127:563–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beukers-Stewart BD, Jones GP (2004) The influence of prey abundance on the feeding ecology of two piscivorous species of coral reef fish. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 299:155–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brulé T, Avila DO, Crespo MS, Déniel C (1994) Seasonal and diel changes in diet composition of juvenile red grouper (Epinephelus morio) from Campeche Bank. Bull Mar Sci 55:255–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock LH, Smith GB (1991) Seabasses (Pisces: Serranidae). Memoirs of the hourglass cruises 8(2):243 pp

  • Bullock LH, Murphy MD, Godcharles MF, Mitchell ME (1992) Age, growth and reproduction of jewfish Epinephelus itajara in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Fish Bull 90:243–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett-Herkes J (1975) Contribution to the biology of the red hind, Epinephelus guttatus, a commercially important serranid fish from the tropical western Atlantic. University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, PhD Dissertation, 154 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns KM (2009) Evaluation of the efficacy of the minimum size rule in the red grouper and red snapper fisheries with respect to J and circle hook mortality, barotrauma and consequences for survival and movement. University of South Florida, Doctoral dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AM, Wainwright PC, Huskey SH, Collar DC, Turingan RG (2004) Morphology predicts suction feeding performance in centrarchid fishes. J Exp Biol 207:3873–3881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cass-Calay SL, Schmidt TW (2009) Monitoring changes in the catch rates and abundance of juvenile goliath grouper using the ENP creel survey, 1973–2006. Endanger Species Res 7:183–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton KB, Motta PJ (1998) Feeding morphology, diet, and ecomorphological relationships among five Caribbean labrids (Teleostei, Labridae). Copeia:953–966

  • Collins AB, Barbieri LR, McBride RS, McCoy ED, Motta PJ (2015) Habitat relief and volume are predictors of goliath grouper presence and abundance in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Bull Mar Sci 91:399–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin DJ, Strickler RJ (1990) Zooplankton capture by a coral reef fish: an adaptive response to evasive prey. Environ Biol Fish 29:35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig MT, Sadovy de Mitcheson YJ, Heemstra, PC. 2011. Groupers of the World. A Field and Market Guide. NISC.356 p.

  • Day SW, Higham TE, Cheer AY, Wainwright PC (2005) Spatial and temporal patterns of water flow generated by suction-feeding bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus resolved by particle image velocimetry. J Exp Biol 208:2661–2671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elshoud-Oldenhave MJW, Osse J (1976) Functional morphology of the feeding system of the ruff – Gymnocephalus cernua (L. 1758 –Teleostei, Percidae). J Morphol 150:399–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferry-Graham LA (1998) Feeding kinematics of hatchling swellsharks Cephaloscyllium ventriosum (Scyliorhinidae): the importance of predator size vs. predatory experience. Mar Biol 131:703–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferry-Graham LA, Bolnick DI, Wainwright PC (2002a) Using functional morphology to examine the ecology and evolution of specialization. Integr Comp Biol 42:265–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferry-Graham LA, Wainwright PC, Westneat MW, Bellwood DR (2002b) Mechanisms of benthic prey capture in wrasses (Labridae). Mar Biol 141:819–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferry-Graham LA, Wainwright PC, Lauder GV (2003) Quantification of flow during suction feeding in bluegill sunfish. Zoology 106:159–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flammang BE, Ferry-Graham LA, Rinewalt C, Ardizzone D, Davis C, Trejo T (2009) Prey capture kinematics and four-bar linkages in the bay pipefish, Syngnathus leptorhynchus. Zoology 112:86–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fleshler D. 2011. Success story or pest? The Palm Beach post, 11 June, 6B.

  • Frias-Torres S (2012) Should the critically endangered goliath grouper Epinephelus itajara be culled in Florida? Oryx Available on CJO. doi:10.1017/S0030605312000361

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner JM, Motta PJ (2012) Largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) switch feeding modalities in response to sensory deprivation. Zoology 115:78–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardinger LC, Marenzi RC, Bertoncini AA, Medeiros RP, Hostim-Silva M (2006) Local ecological knowledge on the goliath grouper Epinephelus itajara (Teleostei: Serranidae) in southern Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology 4:441–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb AC (1997) Do flatfish feed like other fishes? A comparative study of percomorph prey-capture kinematics. J Exp Biol 200:2841–2859

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb AC, Ferry-Graham LA (2005) Cranial movements during suction feeding in teleost fishes: are they modified to enhance suction production? Zoology 108:141–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibran FZ (2007) Activity, habitat use, feeding behavior, and diet of four sympatric species of Serranidae (Actinopterygii: Perciformes) in southeastern Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology 5:387–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillis GB, Lauder GV (1995) Kinematics of feeding in bluegill sunfish: is there a general distinction between aquatic capture and transport behaviors? J Exp Biol 198:709–720

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grubich JR, Rice AN, Westneat MW (2008) Functional morphology of bite mechanics in the great barracuda Sphyraena barracuda. Zoology 111:16–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (GMFMC) (1990) Ammendment 2 to the reef fish fishery management plan. Tampa, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Heemstra PC, Randall JE. 1993. FAO Species Catalogue. Groupers of the world (Family Serranidae, subfamily Epinephelinae). An annotated and illustrated catalogue of the grouper, rock cod, hind, coral grouper and lyretail species known to date. FAO Fisheries Synopsis 16 (125), 382 pp.

  • High WL (1980) Bait loss from halibut longline gear observed from a submersible. Mar Fish Rev 42:26–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Higham TE, Day SW, Wainwright PC (2005) Sucking while swimming: evaluating the effects of ram speed on suction generation in bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus using digital particle image velocimetry. J Exp Biol 208:2653–2660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higham TE, Day SW, Wainwright PC (2006) The pressures of suction feeding: the relation between buccal pressure and induced fluid speed in centrarchid fishes. J Exp Biol 209:3281–3287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hixon MA. 1991. Predation as a process structuring coral reef fish communities. In: Sale, P.F. (ed.): The Ecology of Fishes on Coral Reefs: 475–508.

  • Holzman R, Day SW, Wainwright PC (2007) Timing is everything: coordination of strike kinematics affects the force exerted by suction feeding fish on attached prey. J Exp Biol 210:3328–3336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keast A (1985) Development of dietary specializations in a summer community of juvenile fishes. Environ Biol Fish 13:211–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly D (2011) Goliath grouper catches coming? Florida Sportsman, May 2011:50

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig CC, Coleman FC. 2009. Population density, demographics and predation effects of adult Goliath grouper. MARFIN Project (NA05NMF4540045) NOAA/NMFS Final Report. 79 pp.

  • Koenig CC, Coleman FC, Kingon K (2011) Pattern of recovery of the goliath grouper Epinephelus itajara population in the southeastern US. Bull Mar Sci 87:891–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauder GV (1980) Hydrodynamics of prey capture by teleost fishes. Biofluid Mechanics 2:161–181

  • Liem KF (1980) Adaptive significance of intra- and interspecific differences in the feeding repertoires of cichlid fishes. Am Zool 20:295–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liem KF (1990) Aquatic versus terrestrial feeding modes: possible impacts on the trophic ecology of vertebrates. Am Zool 30:209–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liem KF (1993) Ecomorphology of the teleostean skull. In: Hanken J, Hall BK (eds) The skull, Functional and Evolutionary Mechanisms, Volume, vol 3. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 422–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Longley WH and Hildebrand SF. 1941. Systematic Catalogue of the Fishes of Tortugas, Florida. Papers from Tortugas Laboratory, Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publication 535: Volume 34.

  • Mahjoub MS, Anneville O, Molinero JC, Souissi S, Hwang JS (2008) Feeding mechanism and capture success of European whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus L.) larvae. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 388:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Matich P, Heithaus MR, Layman CA (2011) Contrasting patterns of individual specialization and trophic coupling in two marine apex predators. J Anim Ecol 80:294–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKaye KR, Marsh A (1983) Food switching by two specialized algae-scraping cichlid fishes in Lake Malawi, Africa. Oecologia 56:245–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Motta PJ (1988) Functional morphology of the feeding apparatus of ten species of Pacific butterflyfishes (Perciformes, Chaetodontidae): an ecomorphological approach. Environ Biol Fish 22:39–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motta PJ (2004) Prey capture behavior and feeding mechanics of elasmobranchs. In: Carrier J, Musick J, Heithaus M (eds) Biology of sharks and their relatives. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, pp. 165–202

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Motta PJ, Kotrschal KM (1992) Correlative, experimental, and comparative evolutionary approaches in ecomorphology. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 42:400–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motta PJ, Hueter RE, Tricas TC, Summers AP (2002) Kinematic analysis of suction feeding in the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum (Orectolobiformes, Ginglymostomatidae). Copeia 2002:24–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motta PJ, Hueter RE, Tricas TC, Summers AP, Huber DR, Lowry D, Mara KR, Matott MP, Whitenack LB, Wintzer AP (2008) Functional morphology of the feeding apparatus, feeding constraints, and suction performance in the nurse shark Ginglymostoma cirratum. J Morphol 269:1041–1055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muller M, Osse JWM (1984) Hydrodynamics of suction feeding in fish. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 37:51–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller M, Osse JWM, Verhagen JHG (1982) A quantitative hydrodynamical model of suction feeding in fish. J Theor Biol 95:49–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musick JA, Berkeley SA, Cailliet GM, Camhi M, Huntsman G, Nammack M, Warren ML Jr (2000) Marine, estuarine, and diadromous fish stocks at risk of extinction in North America (exclusive of Pacific salmonids). Fisheries 25:6–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakai T, Sano M, Kurokura H (2001) Feeding habits of the darkfin hind Cephalopholis urodeta (Serranidae) at Iriomote Island, southern Japan. Fish Sci 67:640–643

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nauwelaerts S, Wilga C, Sanford C, Lauder GV (2007) Hydrodynamics of prey capture in sharks: effects of substrate. J R Soc Interface 4:341–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth DH (1997a) Modulation of attack behavior and its effect on feeding performance in a trophic generalist fish. J Exp Biol 200:2155–2164

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth DH (1997b) Modulation of buccal pressure during prey capture in Hexagrammos decagrammus (Teleostei: Hexagrammidae). J Exp Biol 200:2145–2154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norton SF (1991) Capture success and diet of cottid fishes: the role of predator morphology and attack kinematics. Ecology 72:1807–1819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton SF (1995) A functional approach to ecomorphological patterns of feeding in cottid fishes. Environ Biol Fish 44:61–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton SF, Brainerd EL (1993) Convergence in the feeding mechanics of ecomorphologically similar species in the Centrarchidae and Cichlidae. J Exp Biol 176:11–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyberg DW (1971) Prey capture in the largemouth bass. Am Midl Nat 86:128–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oufiero CE, Holzman RA, Young FA, Wainwright PC (2012) New insights from serranid fishes on the role of trade-offs in suction-feeding diversification. J Exp Biol 215:3845–3855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish JD (1987) The trophic biology of snappers and groupers. In: Polovina JJ, Ralston S (eds) Tropical snappers and groupers: biology and fisheries management. Westview Press Inc., Boulder, CO., pp. 561–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffenberger JA, Motta PJ (2011) The effects of intraspecific competition on the prey capture behavior and kinematics of the bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus. Environ Biol Fish 93:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelan M (2008) Report on the goliath grouper aggregation and spawning monitoring at Jupiter Florida. Florida Oceanographic Coastal Center, Palm Beach Reef Research Team Final Report, 21 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter HT, Motta PJ (2004) A comparison of strike and prey capture kinematics of three species of piscivorous fishes: Florida gar (Lepisosteus platyrhincus), redfin needlefish (Strongylura notata), and great barracuda (Sphyraena barracuda). Mar Biol 145:989–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pusack TJ, Graham RT (2009) Threatened fishes of the world: Epinephelus itajara (Lichtenstein, 1822) (Epinephelidae, formerly Serranidae). Environ Biol Fish 86:293–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rand DM, Lauder GV (1981) Prey capture in the chain pickerel, Esox niger: correlations between feeding and locomotor behavior. Can J Zool 59:1072–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall JE (1967) Food habits of reef fishes of the West Indies. Stud. Trop. Oceanographic Institute of Marine Science, University of Miami No 5:665–847

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall JE (1983) Caribbean reef fishes, Second edn. Publications, Neptune City, NJ, T.F.H, 350 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall JE, Brock VE (1960) Observations on the biology of epinepheline and lutjanid fishes of the Society Islands, with emphasis on food habits. Trans Am Fish Soc 89:9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadovy Y and Eklund AM. 1999. Synopsis of the biological data on the Nassau grouper, Epinephelus striatus (Bloch 1972) and the jewfish, E. itajara (Lichtenstein 1822). U.S. Dep. Comm., NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS 146, and FAO Fisheries Synopsis 157. 65 pp.

  • Sanderson SL (1991) Functional stereotypy and feeding performance correlated in a trophic specialist. Funct Ecol 5:795–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (2006) Base SAS® 9.1.3 procedures guide, 2nd edn., Vol 1–4. Cary, NC

  • Sass GG, Motta PJ (2002) The effects of satiation on prey capture kinematics in the largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides. Environ Biol Fish 65:441–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (SAMFC). 1990. Ammendment Number 2. Regulatory Impact Review. Regulatory flexibility analysis and environmental assessment for fishery management plan for the snapper-grouper fishery of the South Atlantic region, 47 pp.

  • St John J (1999) Ontogenetic changes in the diet of the coral reef grouper Plectropomus leopardus (Serranidae): patterns in taxa, size and habitat of prey. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 180:233–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoner AW, Ottmar ML (2004) Fish density and size alter Pacific halibut feeding: implications for stock assessment. J Fish Biol 64:1712–1724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svanback R, Eklov P (2003) Morphology dependent foraging efficiency in perch: a trade-off for ecological specialization? Oikos 102:273–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svanback R, Wainwright PC, Ferry-Graham LA (2002) Linking cranial kinematics, buccal pressure, and suction feeding performance in largemouth bass. Physiol Biochem Zool 75:532–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson R, Munro JL (1978) Aspects of the biology and ecology of Caribbean reef fishes: Serranidae (hinds and groupers). J Fish Biol 12:115–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran HQ, Mehta RS, Wainwright PC (2010) Effects of ram speed on prey capture kinematics of juvenile indo-Pacific tarpon Megalops cyprinoides. Zoology 113:75–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Damme J, Aerts P (1997) Kinematics and functional morphology of aquatic feeding in Australian snake-necked turtles (Pleurodira; Chelodina). J Morphol 233:113–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen JL, Muller M (1984) Optimum sucking techniques for predatory fish. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 37:137–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Wassenberg S, Herrel A, Adriaens D, Aerts P (2006) Modulation and variability of prey capture kinematics in clariid catfishes. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol) 305:559–569

  • Viladiu C, Vandewalle P, Osse JWM, Casinos A (1999) Suction feeding strategies of two species of Mediterranean Serranidae (Serranus cabrilla and Serranus scriba). Netherlands Journal of Zoology 49:81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright PC, Bellwood DR (2002) Ecomorphology of feeding in coral reef fishes. In: Coral reef fishes. Dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem (ed. P. F. Sale). Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 33–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright PC, Day SW (2007) The forces exerted by aquatic suction feeders on their prey. J R Soc Interface 4:553–560

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright PC, Lauder GV (1986) Feeding biology of sunfishes: patterns of variation in the feeding mechanism. Zool J Linnean Soc 88:217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright PC, Richard BA (1995) Predicting patterns of prey use from morphology of fishes. Environ Biol Fish 44:97–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright PC, Ferry-Graham LA, Waltzek TB, Carroll AM, Hulsey CD, Grubich JR (2001) Evaluating the use of ram and suction during prey capture by cichlid fishes. J Exp Biol 204:3039–3051

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver DC (1996) Feeding ecology and ecomorphology of three sea basses (Pisces: Serranidae) in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. University of Florida, Gainesville, MS Thesis, 94p

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb PW (1984) Body and fin form and strike tactics of four teleost predators attacking fathead minnow Pimephales promelas prey. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 41:157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE (1974) The fish size, prey size, handling time relation in several sunfishes and some implications. J Fish Res Board Can 31:1531–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westneat MW (2005) Skull biomechanics and suction feeding in fishes. In: Lauder GV, Shadwick RE (eds) Fish biomechanics. Academic Press

  • Wiens JA (1977) On competition and variable environment. Am Sci 65:590–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimberger PH (1991) Plasticity of jaw and skull morphology in the neotropical cichlids Geophagus brasiliensis and G. steindachneri. Evolution 45:1545–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wintzer AP, Motta PJ (2005) A comparison of prey capture kinematics in hatchery and wild Micropterus salmoides floridanus: effects of ontogeny and experience. J Fish Biol 67:409–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf RS, Chislett CR (1974) Trap fishing explorations for snapper and related species in the Caribbean and adjacent waters. Mar Fish Rev 36:49–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Wraith J, Lynch T, Minchinton TE, Broad A, Davis AR (2013) Bait type affects fish assemblages and feeding guilds observed at baited remote underwater video stations. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 477:189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeiser B, Morris JJ, Tucker AD (2008) Caretta caretta (Loggerhead sea turtle) predation. Herpetological Review 39:343–344

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Captain K. McWhorter provided invaluable field assistance and was responsible for fabricating a large portion of the equipment set-up used during feeding trials. We would like to thank the Porter Family Foundation for travel and equipment support throughout the duration of this research. K. Flaherty-Walia, M. L. Habeggar, and D. Huber provided valuable suggestions for kinematic analysis. Thanks to K. McWhorter, J. Williams, C. Monzon-Aguirre and J. Taylor for their assistance in the field and with video analysis. R. McBride, L. Barbieri, E. McCoy, C. Koenig and two anonymous reviewers provided guidance that significantly improved this manuscript. We would also like to thank the many volunteer divers and anglers from FWC’s Fish and Wildlife Research Institute for their help in the field. This work was performed in part as a portion of Collins’ doctoral dissertation at the University of South Florida. All experimental procedures were performed with the approval of the University of South Florida Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC permits #3210 and #3887).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. B. Collins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Collins, A.B., Motta, P.J. A kinematic investigation into the feeding behavior of the Goliath grouper Epinephelus itajara . Environ Biol Fish 100, 309–323 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-016-0543-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-016-0543-4

Keywords

Navigation