Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 99, Issue 12, pp 969–974 | Cite as

Free-swimming speeds and behavior in adult Pacific Lamprey, Entosphenus tridentatus

  • Stewart B. ReidEmail author
  • Damon H. Goodman
Article

Abstract

Lampreys are extremely efficient anguilliform swimmers, well–designed for long–distance travel, although they are frequently characterized as poor swimmers when compared to salmonids. We examine free–swimming adult Pacific Lamprey, Entosphenus tridentatus, in a raceway environment to approximate swim speeds and behaviors that may occur in the natural environment. Lampreys (mean Body Length 59.2 ± 3.0 cm, range 50–66 cm BL) traveled upstream at a mean groundspeed of 0.34 ± 0.188 BL/s (n=126, range 0.01–0.79 BL/s). Swimming activity was strongly nocturnal. Observed speeds in the lower range may have been the result of swimming in midwater against faster currents, indirect paths or rest periods. Lampreys generally took advantage of lower near–bottom current velocities by swimming within 6 cm of the bottom, where currents were substantially lower. Equivalent swim speeds, without currents, would be 0.49 ± 0.190 BL/s (range 0.17–0.96 BL/s). These speeds are in the high range of daily travel rates encountered in tagging studies of both Pacific Lamprey and Atlantic Sea Lamprey, Petromyzon marinus, but compare well when migration is limited to hours of darkness or tracking was continuous. Such rates suggest that, travelling only at night, lampreys would cover 1,000 km upriver in under four months. It is crucial that managers and designers incorporate the swimming capability, near–bottom association, utilization of boundary flow conditions, and nocturnal behavior of lampreys into their activities if we are to effectively manage in-stream facilities and conserve these key anadromous species.

Keywords

Migration Boundary flow Anguilliform Locomotion Management 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Region 8. We are grateful to Scott Harris (California Department of Fish and Wildlife) who shared his familiarity with the facilities and provided field support and to Pacific Gas and Electric who operates the Van Arsdale Fish Ladder and facilities. The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the USFWS. Reference to trade names does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Ethical approval: All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. Procedures followed American Fisheries Society guidelines (2014).

References

  1. Almeida PR, Quintella BR, Dias NM (2002) Movement of radio–tagged anadromous sea lamprey during the spawning migration in the River Mondego (Portugal). Hydrobiologia 483:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrade NO, Quintella BR, Ferreira J, Pinela S, Póvoa I, Pedro S, Almeida PR (2007) Sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus L.) spawning migration in the Vouga river basin (Portugal): poaching impact, preferential resting sites and spawning grounds. Hydrobiologia 582:121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beamish FWH (1974) Swimming Performance of Adult Sea Lamprey, Petromyzon marinus, in Relation to Weight and Temperature. Trans Am Fish Soc 103:355–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beamish FWH (1978) Swimming capacity. In: Hoar WS, Randall DJ (eds) Fish physiology, vol VII. Academic Press, New York, pp. 101–187Google Scholar
  5. Beamish FWH (1979) Migration and spawning energetics of the anadromous sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus. Environ Biol Fish 4:3–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clemens BJ, Binder TR, Docker MF, Moser ML, Sower SA (2010) Similarities, differences, and unknowns in biology and management of three parasitic lampreys of North America. Fisheries 35:580–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clemens BJ, Mesa MG, Magie RJ, Young DA, Schreck CB (2012) Pre–spawning migration of adult Pacific lamprey, Entosphenus tridentatus, in the Willamette River, Oregon, USA. Environ Biol Fish 93:245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dingman SL (1984) Fluvial hydrology. WH Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Evermann BW, Meek SE (1898) A report upon salmon investigations in the Columbia River basin and elsewhere on the Pacific coast in 1896. Bulletin of the U S Fish Comm 17:15–84Google Scholar
  10. Gemmell BJ, Colin SP, Costello JH, Dabiri JO (2015) Suction–based propulsion as a basis for efficient animal swimming. Nat Commun 6(8790):1–8Google Scholar
  11. Goodman DH, Reid SB (2012) Pacific Lamprey (Entosphenus tridentatus) assessment and template for conservation measures in california. U S Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata, California. Online at www.fws.gov/Arcata/fisheries/reports/technical/PLCI_CA_Assessment_Final.pdfGoogle Scholar
  12. Gordon ND, McMahon TA, Finlayson BL (1993) Stream hydrology, an introduction for ecologists. Wiley, ChinchesterGoogle Scholar
  13. Keefer ML, Moser ML, Boggs CT, Daigle WR, Peery CA (2009a) Variability in migration timing of adult Pacific lamprey (Lampetra tridentata) in the Columbia river, U.S.A. Environ Biol Fish 85:253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keefer ML, Peery CA, Caudill CC et al (2009b) Adult Pacific lamprey migration in the lower Columbia River: 2008 radiotelemetry and half–duplex PIT tag studies. Final Report to U S Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  15. Keefer ML, Moser ML, Boggs CT, Daigle WR, Peery CA (2009c) Effects of body size and river environment on the upstream migration of adult Pacific lampreys (Lampetra tridentata). N Am J Fish Manag 29:1214–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keefer ML, Caudill CC, Peery CA, Moser ML (2013) Context–dependent diel behavior of upstream–migrating anadromous fishes. Environ Biol Fish 96:691–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luzier CW, Schaller HA, Brostrom JK, Cook–Tabor C, Goodman DH, Nelle RD, Ostrand K, Streif B (2011) Pacific lamprey (Entosphenus tridentatus) assessment and template for conservation measures. U S Fish and Wildlife Service, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  18. Lynn RJ, Simpson JJ (1987) The California current system: the seasonal variability of its physical characteristics. J Geophys Res 9:12,947–12,966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maitland PS, Renaud CB, Quintella BR, Close DA, Docker MF (2015) Conservation of native lampreys. In: Docker MF (ed) Lampreys: biology, conservation and control, Volume 1. Fish and Fisheries Series no. 37. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 375–428Google Scholar
  20. McIlraith BJ (2011) The adult migration, spatial distribution, and spawning behaviors of anadromous Pacific lamprey (Lampetra tridentata) in the lower Snake River. University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, MS thesisGoogle Scholar
  21. McIlraith BJ, Caudill CC, Kennedy BP, Peery CA, Keefer ML (2015) Seasonal migration behaviors and distribution of adult Pacific lampreys in unimpounded reaches of the Snake River basin. N Am J Fish Manag 35:123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meckley TD, Gurarie E, Wagner CM (2014) Coastal movements of migrating sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) in response to a partial pheromone added to river water: implications for management of invasive populations. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 71:533–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mesa MG, Bayer JM, Seelye JG (2003) Swimming performance and physiological responses to exhaustive exercise in radio–tagged and untagged Pacific lampreys. Trans Am Fish Soc 132:483–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moser ML, Mesa MG (2009) Passage considerations for lamprey. In: Brown L, Chase S, Mesa M, Beamish R, Moyle P (eds) Biology, management, and conservation of lampreys in North America. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp. 115–124Google Scholar
  25. Moser M, Almeida PR, Kemp PS, Sorensen PW (2015) Lamprey Spawning Migration. In: Docker MF (ed) Lampreys: biology, conservation and control, Volume 1. Fish and Fisheries Series no. 37. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 215–263Google Scholar
  26. Orlov AM, Savinyh VF, Pelenev DV (2008) Features of the spatial distribution and size structure of the Pacific lamprey, Lampetra tridentata, in the North Pacific. Russ J Mar Biol 34:276–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Petersen–Lewis RS (2009) Yurok and Karuk traditional ecological knowledge: insights into Pacific lamprey populations of the lower Klamath Basin. In: Brown L, Chase S, Mesa M, Beamish R, Moyle P (eds) Biology, management, and conservation of lampreys in North America. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp. 1–39Google Scholar
  28. Robinson TC, Bayer JM (2005) Upstream migration of Pacific lampreys in the John Day River, Oregon: behavior, timing, and habitat use. Northwest Sci 79:106–119Google Scholar
  29. Rutter C (1908) The fishes of the Sacramento–San Joaquin basin, with a study of their distribution and variation. Bulletin of the U S Fish Comm 27:103–152Google Scholar
  30. Schwartzlose RA, Reid JL (1972) Near–shore circulation in the California current. California marine research Comm. CalCOFI Rept 16:51–65Google Scholar
  31. Spice EK, Goodman DH, Reid SB, Docker MF (2012) Neither philopatric nor panmictic: microsatellite and mtDNA evidence suggests lack of natal homing but limits to dispersal in Pacific lamprey. Mol Ecol 21:2916–2930CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Stier K, Kynard B (1986) Movement of sea–run sea lampreys, Petromyzon marinus, during the spawning migration in the Connecticut River. Fish Bull 84:749–753Google Scholar
  33. Tukey J (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison–Wesley, BostonGoogle Scholar
  34. van Ginneken V, Antonissenv E, Mueller UK, Booms R, Eding E, Verreth J, van den Thillart G (2005) Eel migration to the Sargasso: remarkably high swimming efficiency and low energy costs. Exp Biol 208:1329–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vrieze LA, Bergstedt RA, Sorensen PW (2011) Olfactory–mediated stream finding behavior of migratory adult sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 68:523–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Waldman J, Grunwald C, Wirgin I (2008) Sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus: an exception to the rule of homing in anadromous fishes. Biol Lett 4:659–662CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Western FishesAshlandUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata Fish and Wildlife OfficeArcataUSA

Personalised recommendations