Abstract
Research into the effects of shade on reservoir fish assemblages is lacking, with most investigations focused on streams. Unlike many streams, the canopy in a reservoir shades only a narrow fringe of water adjacent to the shoreline, and may not have the influential effect on the aquatic environment reported in streams. We compared fish assemblages between shaded and unshaded sites in a shallow reservoir. Overall species richness (gamma diversity) was higher in shaded sites, and fish assemblage composition differed between shaded and unshaded sites. Average light intensity was 66 % lower in shaded sites, and differences in average temperature and dissolved oxygen were small. Unlike streams where shade can have large effects on water physicochemistry, in reservoirs shade-related differences in fish assemblages seemed to be linked principally to differences in light intensity. Diversity in light intensity in shaded and unshaded sites in reservoirs can create various mosaics of light-based habitats that enable diversity of species assemblages. Managing to promote the habitat diversity provided by shade may require coping with the artificial nature of reservoir riparian zones and water level fluctuations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alabaster JS, Lloyd RS (2013) Water quality criteria for freshwater fish. Elsevier, London
Anderson TW (2001) Predator responses, prey refuges, and density-dependent mortality of a marine fish. Ecology 82:245–257
Anderson M, Gorley, RN, Clarke, RK (2008) Permanova + for Primer: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods. Plymouth, UK
Beitinger TL, Bennett WA, McCauley RW (2000) Temperature tolerances of north American freshwater fishes exposed to dynamic changes in temperature. Environ Biol Fish 58:237–275
Bettoli PW, Maceina MJ (1996) Sampling with toxicants. In: Murphy BR, Willis DW (eds) Fisheries techniques, 2nd ed. Am Fish Soc Bethesda pp. 303–333
Block CJ, Spotila JR, Standora EA, Gibbons JW (1984) Behavioral thermoregulation of largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, and bluegill Lepomis macrochirus, in a nuclear reactor cooling reservoir. Environ Biol Fish 11:41–52
Boschung HT, Mayden RL (2004) Fishes of Alabama. Smithsonian Books, Washington, DC
Bourassa N, Cattaneo A (2000) Responses of a lake outlet community to light and nutrient manipulation: effects on periphyton and invertebrate biomass and composition. Freshw Biol 44:629–639
Broadmeadow SB, Jones JG, Langford TEL, et al. (2011) The influence of riparian shade on lowland stream water temperatures in southern England and their viability for brown trout. River Res Appl 27:226–237
Brown GW, Krygier JT (1970) Effects of clear-cutting on stream temperature. Wat Resour Res 6:1131–1140
Buckmeier DL, Smith NG, Fleming BP, Bodine KA (2014) Intra-annual variation in river-reservoir interface fish assemblages: implications for fish conservation and management in regulated waters. River Res Appl 30:780–790
Burcher CL, McTammany ME, Benfield EF, Helfman GS (2008) Fish assemblage responses to forest cover. Environ Manage 41:336–346
Clarke K, Gorley R (2015) PRIMER v7: User Manual/Tutorial. Primer-E 296, Plymouth
Ebersole JL, Liss WJ, Frissell CA (2003) Cold water patches in warm streams: physicochemical characteristics and the influence of shading. J Am Water Resour Assoc 39:355–368
Endler JA (1987) Predation, light intensity and courtship behaviour in Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae. Anim Behav 35:1376–1385
Endler JA (1993) The color of light in forests and its implications. Ecol Monogr 63:2–27
Gjerløv C, Richardson JS (2010) Experimental increases and reductions of light to streams: effects on periphyton and macroinvertebrate assemblages in a coniferous forest landscape. Hydrobiologia 652:195–206
Hair CA, Bell JD, Kingsford MJ (1994) Effects of position in the water column, vertical movement and shade on settlement of fish to artificial habitats. Bull Mar Sci 55:434–444
Helfman GS (1981) The advantage to fishes of hovering in shade. Copeia 1981:392–400
Hill WR, Dimick SM (2002) Effects of riparian leaf dynamics on periphyton photosynthesis and light utilisation efficiency. Freshw Biol 47:1245–1256
Jones E, Helfman GS, Harper JO, Bolstad PV (1999) Effects of riparian forest removal on fish assemblages in southern Appalachian streams. Conserv Biol 13:1454–1465
Lauck B, Swain R, Barmuta L (2005) Impacts of shading on larval traits of the frog Litoria ewingii in a commercial forest, Tasmania, Australia. J Herpetol 39:478–486
McCartt AL, Lynch WE Jr, Johnson DL (1997) How light, a predator, and experience influence bluegill use of shade and schooling. Environ Biol Fish 49:79–87
Meador MR, Carlisle DM (2007) Quantifying tolerance indicator values for common stream fish species of the United States. Ecol Indic 7:329–338
Miranda LE (2011) Depth as an organizer of fish assemblages in floodplain lakes. Aquat Sci 73:211–221
Miranda LE, Wigen SL, Dagel JD (2014) Reservoir floodplains support distinct fish assemblages. River Res Appl 30:338–346
Naiman RJ, Latterell JJ (2005) Principles for linking fish habitat to fisheries management and conservation. J Fish Biol 67:166–185
Nakano S, Miyasaka H, Kuhara N (1999) Terrestrial-aquatic linkages: riparian arthropod inputs alter trophic cascades in a stream food web. Ecology 80:2435–2441
Plumb JA, Hanson LA (2011) Health maintenance and principal microbial diseases of cultured fishes. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey
Pusey BJ, Arthington AH (2003) Importance of the riparian zone to the conservation and management of freshwater fish: a review. Mar Freshw Res 54:1–16
Ross ST (2001) The inland fishes of Mississippi. Univ. Press of Mississippi, Jackson, Mississippi
Schneider KN, Winemiller KO (2008) Structural complexity of woody debris patches influences fish and macroinvertebrate species richness in a temperate floodplain-river system. Hydrobiologia 610:235–244
Seehausen O, Terai Y, Magalhaes IS, et al. (2008) Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish. Nature 455:620–626
Wang L, Lyons J, Rasmussen P, Seelbach P, Simon T, Wiley M, Kanehl P, Baker E, Niemela S, Stewart PM (2003) Watershed, reach, and riparian influences on stream fish assemblages in the Northern Lakes and Forest Ecoregion, U.S.a. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:491–505
Wetzel RG (1990) Reservoir ecosystems: conclusions and speculations. In: Thornton KW, Kimmel BL, Payne FE (eds) Reservoir limnology: ecological perspectives. Wiley, NY, pp. 227–238
Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251
Acknowledgments
Funding was provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the Reservoir Fish Habitat Partnership. D. Hann, H. Schramm, and two anonymous referees provided helpful reviews. This study was performed under the auspices of Mississippi State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocol number 14–029 and a Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks Collection Permit. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Raines, C.D., Miranda, L.E. Role of riparian shade on the fish assemblage of a reservoir littoral. Environ Biol Fish 99, 753–760 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-016-0519-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-016-0519-4