Abstract
Currently, biodiversity is threatened by several factors often associated with human population growth and the extension of areas occupied by human activity. In particular, freshwater fish fauna is affected by overfishing, deforestation, water pollution, introduction of exotic species and habitat fragmentation promoted by hydroelectric dams, among other environmental impact factors. Several action plans to preserve ichthyofauna biodiversity have been adopted; however, these plans frequently cover only a small number of species, and decisions are often made without strong scientific support. This study aimed to evaluate the genetic aspects of wild groups of Brycon orbignyanus, an endangered fish species, using microsatellites and D-loop regions to identify the genetic structure of the samples and to establish priority areas for conservation based on the genetic patterns of this species. The results indicated that the samples showed levels of genetic variability compatible with others studies with Neotropical fishes. However, the results obtained in the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for microsatellites (F ST = 0.258) and D-loop (F ST = 0.234) and the interpopulation fixation index revealed that B. orbignyanus was structured in different subpopulations in the La Plata River basin; the areas with better environmental conditions also showed subgroups with higher rates of genetic variability. Future conservation actions addressing these sites should consider two different management units: the complex formed by the Ivinhema River, Upper Paraná, Camargo Port and Ilha Grande groups; and the complex formed by the Verde River and Sucuriu River groups.

Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abell R, Thieme ML, Revenga C et al (2008) Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. Bioscience 58:403–414. doi:10.1641/B580507
Agostinho AA, Gomes LC, Fernandez DR, Suzuki HI (2002) Efficiency of fish ladders for neotropical ichthyofauna. River Res Appl 18:299–306. doi:10.1002/rra.674
Agostinho AA, Thomaz SM, Gomes LC (2005) Conservation of the biodiversity of Brazil’s inland waters. Conserv Biol 19:646–652. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00701.x
Anderson S (2003) Animal genetic resources and sustainable livelihoods. Ecol Econ 45:331–339. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00088-0
Anderson S, Centonze R (2007) Property rights and the management of animal genetic resources. World Dev 35:1529–1541. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.05.020
Araripe J, Rego PS, Queiroz H, Sampaio I, Schneider H (2013) Dispersal capacity and genetic structure of Arapaima gigas on different geographic scales using microsatellite markers. PLoS One 8:e54470. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054470
Avise J (2009) Phylogeography: retrospect and prospect. J Biogeogr 39(1):3–15. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.02032.x
Barroso RM, Hilsdorf AWS, Moreira HLM, Mello AM, Guimarães SEF, Cabello PH, Traub-Cseko YM (2003) Identification and characterization of microsatellites loci in Brycon opalinus (Cuvier, 1819) (Characiforme, Characidae, Bryconiae). Mol Ecol Notes 3:297–298. doi:10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00435.x
Bijlsma R, Loeschcke V (2012) Genetic erosion impedes adaptive responses to stressful environments. Evol Appl 5:117–129. doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00214.x
Brown GG (1986) Structural conservation and variation in the D-loop containing region of vertebrate mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Biol 192:503–511. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(86)90272-x
Castagnolli N (1992) Criação de peixes de água doce. Funep, Jaboticabal
Cecílio BE, Agostinho AA (1997) Estrutura das populações de peixes do reservatório de segredos. In: Agostinho AA (ed) Reservatório de segredos: bases ecológicas para o manejo. EDUEM, Maringá, pp 113–139
Chistiakov DA, Hellemans B, Volckaert FAM (2006) Microsatellites and their genomic distribution, evolution, function and applications: a review with special reference to fish genetics. Aquaculture 255:1–29. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.11.031
Crandall KA, Bininda-Emonds OR, Mace GM, Wayne RK (2000) Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 15:290–295. doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01876-0
Crawford N (2010) SMOGD: software for the measurement of genetic diversity. Mol Ecol Resour 10:556–557. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02801.x
Crawford SS, Morito B (1997) Comment: toward a definition of conservation principles for fisheries management. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:2720–2723. doi:10.1139/f97-236
DeWoody JA, Avise JC (2000) Microsatellite variation in marine freshwater and anadromous fishes compared with other animals. J Fish Biol 56:461–473. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb00748.x
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x
Excoffier L, Lischer HE (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Res 10:564–567. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x
Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491
Ferreira DG, Galindo BA, Silva WF, Almeida FS, Sofia SH (2014) Genetic structure of a Neotropical sedentary fish revealed by AFLP, microsatellite and mtDNA markers: a case study. Conserv Genet 1–16. doi 10.1007/s10592-014-0648-2
Frankham R (2003) Genetics and conservation biology. C R Biol 326:S22–S29. doi:10.1016/S1631-0691(03)00023-4
Frankham R (2005) Genetics and extinction. Biol Cons 126:131–140. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.05.002
Frankham R, Briscoe DA, Ballou JD (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Fraser DJ, Bernatchez L (2001) Adaptive evolutionary conservation: towards a unified concept for defining conservation units. Mol Ecol 10:2741–2752. doi:10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01411.x
Garcez R, Calcagnotto D, Almeida-Toledo LF (2011) Population structure of the migratory fish Prochilodus lineatus (Characiformes) from Rio Grande Basin (Brazil), an area fragmented by dams. Aquat Conserv 21:268–275. doi:10.1002/aqc.1176
Ivanova NV, Dewaard JR, Hebert PDN (2006) An inexpensive, automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA. Mol Ecol Notes 6:998–1002. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01428.x
Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A et al (2012) GENEIOUS Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bionformatics 28:1647–1649. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199
Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25:1451–1452. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187
Lopera-Barrero NM (2009) Conservation of Brycon orbignyanus natural populations and stocks for their reproductive, genetic, environmental sustainability: a model for species threatened with extinction. Cienc Investig Agrar 36:191–208. doi:10.4067/S0718-16202009000200004
Machado ABM, Drummond BM, Paglia AP (2008) Livro vermelho da fauna brasileira ameaçada de extinção. Fundação Biodiversitas, Belo Horizonte
Martins C, Wasko AP, Oliveira C, Foresti F (2003) Mitochondrial DNA variation in wild populations of Leporinus elongatus from the Paraná River Basin. Genet Mol Biol 26:33–38. doi:10.1590/S1415-47572003000100006
Melo BF, Sato Y, Foresti F, Oliveira C (2013) The roles of marginal lagoons in the maintenance of genetic diversity in the Brazilian migratory fishes Prochilodus argenteus and P. costatus. Neotrop Ichthyol 11:625–636. doi:10.1590/S1679-62252013000300016
Mittermeier RA, Myers N, Thomsen JB, Da Fonseca GA, Olivieri S (1998) Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conserv Biol 12:516–520. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012003516.x
Moritz C (1999) Conservation units and translocations: strategies for conserving evolutionary processes. Hereditas 130:217–228. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1999.00217.x
Myers N (1988) Threatened biotas:“hot spots” in tropical forests. Environmentalist 8:187–208. doi:10.1007/BF02240252
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GA, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858. doi:10.1038/35002501
Nelson JS (2006) Fishes of the world. Wiley, Hoboken
Olver CH, Shuter BJ, Minns CK (2011) Toward a definition of conservation principles for fisheries management. Can J Fish Aquatic Sci 52:1884–1894. doi:10.1139/f95-751
Paranani-Antunes RS, Prioli AJ, Alves SM et al (2011) Genetic variability of Brycon orbignyanus (Valenciennes, 1850) (Characiformes: Characidae) in cultivated and natural populations of the Upper Paraná River, and implications for the conservation of the species. Braz Arch Biol Technol 54:839–848. doi:10.1590/S1516-89132011000400025
Pereira LHG, Foresti F, Oliveira C (2009) Genetic structure of the migratory catfish Pseudoplatystoma corruscans (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae) suggests homing behaviour. Ecol Freshw Fish 18:215–225. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0633.2008.00338.x
Rege JEO, Gibson JP (2003) Animal genetic resources and economic development: issues in relation to economic valuation. Ecol Econ 45:319–330. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00087-9
Reis RE, Kullander SO, Ferraris CJ (2003) Check list of the freshwater fishes of South and Central America. Edipucrs, Porto Alegre
Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225. doi:10.2307/2409177
Rubin CS, Warner RE, Bouzat JL, Paige KN (2001) Population structure of Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingü) in an urban landscape. Biol Cons 99:323–330. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00198-1
Rueda EC, Carriquiriborde P, Monzón AM, Somoza GM, Ortí G (2013) Seasonal variation in genetic population structure of sabalo (Prochilodus lineatus) in the Lower Uruguay River. Genetica 141:401–407. doi:10.1007/s10709-013-9739-0
Sanches A, Galetti PMJ (2006) Genetic evidence of population structuring in the neotropical fresh water fish Brycon hilarii (Valencinnes, 1850). Braz J Biol 4:89–895. doi:10.1590/S1519-69842007000500012
Sanches A, Galetti PMJ (2012) Population genetic structure revealed by a school of the freshwater migratory fish, Brycon hilarii. Lat Am J Aquatic Res 40:408–417. doi:10.3856/vol40-issue2-fulltext-15
Santos MCF, Ruffino ML, Farias IP (2007) High levels of genetic variability and panmixia of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier, 1816) in the main channel of the Amazon River. J Fish Biol 71:33–44. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01514.x
Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 16:233–234. doi:10.1038/72708
Selkoe KA, Toonen RJ (2006) Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers. Ecol Lett 9:615–629. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00889.x
Sivasundar A, Bermingham E, Orti G (2001) Population structure and biogeography of migratory freshwater fishes (Prochilodus: Characiformes) in Major South American Rivers. Mol Ecol 10:407–417. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01194.x
Song J, Hou F, Zhang X, Yue B, Song Z (2014) Mitochondrial genetic diversity and population structure of a vulnerable freshwater fish, rock carp (Procypris rabaudi) in upper Yangtze River drainage. Biochem Syst Ecol 55:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.bse.2014.02.008
Sonstebo JH, Borgstrom R, Heun M (2007) Genetic structure of Brown Trout (Salmo trutta L.) from the Hardangervidda Mountain Plateau (Norway) analyzed by microsatellite DNA: a basis for conservation guidelines. Conserv Genet 8:33–44. doi:10.1007/s10592-006-9145-6
Templeton AR (1998) Nested clade analyses of phylogeographic data: testing hypotheses about gene flow and population history. Molec Ecol 7:381–397. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00308.x
Terencio ML, Schneider CH, Porto JIR (2012) Molecular signature of the D-loop in the brown pencilfish Nannostomus eques (Characiformes, Lebiasinidae) reveals at least two evolutionary units in the Rio Negro Basin, Brazil. J Fish Biol 81:110–124. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03320.x
Thomas MA, Roemer GW, Donlan CJ, Dickson BG, Matocq M, Malaney J (2013) Ecology: gene tweaking for conservation. Nature 501:485–486. doi:10.1038/501485a
Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x
Vaz MM, Torquato VC, Barbosa NDC (2000) Guia ilustrado de peixes da Bacia do Rio Grande. CEMIG/CETEC, Belo Horizonte
Vogiatzi E, Kalogianni E, Zimmerman B et al (2014) Reduced genetic variation and strong genetic population structure in the freshwater killifish Valencia letourneuxi (Valenciidae) based on nuclear and mitochondrial markers. Biol J Linnean Soc 111:334–349. doi:10.1111/bij.12206
Wilson GA, Rannala B (2003) Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multiloco genotypes. Genetics 163:1177–1191. doi:10.3410/f.1012487.188326
Woodruff DS (2001) Population, species, and conservation genetics. In: Levin S (ed) Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, 4th edn. Academic, San Diego, pp 811–829
Wright S (1949) The genetical structure of populations. Ann Eugen 15:323–354. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1949.tb02451.x
Yeh FC, Boyle TJB (1997) Population genetic analysis of co-dominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits. Belg J Bot 129:157
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the National Centre for Research and Conservation of Continental Fish (ICMBio/CEPTA), Ilha Grande National Park (ICMBio), Inter-Municipal Consortium for Conservation of Remnant of the Parana River and Hinterlands (CORIPA), Santa Catarina Federal University (UFSC), State University of Maringá (UEM) and State University of Londrina (UEL), for their collaboration in the development of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Fig. 1
Graphic of Delta K values obtained through the Structure software for all microsatellite loci. Y axis for the values of delta (K) and X axis for the different values of K tested (DOC 386 kb)
Tabela 1
Data of four microsatellite loci for each population of B. orbignyanus. N = number of samples; Na = number of alleles; Np = number of private alleles; Ho = observed heterozygosity; He = expected heterozygosity; FIS = fixation index (inbreeding); HWE = probability values in accordance with the Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium; * = P ≤ 0.012 adjusted with the Bonferroni Correction; R = frequency of null alleles per locus (DOC 93 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ashikaga, F.Y., Orsi, M.L., Oliveira, C. et al. The endangered species Brycon orbignyanus: genetic analysis and definition of priority areas for conservation. Environ Biol Fish 98, 1845–1855 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-015-0402-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-015-0402-8


