Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 98, Issue 4, pp 1089–1104 | Cite as

Temperature effects induced by climate change on the growth and consumption by salmonines in Lakes Michigan and Huron

  • Yu-Chun KaoEmail author
  • Charles P. Madenjian
  • David B. Bunnell
  • Brent M. Lofgren
  • Marjorie Perroud


We used bioenergetics models to investigate temperature effects induced by climate change on the growth and consumption by Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, lake trout Salvelinus namaycush, and steelhead O. mykiss in Lakes Michigan and Huron. We updated biological inputs to account for recent changes in the food webs and used temperature inputs in response to regional climate observed in the baseline period (1964–1993) and projected in the future period (2043–2070). Bioenergetics simulations were run across multiple age-classes and across all four seasons in different scenarios of prey availability. Due to the increased capacity of prey consumption, future growth and consumption by these salmonines were projected to increase substantially when prey availability was not limited. When prey consumption remained constant, future growth of these salmonines was projected to decrease in most cases but increase in some cases where the increase in metabolic cost can be compensated by the decrease in waste (egestion and excretion) loss. Consumption by these salmonines was projected to increase the most during spring and fall when prey energy densities are relatively high. Such seasonality benefits their future growth through increasing annual gross energy intake. Our results indicated that lake trout and steelhead would be better adapted to the warming climate than Chinook salmon. To maintain baseline growth into the future, an increase of 10 % in baseline prey consumption was required for Chinook salmon but considerably smaller increases, or no increases, in prey consumption were needed by lake trout and steelhead.


Climate change Bioenergetics models Salmonines Lake michigan Lake huron 



We thank Michael Wiley and James Breck for providing valuable comments on an early draft of manuscript. We also thank Roger Bergstedt, Jixiang He, Gregory Jacobs, Amber Peters, and Jeffery Schaeffer for sharing unpublished data. Simon Hsu and Yo-Jin Shiau provided technical support. This research was funded by the U.S. Geological National Climate Change and Wildlife Science Center. This article is Contribution 1864 of the U.S. Geological Survey Great Lakes Science Center.

Supplementary material

10641_2014_352_MOESM1_ESM.doc (501 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 501 kb)


  1. Assel RA (2005) Classification of annual Great Lakes ice cycles: winters of 1973–2002. J Clim 18:4895–4905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergstedt RA, Argyle RL, Seelye JG, Scribner KT, Curtis GL (2003) In situ determination of the annual thermal habitat use by lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) in Lake Huron. J Great Lakes Res 29:347–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergstedt RA, Argyle RL, Krueger CC, Taylor WW (2012) Bathythermal habitat use by strains of Great Lakes- and Finger Lakes-origin lake trout in Lake Huron after a change in prey fish abundance and composition. T Am Fish Soc 141:263–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandt SB, Magnuson JJ, Crowder LB (1980) Thermal habitat partitioning by fishes in Lake Michigan. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37:1557–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandt SB, Mason DM, McCormick MJ, Lofgren B, Hunter TS, Tyler JA (2002) Climate change: implications for fish growth performance in the Great Lakes. In: McGinn NA (ed) Fisheries in a Changing Climate. American Fisheries Society Symposium 32, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, pp 61–75Google Scholar
  6. Brodeur RD, Francis RC, Pearcy WG (1992) Food consumption of juvenile coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha) on the continental shelf off Washington and Oregon. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:1670–1685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown EH, Busiahn TR, Jones ML, Argyle RL (1999) Allocating Great Lakes forage bases in response to multiple demand. In: Taylor WW, Ferreri CP (eds) Great Lakes fisheries policy and management: a binational perspective. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Michigan, USA, pp 355–394Google Scholar
  8. Coutant CC (1987) Thermal preference: when does an asset become a liability? Environ Biol Fishes 18(3):161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crawford SS (2001) Salmonine introductions to the Laurentain Great Lakes: an historical review and evaluation of ecological effects. Can Spec Pub Fish Aquat Sci 132Google Scholar
  10. Dobiesz NE (2003) An evaluation of the role of top piscivores in the fish community of the main basin of Lake Huron. Michigan State University, Doctoral dissertationGoogle Scholar
  11. Dobiesz NE, Lester NP (2009) Changes in mid-summer water temperature and clarity across the Great Lakes between 1968 and 2002. J Great Lakes Res 35:371–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dolan DM, Chapra SC (2012) Great Lakes total phosphorus revisited: 1. loading analysis and update (1994–2008). J Great Lakes Res 38(4):730–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eshenroder RL, Payne NR, Johnson JE, Bowen C, Ebener MP (1995) Lake trout rehabilitation in Lake Huron. J Great Lakes Res 21:108–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fahnenstiel G, Pothoven S, Vanderploeg H, Klarer D, Nalepa T, Scavia D (2010) Recent changes in primary production and phytoplankton in the offshore region of southeastern Lake Michigan. J Great Lakes Res 36:20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fenske JL, Shouder MF (1992) Swan River harvest weir report, 1984–90. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Technical Report, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, pp 92–6Google Scholar
  16. Hanson PC, Johnson TB, Schindler DE, Kitchell JF (1997) Fish Bioenergetics 3.0. University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute Technical Report WISCU-T-97-001, Madison, Wisconsin, USAGoogle Scholar
  17. Hay RL (1992) Little Manistee River harvest weir and chinook salmon egg-take report, 1990. Michigan Department of Natural Resources , Fisheries Technical Report, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, pp 92–5Google Scholar
  18. Hayhoe K, VanDorn J, Croley T, Schlegal N, Wuebbles D (2010) Regional climate change projections for Chicago and the US Great Lakes. J Great Lakes Res 36:7–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. He JX, Ebener MP, Riley SC, Cottrill A, Kowalski A, Koproski S, Mohr L, Johnson JE (2012) Lake trout status in the main basin of Lake Huron, 1973–2010. N Am J Fish Manage 32:402–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hill DK, Magnuson JJ (1990) Potential effects of global climate warming on the growth and prey consumption of Great Lakes fish. T Am Fish Soc 119:265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2000) Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Kitchell JF, Stewart DJ, Weininger D (1977) Applications of a bioenergetics model to yellow perch (Perca flavescens) and walleye (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum). J Fish Res Board Can 34:1922–1935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kling GW, Hayhoe K, Johnson LB, Magnuson JJ, Polasky S, Robinson SK, Shuter BJ, Wander MM, Wuebbles DJ, Zak DR (2003) Confronting Climate Change in the Great Lakes. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge and Massachusetts and Ecological Society of America, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  24. Lofgren BM (2004) A model for simulation of the climate and hydrology of the Great Lakes basin. J Geophys Res 109:D18108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Madenjian CP, O’Connor DV, Nortrup DA (2000) A new approach toward evaluation of fish bioenergetics models. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:1025–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Madenjian CP, O’Connor DV, Chernyak SM, Rediske RR, O’Keefe JP (2004) Evaluation of a chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) bioenergetics model. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:627–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Madenjian CP, Pothoven SA, Dettmers JM, Holuszko JD (2006) Changes in seasonal energy dynamics of alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus) in Lake Michigan after invasion of dreissenid mussels. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63:891–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Madenjian CP, Stapanian MA, Witzel LD, Einhouse DW, Pothoven SA, Whitford HL (2011) Evidence for predatory control of the invasive round goby. Biol Invasions 13:987–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Madenjian CP, David SR, Pothoven SA (2012) Effects of activity and energy budget balancing algorithm on laboratory performance of a fish bioenergetics model. T Am Fish Soc 141:1328–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Madenjian CP, Pothoven SA, Kao YC (2013) Reevaluation of lake trout and lake whitefish bioenergetics models. J Great Lakes Res 39:358–364   CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Magnuson JJ, Meisner JD, Hill DK (1990) Potential changes in the thermal habitat of Great Lakes fish after global climate warming. T Am Fish Soc 119:254–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Magnuson JJ, Webster KE, Assel RA, Bowser CJ, Dillon PJ, Eaton JG, Evans HE, Fee EJ, Hall RI, Mortsch LR, Schindler DW, Quinn FH (1997) Potential effects of climate changes on aquatic systems: laurentian Great Lakes and Precambrian shield region. Hydrol Process 11:825–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCormick MJ, Fahnenstiel GL (1999) Recent climatic trends in nearshore water temperatures in the St. Lawrence Great Lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 44:530–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. NCDC, NOAA National Climate Data Center, (2013) Climate at a Glance. Accessed June 2013.
  35. Olson RA, Winter JD, Nettles DC, Haynes JM (1988) Resource partitioning in summer by salmonids in south-central Lake Ontario. T Am Fish Soc 117:552–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rand PS, Stewart DJ, Seelbach PW, Jones ML, Wedge LR (1993) Modeling steelhead population energetics in Lakes Michigan and Ontario. T Am Fish Soc 122:977–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Riley SC, Roseman EF, Nichols SJ, O’Brien TP, Kiley CS, Schaeffer JS (2008) Deepwater demersal fish community collapse in Lake Huron. T Am Fish Soc 137:1879–1890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spigarelli SA, Thommes MM (1979) Temperature selection and estimated thermal acclimation by rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) in a thermal plume. J Fish Res Board Can 36:366–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stefan HG, Fang X, Eaton JG (2001) Simulated fish habitat changes in North American lakes in response to projected climate warming. T Am Fish Soc 130:459–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stewart DJ (1980) Salmonid predators and their forage base in Lake Michigan: a bioenergetics-modeling synthesis. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, Doctoral dissertationGoogle Scholar
  41. Stewart TJ, Bowlby JN (2009) Chinook salmon and rainbow trout catch and temperature distributions in Lake Ontario. J Great Lakes Res 35:232–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stewart DJ, Ibarra M (1991) Predation and production by salmonine fishes in Lake Michigan, 1978–88. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:909–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stewart DJ, Weininger D, Rottiers DV, Edsall TA (1983) An energetics model for lake trout, Salvelinus namaycush: application to the Lake Michigan population. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 40:681–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thayer SA, Loftus AJ (2012) Great Lakes recreational fisheries and their role in fisheries management and policy. In: Taylor WW, Lynch AJ, Leonard NJ (eds) Great Lakes fisheries policy and management: a binational perspective, 2nd edn. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Michigan, USA, pp 399–440Google Scholar
  45. Vanderploeg HA et al (2002) Dispersal and emerging ecological impacts of Ponto-Caspian species in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59(7):1209–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wells L (1968) Seasonal depth distribution of fish in southeastern Lake Michigan. Fish Bull 67:1–15Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu-Chun Kao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Charles P. Madenjian
    • 2
  • David B. Bunnell
    • 2
  • Brent M. Lofgren
    • 3
  • Marjorie Perroud
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Natural Resources and EnvironmentUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.U. S. Geological Survey, Great Lakes Science CenterAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.Great Lakes Environmental Research LaboratoryNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationAnn ArborUSA
  4. 4.Cooperative Institute for Limnology and Ecosystems ResearchUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  5. 5.Climate DivisionFederal Office for the EnvironmentBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations