Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 97, Issue 10, pp 1129–1147

The fish community of a newly restored southern California estuary: ecological perspective 3 years after restoration

  • Thomas J. Farrugia
  • Mario Espinoza
  • Christopher G. Lowe
Article

Abstract

Bays and estuaries are considered essential fish habitat, yet in many parts of the world, these areas have been degraded or destroyed. In southern California, habitat restoration has become a widely used approach for protecting coastal ecosystems; however, there is little information available on the success of these efforts. Monthly abundance surveys were employed to examine spatial and temporal trends in the fish assemblages 3 years after the restoration of the Bolsa Chica Full Tidal Basin (BCFTB). This was used as a short-term success assessment of the BCFTB restoration, as well as an important baseline against which future studies can determine the long-term trajectory of the restoration. Forty-four species of fish were caught inside the BCFTB, at an average density of 116.8 fish 100 m−2 and an average biomass of 4.2 kg 100 m−2. There was a seasonal pattern in fish abundances but no overall increase or decrease in abundances during the entire study period. Marine, estuarine and migrant fish species were found in the BCFTB, each showing different seasonal patterns in abundance, similar to nearby estuaries, with 14 species driving these patterns. Water temperature and season were the most influential factors on the species composition of the fish community in the BCFTB. Therefore, 3 years after restoration the BCFTB is providing habitat for coastal fish species where none existed previously, and shows a community structure similar to natural estuaries in southern California. The BCFTB restoration has been initially successful but needs to be monitored periodically to assess its long-term success.

Keywords

Abundance surveys Community ecology Fish habitat Restoration success 

References

  1. Able KW, Nemerson DM, Grothues TM (2004) Evaluating salt marsh restoration in Delaware Bay: analysis of fish response at former salt hay farms. Estuaries 27:58–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Able KW, Grothues TM, Hagan SM, Kimball ME, Nemerson DM, Taghon GL (2008) Long-term response of fishes and other fauna to restoration of former salt hay farm: multiple measures of restoration success. Rev Fish Biol Fish 18:65–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen LG (1982) Seasonal abundance, composition, and productivity of the littoral fish assemblage in Upper Newport Bay, California. Fish Bull NOAA 80:769–790Google Scholar
  4. Allen LG, Findlay AM, Phalen CM (2002) Structure and standing stock of fish assemblages of San Diego Bay, California from 1994 to 1999. Bull South Calif Acad Sci 101:49–85Google Scholar
  5. Allen LG, Yoklavich MM, Cailliet GM, Horn MH (2006) Bays and estuaries. In: Allen LG, Pondella DJ II, Horn MH (eds) The ecology of marine fishes: California and adjacent waters. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 119–148Google Scholar
  6. Barry JP, Yoklavich MM, Cailliet GM, Ambrose DA, Antrim BS (1996) Trophic ecology of the dominant fishes in Elkhorn Slough, California, 1974–1980. Estuaries 19:115–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borja A, Dauer DM, Elliott M, Simenstad CA (2010) Medium- and long-term recovery of estuarine and coastal ecosystems: patterns, rates and restoration effectiveness. Estuar Coasts 33:1249–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campos BR, Fish MA, Jones G, Riley RW, Allen PJ, Klimley PA, Cech JJ, Kelly JT (2009) Movements of brown smooth-hounds, Mustelus henlei, in Tomales Bay, California. Environ Biol Fish 85:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlberg DM (2009) Bolsa Chica: its history from prehistoric times to the present. Amigos de Bolsa Chica, Huntington BeachGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlisle AB, Starr RM (2009) Habitat use, residency, and seasonal distribution of female leopard sharks Triakis semifasciata in Elkhorn Slough, California. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 380:213–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapman DD, Babcock EA, Gruber SH, Dibattista JD, Franks BR, Kessel SA, Guttridge T, Pikitch EK, Feldheim KA (2009) Long-term natal site-fidelity by immature lemon sharks (Negaprion brevirostris) at a subtropical island. Mol Ecol 18:3500–3507Google Scholar
  12. Crain CM, Albertson LK, Bertness MD (2008) Secondary succession dynamics in estuarine marshes across land-scale salinity gradients. Ecology 89:2889–2899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliott M, Hemingway KL, Costella MJ, Duhamel S, Hostens K, Labropoulou M, Marshall S, Winkler H (2002) Links between fish and other trophic levels. In: Elliott M, Hemingway KL (eds) Fishes in estuaries. Blackwell Science, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eschmeyer WN, Herald ES, Hammann H (1983) A field guide to Pacific coast fishes of North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  15. Espinoza M, Farrugia TJ, Lowe CG (2011a) Habitat use, movements and site fidelity of the gray smooth-hound shark (Mustelus californicus Gill 1863) in a newly restored southern California estuary. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 401:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Espinoza M, Farrugia TJ, Webber DM, Smith F, Lowe CG (2011b) Testing a new acoustic telemetry technique to quantify long-term, fine-scale movements of aquatic animals. Fish Res 108:364–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farrugia TJ, Espinoza M, Lowe CG (2011) Abundance, habitat use and movement patterns of the shovelnose guitarfish (Rhinobatos productus) in a restored southern California estuary. Mar Freshw Res 62:648–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fodrie FJ, Herzka SZ (2008) Tracking juvenile fish movement and nursery contribution within arid coastal embayments via otolith microchemistry. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 361:253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gartz R (2004) Length-weight relationships for 18 fish species common to the San Francisco estuary. IEP Newsl 17:49–57Google Scholar
  20. Gillanders BM, Able KW, Brown JA, Eggleston DB, Sheridan PF (2003) Evidence of connectivity between juvenile and adult habitats for mobile marine fauna: an important component of nurseries. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 247:281–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hendricks JN, Horn MH (2008) Foraging ecology of the Elegant Tern (Thalasseus elegans) at the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve with new full tidal basin. Bull South Calif Acad Sci 107:116Google Scholar
  22. Herzka SZ (2005) Assessing connectivity of estuarine fishes based on stable isotope ratio analysis. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 64:58–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hobbs RJ, Norton DA (1996) Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restor Ecol 4(2):93–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hopkins TE, Cech JJ (2003) The influence of environmental variables on the distribution and abundance of three elasmobranchs in Tomales Bay, California. Environ Biol Fish 66:279–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Horn MH, Allen LG (1981) Ecology of fishes in upper Newport Bay, California: seasonal dynamics and community structure. Calif Fish Game 45:101Google Scholar
  26. Irlandi EA, Crawford MK (1997) Habitat linkages: the effect of intertidal saltmarshes and adjacent subtidal habitats on abundance, movement, and growth of an estuarine fish. Oecologia 110:222–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kennish MJ (2002) Environmental threats and environmental future of estuaries. Environ Conserv 29:78–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kirsten DS (2005) Economic consequences of wetland degradation for local populations in Africa. Ecol Econ 53:177–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knapp P, Peterson B (2011) Western snowy plover nesting at Bolsa Chica, Orange County, California. Bolsa Chica Restoration http://www.bolsachicarestoration.org/admincms/lib/fckeditor/uploads/file/Reports/2011%20Bolsa%20Chica%20WSP%20Report.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2012
  30. Kwak TJ, Zedler JB (1997) Food web analysis of southern California coastal wetlands using multiple stable isotopes. Oecologia 110:262–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lapointe NWR, Thiem JD, Doka SE, Cooke SJ (2013) Opportunities for improving aquatic restoration science and monitoring through the use of animal electronic tagging technology. Bioscience 63(5):390–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Latimer JS, Boothman WS, Pesch CE, Chmura GL, Pospelova V, Jayaraman S (2003) Environmental stress and recovery: the geochemical record of human disturbance in New Bedford Harbor and Apponagansett Bay, Massachusetts (USA). Sci Total Environ 313:153–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lowe CG, Bray RN (2006) Fish movement and activity patterns. In: Allen LG, Pondella DJ II, Horn MH (eds) The ecology of marine fishes: California and adjacent waters. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 119–148Google Scholar
  34. Mann KH (2000) Ecology of coastal waters with implications for management. Blackwell Science, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Matern SA, Cech JJ, Hopkins TE (2000) Diel movements of bat rays, Myliobatis californica, in Tomales Bay, California: evidence for behavioral thermoregulation? Environ Biol Fish 58:173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Merkel and Associates (2008) Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project. Monitoring Program Annual Report. http://www.bolsachicarestoration.org/admincms/lib/fckeditor/uploads/file/Reports/Bolsa_Chica_Restoration_2008_Report.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2012
  37. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) (1990) Estuaries of the United States, statistics of a national resource base. Special NOAA 20th Anniversary Report, Strategic Assessment Branch, Office of Oceanography and Marine Assessment, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  38. Pondella DJ, Allen LG, Craig MT, Gintert B (2006) Evaluation of eelgrass mitigation and fishery enhancement structures in San Diego Bay, California. Bull Mar Sci 78:115–131Google Scholar
  39. Potter HL, Hyndes GA (1994) Composition of the fish fauna of a permanently open estuary on the southern coast of Australia, and comparisons with a nearby seasonally closed estuary. Mar Biol 121:199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. R Development Core Team (2005) R: a language and environment of statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, ISBN 3-900051-07-0Google Scholar
  41. Ray GC (2005) Connectivities of estuarine fishes to the coastal realm. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 64:18–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roberts L (1993) Wetland trading is a losing game, say ecologist. Science 260:1890–1892Google Scholar
  43. ter Braak Cajo JF (1994) Canonical community ordination. Part I: basic theory and linear methods. Ecoscience 1:127–140Google Scholar
  44. ter Braak Cajo JF, Verdonschot FM (1995) Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat Sci 57:255–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Turner KR, van den Bergh CJM, Soderqvist T, Barendregt A, van der Straaten J, Malby E, Ierland E (2000) Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy. Ecol Econ 35:7–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Cleve FB, Leschine T, Klinger T, Simenstad C (2006) An evaluation of the influence of natural science in regional-scale restoration projects. Environ Manag 37:367–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Van Dyke E, Wasson K (2005) Historical ecology of a central California estuary: 150 years of habitat change. Estuaries 28:173–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Warren RS, Fell PE, Rozsa R, Brawley AH, Orsted AC, Oldon ET, Swamy V, Niering WA (2002) Salt marsh restoration in Connecticut: 20 years of science and management. Res Ecol 10:497–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. West JM, Williams GD, Madon SP, Zedler JB (2003) Integrating spatial and temporal variability into the analysis of fish food web linkages in Tijuana estuary. Environ Biol Fish 67:297–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wood S (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  51. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  52. Zedler JB (1996) Coastal mitigation in southern California: the need for a regional restoration strategy. Ecol Appl 6:84–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zedler JB, Callaway JC (1999) Tracking wetland restoration: do mitigation sites follow desired trajectories? Res Ecol 7:69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zedler JB, Williams GD, Desmond JS (1997) Wetland mitigation: can fishes distinguish between natural and constructed wetlands? Fisheries 22:26–28Google Scholar
  55. Zedler JB, Callaway JC, Sullivan G (2001) Declining biodiversity: why species matter and how their functions might be restored in Californian tidal marshes. Bioscience 51:1005–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas J. Farrugia
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mario Espinoza
    • 1
  • Christopher G. Lowe
    • 1
  1. 1.California State UniversityLong BeachUSA
  2. 2.University of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksUSA

Personalised recommendations