Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hydroacoustic tracking of the endangered Atlantic whitefish (Coregonus huntsmani); comparative analysis from wild and hatchery reared populations

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Atlantic whitefish (Coregonus huntsmani) are an endangered species located in only three lakes in Nova Scotia, Canada. Conservation efforts are directed toward increasing their range and number of viable populations. Current stocking programs use hatchery reared fish. The goal of the study was to determine the survival and distribution of hatchery reared Atlantic whitefish after release. Comparative hydroacoustic tracking experiments were performed to examine the survival, depth preferences and movements of hatchery reared and wild Atlantic whitefish. Hatchery reared fish were released to a non native lake whereas wild fish were released back to their native lake. Hatchery reared fish were ‘lost’ from the study lakes through presumed predation at a much higher rate (67 %) than wild released (6.5 %). Mortality rate in wild released fish was higher (50 %) than hatchery reared fish (20 %) and were likely due to the increased stress associated with handling or tagging. Movements were tracked over 248 and 342 days for wild captured and hatchery reared fish respectively. Hatchery reared fish were slow to disperse from the release site (mean ± standard error; 12 ± 3.2 days) and swam at the surface of the water for extended periods, which could have led to the unknown losses of these fish. After dispersal throughout the lake, however, the hatchery-reared fish were distributed in depths similar to those of the wild released fish, an important finding for the use of hatchery-reared fish in conservation. Results are discussed to improve hatchery practices for fish destined for stocking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anras MLB, Lagardere JP (2004) Domestication and behaviour in fish. Prod Anim 17:211–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Aprahamian MW, Smith KM, Mcginnity P, Mckelvey S, Taylor J (2003) Restocking of salmonids - opportunities and limitations. Fish Res 62:211–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araki H, Cooper B, Blouin MS (2007) Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild. Science 318:100–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford RG, Longard D, Longue P (2004a) Status, trend and recovery considerations in support of an allowable harm assessment for Atlantic whitefish (Coregonus huntsmani). Can Sci Adv Secr Res Doc 2004/109

  • Bradford RG, Schaefer H, Stevens G (2004b) Scope for human induced mortality in the context of Atlantic whitefish (Coregonus huntsmani) survival and recovery. Can Sci Adv Secr Res Doc 2004/110

  • Bradford RG, Bentzen P, Campbell DM, Cook AM, Gibson AJF, Whitelaw J (2010) Update status report for atlantic whitefish (Coregonus huntsmani). Can Sci Advis Sec Res Doc 2010/005. vi + 39 p

  • Brennan NP, Darcy MC, Leber KM (2006) Predator-free enclosures improve post-release survival of stocked common snook. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 335:302–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brokordt KB, Fernandez M, Gaymer CF (2006) Domestication reduces the capacity to escape from predators. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 329:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell RC, Williams R (1983) Post-stocking movements and recapture of hatchery-reared trout released into flowing waters - effect of prior acclimation to flow. J Fish Biol 23:265–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edge TA (1984) Preliminary status of the Acadian whitefish (Coregonus canadensis). Can Field Nat 98:86–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R (2008) Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs. Mol Ecol 17:325–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hindar K, Ryman N, Utter F (1991) Genetic effects of cultured fish on natural fish populations. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:945–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntingford FA (2004) Implications of domestication and rearing conditions for the behaviour of cultivated fishes. J Fish Biol 65:122–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings JA, Fraser DJ (2008) The nature of fisheries- and farming-induced evolution. Mol Ecol 17:294–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft S, Aastveit AH, Torjesen PA, Andersen O (2005) Effects of stress on growth, cortisol and glucose levels in non-domesticated eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis) and domesticated rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Comp Biochem Phys A 141:353–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey G, Mclean JE, Quinn TP (2001) Comparisons of run timing, spatial distribution, and length of wild and newly established hatchery populations of steelhead in Forks Creek, Washington. N Am J Fish Manag 21:717–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller GA, Marsh PC, Foster D, Ulibarri M, Burke T (2003) Factors influencing poststocking dispersal of razorback sucker. N Am J Fish Man 23:270–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paukert CP, Ward DL, Sponholtz PJ, Hilwig KD (2005) Effects of repeated hoopnetting and handling on bonytail chub. J Freshw Ecol 20:649–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pister EP (2001) Wilderness fish stocking: history and perspective. Ecosystems 4:279–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisenbichler RR, McIntyre JD (1977) Genetic differences in growth and survival of juvenile hatchery and wild Steelehead Trout (Salmo gairdner). J Fish Res Bd Can 34:123–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roland AE (1982) Geological background and physiography of Nova Scotia. The Nova Scotian Institute of Science, Halifax

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair ARE, Pech RP, Dickman CR, Hik D, Mahon P, Newsome AE (1998) Predicting effects of predation on conservation of endangered prey. Conserv Biol 12:564–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg K (1985) Foraging activity patterns in the goosander (Mergus merganser) and the red-breasted merganser (M. serrator) in relation to patterns of activity in their major prey species. Oecologia 67(1):35–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waples RS (1999) Dispelling some myths about hatcheries. Fisheries 24:12–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildhaber ML, Lamberson PJ (2004) Importance of the habitat choice behavior assumed when modeling the effects of food and temperature on fish populations. Ecol Model 175:395–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Endangered Species Recovery Fund through the World Wildlife Federation to PB and AMC, and an NSERC Discovery Grant to PB. The authors acknowledge the work of Bev Davison and John Whitelaw at the Mersery Biodiversity Facility, Department of Fisheries and Oceans who raised and released the hatchery-reared fish. Recommendations by two anonymous reviewers significantly improved this manuscript. All experiments were reviewed and approved by the Dalhousie University Animal Care Committee prior to the initiation of experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Cook.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cook, A.M., Bradford, R.G. & Bentzen, P. Hydroacoustic tracking of the endangered Atlantic whitefish (Coregonus huntsmani); comparative analysis from wild and hatchery reared populations. Environ Biol Fish 97, 955–964 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-013-0197-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-013-0197-4

Keywords

Navigation