Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 97, Issue 7, pp 821–838 | Cite as

Big fish in shallow water; use of an intertidal surf-zone habitat by large-bodied teleosts and elasmobranchs in tropical northern Australia

  • Andrew J. TobinEmail author
  • Amos Mapleston
  • Alastair V. Harry
  • Mario Espinoza


Shallow intertidal habitats are recognised as critical for larval and juvenile fish, and are often assumed to function as refuge areas where predation risk is reduced. Yet there is growing evidence that suggest these areas may also be regularly inhabited by large bodied fish and be the site of high levels of juvenile fish predation. In the present study we examined the use of an intermittently available surf zone habitat in tropical northern Australia by a diverse community of large-bodied teleosts (mean total length 444 mm), sharks (mean total stretched length 658 mm) and rays (mean total stretched length 1,108 mm). Drawing on the methods and ecological knowledge of a local commercial fishery, gillnets were used to capture fish as they entered the surf zone on the flooding tide. Monthly surveys over a one-year period revealed a dynamic assemblage consisting of 30 species of teleosts (mostly caught as adults) and 14 species of sharks and rays (mostly caught as juveniles or young of the year). Although it is unclear why these fish use this habitat, we conclude that it may support a broad range of biological benefits including spawning for teleosts, parturition for elasmobranchs, as well as foraging and refuge. The unique findings of this study highlight existing knowledge gaps and the need to better understand what fish use the intertidal zone and why. This should be a high priority given the increasing anthropogenic pressures on coastal margins.


Shallow water Intertidal Surf zone Spawning Refuge 



This study was funded by the Australian Commonwealth Government Marine and Tropical Scientific Research Facility (MTSRF), Project 4.8.4 and carried out under James Cook University Ethics Approval A1566. The authors thank the many volunteers that assisted with the field work as well as two anonymous reviewers whose comments helped improve this manuscript.


  1. Able KW, Jones KMM, Fox DA (2009) Large nektonic fishes in marsh creek habitats in the Delaware Bay estuary. Northeast Nat 16:27–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Able KW, Wuenschel MJ, Grothues TM, Vasslides JM, Rowe PM (2013) Do surf zones in New Jersey provide “nursery” habitat for southern fishes? Environ Biol Fish 96:661–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abrahams M, Kattenfeld M (1997) The role of turbidity as a constraint on predator–prey interactions in aquatic environments. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40:169–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ackerman JT, Kondratieff MC, Matern SA, Cech JJ (2000) Tidal influence on spatial dynamics of leopard sharks, Triakis semifasciata, in Tomales Bay, California. Environ Biol Fishes 58:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker R, Sheaves M (2006) Visual surveys reveal high densities of large piscivores in shallow estuarine nurseries. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 323:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker R, Sheaves M (2007) Shallow-water refuge paradigm: conflicting evidence from tethering experiments in a tropical estuary. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 349:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banks SA, Skilleter GA (2002) Mapping intertidal habitats and an evaluation of their conservation status in Queensland, Australia. Ocean Coast Manage 45:485–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Becker A, Cowley PD, Whitfield AK, Jarnegren J, Naesje TF (2011) Diel fish movements in the littoral zone of a temporarily closed South African estuary. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 406:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bennett BA (1989) The fish community of a moderately exposed beach on the southwestern Cape Coast of South-Africa and an assessment of this habitat as a nursery for juvenile fish. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 28:293–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blaber SJM, Brewer DT, Salini JP (1995) Fish communities and the nursery role of the shallow inshore waters of a tropical bay in the Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 40:177–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blaber SJM, Cyrus DP, Albaret JJ, Ching CV, Day JW, Elliott M, Fonseca MS, Hoss DE, Orensanz J, Potter IC, Silvert W (2000) Effects of fishing on the structure and functioning of estuarine and nearshore ecosystems. ICES J Mar Sci 57:590–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown AC, McLachlan A (2002) Sandy shore ecosystems and the threats facing them: some predictions for the year 2025. Environ Conserv 29:62–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carlisle AB, Starr RM (2009) Habitat use, residency, and seasonal distribution of female leopard sharks Triakis semifasciata in Elkhorn Slough, California. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 380:213–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castellanos-Galindo GA, Krumme U, Willis TJ (2010) Tidal influences on fish distributions on tropical eastern Pacific rocky shores (Colombia). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 416:241–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clarke KR (1993) Nonparametric Multivariate Analyses of Changes in Community Structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2001) Primer version 5, vol Primer E. Plymouth, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Compagno LJV (1984) Sharks of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. FAO species catalogue, Hexanchiformes to Lamniformes. FAO Fisheries Synopsis 125 Vol. 4, Part 1. Food and Agriculture Organization, RomeGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis TL (1985) The food of barramundi Lates calcarifer (Bloch), in coastal and inland waters of Van Diemen Gulf and the Gulf of Carpentaria Australia. J Fish Biol 26:669–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Denny M, Dairiki J, Distefano S (1992) Biological consequences of topography on wave-swept rocky shores .1. Enhancement of external fertilization. Biol Bull (Woods Hole) 183:220–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Erisman BE, Buckhorn ML, Hastings PA (2007) Spawning patterns in the leopard grouper, Mycteroperca rosacea, in comparison with other aggregating groupers. Mar Biol 151:1849–1861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Espinoza M, Farrugia TJ, Lowe CG (2011) Habitat use, movements and site fidelity of the gray smooth-hound shark (Mustelus californicus Gill 1863) in a newly restored southern California estuary. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 401:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Froeschke J, Stunz GW, Wildhaber ML (2010) Environmental influences on the occurrence of coastal sharks in estuarine waters. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 407:279–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gordoa A (2009) Characterization of the infralittoral system along the north-east Spanish coast based on sport shore-based fishing tournament catches. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 82:41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gutteridge AN, Bennett MB, Huveneers C, Tibbetts IR (2011) Assessing the overlap between the diet of a coastal shark and the surrounding prey communities in a sub-tropical embayment. J Fish Biol 78:1405–1422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hammerschlag N, Morgan AB, Serafy JE (2010) Relative predation risk for fishes along a subtropical mangrove-seagrass ecotone. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 401:259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harry AV, Tobin AJ, Simpfendorfer CA, Welch DJ, Mapleston A, White J, Williams AJ, Stapley J (2011) Evaluating catch and mitigating risk in a multi-species, tropical, inshore shark fishery within the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area. Mar Freshw Res 62:710–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harvey CJ (1998) Use of sandy beach habitat by Fundulus majalis, a surf-zone fish. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 164:307–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heithaus MR, Dill LM, Marshall GJ, Buhleier BM (2002) Habitat use and foraging behaviour of tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) in a seagrass ecosystem. Mar Biol 140:237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heupel MR, Simpfendorfer CA (2002) Estimation of mortality of juvenile blacktip sharks, Carcharhinus limbatus, within a nursery area using telemetry data. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:624–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heupel MR, Carlson JK, Simpfendorfer CA (2007) Shark nursery areas: concepts, definition, characterization and assumptions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 337:287–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hight BV, Lowe CG (2007) Elevated body temperatures of adult female leopard sharks, Triakis semifasciata, while aggregating in shallow nearshore embayments: evidence for behavioral thermoregulation? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 352:114–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hay DE, McCarter PB, Daniel KS, Schweigert JF (2009) Spatial diversity of Pacific herring (Clupea pallasi) spawning areas. ICES J Mar Sci 66:1662–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jensen SG, Aagaard T, Baldock TE, Kroon A, Hughes M (2009) Berm formation and dynamics on a gently sloping beach; the effect of water level and swash overtopping. Earth Surf Process Landforms 34:1533–1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jirik KE, Lowe CG (2012) An elasmobranch maternity ward: female round stingrays Urobatis halleri use warm, restored estuarine habitat during gestation. J Fish Biol 80:1227–1245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kinney MJ (2011) The communal nursery area paradigm revisited : niche overlap versus niche separation among juvenile shark species in Cleveland Bay. PhD dissertation, James Cook University, Townsville, QLDGoogle Scholar
  36. Kinney MJ, Hussey NE, Fish AT, Tobin AJ, Simpfendorfer CA (2011) Communal or competitive? Stable isotope analysis provides evidence of resource partitioning within a communal shark nursery. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 439:263–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Knip DM, Heupel MR, Simpfendorfer CA (2010) Sharks in nearshore environments: models, importance, and consequences. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 402:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Knip DM, Heupel MR, Simpfendorfer CA, Tobin AJ, Moloney J (2011) Ontogenetic shifts in movement and habitat use of juvenile pigeye sharks Carcharhinus amboinensis in a tropical nearshore region. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 425:233–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Krumme U, Brenner M, Saint-Paul U (2008) Spring-neap cycle as a major driver of temporal variations in feeding of intertidal fishes: evidence from the sea catfish Sciades herzbergii (Ariidae) of equatorial west Atlantic mangrove creeks. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 367:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lasiak TA (1984) Structural aspects of the surf-zone fish assemblage at Kings Beach, Algoa Bay, South Africa - long term fluctuations. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 18:459–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Layman CA (2000) Fish assemblage structure of the shallow ocean surf-zone on the eastern shore of Virginia barrier islands. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 51:201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ley JA, Halliday IA, Tobin AJ, Garrett RN, Gribble NA (2002) Ecosystem effects of fishing closures in mangrove estuaries of tropical Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 245:223–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lotze HK, Lenihan HS, Bourque BJ, Bradbury RH, Cooke RG, Kay MC, Kidwell SM, Kirby MX, Peterson CH, Jackson JBC (2006) Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science 312:1806–1809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lowe CG (2002) Bioenergetics of free-ranging juvenile scalloped hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna lewini) in Kane’ohe Bay, Oahu, HI. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 278:141–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Matern SA, Cech JJ, Hopkins TE (2000) Diel movements of bat rays, Myliobatis californica, in Tomales Bay, California: evidence for behavioral thermoregulation? Environ Biol Fish 58:173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mead KS, Denny MW (1995) The effects of hydrodynamic shear-stress on fertilization and early development of the purple sea-urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Biol Bull (Woods Hole) 188:46–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Morley SA, Toft JD, Hanson KM (2012) Ecological effects of shoreline armouring on intertidal habitats of a Puget Sound urban estuary. Estuar Coast 35:774–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nanami A, Endo T (2007) Seasonal dynamics of fish assemblage structures in a surf zone on an exposed sandy beach in Japan. Ichthyol Res 54:277–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Park HH, Millar RB, Bae BS, An HC, Chun YY, Yang JH, Yoon SC (2011) Size selectivity of Korean flounder (Glyptocephalus stelleri) by gillnets and trammel nets using an extension of SELECT for experiements with differing mesh sizes. Fish Res 107:196–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Quinn T, Krueger K, Pierce K, Penttila D, Perry K, Hicks T, Lowry D (2012) Patterns of surf smelt, Hypomesus pretiosus, intertidal spawning habitat use in Puget Sound, Washington State. Estuar Coast 35:1214–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Development Core Team R (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vol. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  52. Robertson AI, Lenanton RCJ (1984) Fish community structure and food-chain dynamics in the surf-zone of sandy beaches – the role of detached macrophyte detritus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 84:265–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ryer CH, Laurel BJ, Stoner AW (2010) Testing the shallow water refuge hypothesis in flatfish nurseries. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 415:275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sheaves MJ (1992) Patterns of distribution and abundance of fishes in different habitats of a mangrove-lined tropical estuary, as determined by fish trapping. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 43:1461–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Simpfendorfer C (1992) Biology of tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) caught by the Queensland Shark Meshing Program off Townsville, Australia. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 43:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Simpfendorfer CA, Milward NE (1993) Utilisation of a tropical bay as a nursery area by sharks of the families Charcharinidae and Sphyrinidae. Environ Biol Fishes 37:337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Simpfendorfer CA, Freitas GG, Wiley TR, Heupel MR (2005) Distribution and habitat partitioning of immature bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas) in a southwest Florida estuary. Estuaries 28:78–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Simpfendorfer CA, Wiley TR, Yeiser BG (2010) Improving conservation planing for an endangered sawfish using data from acoustic telemtry. Biol Cons 143:1460–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Speed CW, Meekan MG, Field IC, McMahon CR, Bradshaw CJA (2012) Heat-seeking sharks: support for behavioural thermoregulation in reef sharks. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 463:231–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. ter Braak CJF (1986) Canonical correspondence-analysis—a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (1998) CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide to Canoco for Winds: software for canonical community ordination, ver 4. Microcomputer Power, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  62. ter Braak CJF, Verdonschot PFM (1995) Canonical correspondence-analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat Sci 57:255–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vaudo JJ, Lowe CG (2006) Movement patterns of the round stingray Urobatis halleri (Cooper) near a thermal outfall. J Fish Biol 68:1756–1766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Watt-Pringle P, Strydom NA (2003) Habitat use by larval fishes in a temperate South African surf zone. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 58:765–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. West G (1990) Methods of assessing ovarian development in fishes—a review. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 41:199–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. White JW, Heupel MR, Simpfendorfer CA, Tobin AJ (2013) Shark-like batoids in Pacific fisheries: prevalence and conservation concerns. Endang Species Res 19:277–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. White WT, Potter IC (2004) Habitat partitioning among four elasmobranch species in nearshore, shallow waters of a subtropical embayment in Western Australia. Mar Biol 145:1023–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew J. Tobin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Amos Mapleston
    • 1
  • Alastair V. Harry
    • 1
  • Mario Espinoza
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture & School of Earth Environmental SciencesJames Cook UniversityQueenslandAustralia

Personalised recommendations