Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Habitat associations of fish assemblages in the Cache River, Illinois

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fish and habitat were sampled by state agencies at 48 stations throughout the Cache River watershed, Illinois between 1992 and 2009. Two distinct fish assemblages were identified, one primarily found in the lower mainstem Cache River and a second found throughout tributaries and the upper mainstem Cache River. Using a canonical correspondence analysis, the distribution of fish species was largely explained by substrate, land use, drainage area and local habitat features. Creek chub, central stoneroller, fringed darter and fantail darter are species found to be positively associated with gravel substrate and forest. In contrast, black buffalo, gizzard shad, smallmouth buffalo, freshwater drum and bigmouth buffalo were positively associated with drainage area, silt, channel width and row crops. Cobble appears to be rare habitat associated with fringed darter, freckled madtom and fantail darter. Results suggest that substrate, land use and local habitat features influence fish assemblages within the Cache River watershed. This information contributes to both understanding aquatic community structure in a highly altered yet diverse watershed as well as management activities within the Cache River watershed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler S, Hubener T, Dressler M, Lotter AF, Anderson NJ (2010) A comparison of relative abundance versus class data in diatom-based quantitative reconstructions. Journal of Environmental Management 91(6):1380–1388. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allan JD (2004) Landscapes and riverscapes: The influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 35:257–284. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.120202.110122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan JD, Erickson DL, Fay J (1997) The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biology 37(1):149–161. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.d01-546.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allgire RL, Cahill RA (2001) Benchmark sedimentation survey of the lower Cache River Wetlands. State Water Survey Contract Report 2001–17, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Benda L, Poff NL, Miller D, Dunne T, Reeves G, Pess G, Pollock M (2004) The network dynamics hypothesis: How channel networks structure riverine habitats. Bioscience 54(5):413–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett D, Middleton B, Kraft S, Lant C, Sengupta R, Beaulieu J, Sharpe D, Cook K, Burr B, Beck R, Flanagan K (2001) Ecosystem function and restoration in the Cache River Bioreserve. Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Carbondale

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkman H, Rabeni CF (1987) Effects of siltation on stream communities. Environmental Biology of Fishes 18:285–294. doi:10.1007/BF00004881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt ES, Sudduth E, Palmer MA, Allan JD, Meyer JL, Alexander G, Follstad Shah J, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Lave R, Rumps J, Pagano L (2007) Restoring rivers one reach at a time: Results from a survey of U.S. river restoration practitioners. Restoration Ecology 15(3):482–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhowmik N, Hibbeler S, Howard B, Demissie M, Gatz D, Angel J, Wendland W (1997) Hydrology, air quality, and climate. In: Illinois Department of Natural Resources (ed) Cache River Area Assessment, vol 1 (1). p 62

  • Bond NR, Lake PS (2003) Characterizing fish-habitat associations in streams as the first step in ecological restoration. Austral Ecology 28:611–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DJ, Coon TG (1994) Abundance and assemblage structure of fish larvae in the Lower Missouri River and its tributaries. T Am Fish Soc 123(5):718–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burr B, Cook K, Einsenhour D, Piller K, Poly W, Sauer R, Taylor C, Atwood E, Seegert G (1996) Selected Illinois fishes in jeopardy: New records and status evaluations. 89:169–186

  • Burr BM (1992) The fishes of Illinois: An overview of a dynamic fauna. In: Page LM, Jeffords MR (eds) Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin, vol 34. 427, Champaign, p 417

    Google Scholar 

  • Cache River Watershed Resource Planning Committee (1995) Cache River Watershed Resource Plan.

  • Cooper SD, Diehl S, Kratz K, Sarnelle O (1998) Implications of scale for patterns and processes in stream ecology. Austral Ecology 23:27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demissie M, Bekele E, Lian Y, Keefer L (2010) Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling for evaluating alternatives for managed connection of the Upper and Lower Cache Rivers. Illinois State Water Survey Contract Report 2010–06, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Demissie M, Soong TW, Allgire R, Keefer L, Makowski P (1990) Cache river basin: Hydrology, hydraulics, and sediment transport, vol 1. Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Dettmers JM, Geutreuter S, Wahl DH, Soluk DA (2001) Patterns in abundance of fishes in main channels of the upper Mississippi River system. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:933–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Systems Research Institute (2011) ArcGIS desktop: Release 9.2. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans JW, Noble RL (1979) The longitudinal distribution of fishes in an East Texas stream. American Midland Naturalist 101(2):333–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fausch KD, Karr JR, Yant PR (1984) Regional application of an index of biotic integrity based on stream fish communities. T Am Fish Soc 113:39–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fausch KD, Torgersen CE, Baxter CV, Li HW (2002) Landscapes to riverscapes: Bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. Bioscience 52(6):483–498. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0483:LTRBTG]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer JR, Paukert CP (2008) Habitat relationships with fish assemblages in minimally disturbed Great Plains regions. Ecol Freshw Fish 17(4):597–609. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0633.2008.00312.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frissell CA, Liss WJ, Warren CE, Hurley MD (1986) A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification - viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Management 10(2):199–214. doi:10.1007/BF01867358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guetersloh M (2002) Big creek watershed restoration plan: A component of the cache river watershed resource plan. Cache River Watershed Resource Planning Committee, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy CS, Brown MB (2007) Analysis and interpretation of freshwater fisheries data. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding JS, Benfield EF, Bolstad PV, Helfman GS, Jones EBD (1998) Stream biodiversity: The ghost of land use past. P Natl Acad Sci USA 95(25):14843–14847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich K (2011) Insect emergence and riparian bird responses to rock weir construction in the Cache River Basin of Southern Illinois. Southern Illinois University—Carbondale, Carbondale

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeinghaus DJ, Winemiller KO, Birnbaum JS (2007) Local and regional determinants of stream fish assemblage structure: Inferences based on taxonomic vs. functional groups. Journal of Biogeography 34(2):324–338. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01587.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover JJ, Killgore KJ (1997) Fish communities. In: Messina MG, Conner WH (eds) Southern forested wetlands:ecology and management. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter RG, Faulkner SP, Gibson KA (2008) The importance of hydrology in restoration of bottomland hardwood wetland functions. Wetlands 28(3):605–615. doi:10.1672/07-139.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board (2011) Checklist of endangered and threatened animals and plants of Illinois. Springfield, IL

  • Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (1994) Quality assurance and field methods manual. Springfield, IL

  • Jackson DA, Walker SC, Poos MS (2010) Cluster analysis of fish community data: “New” tools for determining meaningful groupings of sites and species assemblages. In: Gido KB, Jackson DA (eds) Community ecology of stream fishes: Concepts, approaches and techniques, vol Symposium 73. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman RHG, Ter Braak CJF, Van Tongeren OFR (1995) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR (1981) Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6(6):21–27. doi:10.1577/1548-8446(1981)006<0021:AOBIUF>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR, Toth LA, Dudley DR (1985) Fish communities of Midwestern rivers—a history of degradation. Bioscience 35(2):90–95. doi:10.2307/1309845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse BS, Groninger JW (2003) Vegetative characteristics of recently reforested bottomlands in the lower cache river watershed, Illinois, U.S.A. Restoration Ecology 11(3):273–280. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00178.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak TJ, Peterson JT (2007) Community indices, parameters, and comparisons. In: Guy CS, Brown ML (eds) Analysis and interpretation of freshwater fisheries data. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake PS, Bond N, Reich P (2007) Linking ecological theory with stream restoration. Freshwater Biology 52(4):597–615. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01709.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lammert M, Allan JD (1999) Assessing biotic integrity of streams: Effects of scale in measuring the influence of land use/cover and habitat structure on fish and macroinvertebrates. Environmental Management 23(2):257–270. doi:10.1007/s002679900184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh-Matthews E, Matthews WJ (2000) Geographic, terrestrial and aquatic factors: which most influence the structure of stream fish assemblages in the midwestern United States? Ecol Freshw Fish 9(1–2):9–21. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0633.2000.90103.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly RL, Herricks EE, Johnston DM (1993) Channelization and levee construction in Illinois - review and implications for management. Environmental Management 17(6):781–795. doi:10.1007/BF02393899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution 14(11):450–453. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01679-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muir DB, Hite RL, King MM, Matson MR (1995) An intensive survey of the cache river basin: Summer 1992, vol IEPA/WPC/95–013. Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Marion

    Google Scholar 

  • Omernik JM (1987) Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Map (scale 1:7,500,000). Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77(1):118–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne LL, Wiley MJ (1992) Influence of tributary spatial position on the structure of warmwater fish communities. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49(4):671–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Ambrose RF, Poff NL (1997) Ecological theory and community restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 5(4):291–300. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100X.1997.00543.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Bernhardt ES, Allan JD, Lake PS, Alexander G, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm CN, Shah JF, Galat DL, Loss SG, Goodwin P, Hart DD, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Kondolf GM, Lave R, Meyer JL, O’Donnell TK, Pagano L, Sudduth E (2005) Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42(2):208–217. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01004.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pease AA, Taylor JM, Winemiller KO, King RS (2011) Multiscale environmental influences on fish assemblage structure in Central Texas streams. T Am Fish Soc 140(5):1409–1427. doi:10.1080/00028487.2011.623994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pflieger WL (1997) The Fishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillippi MA, Burr BM, Brandon RA (1986) A preliminary survey of the aquatic fauna of the cache river in johnson and pulaski counties. Illinois. Illinois Department of Conservation, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL (1997) Landscape filters and species traits: Towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16(2):391–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poly WJ, Wilson AK (1998) The fringed darter, Etheostoma crossopterum, in the Cache river basin of southern Illinois (Percidae: Subgenus Catonotus). Ohio Journal of Science 98(2):6–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Power ME, Stout RJ, Cushing CE, Harper PP, Hauer FR, Matthews WJ, Moyle PB, Statzner B, Wais De Badgen IR (1988) Biotic and abiotic controls in river and stream communities. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7(4):456–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quist MC, Hubert WA, Isaak DJ (2004) Fish assemblage structure and relations with environmental conditions in a Rocky Mountain watershed. Canadian Journal of Zoology 82(1554–1565). doi:10.1139/Z04-134

  • Rabeni CF, Smale MA (1995) Effects of siltation on stream fishes and the potential mitigating role of the buffering riparian zone. Hydrobiologia 303:211–219. doi:10.1007/BF00034058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahel FJ (2002) Homogenization of freshwater faunas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33:291–315. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolysis.33.010802.150429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahel FJ, Hubert WA (1991) Fish assemblages and habitat gradients in a Rocky Mountain - Great Plains stream: Biotic zonation and additive patterns of community change. T Am Fish Soc 12:319–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raibley PT, Irons KS, O’Hara TM, Blodgett KD, Sparks RE (1997) Winter habitats used by largemouth bass in the Illinois River, a large river-floodplain system. N Am J Fish Manage 17:401–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE (1987) Community diversity—relative roles of local and regional processes. Science 235(4785):167–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roth NR, Allan JD, Erickson DL (1996) Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales. Landscape Ecology 11:141–156. doi:10.1007/BF02447513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser IJ (1982) Fish community structure and function along two habitat gradients in a headwater stream. Ecol Monogr 52:395–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser IJ (1991) Stream fish ecology: A landscape perspective. BioScience 41(10):704–712. doi:10.2307/1311765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shasteen SP, Matson MR, King MM, Levesque JM, Minton GL, Tripp SJ, Muir DB (2002) An intensive survey of the cache river basin, summer 1999. Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Marion

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimodaira H (2002) An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst Biol 51(3):492–508. doi:10.1080/10635150290069913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith PW (2002) The fishes of Illinois. University of Illinois Press, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart JS, Wang LZ, Lyons J, Horwatich JA, Bannerman R (2001) Influences of watershed, riparian-corridor, and reach-scale characteristics on aquatic biota in agricultural watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37(6):1475–1487. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03654.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki R, Shimodaira H (2011) pvclust: Hierarchical clustering with p-values via multiscale bootstrap resampling. R Library http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pvclust/index.html.

  • Talmage PJ, Perry JA, Goldstein RM (2002) Relation of instream habitat and physical conditions to fish communities of agricultural streams in the northern Midwest. N Am J Fish Manage 22(3):825–833. doi:10.1577/1548-8675(2002)022<0825:ROIHAP>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2002) CANOCO 4.5, Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornbrugh D, Gido KB (2010) Influence of spatial positioning within stream networks on fish assemblage structure in the Kansas River basin, USA. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 67:143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Union County Soil and Water Conservation District (2006) Big Creek pilot project. Anna, IL

  • Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummin KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE (1980) The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37:130–137. doi:10.1139/f80-017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waite IR, Carpenter KD (2000) Associations among fish assemblage structure and environmental variables in Willamette Basin streams, Oregon. T Am Fish Soc 129(3):754–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther DA, Whiles MR (2008) Macroinvertebrate responses to constructed riffles in the Cache River, Illinois, USA. Environmental Management 41(4):516–527. doi:10.1007/s00267-007-9058-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warren ML, Burr BM (1989) Distribution, abundance and status of the cypress minnow, Hybognathus hayi, an endangered Illinois species. Natural Areas Journal 163 9(3):1–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (2002) Riverine landscape: taking landscape ecology into the water. Freshwater Biology 47:501–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all personnel involved from Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Illinois Natural History Survey and Illinois Environmental Protection Agency for sharing data for this study. We would especially like to thank Jana Hirst, Les Frankland, Jim Mick and technicians involved in data collection. Funding was provided by the National Science Foundation—Integrated Graduate Education, Research and Training program, “Watershed Science and Policy” at Southern Illinois University Carbondale.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Resources and Policy Program, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, 62901, USA

    Kristen L. Bouska

  2. Center for Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences and Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, 62901, USA

    Gregory Whitledge

Authors
  1. Kristen L. Bouska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gregory Whitledge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristen L. Bouska.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bouska, K.L., Whitledge, G. Habitat associations of fish assemblages in the Cache River, Illinois. Environ Biol Fish 97, 27–42 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-013-0120-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-013-0120-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation