Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 96, Issue 8, pp 927–939 | Cite as

Movements and dispersal of farmed Atlantic salmon following a simulated-escape event

  • Øyvind SolemEmail author
  • Richard D. Hedger
  • Henning A. Urke
  • Torstein Kristensen
  • Finn Økland
  • Eva M. Ulvan
  • Ingebrigt Uglem


One of the major challenges for understanding the ecological impact of escaped farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) is predicting their dispersal patterns after an escape event. Here, we quantify the behaviour of escaped farmed salmon using a simulated-escape experiment within a Norwegian fjord system. Thirty-seven individuals were tagged with acoustic transmitters and their spatial distribution, horizontal movements and diving behaviour was monitored throughout the fjord and accompanying rivers using 29 acoustic receivers. A rapid movement away from the release site occurred. There was no movement into the rivers feeding the fjord and there was no preference for residence at the fish farms: nearly a third of the individuals had a final detection in the outer part of the fjord and no detections occurred from approximately 2 months after release. As it is unlikely that all fish died or remained undetected within the study area it is reasonable to assume that a substantial proportion of the fish moved out of the fjord system. If a recapture program is not implemented immediately after an escape event, we recommend spreading potential recapture efforts over a relatively large area.


Fish farms Atlantic salmon Escape patterns Acoustic telemetry 



This study was funded by the Fisheries Directorate and the Directorate for Nature Management and was conducted as collaboration between the Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) and Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA). We would especially like to thank Aqua Gen Marine for very helpful collaboration. They supplied farmed Atlantic salmon, premises for tagging the fish, and deployed out receivers on some of their farms in the fjord. We would also like to thank Marine Harvest Norway AS and Lerøy Hydrotech AS for placing out receivers at some of their farms. Finally, we would like to thank Jo Arve Alfredsen, NTNU, for assistance under field work spring 2011.


  1. Anon (2011) Status for norske laksebestander i 2011. Rapport fra Vitenskapelig råd for lakseforvaltning nr 3:1–285Google Scholar
  2. Chittenden CM, Rikardsen AH, Skilbrei O, Davidsen JG, Halttunen E, Skarðhamar J, McKinley RS (2011) An effective method for the recapture of escaped farmed salmon. Aqua Environ Interact 1:215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ferguson A, Fleming I, Hindar K, Skaala Ø, McGinnity P, Cross TF, Prodöhl P (2007) Farm escapes. In: Verspoor E, Stradmeyer L, Nielsen JL (eds) The Atlantic salmon: genetics, conservation and management. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 357–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fiskeridirektoratet (2012) Statistikk for akvakultur. (
  5. Hansen LP (2006) Migration and survival of farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) released from two Norwegian fish farms. ICES J Mar Sci 63:1211–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hansen LP, Youngson AF (2010) Dispersal of large farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, from simulated escapes at fish farms in Norway and Scotland. Fish Manag Ecol 17:28–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hedger RD, Martin F, Hatin D, Caron F, Whoriskey FG, Dodson JJ (2008) Active migration of wild Atlantic salmon Salmo salar smolt through a coastal embayment. Mar Ecol Prog Series 355:235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heggberget TG, Økland F, Ugedal O (1993) Distribution and migratory behaviour of adult wild and farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) during return migration. Aquaculture 118:73–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hindar K, Fleming IA, McGinnity P, Diserud O (2006) Genetic and ecological effects of salmon farming on native salmon: modeling from experimental results. ICES J Mar Sci 63:1234–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jákupsstovu SHI (1988) Exploitation and migration of salmon in Faroese waters. In: Mills D, Piggins D (eds) Atlantic salmon: Planning for the future. Croom Helm, London, pp 458–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jensen Ø, Dempster T, Thorstad EB, Uglem I, Fredheim A (2010) Escapes of fishes from Norwegian sea-cage aquaculture: causes, consequences and prevention. Aqua Environ Interact 1:71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jepsen N, Holthe E, Økland F (2006) Observations of predation on salmon and trout smolts in a river mouth. Fish Manag Ecol 13:341–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McGinnity P, Prodöhl P, Maoiléidigh NÓ, Hynes R et al (2004) Differential lifetime success and performance of native and non-native Atlantic salmon examined under communal natural conditions. J Fish Biol 65:173–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meister AL (1984) The marine migration of tagged Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) of USA origin. ICES CM 1984/M27.Google Scholar
  15. Naylor R, Hindar K, Fleming IA, Goldburg R et al (2005) Fugitive salmon: assessing the risks of escaped fish from net-pen aquaculture. Bio Sci 55:427–437Google Scholar
  16. Olsen RE, Skilbrei OT (2010) Feeding preference of recaptured Atlantic salmon Salmo salar following simulated escape from fish pens during autumn. Aquacult Environ Interact 1:167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0,
  18. Roberge C, Normandeau É, Einum S, Guderley H, Bernatchez L (2008) Genetic consequences of interbreeding between farmed and native Atlantic salmon: insights from the transcriptome. Mol Ecol 17:314–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Skaala Ø, Wennevik V, Glover KA (2006) Evidence of temporal genetic change in wild Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., populations affected by farm escapees. ICES J Mar Sci 63:1224–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Skilbrei OT (2010a) Reduced migratory performance of simulated escaped Atlantic salmon post-smolts during autumn. Aqua Environ Interact 1:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Skilbrei OT (2010b) Adult recaptures of farmed Atlantic salmon postsmolts allowed to escape during summer. Aqua Environ Interact 1:147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Skilbrei OT, Holst JC, Asplin L, Holm M (2009) Vertical movements of “escaped” farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) – a simulation study in a western Norwegian fjord. ICES J Mar Sci 66:278–288Google Scholar
  23. Skilbrei OT, Jørgensen T (2010) Recapture of cultured salmon following a large-scale escape experiment. Aqua Environ Interact 1:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Skilbrei OT, Holst JC, Asplin L, Mortensen S (2010) Horizontal movements of simulated escaped farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in a western Norwegian fjord. ICES J Mar Sci 6:1206–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Uglem I, Bjørn P-A, Dale T, Kerwath S, Økland F, Nilsen R, Aas K, Fleming I, McKinley RS (2008) Movements and spatiotemporal distribution of escaped farmed and local wild Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) in a Norwegian fjord. Aqua Res 39:158–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Whoriskey FG, Brooking P, Doucette G, Thinker S, Carr JW (2006) Movements and survival of sonically tagged farmed Atlantic salmon released in Cobscook Bay ME USA. ICES J Mar Sci 63:1218–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Øyvind Solem
    • 1
    Email author
  • Richard D. Hedger
    • 1
  • Henning A. Urke
    • 1
  • Torstein Kristensen
    • 1
  • Finn Økland
    • 1
  • Eva M. Ulvan
    • 1
  • Ingebrigt Uglem
    • 1
  1. 1.Norwegian Institute for Nature ResearchTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations