Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 96, Issue 2–3, pp 189–201 | Cite as

Mobile receivers: releasing the mooring to ‘see’ where fish go

  • Sean A. Hayes
  • Nicole M. Teutschel
  • Cyril J. Michel
  • Cory Champagne
  • Patrick W. Robinson
  • Melinda Fowler
  • Tina Yack
  • David K. Mellinger
  • Samantha Simmons
  • Daniel P. Costa
  • R. Bruce MacFarlane
Article

Abstract

Much has been learned from the large scale deployment of acoustic tags on aquatic species and associated networks of riverine and marine receivers. While effective in the linear environment of river systems, marine systems limit the ability to provide spatial information on fish movements and distributions due to a combination of costs, logistics, and lack of off-shore technology. At the same time, each year millions of dollars worth of tags are being released into the aquatic environment with extended battery/transmission life, yet detections are limited to coastal arrays. Here we explore new methods of tracking acoustically tagged species in the marine environment. A new miniaturized acoustic receiver, the Vemco Mobile Transceiver (VMT) can be carried by large marine organisms. In combination with satellite and archival tag technology, VMTs were deployed on northern elephant seals to monitor acoustic tags encountered during their migrations across the Northeast Pacific. Early results include acoustic detections of tagged great white sharks, salmon sharks, Chinook salmon, steelhead, lingcod, green sturgeon and other elephant seals. We also propose several alternative directions for future effort: 1) analyzing the growing number of passive acoustic survey recordings made from hydrophone arrays for acoustic tag detections, 2) working with acoustic technology providers to develop hull-mounted receiver systems for the thousands of ocean going vessels around the world and 3) integrating acoustic receiver technology into the thousands of moored and drifting oceanographic buoy arrays.

Keywords

Acoustic tag Mobile receiver Elephant seal Offshore tracking Salmon 

References

  1. Argo_Project_Office (2006) Argo, an array of profiling floats observing the ocean in real-time. In: H. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Tasmainia, Austrialia (ed.) Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey H, Mate BR, Palacios DM, Irvine L, Bograd SJ, Costa DP (2009) Behavioural estimation of blue whale movements in the Northeast Pacific from state-space model analysis of satellite tracks. Endanger Species Res 10:93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biuw M, Boehme L, Guinet C, Hindell M, Costa D, Charrassin JB, Roquet F, Bailleul F, Meredith M, Thorpe S, Tremblay Y, McDonald B, Park YH, Rintoul SR, Bindoff N, Goebel M, Crocker D, Lovell P, Nicholson J, Monks F, Fedak MA (2007) Variations in behavior and condition of a Southern Ocean top predator in relation to in situ oceanographic conditions. PNAS 104:13705–13710PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boehlert GW, Costa DP, Crocker DE, Green P, O’Brien T, Levitus S, Le Boeuf BJ (2001) Autonomous pinniped environmental samplers: using instrumented animals as oceanographic data collectors. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 18:1882–1893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bograd SJ, Block BA, Costa DP, Godley BJ (2010) Biologging technologies: new tools for conservation. Introduction. Endanger Species Res 10:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charrassin J-B, Hindell M, Rintoul SR, Roquet F, Sokolov S, Biuw M, Costa D, Boehme L, Lovell P, Coleman R, Timmermann R, Meijers A, Meredith M, Parka Y-H, Bailleul F, Goebel M, Tremblay Y, Bost C-A, McMahon CR, Field IC, Fedak MA, Guinet C (2008) Southern Ocean frontal structure and sea-ice formation rates revealed by elephant seals. PNAS 105:11634–11639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Costa DP (1993) The secret life of marine mammals. Oceanography 6:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costa DP, Klinck JM, Hofmann EE, Dinniman MS, Burns JM (2008) Upper ocean variability in west Antarctic Peninsula continental shelf waters as measured using instrumented seals. Deep-Sea Research IIGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa DP, Tremblay Y, Hayes SA (2009) Research on Higher Trophic Levels. In: Glickson D (ed.) Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop, National Research Council, pp. 124–129Google Scholar
  10. Costa DP, Huckstadt LA, Crocker DE, McDonald BI, Goebel ME, Fedak MA (2010) Approaches to studying climatic change and its role on the habitat selection of antarctic pinnipeds. Integr Comp Biol 50:1018–1030PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hayes SA, Bond MH, Wells BK, Hanson CV, Jones AW, MacFarlane RB (2011) Using archival tags to infer habitat use of Central California steelhead and coho salmon. In: Parsons B, McKenzie J, Mesa M, Phelps Q, Seitz A, Pepperell J, Kopf R (ed.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Advances in Fish Tagging and Marking Technology, American Fisheries SocietyGoogle Scholar
  12. Holland KN, Meyer CG, Dagorn LC (2009) Inter-animal telemetry: results from first deployment of acoustic ‘business card’ tags. Endanger Species Res 10:287–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jorgensen SJ, Reeb CA, Chapple TK, Anderson S, Perle C, Van Sommeran SR, Fritz-Cope C, Brown AC, Klimley AP, Block BA (2009) Philopatry and migration of Pacific white sharks. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci 277:679–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klimley AP, Voegell F, Beavers SC, LeBoeuf BJ (1998) Automated listening stations for tagged marine fishes. Mar Technol Soc J 32:94–101Google Scholar
  15. Kuhn CE, Crocker DE, Tremblay Y, Costa DP (2009) Time to eat: measurements of feeding behaviour in a large marine predator, the northern elephant seal Mirounga angustirostris. J Anim Ecol 78:513–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Le Boeuf BJ, Crocker DE, Costa DP, Blackwell SB, Webb PM, Houser DS (2000) Foraging ecology of northern elephant seals. Ecol Monogr 70:353–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindley ST, Moser ML, Erickson DL, Belchik M, Welch DW, Rechisky EL, Kelly JT, Heublein J, Klimley A (2008) Marine migration of North American Green Sturgeon. Trans Am Fish Soc 137:182–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lloyd’s_List_Intelligence. Lloyd’s List Intelligence Brochure. In: Informa_plc (ed.) Mortimer House, 37–41 Mortimer Street, London, W1T 3JH, pp. 5Google Scholar
  19. Mellinger DK (2001) ISHMAEL 1.0 User’s guide: Integrated system for holistic multi-channel acoustic exploration and localization. NOAA Technical Memorandum OAR-PMEL-120Google Scholar
  20. Mellinger DK, Stafford KM, Moore SE, Dziak RP, Matsumoto H (2007) An overview of fixed passive acoustic observation methods for cetaceans. Oceanography 20:36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Melnychuk MC, Welch DW, Walters CJ (2010) Spatio-temporal migration patterns of Pacific salmon smolts in rivers and coastal marine waters. PLoS One 5:e12916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Michel C (2010) River and estuarine survival and migration of yearling Sacramento River Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus Tshawytscha) smolts and the influence of environment. Master of Arts, University of California, Santa Cruz, 120Google Scholar
  23. Muir WD, Smith SG, Williams JG, Hockersmith EE, Skalski JR (2001) Survival estimates for migrant yearling Chinook Salmon and steelhead tagged with passive integrated transponders in the lower snake and lower Columbia Rivers, 1993–1998. N Am J Fish Manag 21:269–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Myers KW, Aydin KY, Walker RV, Fowler S, Dahlberg ML (1996) Known ocean ranges of stocks of Pacific salmon and steelhead as shown by tagging experiments, 1956–1995. pp. 4p + figs., North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission Doc 192, University of Washington, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  25. Nicholls KW, Boehme L, Biuw M, Fedak MA (2008) Wintertime ocean conditions over the southern Weddell Sea continental shelf, Antarctica. Geophys Res Lett 35:L21605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oliver GW, Morris PA, Thorson PH, le Boeuf BJ (1998) Homing behavior of juvenile northern elephant seals. Mar Mammal Sci 14:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Prentice EF, McComas RL (2007) Unmanned underwater vehicles for fish and marine mammal shadowing and data acquisition: A concept. In: Sheridan P, Ferguson JW, Downing SL (eds.) Report of the National Marine Fisheries Service Workshop on Advancing Electronic Tag Technology and their use in Stock Assessments., U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo., NMFSF-F/SPO-82, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Seattle WA, pp. 15–16Google Scholar
  28. Rankin S, Barlow JP, Oswald J, Ballance L (2008) Acoustic studies of marine mammals during seven years of combined visual and acoustic line-transect surveys for cetaceans in the eastern and central Pacific Ocean. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-429: 69Google Scholar
  29. Rechisky EL, Welch DW, Porter AD, Jacobs MC, Ladouceur A (2009) Experimental measurement of hydrosystem-induced delayed mortality in juvenile Snake River spring Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) using a large-scale acoustic array. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66:1019–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shaffer SA, Tremblay Y, Weimerskirch H, Scott D, Thompson DR, Sagar PM, Taylor GA, Foley DG, Block BA, Costa DP (2006) Migratory shearwaters integrate oceanic resources across the Pacific Ocean in an endless summer. PNAS 103:12799–12802PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Simmons SE, Crocker DE, Kudela RM, Costa DP (2007) Linking foraging behaviour with oceanography and bathymetry at mesoscales in the northern elephant seal. Marine Ecology Progress Series 346Google Scholar
  32. USCG (2010) National GMDSS Implementation Task Force, Newsletter and Summary Record of 20 May 2010 Meeting, section 2.b http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pdf/gmdss/taskForce/TFSR-63.pdf. pp 9
  33. Villegas-Amtmann S, Costa DP (2010) Oxygen stores plasticity linked to foraging behaviour and pregnancy in a diving predator, the Galapagos sea lion. Funct Ecol 24:785–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Welch DW, Ward BR, Batten SD (2004) Early ocean survival and marine movements of hatchery and wild steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) determined by an acoustic array: Queen Charlotte Strait, British Columbia. Deep-Sea Res II Top Stud Oceanogr 51:897–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Welch DW, Rechinsky EL, Melnychuk MC, Porter AD, Walters CJ, Clements S, Clemens BJ, McKinley RS, Schreck C (2008) Survival of migrating salmon smolts in large rivers with and without dams. PLoS Biol 6:e265. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060265 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 (outside the USA) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sean A. Hayes
    • 1
  • Nicole M. Teutschel
    • 2
  • Cyril J. Michel
    • 3
  • Cory Champagne
    • 2
  • Patrick W. Robinson
    • 2
  • Melinda Fowler
    • 2
  • Tina Yack
    • 4
  • David K. Mellinger
    • 5
  • Samantha Simmons
    • 6
  • Daniel P. Costa
    • 2
  • R. Bruce MacFarlane
    • 3
  1. 1.Fisheries Ecology Division, NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Fisheries Science CenterSanta CruzUSA
  2. 2.Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of California, Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA
  3. 3.NOAA SWFSCSanta CruzUSA
  4. 4.Protected Resources Division, NOAA NMFS SWFSCLa JollaUSA
  5. 5.Hatfield Marine Science CenterOregon State UniversityNewportUSA
  6. 6.Marine Mammal CommissionBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations