Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 93, Issue 4, pp 449–459 | Cite as

Early development and larval behaviour of two clingfishes, Lepadogaster purpurea and Lepadogaster lepadogaster (Pisces: Gobiesocidae)

  • I. Tojeira
  • A. M. Faria
  • S. Henriques
  • C. Faria
  • E. J. Gonçalves
Article

Abstract

The recent revision on the taxonomic status of Lepadogaster lepadogaster resulted in the division of this species into L. lepadogaster and L. purpurea, the clarification of each species’ distribution ranges and the elimination of L. zebrina (now in synonymy with L. lepadogaster). This new taxonomic status led to the need of clarifying the early development of the two species. Embryonic development lasted 21 days in L. purpurea at a mean temperature of 14.2°C, and 16 days in L. lepadogaster at a mean temperature of 16.5°C. Newly hatched larvae of both species measured 5.2 mm, had the mouth and anus opened, pigmented eyes and almost no yolk. At hatching and throughout development the two species can be distinguished by the ventral pigmentation which is absent in L. purpurea. The change to a benthic mode of life was gradual in both species, with larvae increasingly spending more time close to the bottom until definitely settling. Larval development lasted 33 days in L. purpurea at a mean temperature of 14.6°C and 18 days in L. lepadogaster at a mean temperature of 16.5°C. Locomotion and foraging behaviours are described for both species. L. lepadogaster showed a higher frequency of swimming and foraging behaviour when compared with L. purpurea.

Keywords

Lepadogaster lepadogaster Lepadogaster purpurea Gobiesocidae Clingfishes Early development Larval behaviour 

References

  1. Allen LG (1984) Gobiesociformes: development and relationships. In: Moser HG, Richards WJ, Cohen DM, Fahay MP, Kendall AW Jr, Richardson SL (eds) Ontogeny and systematics of fishes. The American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, pp 629–636Google Scholar
  2. Barlow GW (1968) Ethological units of behavior. In: Ingle DJ (ed) The central nervous system and fish behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 217–232Google Scholar
  3. Beldade R, Pedro T, Gonçalves EJ (2007) Pelagic larval duration of 10 temperate cryptobenthic fishes. J Fish Biol 71:376–382. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01491.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blaxter JHS (1969) Development: eggs and larvae. In: Hoar WS, Randall DJ (eds) Fish physiology, vol. III. Academic, New York, pp 178–252Google Scholar
  5. Borges R, Faria C, Gil F, Gonçalves EJ, Almada VC (2003) Embryonic and larval development of Gobius paganellus (Pisces: Gobiidae). J Mar Biol Assoc UK 83:1151–1156. doi:10.1017/S0025315403008415h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breining T, Britz R (2000) Egg surface of three clingfish species, using scanning electron microscopy. J Fish Biol 56:1129–1137. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb02128.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Briggs JC (1955) A monograph of the clingfishes (order Xenopterygii). Stanf Ichthyol Bull 6:1–224Google Scholar
  8. Briggs JC (1986) Gobiesocidae. In: Whitehead PJP, Bauchot M-L, Hureau J-C, Nielsen J, Tortonese E (eds) Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. UNESCO, Paris, pp 1351–1359Google Scholar
  9. Briggs JC (1990) Gobiesocidae. In: Quéro JC, Hureau JC, Karrer C, Post A, Saldanha L (eds) Check-list of the fishes of the eastern tropical Atlantic. UNESCO, Societas Europaea Ichthyologorum & JNICT, Lisboa, pp 474–480Google Scholar
  10. Browman HI, O’Brien WJ (1992a) The ontogeny of search behaviour in the white crappie Pomoxis annularis. Env Biol Fish 34:181–195. doi:10.1007/BF00002393 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Browman HI, O’Brien WJ (1992b) Foraging and prey-search behaviour of golden shiner (Notemigonus crysoleucas) larvae. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:813–819. doi:10.1139/f92-092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fukuhara O (1987) Larval development and behavior in early life stages of black sea bream reared in the laboratory. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 53:371–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gonçalves EJ, Almada VC, Almeida SP, Gonçalves DM, Repas M, Simões N (1996) Observations on the agonistic behaviour of Lepadogaster lepadogaster purpurea (Pisces: Gobiesocidae). J Fish Biol 49:367–369. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1996.tb00032.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gonçalves D, Gonçalves EJ, Almada VC, Almeida SP (1998) Comparative behaviour of two species of Lepadogaster (Pisces: Gobiesocidae) living at different depths. J Fish Biol 53:447–450. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb00992.x Google Scholar
  15. Guitel F (1888) Recherches sur les Lepadogasters. Arch Zoologie Exp Gen, 2ème série, 6:423–647Google Scholar
  16. Hefford AE (1910) Notes on teleostean ova and larvae observed at Plymouth in spring and summer, 1909. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 9:47–48. doi:10.1017/S0025315400073227 Google Scholar
  17. Henriques M, Lourenço R, Almada F, Calado G, Gonçalves DM, Guillemaud T, Cancela ML, Almada VC (2002) A revision of the status of Lepadogaster lepadogaster (Teleostei: Gobiesocidae): sympatric subspecies or a long misunderstood blend of species? Biol J Linn Soc 76:327–338. doi:10.1046/j.1095-8312.2002.00067.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hickford MJ, Schiel DR (2003) Comparative dispersal of larvae from demersal versus pelagic spawning fishes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 252:255–271. doi:10.3354/meps252255 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kiørboe T, Munk P (1986) Feeding and growth of larval herring, Clupea harengus, in relation to density of copepod nauplii. Environ Biol Fish 17:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leis JM, McCormick MI (2002) The biology, behavior, and ecology of the pelagic, larval stage of coral reef fishes. In: Sale PF (ed) Coral reef fishes: dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 171–199Google Scholar
  21. Martin P, Bateson P (1993) Measuring behavior: an introductory guide. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller TJ, Crowder LB, Rice JA (1993) Ontogenetic changes in behavioural and histological measures of visual acuity in three species of fish. Environ Biol Fish 37:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Munk P, Kiørboe T (1985) Feeding behaviour and swimming activity of larval herring (Clupea harengus) in relation to density of copepod nauplii. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 24:15–21. doi:10.3354/meps024015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Padoa E (1956) Uova, larva e stadi giovanili de Teleostei. Fauna e Flora del Golfo di Napoli Monogr 38:783–877Google Scholar
  25. Pankhurst PM, Montgomery JC, Pankhurst NW (1991) Growth, development and behaviour of artificially reared larval Pagrus auratus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) (Sparidae). Aust J Mar Freshw Res 42:391–398. doi:10.1071/MF9910391 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Powles H, Markle D (1984) Identification of fish larvae. In: Moser HG, Richards WJ, Cohen DM, Fahay MP, Kendall AW Jr, Richardson SL (eds) Ontogeny and systematics of fishes. The American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, pp 31–33Google Scholar
  27. Rabe J, Brown JA (2001) The behavior, growth, and survival of witch flounder (Glyptocephalus cynoglossus) larvae in relation to prey availability: adaptations to an extended larval period. Fish Bull 99:465–474Google Scholar
  28. Raventós N, Macpherson E (2001) Planktonic larval duration and settlement marks on the otoliths of Mediterranean littoral fishes. Mar Biol 138:1115–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Russel FS (1976) The eggs and planktonic stages of British marine fishes. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Sponaugle S, Cowen R, Shanks A, Morgan S, Leis J, Pineda J, Boehlert G, Kingsford M, Lindeman K, Grimes C, Munro J (2002) Predicting self-recruitment in marine populations: biophysical correlates and mechanisms. Bull Mar Sci 70:341–375Google Scholar
  31. Thresher RE (1984) Reproduction in Reef Fishes. T.F.H. Publications, Neptune CityGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Tojeira
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. M. Faria
    • 1
  • S. Henriques
    • 3
  • C. Faria
    • 1
    • 4
  • E. J. Gonçalves
    • 1
  1. 1.Eco-Ethology Research Unit, Instituto Superior de Psicologia AplicadaLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.Task Group For Maritime AffairsPaço de ArcosPortugal
  3. 3.Centro de OceanografiaFaculdade de Ciências da Universidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal
  4. 4.Centro de Investigação em EducaçãoFaculdade de Ciências da Universidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations