Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hearing sensitivity in two black bass species using the auditory brainstem response approach

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, several bioacoustic studies have focused on the red eye bass (Micropterus coosae). One of these studies documented sound production, while the other played back sounds produced by prey items in order to determine their attractiveness to M. coosae. Surprisingly, the hearing ability of fishes in the genus Micropterus has received very little attention. The need for audiograms describing hearing in Micropterus is apparent. This study utilized the auditory brainstem response (ABR) approach to determine hearing sensitivity in terms of both sound pressure level (SPL) and particle acceleration in two black bass species, the red eye bass (M. coosae) and the Alabama bass (M. henshalli). Audiograms produced in this study expressed in both SPL and particle acceleration showed a positive relationship between hearing threshold and frequency. Micropterus coosae was most sensitive to frequencies that overlap with the peak frequencies of their vocalizations, and the vocalizations of a prey species, Cyprinella trichroistia. Bass hearing sensitivities at lower frequencies, measured in terms of particle acceleration, were similar to several sciaenid species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Alfons B, Kroese A, Schellart NAM (1992) Velocity-and acceleration-sensitive units in the trunk lateral line of the trout. J Neurophysiol 68:2212–2221

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper BM, Mann DA (2006) Evoked potential audiograms of the nurse shark (Ginglymostoma cirratum) and the yellow stingray (Urobatis jamaicensis). Environ Biol Fish 76:101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corwin JT, Bullock TH, Schweitzer J (1982) The auditory brainstem response in five vertebrate classes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 54:629–641

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs DM, Souza MJ, Wilkins HR, Presson JC, Popper AN (2001) Age-and size-related changes in the inner ear and hearing ability of the adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 03:174–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt DH, Johnston CE (2009) Signaling without the risk of illegitimate receivers: do predators respond to the acoustic signals of Cyprinella (Cyprinidae)? Environ Biol Fish 84:347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horodysky AZ, Brill RW, Fine ML, Musick JA, Latour RJ (2008) Acoustic pressure and particle motion thresholds in six sciaenid fishes. J Exp Biol 211:1504–1511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston CE, Bolling MK, Holt DE, Phillips CT (2008) Production of acoustic signals during aggression in Coosa bass, Micropterus coosae. Environ Biol Fish 82:17–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones KA (2005) Knowing bass; the scientific approach to catching more fish. First Lyons, Guilford, p 108

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon TN, Ladich F, Yan HY (1998) A comparative study of hearing ability in fishes: the auditory brainstem response approach. J Comp Physiol A 182:307–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kojima T, Ito H, Komata T, Taniuchi T, Akamatsu T (2005) Measurements of auditory sensitivity in common carp Cyprinus carpio by the auditory brainstem response technique and cardiac conditioning method. Fish Sci 71:95–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mann DA, Higgs DM, Tavolga WN, Souza MJ, Popper AN (2001) Ultrasound detection by clupeiform fishes. J Acoust Soc Am 109:3048–3054

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Münz H (1985) Single unit activity in the peripheral lateral line system of the cichlid fish Sarotherodon niloticus L. J Comp Physiol A 157:555–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myrberg AA (1981) Sound communication and interception in fishes. In: Fay RR, Popper AN, Tavolga WN (eds) Hearing and sound communication in fishes. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 345–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper AN, Fay RR (2010) Rethinking sound detection by fishes. Hear Res. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2009.12.023

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright KJ, Higgs DM, Belanger AJ, Leis JM (2005) Auditory and olfactory abilities of pre-settlement larvae and post-settlement juveniles of a coral reef damselfish (Pisces: Pomacentridae). Mar Biol 147:1425–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dennis Higgs for technical assistance in setting up the ABR system and David Mann for assistance in calculating particle accelerations. We would also like to thank Hong Young Yan for providing M. salmoides audiogram data. Thanks to Patricia Speares, Nicole Kierl, and Sean Holder for help collecting and maintaining specimens.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Fisheries and Allied Aquaculture, Auburn University, 203 Swingle Hall, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA

    Daniel E. Holt & Carol E. Johnston

Authors
  1. Daniel E. Holt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carol E. Johnston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel E. Holt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holt, D.E., Johnston, C.E. Hearing sensitivity in two black bass species using the auditory brainstem response approach. Environ Biol Fish 91, 121–126 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-010-9756-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-010-9756-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation