Skip to main content
Log in

Challenging fear: chemical alarm signals are not causing morphology changes in crucian carp (Carassius carassius)

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Crucian carp develops a deep body in the presence of chemical cues from predators, which makes the fish less vulnerable to gape-limited predators. The active components originate in conspecifics eaten by predators, and are found in the filtrate of homogenised conspecific skin. Chemical alarm signals, causing fright reactions, have been the suspected inducers of such morphological changes. We improved the extraction procedure of alarm signals by collecting the supernatant after centrifugation of skin homogenates. This removes the minute particles that normally make a filtered sample get turbid. Supernatants were subsequently diluted and frozen into ice-cubes. Presence of alarm signals was confirmed by presenting thawed ice-cubes to crucian carp in behaviour tests at start of laboratory growth experiments. Frozen extracts were added further on three times a week. Altogether, we tested potential body-depth-promoting properties of alarm signals twice in the laboratory and once in the field. Each experiment lasted for a minimum of 50 days. Despite growth of crucian carp in all experiments, no morphology changes were obtained. Accordingly, we conclude that the classical alarm signals that are releasing instant fright reactions are not inducing morphological changes in this species. The chemical signals inducing a body-depth increase are suspected to be present in the particles removed during centrifugation (i.e., in the precipitate). Tissue particles may be metabolized by bacteria in the intestine of predators, resulting in water-soluble cues. Such latent chemical signals have been found in other aquatic organisms, but hitherto not reported in fishes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson J, Johansson F, Söderlund T (2006) Interactions between predator- and diet-induced phenotypic changes in body shape of crucian carp. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 273:431–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop TD, Brown JA (1992) Threat-sensitive foraging by larval threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brönmark C, Miner JG (1992) Predator-induced phenotypic change in body morphology in crucian carp. Science 258:1348–1350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brönmark C, Pettersson LB (1994) Chemical cues from piscivores induce a change in morphology in crucian carp. Oikos 70:396–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brönmark CR, Paszkowski CA, Tonn WM, Hargeby A (1995) Predation as a determinant of size structure in populations of crucian carp (Carassius carassius) and tench (Tinca tinca). Ecol Freshw Fish 4:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers DP, Zhao X, Brown GE, Marchant TA, Ferrari MCO (2008) Predator-induced changes in morphology of a prey fish: the effects of food level and temporal frequency of predation risk. Evol Ecol 22:561–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domenici P, Turesson H, Brodersen J, Brönmark C (2008) Predator-induced morphology enhances escape locomotion in crucian carp. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 275(1631):195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eklöv P, Jonsson P (2007) Pike predators induce morphological changes in young perch and roach. J Fish Biol 70:155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen NT, Andersen Å, Stabell OB (2002) Alarm responses of the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, induced by chemically labelled durophagus predators and simulated acts of predation. Mar Biol 140:365–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvell CD (1990) The ecology and evolution of inducible defences. Q Rev Biol 65:323–340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holopainen IJ, Pitkänen AK (1985) Population size and structure of crucian carp (Carassius carassius (L.)) in two small, natural ponds in eastern Finland. Ann Zool Fenn 22:397–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Holopainen IJ, Aho J, Vornanen M, Huuskonen H (1997a) Phenotypic plasticity and predator effects on morphology and physiology of crucian carp in nature and in the laboratory. J Fish Biol 50:781–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holopainen IJ, Tonn WM, Paszkowski CA (1997b) Tales of two fish: the dichotomous biology of crucian carp (Carassius carassius (L.)) in northern Europe. Ann Zool Fenn 34:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen HP, Stabell OB (2004) Antipredator behaviour mediated by chemical cues: the role of conspecific alarm signalling and predator labelling in the avoidance response of a marine gastropod. Oikos 104:43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson F, Andersson J (2009) Scared fish get lazy, and lazy fish get fat. J Anim Ecol 78:772–777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karlson P, Lüscher M (1959) “Pheromones”: a new term for a class of biological active substances. Nature 183:55–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Killen SS, Brown JA (2006) Energetic cost of reduced foraging under predation threat in newly hatched ocean pout. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 321:255–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence BJ, Smith RJF (1989) Behavioral response of solitary fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, to alarm substance. J Chem Ecol 15:209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathis A, Smith RJF (1993a) Chemical labeling of northern pike (Esox lucius) by the alarm pheromone of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas). J Chem Ecol 19:1967–1979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathis A, Smith RJF (1993b) Fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, learn to recognize northern pike, Esox lucius, as predators on the basis of chemical stimuli from minnows in the pikes diet. Anim Behav 46:645–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash RDM, Valencia AH, Geffen AJ (2006) The origin of Fulton’s condition factor—setting the record straight. Fisheries 31(5):236–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson PA, Brönmark C (2000) Prey vulnerability to a gape-size limited predator: behavioural and morphological impacts on northern pike piscivory. Oikos 88(3):539–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson PA, Brönmark C, Pettersson LB (1995) Benefits of a predator-induced morphology in crucian carp. Oecologia 104:291–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson L, Nilsson P, Bronmark C (2000) Predator recognition and defence strategies in crucian carp, Carassius carassius. Oikos 88(1):200–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer W (1960) Über die Schreckreaktion bei Fischen und die Herkunft des Schreckstoffes. Z vergl Physiol 43:578–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer W (1962) The fright reaction of fish. Biol Rev 37:495–511

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer W (1977) The distribution of fright reaction and alarm substance cells in fishes. Copeia 1977(4):653–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piironen J, Holopainen IJ (1988) Length structure and reproductive potential of crucian carp (Carassius carassius L.) populations in some small forest ponds. Ann Zool Fenn 25:202–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Poleo ABS, Øxnevad SA, Østbye K, Heibo E, Andersen RA, Vøllestad LA (1995) Body morphology of crucian carp Carassius carassius in lakes with or without piscivorous fish. Ecography 18:225–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricker WE (1975) Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bull Fish Res Bd Can 191:1–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York

  • Stabell OB (2005) Latent alarm signals: are they present in vertebrates? In: Mason RT, LeMaster MP, Muller-Schwarze D (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates 10. Springer Science + Business Media, Inc., New York, pp 381–388

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stabell OB, Lwin MS (1997) Predator-induced phenotypic changes in crucian carp are caused by chemical signals from conspecifics. Environ Biol Fish 49:145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stabell OB, Ogbebo F, Primicerio R (2003) Inducble defences in Daphnia depend on latent alarm signals from conspecific prey activated in predators. Chem Senses 28:141–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tollrian R, Harvell CD (1999) The ecology and evolution of inducible defences. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonn WM, Paszkowski CA, Holopainen IJ (1992) Piscivory and recruitment: mechanisms structuring prey populations in small lakes. Ecology 73:951–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonn WM, Holopainen IJ, Paszkowski CA (1994) Density-dependent effects and the regulation of crucian carp populations in single-species ponds. Ecology 75:824–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Frisch K (1938) Zur Psychologie des Fisch-Schwarmes. Naturwissenschaften 29:321–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Frisch K (1941) Über einen schreckstoff der fischhaut und seine biologishe bedeutung. Z vergl Physiol 29:46–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vøllestad LA, Varreng K, Poléo ABS (2004) Body depth variation in crucian carp Carassius carassius: an experimental individual-based study. Ecol Freshw Fish 13:197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO, Bossert WH (1963) Chemical communication among animals. In: Pincus G (ed) Recent progress in hormone research. Academic, New York and London, pp 673–716

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by The Research Council of Norway, through NFR-grant no 159213/V40, and Estonian target financed grant SF0170011s08. We want to thank Hugo Tollefsen at Kårvik Research Station, University of Tromsø, Norway, for donating Arctic char and arranging transport of live fish to Kristiansand by air. We are also indebted to Tõnn Tuvikene for his help in adding stimuli to the experimental ponds during the course of the study in Estonia, and to two anonymous referees for their comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ole B. Stabell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stabell, O.B., Faeravaag, A.C. & Tuvikene, A. Challenging fear: chemical alarm signals are not causing morphology changes in crucian carp (Carassius carassius). Environ Biol Fish 89, 151–160 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-010-9707-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-010-9707-9

Keywords

Navigation