Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of habitat dynamics on the distribution and abundance of the federally threatened Santa Ana Sucker, Catostomus santaanae, in the Santa Ana River

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Habitat degradation affects native stream fish populations worldwide. We examined the impact of fluctuation in environmental variables on the population dynamics of the federally threatened Santa Ana sucker, Catostomus santaanae, in the Santa Ana River, California through: 1) annual quantitative surveys of C. santaanae abundance and habitat at three 100-m sites between 2001 and 2008 and 2) annual surveys of habitat composition within a 30-km stretch of the Santa Ana River between 2006 and 2008. We used Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) to evaluate competing models that used environmental variables to explain variation in C. santaanae abundance among sites and years. The most plausible model identified a positive relationship between C. santaanae abundance and both the amount of coarse substrate (i.e., gravel and cobble) and rate of discharge among site-years. Surveys at the 30-km scale indicated that the prevalence of coarse substrate declined in a downstream direction in each year and that the total amount of this habitat type varied annually. Specifically, cobble/gravel habitat was mostly confined to the upstream 4 km, 9.6 km, and 5.1 km of the survey area in 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively. Fine sediment comprised the bulk of downstream habitat every year. This large-scale flux in the distribution of coarse sediment likely has a large effect on the population dynamics of C. santaanae in the Santa Ana River. Our results underscore the need to maintain and enhance suitable C. santaanae habitat to ensure its long-term persistence in the Santa Ana River.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berkman HE, Rabeni CF (1987) Effects of siltation on stream fish communities. Environ Biol Fishes 18:285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown LR, Burton CA, Belitz (2005) Aquatic assemblages of the highly urbanized Santa Ana River basin, California. In: Brown LR, Gray R, Hughes RM, Meador MR (eds) Effects of urbanization on stream ecosytems. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 47, Bethesda, Maryland

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer Scientific, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Buth DG, Crabtree CB (1982) Genetic variability and population structure of Catostomus santaanae in the Santa Clara Drainage. Copeia 1982:439–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney R, Swift CC (2008) Description and ecology of the larvae and juveniles of three native cypriniformes of coastal southern California. Ichthyol Res 55:65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillette DP, Tiemann JS, Edds DR, Wildhaber ML (2006) Habitat use by a Midwestern USA riverine fish assemblage: effects of season, water temperature and river discharge. J Fish Bio 68:1494–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield DW, Ross ST, Deckert GD (1970) Some aspects of the life history of the Santa Ana sucker, Catostomus (Pantosteus) santaanae (Snyder). Calif Fish Game 56:166–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GD, Ratajczak RE, Crawford M, Freeman MC (1998) Assemblage organization in stream fishes: effects of environmental variation and interspecific interactions. Ecol Mon 68:395–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haner BE (1984) Santa Ana River: an example of a sandy braided floodplain system showing sediment source area imprintation and selective sediment modification. Sediment Geol 38:247–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazelton PD, Grossman GD (2009) The effects of turbidity and an invasive species on foraging success of rosyside dace (Clinostomus funduloides). Freshwater Bio 54:1977–1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horne AJ, Goldman CR (1994) Limnology. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins JA, Goodbred SL, Sobiech SA, Olivier HM, Draugelis-Dale RA, Alvarez DA (2009) Effects of wastewater discharges on endocrine and reproductive function of Western mosquitofish (Gambusia spp.) and implications for the threatened Santa Ana sucker (Catostomus santaanae). U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1097

  • Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19:101–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judy RD, Seeley PN Jr, Murray TM, Svirsky SC, Whitworth MR, Ischinger LS (1984) 1982 national fisheries survey, volume 1. Technical report: initial findings. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-84/06

  • Martin JW, Wicksten MK (2004) Review and redescription of the freshwater Atyid shrimp genus Syncaris Holmes, 1900, in California. J Crustac Biol 24:447–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RM (1968) Records of some native freshwater fishes transplanted into various waters of California, Baja California, and Nevada. Calif Fish Game 54:170–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle PB (2002) Inland fishes of California. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Otis DL, Burnham KP, White GC, Anderson DR (1978) Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildl Monogr 62:1–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Power ME (1982) Habitat quality and distribution of algae-grazing catfish in a Panamanian stream. J Anim Ecol 53:357–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusey BJ, Arthington AH (2003) Importance of the riparian zone to the conservation and management of freshwater fish: a review. Mar Freshw Res 54:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabeni CF, Jacobson RB (1999) Warmwater streams. In: Kohler CC, Hubert WA (eds) Inland fisheries management in North America. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabeni CF, Smale MA (1995) Effects of siltation on stream fishes and the potential mitigating role of the buffering riparian zone. Hydrobiologia 303:211–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley SC, Fausch KD (1992) Underestimation of trout population size by maximum-likelihood removal estimates in small streams. N Am J Fish Man 12:768–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiki MK, Martin BA, Knowles GW, Tennant P (2007) Life History and ecological characteristics of the Santa Ana sucker, Catostomus santaanae. Calif Fish Game 93:87–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland AB, Meyer JL, Gardiner EP (2002) Effects of land cover on sediment regime and fish assemblage structure in four southern Appalachian streams. Freshwater Biol 47:1791–1805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swift CC, Haglund TR, Ruiz M, Fisher RN (1993) The status and distribution of the freshwater fishes of Southern California. Bull South Calif Acad Sci 92:101–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson AR, Petty JT, Grossman GD (2001) Multi-scale effects of resource patchiness on foraging behaviour and habitat use by longnose dace, Rhinichthys cataractae. Freshw Biol 46:145–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Fish and Wildlife Service (2000) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; threatened status for the Santa Ana sucker. Fed Regist 65:19686–19698

    Google Scholar 

  • White BC, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Otis DL (1982) Capture–recapture and removal methods for sampling closed populations. Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA-8787-NERP, Los Alamos, New Mexico

  • Wood PJ, Armitage PD (1997) Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Env Man 21:203–217

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank E. Porter, C. Medak, K. Crump, D. Stadlander, E. Webber and two anonymous reviewers for providing valuable comments on the manuscript and T. McKinney for helping with preparation of the maps. We also thank the Santa Ana Sucker Conservation Team for partially funding this research. In particular, J. Beehler, of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority coordinated much of the biological activities of the Team and B. Nash and D. Zembal helped implement the regional surveys. Sampling was made under scientific collection permits to C. Swift, J. Baskin, and T. Haglund from California Department of Fish and Game and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Richard Thompson.

Additional information

The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, A.R., Baskin, J.N., Swift, C.C. et al. Influence of habitat dynamics on the distribution and abundance of the federally threatened Santa Ana Sucker, Catostomus santaanae, in the Santa Ana River. Environ Biol Fish 87, 321–332 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-010-9604-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-010-9604-2

Keywords

Navigation