Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 78, Issue 3, pp 257–269 | Cite as

Swimming performance and morphology of juvenile sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka: comparison of inlet and outlet fry populations

  • Lucas B. PonEmail author
  • Scott G. Hinch
  • Glenn N. Wagner
  • Andrew G. Lotto
  • Steven J. Cooke
Original Paper

Abstract

We raised two populations of sockeye salmon fry from fertilized eggs in the laboratory and tested the hypothesis that outlet fry populations, fish which must migrate upstream to reach rearing lakes after yolk-sac absorption, have better swimming ability and morphological characteristics conducive to enhanced swimming performance than inlet fry populations, fish which migrate downstream to rearing lakes. Despite being of identical age, fry from the outlet population were larger (approx. 6.7% longer, ~5 mm on average) and more laterally compressed than inlet fry at the time of our initial experiments. Using an open-top box flume, we found that the burst-swimming performance (in cm s−1) of the outlet population was 31% better. We found no differences between populations in prolonged-swimming performance. We were unable to find any direct relationships between measures of swimming performance and size or shape variables, suggesting that the larger, more robust morphology of outlet fry was not responsible for the superior burst ability. Recent biochemical studies indicate outlet fry may be metabolically better provisioned for burst swimming than inlet fry. It is possible that the morphological differences between the populations of fry reflect adaptations needed by adults during their migration and spawning.

Keywords

Onchorhynchus nerka Morphology Burst-swimming ability Intra-specific variation Local adaptation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank David Patterson for collecting the adult salmon and rearing the juveniles used in this experiment. Glenn Crossin kindly provided input on study design. Funding for this study was provided through NSERC Discovery and Strategic Grants to SGH, and NSERC undergraduate and graduate scholarships to LBP. Funding and logistic support was also provided by the Fraser River Environmental Watch Program at Fisheries and Oceans Canada.

References

  1. Beacham TD, Murray CB (1993) Fecundity and egg size variation in North American Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus). J Fish Biol 42:485–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beamish FWH (1978) Swimming capacity. In: Hoar WS, Randall DJ (eds) Fish physiology, vol 7. Academic Press, New York, pp 101–187Google Scholar
  3. Bernatchez L, Dodson JJ (1987) Relationship between bioenergetics and behaviour in anadromous fish migration. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 44:399–407Google Scholar
  4. Brett JR (1964) The respiratory metabolism and swimming performance of young sockeye salmon. J Fish Res Board Can 21:1183–1226Google Scholar
  5. Burgner RL (1991) Life history of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). In: Groot C, Margolis L (eds) Pacific salmon life histories. UBC Press, Vancouver, pp 3–117Google Scholar
  6. Crossin GT, Hinch SG, Farrell AP, Whelly MP, Healey MC (2003) Pink salmon (Onchorhynchus gorbuscha) migratory energetics: response to migratory difficulty and comparisons with sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Can J Zool 81:1986–1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crossin GT, Hinch SG, Farrell AP, Higgs DA, Lotto AG, Oakes JD, Healey MC (2004) Energetics and morphology of sockeye salmon: effects of upriver migratory distance and elevation. J Fish Biol 65:788– 810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gregory TR, Wood CM (1998) Individual variation and inter-relationships between swimming performance, growth rate, and feeding in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:1583–1590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gregory TR, Wood CM (1999) Interactions between individual feeding behaviour, growth, and swimming performance in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fed different rations. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:479–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Groot C, Margolis L (1991) Pacific salmon life histories. UBC Press, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  11. Hawkins DK, Quinn TP (1996) Critical swimming velocity and associated morphology of juvenile coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki clarki), steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and their hybrids. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:1487–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hendry AP, Berg OK (1999) Secondary sexual characters, energy use, senescence, and the cost of reproduction in sockeye salmon. Can J Zool 77:1663–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hinch SG, Cooke SJ, Healey MC, Farrell AP (2005) Behavioural physiology of fish migrations: Salmon as a model approach. In: Hoar WS, Randall DJ, Farrell AP (eds) Fish physiology, vol 24. Elsevier Press, pp 239–295Google Scholar
  14. Kaeriyama M, Urawa S, Fukuwaka M (1995) Variation in body size, fecundity, and egg size of sockeye and kokanee salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka, released from hatchery. Scientific Rep Hokkaido Salmon Hatchery 49:1–9Google Scholar
  15. Kinnison MT, Unwin MJ, Hendry AP, Quinn TP (2001) Migratory costs and the evolution of egg size and number in introduced and indigenous salmon populations. Evolution 55:1656–1667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kinnison MT, Unwin MJ, Quinn TP (2003) Migratory costs and contemporary evolution of reproductive allocation in male Chinook salmon. J Evol Biol 16:1257–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kolok AS (1992) The critical swimming speeds of juvenile largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) are repeatable. J Exp Biol 170:265–270Google Scholar
  18. Kolok AS (1999) Interindividual variation in the prolonged locomotor performance of ectothermic vertebrates: a comparison of fish a herpetofaunal methodologies and a brief review of the recent fish literature. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:700–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee CG, Farrell AP, Lotto AG, MacNutt MJ, Hinch SG, Healey MC (2003a) Effects of temperature on swimming performance and oxygen consumption in adult sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) and coho (O. kisutch) salmon stocks. J Exp Biol 206:3239–3251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee CG, Farrell AP, Lotto A, Hinch SG, Healey MC (2003b) Excess post-exercise oxygen consumption in adult sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) and coho (O. kisutch) salmon following critical speed swimming. J Exp Biol 206:3253–3260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Linley TJ (1993) Patterns of life history variation among sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in the Fraser River, British Columbia. PhD Thesis, University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  22. McCarthy ID (2000) Temporal repeatability of relative standard metabolic rate in juvenile Atlantic salmon and its relation to life history variation. J Fish Biol 57:224–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moore K (1996) The adaptive significance of body size and␣shape in sexually mature sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). MSc Thesis, University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  24. Patterson DA, Guderley H, Bouchard P, Macdonald JS, Farrell AP (2004) Maternal influence and population␣differences in activities of mitochondrial and glycolytic enzymes in emergent sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) fry. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:1225–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pimental RA (1979) Morphometrics: the multivariate analysis of biological data. Kendall and Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IAGoogle Scholar
  26. Quinn TP (1984) Homing and straying in Pacific salmon. In: McCleave JD, Arnold GP, Dodson JM, Neill WH (eds) Mechanisms of migration in fishes. Plenum, New␣YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Quinn TP, Dittman AH (1990) Pacific salmon migrations and homing: mechanisms and adaptive significance. Trends Ecol Evol 5:174–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reyment RA, Blackwell RE, Campbell NA (1984) Multivariate morphometrics. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Ricker WE (1972) Hereditary and environmental factors affecting certain salmonid populations. In: Simon RC, Larkin PA (eds) The stock concept in Pacific salmon, Institute of Fisheries, UBC, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  30. SAS Institute Inc. (2001) JMP-IN v. 4.0.4. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CAGoogle Scholar
  31. Sargent RC, Taylor PD, Gross MR (1987) Parental care and the evolution of egg size in fishes. Am Natural 129:32–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Taylor EB (1991) A review of local adaptation in Salmonidae, with particular reference to Pacific and Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture 98:185–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Taylor EB, McPhail JD (1985a) Variation in burst and prolonged-swimming performance among British Columbia populations of coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 42:2029–2033Google Scholar
  34. Taylor EB, McPhail JD (1985b) Variation in body morphology among British Columbia populations of coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 42:2020–2028Google Scholar
  35. Thomas AE, Donahoo MJ (1977) Differences in swimming performance among strains of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). J Fish Res Board Can 34:304– 306Google Scholar
  36. van den Berghe EP, Gross MR (1989) Natural selection resulting from female breeding competition in a Pacific salmon (coho: Oncorhynchus kisutch). Evolution 43:125–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Webb PW (1978) Fast-start performance and body form in seven species of teleost fish. J Exp Biol 74:211–266Google Scholar
  38. Weihs D (1973) The mechanism of rapid starting of a slender fish. Biorheology 10:343–350Google Scholar
  39. Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw–Hill, New York, NYGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucas B. Pon
    • 1
    Email author
  • Scott G. Hinch
    • 1
    • 2
  • Glenn N. Wagner
    • 3
  • Andrew G. Lotto
    • 1
  • Steven J. Cooke
    • 4
  1. 1.Centre for Applied Conservation Research, Department of Forest SciencesUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Institute for Resources, Environment and SustainabilityUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.Marine Sciences Research CentreState University of New YorkStony BrookUSA
  4. 4.Institute of Environmental Science and Department of BiologyCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations