Skip to main content
Log in

Ecology and population structure of the bayou darter, Etheostoma rubrum: disjunct riffle habitats and downstream transport of larvae

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The bayou darter, Etheostoma rubrum (Percidae), is endemic to the Bayou Pierre system in Mississippi. Adult and juvenile E. rubrum occupy swift, shallow riffles or runs over coarse gravel and pebble substrata. Habitat requirements of larval and post-larval stages, and the role of downstream dispersal of larvae in colonizing riffles are poorly known. The potential for movement and the high level of habitat specificity for the discontinuous riffle habitat suggest that E. rubrum may comprise a metapopulation of linearly arranged local populations. The greatest population densities of E. rubrum occur in the upper reaches of Bayou Pierre. We hypothesized that metapopulation structure of E. rubrum may include source–sink dynamics, whereby downstream areas are a sink for larvae/early juveniles originating upstream. We tested hypotheses that a transport mechanism, larval drift, occurred in E. rubrum, and that downstream riffles showed characteristics of population sinks. We captured larval stages of E. rubrum in cross-sectional and longitudinal drift nets, and rates of drift tended to increase during the day. Larval E. rubrum (n=19) occurred in samples above and below riffle areas, with no differences among longitudinal drift nets placed above and below riffles. Thus, larval drift is a viable transport mechanism. Relative abundance of adults and juveniles declined from upstream to downstream, and inter-riffle distances increased with cumulative downstream distance. However, both predictions of the source–sink hypothesis were not supported. The distribution of size classes did not change between upstream and downstream riffles nor did the mean size-adjusted body mass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balon, E. K. 1990. Epigenesis of an epigeneticist:the development of some alternative concepts on the early ontogeny and evolution of fishes. Guelph Ichthyol. Rev. 1:1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balon, E. K. 1999. Alternative ways to become a juvenile or a definitive phenotype (and on some persisting linguistic offenses). Environ. Biol. Fish. 56:17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. V. & M. L. Armstrong. 1985. Propensity to drift downstream among various species of fish. J. Freshwater Ecol. 3:3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, W. J. & R. L. Iman. 1981. Rank transformation as a bridge between parametric and non-parametric statistics. Am. Stat. 35:124–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, B. W. & P. M. Powles. 1986. Spawning and larva drift of sympatric walleyes and white suckers in an Ontario stream. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 115:41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, K. B., F. D. Hoyt & S. Timbrook. 1984. Chronology of appearance and habitat partitioning by stream larval fishes. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 113:217–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzin, W. G. & S. M. Harbicht. 1992. Tests of drift samplers for estimating abundances of recently hatched walleye larvae in small rivers. North Am. J. Fish. Manage. 12:396–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, W. F. & H. W. Mohr, Jr. 1978. Larval fish drift in a large river with comparison of sampling methods. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 107:46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli, N. J. & C. M. Taylor. 1999. Testing metapopulation models with stream-fish assemblages. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1:835–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. & D. Simberloff. 1997. The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain, and application to conservation. pp. 5–26. In:I. Hanski & M. E. Gilpin (eds.), Metapopulation Biology, Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution, Academic Press, San Diego, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, M. L., C. H. Hocutt & J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Monitoring of fish in lotic habitats. pp. 205–231. In:C. H. Hocutt & J. R. Stauffer, Jr. (eds.), Biological Monitoring of Fish, D. C. Heath & Co., Lexington Books, Lexington, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6:65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N. 1970. The Ecology of Running Waters, University of Toronto Press, Toronto. 555 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, T. A., M. N. Gaboury, R. A. Janusz & L. R. Janusz. 1995. Larval fish drift in the Valley River, Manitoba:influence of abiotic and biotic factors, and relationships with future year-class strengths. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52:2423–2431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. G. & S. T. Ross. 1992. Reproduction, age and growth of the bayou darter, Etheostoma rubrum (Pisces, Percidae):an endemic of Bayou Pierre. Am. Midland Nat. 127:91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lathrop, B. F. 1982. Ichthyoplankton density fluctuations in the lower Susquehanna River, Pennsylvania, from 1976 through 1980. pp. 28–36. In:C. F. Bryan, J. V. Conner & F. M. Truesdale (eds.), Fifth Annual Larval Fish Conference, La. Coop. Fish. Res. Unit, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mu¨ller, K. 1974. Stream drift as a chronobiological phenomenon in running water ecosystems. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 309–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paller, M. H. 1987. Distribution of larval fish between macrophyte beds and open channels in a southeastern floodplain swamp. J. Freshwater Ecol. 4:191–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, D. S. 1994. The downstream migration of young fishes in rivers:Mechanisms and distribution. Folia Zoologica 43: 193–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Péladeau, N. 1996. SIMSTAT for Windows, Provalis Research, Montreal. 255 pp.

  • Pulliam, H. R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132:651–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raney, E. C. & R. D. Suttkus. 1966. Etheostoma rubrum, a new percid fish of the subgenus Nothonotus from Bayou Pierre, Mississippi. Tulane Stud. Zool. 13:95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. T. & S. D. Wilkins. 1993. Reproductive behavior and larval characteristics of the threatened bayou darter (Etheostoma rubrum)in Mississippi. Copeia 1993:11271132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. T., J. G. Knight & S. D. Wilkins. 1990. Longitudinal occurrence of the bayou darter (Percidae:Etheostoma rubrum)in Bayou Pierre-a response to stream order or habitat availability? Polish Arch. Hydrobiol. 37:221–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. T., J. G. Knight & S. D. Wilkins. 1992. Distribution and microhabitat dynamics of the threatened bayou darter, Etheostoma rubrum. Copeia 1992:658–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. T., M. T. O 'Connell, D. M. Patrick, C. A. Latorre, W. T. Slack, J. G. Knight & S. D. Wilkins. 2001. Stream erosion and densities of Etheostoma rubrum (Percidae) and associated riffle-inhabiting fishes:biotic stability in a variable habitat. Copeia 2001:916–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheidegger, K. J. 1990. Larval fish assemblage composition and microhabitat use in two southeastern rivers. Unpublished Master 's Thesis, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama. 133 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, I. A. 1985. Flow regime, juvenile abundance and the assembly structure of stream fishes. Ecol. 66:1484–1490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm, S. A., M. D. Harvey & C. C. Watson. 1984. Incised Channels:Morphology, Dynamics and Control, Water Resources Publications, Littleton, CO. 200 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. 1956. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York. 312 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, D. E. 1976. Terminologies for intervals of larval fish development. pp. 41–58. In:J. Boreman (ed.), Great Lakes Fish Egg and Larval Identification, Proceedings of a Workshop, U. S. Fish Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-76/23.

  • Stickney, R. R. 1983. Care and handling of live fish. pp. 85–94. In:L. A. Nielen & D. L. Johnson (eds.), Fisheries Techniques, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. 468 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suttkus, R. D. & G. H. Clemmer. 1977. A status report on the bayou darter, Etheostoma rubrum, and the Bayou Pierre system. Southeast. Fish. Coun. Proc. 1:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teels, B. M. 1976. The ecology of endangered fishes in Bayou Pierre. pp. 73–78. In:M. S. Priest (director), Proceedings Mississippi Water Resources Conference, 20 April 1976, Mississippi State University, Water Resources Research Institute, Mississippi State, Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, T. F. 1972. The drift of stream invertebrates. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 17:53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B. J., D. R. Brown & K. M. Michels. 1991. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York. 1058 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. M. 1996. Phylogenetic systematics of the darter sub-genus Nothonotus (Teleostei:Percidae). Copeia 1996:300–318.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Slack, W., Ross, S. & Ewing, J. Ecology and population structure of the bayou darter, Etheostoma rubrum: disjunct riffle habitats and downstream transport of larvae. Environmental Biology of Fishes 71, 151–164 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-004-0101-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-004-0101-3

Navigation