Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Carbon Pricing Efficacy: Cross-Country Evidence

Environmental and Resource Economics volume 77, pages 69–94 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

To date there has been an absence of cross-country empirical studies on the efficacy of carbon pricing. In this paper we present estimates of the contribution of carbon pricing to reducing national carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fuel combustion, using several econometric modelling approaches that control for other key policies and for structural factors that are relevant for emissions. We use data for 142 countries over a period of two decades, 43 of which had a carbon price in place at the national level or below by the end of the study period. We find evidence that the average annual growth rate of CO2 emissions from fuel combustion has been around 2 percentage points lower in countries that have had a carbon price compared to countries without. An additional euro per tonne of CO2 in carbon price is associated with a reduction in the subsequent annual emissions growth rate of approximately 0.3 percentage points, all else equal. While it is impossible to fully control for all relevant influences on emissions growth, our estimates suggest that the emissions trajectories of countries with and without carbon prices tend to diverge over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. ‘Initial’ refers to the year that is at the start of the growth period.

  2. The Kaya Identity decomposes CO2 emissions into four factors: population * GDP per capita * the energy intensity of GDP * the carbon intensity of energy.

  3. Controlling for economic growth also removes effects of carbon pricing that transpire via a change in the GDP growth rate. Computable general equilibrium studies sometimes find small adverse effects of a carbon price on GDP growth (Li et al. 2014, for example), although this would depend on how a carbon pricing scheme is designed. A negative and significant effect remains when the GDP per capita growth control is omitted.

  4. We obtain similar results when excluding these countries (see robustness tests in the Online Appendix; Table A.2). We also present robustness tests using a binary carbon pricing variable for different periods (such as three or four years; Table A.3), finding similar results.

  5. The feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard variables are not included in the same regressions as the renewable policies score variable given the similarity of these measures.

  6. The Online Appendix also includes regressions that control for the feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard variables instead of the renewable energy policies score variable. The carbon price coefficients remain similar (Tables A.6 and A.7).

  7. The net gasoline tax is measured as the gap between the local and the international benchmark prices. This gap will be affected by whether a carbon price is in place.

  8. exp(− 0.128) − 1 = –12%.

  9. The binary carbon-pricing variable has a value of 1 for Australia in 2014, 0 in 2015 due to abolishment of carbon pricing, and a value of 1 again in 2016 due to the introduction of the Emissions Reduction Safeguard Mechanism.

  10. This is based on the average associations in regressions with the policy controls in Tables 4 and 6.

References

  • Aguirre M, Ibikunle G (2014) Determinants of renewable energy growth: a global sample analysis. Energy Policy 69:374–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldy JE, Stavins RN (2012) The promise and problems of pricing carbon: theory and experience. J Environ Dev 21:152–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson JJ (2019) Carbon taxes and CO2 emissions: Sweden as a case study. Am Econ J Econ Policy 11(4):1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Arimura TH, Abe T (2020) The impact of the Tokyo emissions trading scheme on office buildings: what factor contributed to the emission reduction? Environ Econ Policy Stud. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-020-00271-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin C, Esen Ö (2018) Reducing CO2 emissions in the EU member states: do environmental taxes work? J Environ Plan Manag 61:2396–2420

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin E, Carley S, Brass JN, MacLean LM (2017) Global renewable electricity policy: a comparative policy analysis of countries by income status. J Comp Policy Anal Res Pract 19:277–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball J (2018) Why carbon pricing isn’t working: good idea in theory, failing in practice. Foreign Aff June/July

  • Barro RJ (2015) Convergence and modernisation. Econ J 125:911–942

    Google Scholar 

  • Bel G, Joseph S (2015) Emission abatement: untangling the impacts of the EU ETS and the economic crisis. Energy Econ 49:531–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Best R, Burke PJ (2017) The importance of government effectiveness for transitions toward greater electrification in developing countries. Energies 10:1247

    Google Scholar 

  • Best R, Burke PJ (2018a) Adoption of solar and wind energy: the roles of carbon pricing and aggregate policy support. Energy Policy 118:404–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Best R, Burke PJ (2018b) Electricity availability: a precondition for faster economic growth? Energy Econ 74:321–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Best R, Burke PJ (2020) Energy mix persistence and the effect of carbon pricing. Aust J Agric Resour Econ (in press)

  • Bruvoll A, Larsen BM (2004) Greenhouse gas emissions in Norway: do carbon taxes work? Energy Policy 32:493–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock D (2012) Emissions trading in New Zealand: development, challenges and design. Env Polit 21:657–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke PJ, Csereklyei Z (2016) Understanding the energy-GDP elasticity: a sectoral approach. Energy Econ 58:199–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke PJ, Nishitateno S (2013) Gasoline prices, gasoline consumption, and new-vehicle fuel economy: evidence for a large sample of countries. Energy Econ 36:363–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke PJ, Shahiduzzaman M, Stern DI (2015) Carbon dioxide emissions in the short run: the rate and sources of economic growth matter. Glob Environ Chang 33:109–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley S, Baldwin E, MacLean LM, Brass JN (2017) Global expansion of renewable energy generation: an analysis of policy instruments. Environ Resour Econ 68:397–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirinko RS, Fazzari SM, Meyer AP (2011) A new approach to estimating production function parameters: the elusive capital-labor substitution elasticity. J Bus Econ Stat 29:587–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Coady D, Parry I, Sears L, Shang B (2015) How large are global energy subsidies? IMF Work Pap 15:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz C, Keefer P, Scartascini C (2018) Database of political institutions 2017 (DPI2017) Inter-American Development Bank. Numbers for Development

  • Csereklyei Z, Stern DI (2015) Global energy use: decoupling or convergence? Energy Econ 51:633–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkgraaf E, van Dorp T, Maasland E (2018) On the effectiveness of feed-in tariffs in the development of photovoltaic solar. Energy J 39:81–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott J, Fullerton D (2014) Can a unilateral carbon tax reduce emissions elsewhere? Resou Energy Econ 36:6–21

    Google Scholar 

  • ESMAP (2018) Policy matters—regulatory indicators for sustainable energy. Washington DC

  • Fay M, Hallegatte S, Vogt-Schilb A, Rozenberg J, Narloch U, Kerr T (2015) Decarbonizing development: three steps to a zero-carbon future. Climate change and development. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup (2009) Top-emitting countries differ on climate change threat. By Anita Pugliese and Julie Ray. https://news.gallup.com/poll/124595/Top-Emitting-Countries-Differ-Climate-Change-Threat.aspx, accessed Jan 6, 2020

  • Gygli S, Haelg F, Potrafke N, Sturm J-E (2019) The KOF Globalisation Index—revisited. Rev Int Organ 14(3):543–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Haites E (2018) Carbon taxes and greenhouse gas emissions trading systems: what have we learned? Clim Policy 18:955–966

    Google Scholar 

  • Haites E, Maosheng D, Gallagher KS et al (2018) Experience with carbon taxes and greenhouse gas emissions trading systems. Duke Environ Law Policy Forum 29:109–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamamoto M (2020) Impact of the Saitama Prefecture target-setting emissions trading program on the adoption of low-carbon technology. Environ Econ Policy Stud. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-020-00270-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havranek T, Irsova Z, Janda K (2012) Demand for gasoline is more price-inelastic than commonly thought. Energy Econ 34:201–207

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2017) CO2 emissions from fuel combustion 2017—highlights. https://doi.org/10.1787/co2_fuel-2017-en

  • IEA (2019) IEA statistics. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/statistics, accessed 19 Dec 2019

  • IMF (2000) Transition economies: an IMF perspective on progress and prospects. https://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/ib/2000/110300.htm

  • Johnstone N, Haščič I, Popp D (2010) Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts. Environ Resour Econ 45:133–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Li JF, Wang X, Zhang YX, Kou Q (2014) The economic impact of carbon pricing with regulated electricity prices in China—an application of a computable general equilibrium approach. Energy Policy 75:46–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Li X (2011) The effect of carbon tax on per capita CO2 emissions. Energy Policy 39:5137–5146

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw NG (2009) Smart taxes: an open invitation to join the Pigou Club. East Econ J 35:14–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin G, Saikawa E (2017) Effectiveness of state climate and energy policies in reducing power-sector CO2 emissions. Nat Clim Change 7:912–919

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Zarzoso I, Maruotti A (2011) The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: evidence from developing countries. Ecol Econ 70:1344–1353

    Google Scholar 

  • Meckling J, Sterner T, Wagner G (2017) Policy sequencing toward decarbonization. Nat. Energy 2:918–922

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray BC, Maniloff PT (2015) Why have greenhouse emissions in RGGI states declined? An econometric attribution to economic, energy market, and policy factors. Energy Econ 51:581–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray B, Rivers N (2015) British Columbia’s revenue-neutral carbon tax: a review of the latest “grand experiment” in environmental policy. Energy Policy 86:674–683

    Google Scholar 

  • Narassimhan E, Gallagher KS (2017) Carbon pricing in practice: a review of the evidence. Medford, Clim Policy Lab, p 50

    Google Scholar 

  • Narassimhan E, Gallagher KS, Koester S, Alejo JR (2018) Carbon pricing in practice: a review of existing emissions trading systems. Clim Policy 18:967–991

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan PK, Narayan S (2010) Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy 38:661–666

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2016) Effective carbon rates: pricing CO2 through taxes and emissions trading systems. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2018) Effective carbon rates 2018. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Polzin F, Migendt M, Täube FA, von Flotow P (2015) Public policy influence on renewable energy investments—a panel data study across OECD countries. Energy Policy 80:98–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Presno MJ, Landajo M, Fernández González P (2018) Stochastic convergence in per capita CO2 emissions. An approach from nonlinear stationarity analysis. Energy Econ 70:563–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe BC (2018) Can We Price Carbon? Series: American and comparative environmental policy. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • REN21 (2017) REN21: Renewables 2017 Global Status Report. Paris: REN21 Secretariat

  • REN21 (2018) REN21: Renewables 2018 Global Status Report. Paris: REN21 Secretariat

  • Ross ML, Hazlett C, Mahdavi P (2017) Global progress and backsliding on gasoline taxes and subsidies. Nat Energy 2:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein J (2010) Teacher quality in educational production: tracking, decay, and student achievement. Q J Econ 125:175–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadorsky P (2014) The effect of urbanization on CO2 emissions in emerging economies. Energy Econ 41:147–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee R, Stavins RN (2017) Lessons learned from three decades of experience with cap and trade. Rev Environ Econ Policy 11:59–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Somanathan E, Sterner T, Sugiyama T, et al (2014) National and sub-national policies and institutions. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

  • Stern DI, Gerlagh R, Burke PJ (2017) Modeling the emissions–income relationship using long-run growth rates. Environ Dev Econ 22:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner J, Bird L, Dobos H (2011) Carbon taxes: a review of experience and policy design considerations. Clim Policy 11:922–943

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2019a) Carbon pricing dashboard. https://carbonpricingdashboard.worldbank.org/what-carbon-pricing

  • World Bank (2019b) World development indicators. https://data.worldbank.org/, accessed 20 Dec 2019

  • World Bank and Ecofys (2018) State and trends of carbon pricing 2018 (May), May 2018. Washington, DC

  • Worldwide Governance Indicators (2016) Worldwide Governance Indicators. https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/, accessed 29 Mar 2016

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council under grant DE160100750. We thank participants at conferences and seminars at the Australian National University, Nanyang Technological University, Macquarie University, the Australasian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Conference 2019, and the 7th International Association for Energy Economics Asia-Oceania Conference in 2020. We thank David Stern, Kenneth Baldwin, and Bruce Mountain for comments. Author contributions: RB and PB contributed to the conceptualisation of the study, econometric analysis, and writing. FJ contributed to the conceptualisation of the study, review of estimations, and interpretation of results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia

    Rohan Best

  2. Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia

    Paul J. Burke & Frank Jotzo

Authors
  1. Rohan Best
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul J. Burke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frank Jotzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rohan Best.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 413 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Best, R., Burke, P.J. & Jotzo, F. Carbon Pricing Efficacy: Cross-Country Evidence. Environ Resource Econ 77, 69–94 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00436-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00436-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

search

Navigation