Environmental Disasters and Electoral Cycle: An Empirical Analysis on Floods and Landslides in Italy

  • Alessio D’AmatoEmail author
  • Giovanni Marin
  • Andrea Rampa


The aim of this paper is to analyse potential drivers of land use policy, in the form of building permits issued in Italian provinces. We first derive testable implications on the basis of a standard political agency framework, augmented to account for the impact of past environmental disasters (floods, landslides and earthquakes) and for the relevance of “building permits intensive” sectors in determining voters’ support to an incumbent politician. We then perform an empirical analysis that tests theoretical predictions using a unique dataset covering Italy in the period 2001–2012. Our main conclusions show that the occurrence of floods and earthquakes decreases building permits, implying that a bad history in terms of these phenomena strengthens the importance of voters affected by past disasters. No corresponding evidence seems to emerge with reference to landslides. On the other hand, the relevance of the construction sector increases the number of building permits issued. Finally, when elections approach, the number of building permits issued grows, suggesting that incumbent politicians may distort land use policies in order to favour “brown” voters in periods close to elections.


Catastrophic events Land use Uncertainty Environmental policy Risk Natural disaster 
JEL Classification H11 Q54 Q58 



We are grateful to IRPI (Research Institute for Geo-Hydrological Protection) for data and support, and to Thomas Bassetti, Claudio Petucco, Massimiliano Mazzanti, and audience at the 2016 IAERE and EAERE Conferences for very useful comments and suggestions. We acknowledge financial support from the research project “La valutazione economica dei disastri economici in Italia” funded by the Fondazione Assicurazioni Generali. The usual disclaimer applies.


  1. Besley T (2006) Principled agents? The political economy of good government. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Besley T, Burgess R (2002) The political economy of government responsiveness: theory and evidence from India. Q J Econ 117(4):1415–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burgess R, Hansen M, Olken B, Potapov P, Sieber S (2012) The political economy of deforestation in the tropics. Q J Econ 127(4):1707–1754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cutter SL, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate E, Webb J (2008) A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob Environ Change 18:598–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deng G, Gan L, Hernandez MA (2015) Do natural disasters cause an excessive fear of heights? Evidence from Wenchuan earthquake. J Urb Econ 90:79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drury AC, Olson RS (1998) Disasters and political unrest: an empirical investigation. J Conting Crisis Manag 6(3):153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Esteban J, Ray D (2006) Inequality, lobbying, and resource allocation. Am Econ Rev 96(1):257–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferraz C (2007) Electoral politics and bureaucratic discretion: evidence from environmental licenses and local elections in Brazil. Unpublished Manuscript, The Institute for Applied Economics Research, Brasilia, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  9. Feyen L, Rutger D, Bodis K, Salamon P, Barredo JI (2012) Fluvial flood risk in Europe in present and future climates. Clim Change 112:47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grossman GM, Helpman E (1994) Protection for sale. Am Econ Rev 84(4):833–850Google Scholar
  11. Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Cardinali M, Galli M, Ardizzone F (2005) Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale. Geomorphology 72:272–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haase D, Nuissl H (2007) Does urban sprawl drive change in the water balance and policy? The case of Leipzig (Germany) 1870–2003. Landsc Urb Plan 80:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hallegatte S (2012) An exploration of the link between development, economic growth, and natural risk (English). Policy Research working paper no. WPS 6216. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Hallegatte S (2014) Natural disasters and climate change. An economic perspective. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Healy A, Malhotra N (2009) Myopic voters and natural disaster policy. Am Polit Sci Rev 103:387–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hervas J (ed) (2003) NEDIES Project - Lessons learnt from landslide disasters in Europe, Report EUR 20558 EN  Google Scholar
  17. ISPRA (2015) Il consumo del suolo in Italia. Report 218, Italian Institute for Research and Environmental Protection (ISPRA)Google Scholar
  18. ISPRA (2017) Il consumo di suolo, dinamiche territoriali e servizi ecosistemici. Report 266, Italian Institute for Research and Environmental Protection (ISPRA)Google Scholar
  19. List JA, Sturm DM (2006) How elections matter: theory and evidence from environmental policy. Q J Econ 121(4):1249–1281Google Scholar
  20. Mysiak J, Testella F, Bonaiuto M, Carrus G, De Dominicis S, Ganucci Cancellieri U, Firus K, Grifoni P (2013) Flood risk management in Italy: challenges and opportunities for the implementation of the EU Floods Directive (2007/60/EC). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:2883–2890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nifo A, Vecchione G (2014) Do institutions play a role in skilled migration? The case of Italy. Reg Stud 48(10):1628–1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pailler S (2018) Re-election incentives and deforestation cycles in the Brazilian Amazon. J Environ Econ Manag 88:345–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peruccacci S, Brunetti MT, Gariano SL, Melillo M, Rossi M, Guzzetti F (2017) Rainfall thresholds for possible landslide occurrence in Italy. Geomorphology 290:39–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rogoff K (1990) Equilibrium political budget cycles. Am Econ Rev 80(1):21–36Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Rome “Tor Vergata”RomeItaly
  2. 2.Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies (SEEDS) - Research CentreFerraraItaly
  3. 3.Department of Economics, Society and PoliticsUniversity of Urbino “Carlo Bo”UrbinoItaly
  4. 4.Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth (IRCrES-CNR)National Research Council of ItalyMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations