Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 71, Issue 2, pp 507–527 | Cite as

Climate Change Mitigation with Technology Spillovers

  • Renaud FoucartEmail author
  • Grégoire Garsous


We explore the implications of an increase in clean technology spillovers between developed and developing countries. We build a game of abatements in which players are linked with technology spillovers determined by an initial choice of absorptive capacities by developing countries. We show that, within a non-cooperative framework, the response of clean technology investments in developed countries to an increase in cross-country technology spillovers is ambiguous. If the marginal benefits of these additional abatements are not sufficiently high, developed countries have a strategic incentive to decrease investments. Such a strategic response jeopardizes the initial effects of an increase in technology spillovers on climate change mitigation and decreases the incentives for developing countries to enhance their absorptive capacities.


Climate change Cross-country spillovers Abatements Technology investments 

JEL Classification

H40 Q54 Q55 Q56 


  1. Aghion P, Hémous D, Veugelers R (2009) No green growth without innovation. Bruegel Policy Contribution, Issue 2009/07, NovemberGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett S (2006) Climate treaties and “breakthrough technologies”. Am Econ Rev 96(2):22–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beccherle J, Tirole J (2011) Regional initiatives and the cost of delaying binding climate change agreements. J Public Econ 95(11):1339–1348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bulow J, Geanakoplos J, Klemperer P (1985) Holding idle capacity to deter entry. Econ J 95(377):178–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buob S, Stephan G (2013) On the incentive compatibility of funding adaptation. Clim Change Econ 4(2):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carraro C, Eyckmans J, Finus M (2006) Optimal transfers and participation decisions in international environmental agreements. Rev Int Organ 1(4):379–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dechezleprêtre A, Glachant M, Ménière Y (2008) The clean development mechanism and the international diffusion of technologies: an empirical study. Energy Policy 36:1273–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dechezleprêtre A, Glachant M, Haščič I, Johnstone N, Ménière Y (2011) Invention and transfer of climate change mitigation technologies: a global analysis. Rev Environ Econ Policy 5(1):109–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dechezleprêtre A, Glachant M, Ménière Y (2013) What drives the international transfer of climate change mitigation technologies? Empirical evidence from patent data. Environ Resource Econ 54(2):161–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Coninck H, Fischer C, Newell R, Ueno T (2008) International technology-oriented agreements to address climate change. Energy Policy 36(1):335–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dutz M, Sharma S (2012) Green growth, technology and innovation. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5932Google Scholar
  12. Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1984) The fat-cat effect, the puppy-dog ploy, and the lean and hungry look. Am Econ Rev 74(2):361–366, Papers and proceedings of the ninety-sixth annual meeting of the American Economic AssociationGoogle Scholar
  13. Gallagher K (2006) Limits to leapfrogging in energy technologies? Evidence from the Chinese automobile industry. Energy Policy 34:383–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Golombek R, Hoel M (2004) Unilateral emission reductions and cross-country technology spillovers. Adv Econ Anal Policy 4(2):1–25Google Scholar
  15. Hilton F (2001) Later abatement, faster abatement: evidence and explanations from the global phaseout of leaded gasoline. J Environ Dev 10:246–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoel M (1991) Global environmental problems: the effects of unilateral actions taken by one country. J Environ Econ Manag 20(1):55–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoel M, De Zeeuw A (2010) Can a focus on breakthrough technologies improve the performance of international environmental agreements? Environ Resour Econ 47(3):395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jaffe AB, Newell RG, Stavins RN (2005) A tale of two market failures: technology and environmental policy. Ecol Econ 54(2):164–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lanjouw J, Mody A (1996) Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology. Res Policy 25(4):549–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. OECD (2015) Climate finance in 2013-14 and the USD 100 billion goal. A report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in collaboration with Climate Policy Initiative (CPI)Google Scholar
  21. Popp D (2010) Innovation and climate policy. Annu Rev Resour Econ 2:275–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Popp D (2011) International technology transfer, climate change, and the clean development mechanism. Rev Environ Econ Policy 5(1):131–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schmidt RC, Strausz R (2015) On the timing of climate agreements. Environ Resour Econ 62(3):521–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Spence M (1984) Cost reduction, competition, and industry performance. Econometrica 52(1):101–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Treich N (2010) The value of a statistical life under ambiguity aversion. J Environ Econ Manag 59(1):15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ulph A, Ulph D (2007) Climate change-environmental and technology policies in a strategic context. Environ Resour Econ 37(1):159–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. UNFCCC (2010) UNFCCC Decision 1/CP.16. The Cancun Agreements, 2010.
  28. Van der Ploeg F, De Zeeuw A (1998) Investment in clean technology and transboundary pollution control. In: Carraro C (ed) Trade, innovation, environment. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  29. World Bank (2010) World development report: development and climate change, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  30. Xepapedeas A (1995) Induced technical change and international agreements under greenhouse warming. Resour Energy Econ 17(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Humboldt UniversityBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Université libre de Bruxelles, ECARESBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations