Skip to main content

Authorship, Collaboration, Topics, and Research Gaps in Environmental and Resource Economics 1991–2015

Abstract

Environmental and Resource Economics is one of the premier journals in the field of environmental economics. It was established with an aspiration to focus more on applied and policy relevant research compared to other established journals, and to establish better channels of communication and collaboration between researchers from Europe and other parts of the world. We present a text based exploratory analysis of 1630 articles published in the Journal from 1991 to 2015 that suggests the Journal has been somewhat successful in meeting both these aims. Perhaps more importantly, it shows the Journal continues to progress toward these goals. The European authors are the largest contributors to the Journal, which is in contrast to other prominent journals (such as Journal of Environmental Economics and Management and Ecological Economics). And while most of the collaboration has occurred within this geographic region (e.g., European authors collaborated with other European authors more frequently), this trend appears to be changing as the proportion of articles written by international collaborators is gradually increasing. Topic analysis reveals that almost all of the articles could be grouped under applied and/or policy relevant topics, and almost two-thirds of the articles are empirical in nature, which suggest that the journal has been able to fulfil both of its commitments. We also investigate trends in research foci over the last 25 years and what kind of research gaps can be discerned.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

References

  • Adams J (2013) Collaborations: the fourth age of research. Nature 497(7451):557–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhouse RE (1998) The transformation of US economics, 1920–1960, viewed through a survey of journal articles. In: Morgan MS, Rutherford MH (eds) The Transformation of American Economics: from interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism, Annual Supplement to Volume 30 of History of Political Economy. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp 85–107

  • Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 3(4–5):993–1022

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookshire DS, Scrogin DO (2000) Reflections upon 25 years of the journal of environmental economics and management. J Environ Econ Manag 39(3):249–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland G, Khalid M, Agnelli S, Al-Athel S, Chidzero B, Fadika L, Hauff V, Lang I, Shijun M, de Botero MM (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future. Oxford University Press

  • Carson RT, Flores NE, Meade NF (2001) Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. Environ Resour Econ 19(2):173–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Stern D, Fisher B, He L, Ma C (2004) Influential publications in ecological economics: a citation analysis. Ecol Econ 50(3–4):261–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Howarth RB, Kubiszewski I, Liu S, Ma C, Plumecocq G, Stern DI (2016) Influential publications in ecological economics revisited. Ecol Econ 123:68–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debertin DL, Pagoulatos A (1992) Research in agricultural economics 1919–1990: seventy-two years of change. Rev Agric Econ 14(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deerwester S, Dumais ST, Furnas GW, Landauer TK, Harshman R (1990) Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J Am Soc Inf Sci 41(6):391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endres DM, Schindelin JE (2003) A new metric for probability distributions. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 49(7):1858–1860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinerer I, Hornik K (2017) tm: text mining package. R package version 0.7-1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tm

  • Furnas GW, Deerwester S, Dumais ST, Landauer TK, Harshman RA, Streeter LA, Lochbaum KE (1988) Information retrieval using a singular value decomposition model of latent semantic structure. In: Proceedings of the 11th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval: ACM, pp 465–480

  • Griffiths TL, Steyvers M (2004) Finding scientific topics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101(suppl 1):5228–5235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimmer J, Stewart BM (2013) Text as data: the promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Anal 21(3):267–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grün B, Hornik K (2011) Topicmodels: an R package for fitting topic models. J Stat Softw 40(13):1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall D, Jurafsky D, Manning CD (2008) Studying the history of ideas using topic models. In: EMNLP 2008–2008 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, proceedings of the conference: a meeting of SIGDAT, a special interest Group of the ACL, 363–371

  • Hamermesh DS (2013) Six decades of top economics publishing: Who and how? J Econ Lit 51(1):162–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley N, Wright RE, Adamowicz V (1998) Using choice experiments to value the environment: design issues, current experience and future prospects. Environ Resour Econ 11(3–4):413–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karl A, Wisnowski J, Rushing WH (2015) A practical guide to text mining with topic extraction. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat 7(5):326–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW (1987) The human environment: the road not taken, the road still beckoning. Annals Assoc Am Geogr 77(4):525–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kullback S, Leibler RA (1951) On information and sufficiency. Annals Math Stat 22(1):79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laband DN, Tollison RD (2000) Intellectual collaboration. J Political Econ 108(3):632–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma C, Stern DI (2006) Environmental and ecological economics: a citation analysis. Ecol Econ 58(3):491–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtagh F, Legendre P (2014) Ward’s hierarchical agglomerative clustering method: Which algorithms implement ward’s criterion? J Classif 31(3):274–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opschoor JB, Jansen HMA (1991) The raison d’être of ERE. Environ Resour Econ 1(1):5–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul MJ, Dredze M (2014) Discovering health topics in social media using topic models. PLoS ONE 9(8):1–11

  • Polyakov M, Gibson FL, Pannell DJ (2016) Antipodean agricultural and resource economics at 60: trends in topics, authorship and collaboration. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 60(4):506–515

  • R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. In: Vienna, Austria: R foundation for statistical computing

  • Rusch T, Hofmarcher P, Hatzinger R, Hornik K (2013) Model trees with topic model preprocessing: an approach for data journalism illustrated with the Wikileaks Afghanistan war logs. Annals Appl Stat 7(2):613–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schymura M, Löschel A (2014) Incidence and extent of co-authorship in environmental and resource economics: evidence from the Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. Scientometrics 99(3):631–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shogren JF, Durden GC (1991) The first 15 years: contributors and contributions to the journal of environmental economics and management, 1974–19881. J Environ Econ Manag 20(3):205–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sievert C, Shirley KE (2014) LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics. Proceedings of the workshop on interactive language learning, visualization, and interfaces. The Association for Computational Linguistics, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, pp 63–70

  • Westgate MJ, Barton PS, Pierson JC, Lindenmayer DB (2015) Text analysis tools for identification of emerging topics and research gaps in conservation science. Conserv Biol 29(6):1606–1614

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted with the support of funding from the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions. We acknowledge helpful comments and suggestions of Ms Tammie Harold and Mr Tas Thamo of UWA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunbo Ma.

Appendix: Additional Figures

Appendix: Additional Figures

See Figs.12, 13 and 14

Fig. 12
figure 12

Top 50 most cited ERE authors

Fig. 13
figure 13

Top 30 most cited ERE articles

Fig. 14
figure 14

Trends in ERE topics: 1991–2015

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Polyakov, M., Chalak, M., Iftekhar, M.S. et al. Authorship, Collaboration, Topics, and Research Gaps in Environmental and Resource Economics 1991–2015. Environ Resource Econ 71, 217–239 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0147-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0147-2

Keywords

  • Topic analysis
  • Latent Dirichlet allocation
  • Co-authorship
  • Environmental and resource economics

JEL Classification

  • A11
  • A14
  • Q0