Advertisement

Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 69, Issue 4, pp 637–659 | Cite as

Renewable Resource Use and Nonseparable Amenity Benefits

  • Gregory Amacher
  • Markku Ollikainen
  • Mikko Puhakka
Article
  • 209 Downloads

Abstract

We incorporate amenity benefits into an overlapping generations model with a renewable resource as a factor of production, source of amenity benefits and store of value. Unlike the conventional renewable resource problems studied under the assumption of additive consumption and amenity benefits, we let amenity benefits affect the utility of consumers in a nonseparable fashion. We examine the role that weights given to consumption and amenities have for harvesting and the resource stock. We characterize dynamics and stability of steady state equilibria with a logistic resource growth function. We demonstrate in parametric and numerical models that the weights given to consumption and amenities in the utility function matter substantially for the steady state equilibrium stock and its stability and dynamics. Both conventional saddle point equilibria and indeterminacy with infinite number of equilibria and saddle-node bifurcation is possible depending on the weights given to consumption and amenities. In addition, we show that for each inefficient equilibrium stock, there is a unique subsidy rate that can move the economy from an inefficient equilibrium to an efficient one. The presence of indeterminacy provides a challenge to resource policies, because the system becomes unpredictable. Therefore, expectations and market psychology may play an important role in resource utilization and provision of amenities.

Keywords

Overlapping generations Renewable resources Nonseparable preferences Indeterminacy 

JEL Classification

D90 Q20 C62 

References

  1. Amacher G, Koskela E, Ollikainen M (2002) Optimal forest policies in an overlapping generations economy with timber and money bequests. J Environ Econ Manag 44:346–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amacher G, Conway C, Sullivan J (2003) Econometric analyses of nonindustrial forest landowners: is there anything left to study? J For Econ 9:137–164Google Scholar
  3. Amacher G, Ollikainen M, Koskela E (2009) The economics of forest resources. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Azariadis C (1993) Intertemporal macroeconomics. Blackwell Publishers, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Beach RH, Pattanayak SK, Yang JC, Murray BC, Abt RC (2005) Econometric studies of non-industrial private forest management: a review and synthesis. For Policy Econ 7:261–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett RL, Farmer REA (2000) Indeterminacy with non-separable utility. J Econ Theory 93:118–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bockstael N, McConnel K (1993) Public goods as characteristics of non-market commodities. Econ J 103:1244–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown GM (2000) Renewable natural resource management and use without markets. J Econ Lit 38:875–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carbone J, Smith VK (2008) Evaluating policy interventions with general equilibrium externalities. J Public Econ 92:1254–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carbone J, Smith VK (2013) Valuing nature in a general equilibrium. J Environ Econ Manag 66:72–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cass D (1972) On capital overaccumulation in the aggregative, neoclassical model of economic growth: a complete characterization. J Econ Theory 4(1972):200–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forest Stewardship Council (2012) Facts and figures. https://us.fsc.org/en-us/what-we-do/facts-figures
  13. Forest Stewardship Council (2016) Facts and figures. https://us.fsc.org/en-us/what-we-do/facts-figures
  14. Galor O (2007) Discrete dynamical systems. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karppinen H (2000) Forest values and the objectives of forest ownership. The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Reports No 757Google Scholar
  16. Kehoe TJ, Levine DK (1990) The economics of indeterminacy in overlapping generations models. J Public Econ 42:219–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kemp M, Van Long N (1979) The under-exploitation of natural resources: a model with overlapping generations. Econ Rec 55:214–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim S (2002) Optimal environmental regulation in the presence of other taxes: the role of non-separable preferences and technology. Contrib Econ Analy Policy 1:1–25Google Scholar
  19. Koskela E, Ollikainen M, Puhakka M (2002) Renewable resources in an overlapping generations economy without capital. J Environ Econ Manag 43:497–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koskela E, Ollikainen M, Puhakka M (2008) Saddles and bifurcations in an overlapping generations economy with a renewable resource. Finn Econ Pap 21:3–21Google Scholar
  21. Krautkraemer JA (1985) Optimal growth, resource amenities and the preservation of natural environments. Rev Econ Stud 52:153–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kurz M (1968) Optimal economic growth with wealth effects. Int Econ Rev 9:348–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuuluvainen J, Karppinen H, Ovaskainen V (1996) Landwoner objectives and nonindustrial private timber supply. For Sci 42:300–309Google Scholar
  24. Majumdar M, Mitra T (1994) Periodic and chaotic programs of optimal intertemporal allocation in an aggregative model with wealth effects. Econ Theory 4:649–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mourmouras A (1991) Competitive equilibria and sustainable growth in a life-cycle model with natural resources. Scand J Econ 93:585–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mourmouras A (1993) Conservationist government policies and intergenerational equity in an overlapping generations model with renewable resources. J Public Econ 51:249–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nyarko Y, Olson LJ (1991) Stochastic dynamic models with stock-dependent rewards. J Econ Theory 55:161–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nyarko Y, Olson LJ (1994) Stochastic growth, when utility depends on both consumption and the stock level. Econ Theory 4:791–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Olson LJ, Knapp KC (1997) Exhaustible resource allocation in an overlapping generations economy. J Environ Econ Manag 32:277–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shi S (1994) Weakly nonseparable preferences and distortionary taxes in a small open economy. Int Econ Rev 35:411–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weil P (1987) Love thy children. reflections on the Barro debt neutrality theorem. J Monet Econ 19:377–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Woodford M (1984) Indeterminacy of equilibrium in the overlapping generations model: a survey. Unpublished, May 1984. http://www.columbia.edu/~mw2230/Woodford84.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory Amacher
    • 1
  • Markku Ollikainen
    • 2
  • Mikko Puhakka
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Natural ResourcesVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.Department of Economics and ManagementUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsUniversity of OuluOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations