Advertisement

Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 69, Issue 1, pp 75–101 | Cite as

General Equilibrium Tragedy of the Commons

  • Dale T. ManningEmail author
  • J. Edward Taylor
  • James E. Wilen
Article

Abstract

Many poor economies depend on open access resources for their livelihoods. Households in resource-based economies allocate their time and other factors between resource extraction and other activities. As a result, factors may shift from one sector to another as marginal returns change. This has two important implications. First, it implies potentially strong linkages between resource and non-resource sectors. Second, it means that unmanaged resources cause inefficient allocations of inputs across all sectors, and the effects of resource management spill into other sectors. We construct a local general equilibrium model that accounts for inputs that over-allocate to an open access resource and create a general equilibrium tragedy of the commons. This model describes resource rent dissipation more adequately in economies with mobile factors than a model with slowly dissipating rents. Perfectly mobile factors dissipate rent in every period, but endogenous wages cause labor and capital allocations to change with the resource stock. We use the model to illustrate medium-run impacts of a limit on capital in an artisanal fishery in Honduras. Simulation results reveal that fishery management has economy-wide impacts on prices and wages. Managers in developing countries thus should consider these linkages when implementing policies to conserve fish stocks.

Keywords

General equilibrium Economic linkages Open access natural resources Artisanal fishery Resource management 

References

  1. Abbott JK, Garber-Yonts B, Wilen JE (2010) Employment and remuneration effects of IFQs in the Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands crab fisheries. Mar Resour Econ 25(4):333–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbott JK, Wilen JE (2009) Rent dissipation and efficient rationalization in for-hire recreational fishing. J Environ Econ Manag 58(3):300–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abbott JK, Wilen JE (2011) Dissecting the tragedy: a spatial model of behavior in the commons. J Environ Econ Manag 62(3):386–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angelucci M, De Giorgi G (2009) Indirect effects of an aid program: how do cash transfers affect ineligibles’ consumption? Am Econ Rev 99(1):486–508Google Scholar
  5. Béné C, Hersoug B, Allison EH (2010) Not by rent alone: analysing the Pro-poor functions of small-scale fisheries in developing countries. Dev Policy Rev 28:325–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bluffstone RA (1995) The effect of labor market performance on deforestation in developing countries under open access: an example from Rural Nepal. J Environ Econ Manag 29:42–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boucher SR, Carter MR, Guirkinger C (2008) Risk rationing and wealth effects in credit markets: theory and implications for agricultural development. Am J Agric Econ 90(2):409–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brooks R, Murray M, Salant S, Weise JC (1999) When is the standard analysis of common property extraction under free access correct? A game-theoretic justification for non-game-theoretic analyses. J Polit Econ 107(4):843–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell HF, Lindner RK (1990) The production of fishing effort and the economic performance of license limitation programs. Land Econ 66(1):56–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carbone JC, Smith VK (2010) Valuing ecosystem services in general equilibrium. No. w15844. National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  11. Cherry TL, Cotten SJ, Jones LR (2013) The appropriation of endogenously provided common-pool resources. Resour Energy Econ 35(3):329–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark CW (1990) Mathematical bioeconomics: the optimal management of renewable resources, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Costello C et al (2012) Status and solutions for the world’s unassessed fisheries. Science 338(6106):517–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costello C, Polasky S (2008) Optimal harvesting of stochastic spatial resources. J Environ Econ Manag 56(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Janvry A, Fafchamps M, Sadoulet E (1991) Peasant household behaviour with missing markets: some paradoxes explained. Econ J 101(409):1400–1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellis F (2000) The determinants of rural livelihood diversification in developing countries. J Agric Econ 51(2):289–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Finnoff D, Tschirhart J (2008) Linking dynamic economic and ecological general equilibrium models. Resour Energy Econ 30(2):91–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Finnoff D, Tschirhart J (2011) Inserting ecological detail into economic analysis: agricultural nutrient loading of an estuary fishery. Sustainability 3(10):1688–1722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Espinosa JA, Smith VK (1995) Measuring the environmental consequences of trade policy: a nonmarket CGE analysis. Am J Agric Econ 77(3):772–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ 68(3):643–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goodman DJ (2000) More reservoirs or transfers? A computable general equilibrium analysis of projected water shortages in the Arkansas River Basin. J Agric Resour Econ 25(2):698–713Google Scholar
  22. Gordon HS (1954) The economic theory of a common-property resource: the fishery. J Polit Econ 62(2):124–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hannesson R (2010) The rent drain: a good measure of the gains from better resource management? Mar Resour Econ 25:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Homans FR, Wilen JE (1997) A model of regulated open access resource use. J Environ Econ Manag 32(1):1–21Google Scholar
  26. Jacoby HG (1993) Shadow wages and peasant family labour supply: an econometric application to the Peruvian Sierra. Rev Econ Stud 60:903–921. doi: 10.2307/2298105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Janssen MA, Anderies JM, Joshi SR (2011) Coordination and cooperation in asymmetric commons dilemmas. Exp Econ 14(4):547–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jardine SL, Sanchirico JN (2012) Catch share programs in developing countries: a survey of the literature. Mar Policy 36(6):1242–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jensen R (2007) The digital provide: information (technology), market performance, and welfare in the South Indian fisheries sector. Q J Econ 122(3):879–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson AE, Cinner JE, Hardt MJ, Jacquet J, McClanahan TR, Sanchirico JN (2013) Trends, current understanding and future research priorities for artisanal coral reef fisheries research. Fish Fish 14(3):281–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liese C, Smith MD, Kramer RA (2007) Open access in a spatially delineated artisanal fishery: the case of Minahasa, Indonesia. Environ Dev Econ 12(1):123–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. López-Feldman A, Edward Taylor J (2009) Labor allocation to non-timber extraction in a Mexican rainforest community. J For Econ 15(3):205–221Google Scholar
  33. Manning DT, Taylor JE, Wilen JE (2014) Market integration and natural resource use in developing countries: a linked agrarian-resource economy in Northern Honduras. Environ Dev Econ 19(02):133–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Manning DT, Taylor JE (2015) Agricultural efficiency and labor supply to common property resource collection: lessons from Rural Mexico. J Agric Resour Econ 40(3):365–386Google Scholar
  35. Manning DT, Uchida H (2016) Are two rents better than none? When monopolies correct ill-defined property rights. Mar Resour Econ 31(2):141–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Murray DL (1991) Export agriculture, ecological disruption, and social inequity: some effect of pesticides in Southern Honduras. Agric Hum Values 8(4):19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ostrom E (2008) Tragedy of the commons. In The new palgrave dictionary of economics, pp 3573–3576Google Scholar
  38. Pascoe S, Greboval DF (eds) (2003) Measuring capacity in fisheries. No. 445. Food Agric OrgGoogle Scholar
  39. Perroni C, Wigle RM (1994) International trade and environmental quality: how important are the linkages? Can J Econ 27:551–567Google Scholar
  40. Peterson D, Dwyer G, Appels D, Fry J (2005) Water trade in the southern Murray–Darling Basin. Econ Rec 81(s1):S115–S127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Plourde CG (1971) Exploitation of Common property replenishable natural resources. Econ Inq 9(3):256–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Robinson EJZ, Albers HJ, Williams JC (2008) Spatial and temporal modeling of community non-timber forest extraction. J Environ Econ Manag 56(3):234–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ruddle K, Hickey F (2008) Accounting for the mismanagement of tropical nearshore fisheries. Environ Dev Sustain 10(5):565–589Google Scholar
  44. Sampson GS, Sanchirico JN, Roheim CA, Bush SR, Edward Taylor J, Allison EH, Anderson JL et al (2015) Secure sustainable seafood from developing countries. Science 348(6234):504–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Samuelson PA (1974) Is the rent-collector worthy of his full hire? East Econ J 1(1):7–10Google Scholar
  46. Sanchirico JN, Wilen JE (1999) Bioeconomics of spatial exploitation in a patchy environment. J Environ Econ Manag 37(2):129–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sanchirico JN, Wilen JE (2005) Optimal spatial management of renewable resources: matching policy scope to ecosystem scale. J Environ Econ Manag 50(1):23–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schneider MH, Zenios SA (1990) A comparative study of algorithms for matrix balancing. Oper Res 38(3):439–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scott A (1957) Optimal utilization and control of fisheries. In: Turvey R, Wiseman J (eds) Econ Fish. F.A.O, RomeGoogle Scholar
  50. Seung CK, Waters EC (2009) Measuring the economic linkage of Alaska fisheries: a supply-driven social accounting matrix (SDSAM) approach. Fish Res 97(1):17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Simon CP, Blume L (1994) Mathematics for economists, vol 7. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Singh I, Squire L, Strauss J (eds) (1986) An overview of agricultural household models: the basic model: theory, empirical results, and policy conclusions. In Agricultural household models: extensions, applications and policy. World Bank and Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 17–47Google Scholar
  53. Smith VL (1968) Economics of production from natural resources. Am Econ Rev 58(3, Part 1):409–431Google Scholar
  54. Smith VL (1974) General equilibrium with a replenishable natural resource. Rev Econ Stud 41:105–115Google Scholar
  55. Smith MD, Crowder LB (2011) Valuing ecosystem services with fishery rents: a lumped-parameter approach to hypoxia in the neuse river estuary. Sustainability 3(11):2229–2267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stavins S, Robert N (2011) The problem of the commons: still unsettled after 100 years. Am Econ Rev 101(1):81–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Taylor JE, Adelman I (2003) Agricultural household models: genesis, evolution, and extensions. Rev Econ Househ 1:33–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Taylor JE, Filipski M (2014) Beyond experiments in development economics: local economy-wide impact evaluation. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Velázquez E, Cardenete MA, Hewings GJD (2007) Water price and water reallocation in Andalusia: a computable general equilibrium approach. No. 07.04. 2007Google Scholar
  60. Weitzman M (1974) Free access vs. private ownership as alternative systems for man-aging common property. J Econ Theory 8:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Weninger Q, McConnell KE (2000) Buyback programs in commercial fisheries: efficiency versus transfers. Can J Econ 33(2):394–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilen J (1979) Regulatory implications of alternative models of fishermen behavior. J Fish Res Board Can 36(7):855–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wilen J (2013) The challenges of pro-poor fisheries reform. Mar Resour Econ 28(3):203–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dale T. Manning
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. Edward Taylor
    • 2
  • James E. Wilen
    • 2
  1. 1.Colorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.University of California-DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations