Advertisement

Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 67, Issue 3, pp 609–636 | Cite as

Attitudes Toward Catastrophe

  • Christoph M. Rheinberger
  • Nicolas Treich
Article

Abstract

In light of climate change and other global threats, policy commentators sometimes urge that society should be more concerned about catastrophes. This paper reflects on what society’s attitude toward low-probability, high-impact events is, or should be. We first argue that catastrophe risk can be conceived of as a spread in the distribution of losses. Based on this conception, we review studies from decision sciences, psychology, and behavioral economics that explore people’s attitudes toward various social risks. Contray to popular belief, we find more evidence against than in favor of catastrophe aversion—the preference for a mean-preserving contraction of the loss distribution—and discuss a number of possible behavioral explanations. Next, we turn to social choice theory and examine how various social welfare functions handle catastrophe risk. We explain why catastrophe aversion may be in conflict with equity concerns and other-regarding preferences. Finally, we discuss current approaches to evaluate and regulate catastrophe risk.

Keywords

Catastrophe Social risks Framing Risk aversion Equity concerns 

References

  1. Abrahamsson M, Johansson H (2006) Risk preferences regarding multiple fatalities and some implications for societal risk decision making–an empirical study. J Risk Res 9:703–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler MD (2005) Against “individual risk”: a sympathetic critique of risk assessment. Univ Pa Law Rev 153:1121–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler MD, Hammitt JK, Treich N (2014) The social value of mortality risk reduction: VSL versus the social welfare function approach. J Health Econ 35:82–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armantier O, Treich N (2004) Social willingness to pay, mortality risks and contingent valuation. J Risk Uncertain 29:7–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arrow KJ, Fisher AC (1974) Environmental preservation, uncertainty, and irreversibility. Q J Econ 88:312–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arrow KJ, Priebsch M (2014) Bliss, catastrophe, and rational policy. Environ Resour Econ 58:491–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrett S, Dannenberg A (2012) Climate negotiations under scientific uncertainty. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:17372–17376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barro RJ (2015) Environmental protection, rare disasters and discount rates. Economica 82:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barro RJ, Ursua J (2012) Rare macroeconomic disasters. Annu Rev Econ 4:83–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Battigalli P, Dufwenberg M (2007) Guilt in games. Am Econ Rev 97:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bedford T (2013) Decision making for group risk reduction: dealing with epistemic uncertainty. Risk Anal 33:1884–1898Google Scholar
  12. Ben-Porath E, Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (1997) On the measurement of inequality under uncertainty. J Econ Theory 75:194–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bergstrom TC (1982) When is a man’s life worth more than his human capital? In: Jones-Lee M (ed) The value of life and safety. No. 3–26. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  14. Bernard C, Rheinberger CM, Treich N (2015) Catastrophe aversion and risk equity under dependent risks. mimeo, Toulouse School of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  15. Bohnenblust H, Slovic P (1998) Integrating technical analysis and public values in risk-based decision making. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 59:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2010) Betrayal aversion: evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States: comment. Am Econ Rev 100:628–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bommier A, Zuber S (2008) Can preferences for catastrophe avoidance reconcile social discounting with intergenerational equity? Soc Choice Welf 31:415–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2012) Salience theory of choice under risk. Q J Econ 127:1243–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bostrom N (2013) Existential risk prevention as global priority. Global Policy 4:15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bostrom N, Cirkovic MM (2008) Global catastrophic risks. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Bovens L, Fleurbaey M (2012) Evaluating life or death prospects. Econ Philos 28:217–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Brennan G, González LG, Güth W, Levati MV (2008) Attitudes toward private and collective risk in individual and strategic choice situations. J Econ Behav Organ 67:253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Breyer S (1993) Breaking the vicious circle: toward effective risk regulation. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Brock JM, Lange A, Ozbay EY (2013) Dictating the risk: experimental evidence on giving in risky environments. Am Econ Rev 103:415–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Broome J (1984) Uncertainty and fairness. Econ J 94:624–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Bruhin A, Fehr-Duda H, Epper T (2010) Risk and rationality: Uncovering heterogeneity in probability distortion. Econometrica 78:1375–1412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cameron TA (2010) Euthanizing the value of a statistical life. Rev Environ Econ Policy 4:161–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Carlsson F, Daruvala D, Jaldell H (2012) Do administrators have the same priorities for risk reductions as the general public? J Risk Uncertain 45:79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dasgupta P, Heal G (1974) The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources. Rev Econ Stud 41:3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Diamond J (2005) Collapse: how societies choose to fail or succeed. Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Diamond PA (1967) Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparison of utility: comment. J Polit Econ 75:765–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Druckman JN (2001) Evaluating framing effects. J Econ Psychol 22:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eisensee T, Strömberg D (2007) News droughts, news floods, and us disaster relief. Q J Econ 122:693–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ellingsen T, Johannesson M, Tjøtta S, Torsvik G (2010) Testing guilt aversion. Games Econ Behav 68:95–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Q J Econ 75:643–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Epstein LG, Segal U (1992) Quadratic social welfare functions. J Polit Econ 100:691–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Evans A, Verlander N (1997) What is wrong with criterion FN-lines for judging the tolerability of risk? Risk Anal 17:157–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fetherstonhaugh D, Slovic P, Johnson SM, Friedrich J (1997) Insensitivity to the value of human life: a study of psychophysical numbing. J Risk Uncertain 14:283–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fischhoff B (1983) Predicting frames. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 9:103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fishburn PC (1984) Equity axioms for public risks. Oper Res 32:901–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fishburn PC, Sarin RK (1991) Dispersive equity and social risk. Manag Sci 37:751–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fishburn PC, Sarin RK (1994) Fairness and social risk I: unaggregated analyses. Manag Sci 40:1174–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fleurbaey M (2010) Assessing risky social situations. J Polit Econ 118:649–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Freeman PK, Kunreuther H (1997) Managing environmental risk through insurance. Studies in risk and uncertainty. Kluwer, NorwellCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Friedl A, De Miranda KL, Schmidt U (2014) Insurance demand and social comparison: an experimental analysis. J Risk Uncertain 48:97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gajdos T, Weymark JA, Zoli C (2010) Shared destinies and the measurement of social risk equity. Ann Oper Res 176:409–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gerking S, Dickie M, Veronesi M (2014) Valuation of human health: an integrated model of willingness to pay for mortality and morbidity risk reductions. J Environ Econ Manag 68:20–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Giddens A (1999) Risk and responsibility. Mod Law Rev 62:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hammerton M, Jones-Lee M, Abbott V (1982) Equity and public risk: some empirical results. Oper Res 30:203–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hammitt JK, Haninger K (2010) Valuing fatal risks to children and adults: effects of disease, latency, and risk aversion. J Risk Uncertain 40:57–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hammitt JK, Treich N (2007) Statistical vs. identified lives in benefit–cost analysis. J Risk Uncertain 35:45–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Harrison GW, Lau MI, Rutström EE, Tarazona-Gomez M (2013) Preferences over social risk. Oxf Econ Pap 65:25–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Harsanyi J (1955) Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. J Polit Econ 63:309–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Horowitz J, Lange A (2014) Cost–benefit analysis under uncertainty—a note on Weitzman’s dismal theorem. Energy Econ 42:201–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hsu M, Bhatt M, Adolphs R, Tranel D, Camerer CF (2005) Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making. Science 310:1680–1683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Huang L, Zhou Y, Han Y, Hammitt JK, Bi J, Liu Y (2013) Effect of the Fukushima nuclear accident on the risk perception of residents near a nuclear power plant in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:19742–19747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hubert P, Barny M, Moatti J (1991) Elicitation of decision-makers’ preferences for management of major hazards. Risk Anal 11:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Itaoka K, Saito A, Krupnick A, Adamowicz W, Taniguchi T (2006) The effect of risk characteristics on the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions from electric power generation. Environ Resour Econ 33:371–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Jenni K, Loewenstein G (1997) Explaining the identifiable victim effect. J Risk Uncertain 14:235–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Johansson-Stenman O (2008) Mad cows, terrorism and junk food: should public policy reflect perceived or objective risks? J Health Econ 27:234–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Johansson-Stenman O, Konow J (2010) Fair air: distributive justice and environmental economics. Environ Resour Econ 46:147–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Jonas H (1984) The imperative of responsibility: in search of an ethics for the technological age. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  63. Jones-Lee MW (1992) Paternalistic altruism and the value of statistical life. Econ J 102:80–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Jones-Lee MW, Loomes G (1995) Scale and context effects in the valuation of transport safety. J Risk Uncertain 11:183–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kasperson RE, Renn O, Slovic P, Brown HS, Emel J, Goble R, Kasperson JX, Ratick S (1988) The social amplification of risk—a conceptual-framework. Risk Anal 8:177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Keeney RL (1980a) Equity and public risk. Oper Res 28:527–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Keeney RL (1980b) Utility-functions for equity and public risk. Manag Sci 26:345–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Keller LR, Sarin RK (1988) Equity in social risk: some empirical observations. Risk Anal 8:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Klinke A, Renn O (2002) A new approach to risk evaluation and management: risk-based, precaution-based, and discourse-based strategies. Risk Anal 22:1071–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kocher MG, Lahno AM, Trautmann ST (2015) Ambiguity aversion is the exception. CESifo working paper series no. 5261Google Scholar
  71. Konow J (2000) Fair shares: accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. Am Econ Rev 90:1072–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Krawczyk M, Le Lec F (2010) ‘Give me a chance!’ An experiment in social decision under risk. Exp Econ 13:500–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kuehberger A (1998) The influence of framing on risky decisions: a meta-analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 75:23–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kuehberger A, Schulte-Mecklenbeck M, Perner J (1999) The effects of framing, reflection, probability, and payoff on risk preference in choice tasks. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 78:204–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kuran T, Sunstein CR (1999) Availability cascades and risk regulation. Stanf Law Rev 51:683–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Laffont J-J, Tirole J (1991) The politics of government decision-making: a theory of regulatory capture. Q J Econ 106:1089–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lahno AM, Serra-Garcia M (2015) Peer effects in risk taking: envy or conformity? J Risk Uncertain 50:73–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lathrop JW (1982) Evaluating technological risk: prescriptive and descriptive perspectives. In: Kunreuther HC, Ley EV (eds) The risk analysis controversy—an institutional perspective. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  79. Lichtenstein S, Gregory R, Slovic P, Wagenaar WA (1990) When lives are in your hands: dilemmas of the societal decision maker. In: Hogarth RM (ed) Insights in decision making: a tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 91–106Google Scholar
  80. Linde J, Sonnemans J (2012) Social comparison and risky choices. J Risk Uncertain 44:45–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N (2001) Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull 127:267–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Lopez-Vargas K (2014) Risk attitudes and fairness: theory and experiment. Working paperGoogle Scholar
  83. Martin IW, Pindyck RS (2015) Averting catastrophes: the strange economics of Scylla and Charybdis. Am Econ Rev 105:2947–2985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Milinski M, Sommerfeld RD, Krambeck H-J, Reed FA, Marotzke J (2008) The collective-risk social dilemma and the prevention of simulated dangerous climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:2291–2294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Millner A (2013) On welfare frameworks and catastrophic climate risks. J Environ Econ Manag 65:310–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Myerson RB (1981) Utilitarianism, egalitarianism, and the timing effect in social choice problems. Econometrica 49:883–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Nordhaus WD (2011) The economics of tail events with an application to climate change. Rev Environ Econ Policy 5:240–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Olivola CY, Sagara N (2009) Distributions of observed death tolls govern sensitivity to human fatalities. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:22151–22156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Olson M (1971) The logic of collective action—public goods and the theory of groups, 2nd edn. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  90. Pate-Cornell M (2002) Risk and uncertainty analysis in government safety decisions. Risk Anal 22:633–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Peterson M (2002) The limits of catastrophe aversion. Risk Anal 22:527–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Pindyck RS (2011) Fat tails, thin tails, and climate change policy. Rev Environ Econ Policy 5:258–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Pindyck RS, Wang N (2013) The economic and policy consequences of catastrophes. Am Econ J Econ Policy 5:306–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Pollak RA (1998) Imagined risks and cost–benefit analysis. Am Econ Rev 88:376–380Google Scholar
  95. Portney PR (1992) Trouble in Happyville. J Policy Anal Manag 11:131–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Posner RA (2004) Catastrophe: risk and response. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  97. Pratt JW, Zeckhauser RJ (1996) Willingness to pay and the distribution of risk and wealth. J Polit Econ 104:747–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Prelec D (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66:497–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Rheinberger CM (2010) Experimental evidence against the paradigm of mortality risk aversion. Risk Anal 30:590–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Rohde IM, Rohde KI (2011) Risk attitudes in a social context. J Risk Uncertain 43:205–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Rothschild M, Stiglitz JE (1970) Increasing risk: I. A definition. J Econ Theory 2:225–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Salanie F, Treich N (2009) Regulation in Happyville. Econ J 119:665–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Schelling T (1968) The life you save may be your own. In: Chase S (ed) Problems in public expenditure analysis. Brookings, Washington, DC, pp 143–144Google Scholar
  104. Sen A (1970) Interpersonal aggregation and partial comparability. Econometrica 38:393–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236:280–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Slovic P (2007) ‘If I look at the mass I will never act’: psychic numbing and genocide. Judgm Decis Mak 2:79–95Google Scholar
  107. Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (2000) Facts and fears: understanding perceived risk. In: Slovic P (ed) The perception of risk. Earthscan, London, pp 137–154Google Scholar
  108. Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B (1984) Modeling the societal impact of fatal accidents. Manag Sci 30:464–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Small DA, Loewenstein G (2003) Helping a victim or helping the victim: altruism and identifiability. J Risk Uncertain 26:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Solow RM (1972) Notes on “Doomsday Models”. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69:3832–3833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Stallen PJM, Geerts R, Vrijling HK (1996) Three conceptions of quantified societal risk. Risk Anal 16:635–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Starr C (1969) Social benefit versus technological risk. Science 165:1232–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Stewart N, Chater N, Stott HP, Reimers S (2003) Prospect relativity: How choice options influence decision under risk. J Exp Psychol Gen 132:23–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Sunstein CR (2004) Valuing life: a plea for disaggregation. Duke Law J 54:385–445Google Scholar
  115. Sunstein CR (2005) Laws of fear: beyond the precautionary principle. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Sunstein CR (2007) Worst-case scenarios. Harvard University Press, HarvardCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Taleb NN (2010) The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable fragility. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  118. Tavoni A, Dannenberg A, Kallis G, Loschel A (2011) Inequality, communication, and the avoidance of disastrous climate change in a public goods game. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:11825–11829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Treich N (2010) The value of a statistical life under ambiguity aversion. J Environ Econ Manag 59:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211:453–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1975) Reactor safety study: an assessment of accident risks in U.S. commercial nuclear power plants. WASH 1400 NUREG-75/014, The Commission, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  122. Västfjäll D, Slovic P, Mayorga M (2015) Pseudoinefficacy: Negative feelings from children who cannot be helped reduce warm glow for children who can be helped. Front Psychol 6:616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Viscusi WK (1998) Rational Risk Policy. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Von Hippel FN (2011) It could happen here. The New York Times, March 24:A31Google Scholar
  125. Wakker P, Deneffe D (1996) Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities when probabilities are distorted or unknown. Manag Sci 42:1131–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Wakker PP (2010) Prospect theory: for risk and ambiguity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Weitzman ML (2009) On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Rev Econ Stat 91:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Wiener J (2016) The tragedy of the uncommons. Global Policy (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  129. Zeckhauser R (1996) The economics of catastrophes. J Risk Uncertain 12:113–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Toulouse School of EconomicsToulouseFrance
  2. 2.Toulouse School of Economics (INRA)ToulouseFrance
  3. 3.European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations