Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 62, Issue 1, pp 125–161 | Cite as

Consumer Learning and Hybrid Vehicle Adoption

Article

Abstract

We study the effect of differences in product quality on new technology diffusion. We propose a model in which heterogeneity in perceived product quality affects consumer adoption. If consumers experientially infer the quality of a technology, an increase in initial exposure to a low-quality product may inhibit subsequent diffusion. Incentives intended to speed up adoption may in fact have the opposite effect, if they propagate low-quality signals. We examine the predictions of the model using sales data for 11 hybrid-vehicle models between 2000 and 2006. Consistent with press reports that the first-generation Insight was perceived to be of lower quality than the first-generation Prius, we find that, conditional on overall hybrid vehicle adoption in the first 2 years, locations with a relatively high Prius market share experienced faster subsequent adoption than states with a relatively high Insight market share. We estimate the elasticity of new hybrid sales with respect to the Prius penetration rate is 0.30–0.58, while the elasticity with respect to the Insight penetration rate is \(-\)0.14 to \(-\)0.44.

Keywords

Hybrid vehicles Consumer behavior Learning Government incentives Energy efficiency 

JEL Classification

O33 Q55 D83 

References

  1. Axsen J, Mountain DC, Jaccard M (2009) Combining stated and revealed choice research to simulate the neighbor effect: the case of hybrid-electric vehicles. Resour Energy Econ 31(3):221–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berestanu A, Li S (2011) Gasoline prices, government support, and the demand for hybrid vehicles in the United States. Int Econ Rev 52(1):161–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bollinger B, Gillingham K (2012) Peer effects in the diffusion of solar photovoltaic panels. Market Sci 31(6):900–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chandra A, Gulati S, Kandlikar M (2010) Green drivers or free riders? An analysis of tax rebates for hybrid vehicles. J Environ Econ Manag 60(2):78–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chevalier J, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews. J Mark Res 43(3):345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi J (1997) Herd behavior, the ’Penguin Effect’, and the suppression of informational diffusion: an analysis of informational externalities and payoff interdependency. RAND J Econ 28(3):407–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen L (1991) The technology pork barrel. Brookings Institutional Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Colombo M, Mosconi R (March 1995) Complementarity and cumulative learning effects in the early diffusion of multiple technologies. J Ind Econ 43(1):13–48Google Scholar
  9. Consumer Reports. “Fuel Efficient Cars 12/00”. December 2000. www.consumerreports.org
  10. De Haan P, Mueller M, Peters A (2006) Does the hybrid Toyota Prius lead to rebound effects? Analysis of size and number of cars previously owned by Swiss prius buyers”. Ecol Econ 58(3):592–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dover Y, Goldenberg J, Shapira D (2012) Network traces on penetration: uncovering degree distribution from adoption data. Mark Sci 31(4):689–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fri R (2003) The role of knowledge: technological innovation in the energy system. Energy J 24(4):51–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gallagher K, Muehlegger E (2011) Giving green to get green? Incentives and consumer adoption of hybrid vehicle technology. J Environ Econ Manag 61(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenman JV (1996) The car park: diffusion models revisited. Energy Econ 18(1–2):107–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Griliches Z (1957) Hybrid corn: an exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica 25(4):501–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Helm D (2010) Government failure, rent-seeking and capture: the design of climate change policy. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 26(2):182–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jensen R (1983) Innovation adoption and diffusion when there are competing innovations. J Econ Theory 29(1):161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kahn M (2007) Do greens drive hummers of hybrids? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice. J Environ Econ Manag 54(2):129–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kahn M, Vaughn R (2009) Green market geography: the spatial clustering of hybrid vehicles and LEED registered buildings. BEJEAP Contrib 9(2):1–24Google Scholar
  20. Kloess M, Muller A (2011) Simulating the impact of policy, energy prices and technological progress on the passenger car fleet in Austria—a model based analysis 2010–2050. Energy Policy 39(9):5045–5062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kopecy K, Suen R (2010) A quantitative analysis of suburbanization and the diffusion of the automobile. Int Econ Rev 51(4):1003–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lamberson PJ (2008) The diffusion of hybrid electric vehicles. In: Future research directions in sustainable mobility and accessibility, report by sustainable mobility accessibility research and transformation at the University of Michigan Center for Advancing Research and Solutions for SocietyGoogle Scholar
  23. Lescaroux F, Rech O (2008) The impact of automobile diffusion on the income elasticity of motor fuel demand. Energy J 29(1):41–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mau P, Eyzaguirre J, Jaccard M, Collins-Dodd C, Tiedmann K (2008) The ‘Neighbor Effect’: simulating dynamics in consumer preferences for new vehicle technologies. Ecol Econ 68(1–2):504–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McFarland J, Herzog H (2006) Incorporating carbon capture and storage technologies in integrated assessment models. Energy Econ 28(5–6):632–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Medlock K, Soligo R (2002) Car ownership and economic development with forecasts to the year 2015. J Transp Econ Policy 36(2):163–188Google Scholar
  27. Narayanan S, Nair HS (2013) Estimating causal installed-base effects: a bias-correction approach. J Mark Res 50(1):70–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Phil P (2007) Once frumpy, green cars start showing some flash. New York Times, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Rose N, Joskow P (1990) The diffusion of new technologies: evidence from the electric utility industry. RAND J Econ 21(3):354–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sallee J (2011) The surprising incidence of tax credits for the Toyota Prius. Am Econ J Econ Policy 3(2):189–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sandahl LJ, Gilbride TL, Ledbetter MR, Steward HE, Calwell C (2006) Compact fluorescent lighting in America: lessons learned on the way to market. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Report for the Department of EnergyGoogle Scholar
  32. Sexton S, Sexton A (2012) Conspicuous conservation: The Prius halo and willingness to pay for environmental bona fides. Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  33. Stoneman P, Toivanen O (1997) The diffusion of multiple technologies: an empirical study. Econ Innov New Technol 5(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Young HP (2009) Innovation diffusion in heterogeneous populations: contagion, social influence, and social learning. Am Econ Rev 99(4):1899–1924CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of California – DavisDavisUSA
  3. 3.NBERCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations