The Conflict Between Conservation and Recreation When Visitors Dislike Crowding: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of the Spatial Distribution of Recreational Beach Users
- 555 Downloads
We investigate conflicts between wildlife conservation and recreational use that can occur at open-access sites when visitors dislike crowding. A theoretical model is proposed which determines the spatial distributions of visitors to a beach, given their willingness to walk to avoid crowding and the configuration of beach access points. This model is estimated for three sections of coastline in eastern England using data from aerial video photography. Visitor density is strongly and negatively correlated with distance from access points. Willingness to walk has a highly skewed population distribution. We discuss the implications of these findings for the management of conflicts between conservation and recreation at open-access sites.
KeywordsConservation Recreation Visitors Crowding Beach
We would like to thank the NERC/ESRC/EPSRC for funding this work through the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. WJS is funded by Arcadia. Viola Kimmel and Emma Coombes digitised the locations of visitors to the beach. Ordnance Survey kindly provided the MasterMap data: \(\copyright \) All Rights Reserved, Ordnance Survey Licence Number 10024462, 2003. Amy Doherty provided meteorological data. We thank two anonymous referees for comments on a previous version of the paper.
- Bateman IJ, Abson D, Beaumont N, Darnell A, Fezzi C, Hanley N, Kontoleon A, Maddison D, Morling P, Morris J, Mourato S, Pascual U, Perino G, Sen A, Tinch D, Turner RK, Valatin G, Andrews B, Asara V, Askew T, Aslam U, Atkinson G, Beharry-Borg N, Bolt K, Cole M, Collins M, Comerford E, Coombes E, Dugdale S, Dunn H, Foden J, Gibbons S, Haines-Young R, Hattam C, Hulme M, Ishwaran M, Lovett A, Luisetti T, MacKerron G, Mangi S, Moran D, Munday P, Paterson J, Resende G, Siriwardena G, Skea J, van Soest D, Termansen M (2011) Economic values from ecosystems. The UK national ecosystem assessment technical report. UNEP-WCMC, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Champ PA, Boyle K, Brown TC (eds) (2003) A primer on non-market valuation, the economics of non-market goods and services, vol 3. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- DeRuyck MC, Soares AG, McLachlan A (1997b) Social carrying capacity as a management tool for sandy beaches. J Coast Res 13:822–830Google Scholar
- Dharmaratne GS, Braithwaite AE (1998) Economic valuation of the coastine for Tourism in Barbados. J Travel Res 37:138–144Google Scholar
- Dominguez J, Vidal M (2003) Influence of researchers on the breeding success of Kentish plovers Charadrius alexandrinus. Ardeola 50:15–19Google Scholar
- Garcia C, Servera J (2003) Impacts of tourism development on water demand and beach degradation on the island of Mallorca (Spain) Geografiska Annaler series a-physical. Geography 85A:287–300Google Scholar
- Liley D, Sutherland WJ (2006) Predicting the consequences of human disturbance for Ringed Plovers Charadrius hiaticula: a game theory approach. Ibis 149(Suppl 1):82–94Google Scholar
- Ruhlen TD, Abbott S, Stendahl LE, Page GW (2003) Evidence that human disturbance reduces snowy plover chick survival. J Field Ornithol 74:300–304Google Scholar
- Sutherland WJ, Parker GA (1985) The distribution of unequal competitors. In: Smith RH, Sibly RM (eds) Behavioural ecology: the ecological consequences of adaptive behaviour. Blackwell, Oxford pp 255–278Google Scholar
- Tratalos JA, Gill JA, Jones A, Showler D, Bateman I, Watkinson AR, Sugden R, Sutherland WJ (2011) Regional models of the influence of human disturbance and habitat quality on territory choice by ringed plover Charadrius hiaticula and oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus. University of East Anglia, Working paperGoogle Scholar