Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Adjusting for Cultural Differences in International Benefit Transfer

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Values for non-market goods can be expected to be sensitive to variations in the cultural contexts of beneficiaries. However, little progress has been made to date in adapting benefit transfer (BT) procedures for cultural variations. Using information from a study that ranked 62 societies with respect to nine attributes of their cultures, we develop an index that is then used to re-weight multiple coastal ecosystem service value estimates. We examine whether these culturally-adjusted BT estimates are statistically different than simply transferring the income-adjusted mean transfer estimates for each coastal ecosystem service from international study sites to the policy site. We find that once differences in income levels have been accounted for, the differences in cultural dimensions between study and policy sites actually have little impact on the magnitude of our transfer estimates. This is not a surprising result given that the majority of the study site estimates are derived from countries that share many ethnic, linguistic and other cultural similarities to the policy site. However, benefit adjustments based on cultural factors could have a much higher impacts in settings different to that investigated here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberini A, Cropper M, Tsu-Tan F, Krupnick A, Jin-Tan L, Shaw D, Harrington W (1997) Valuing health effects of air pollution in developing countries: the case of Taiwan. J Environ Econ Manag 34: 107–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez-Farizo B, Hanley N (2006) Improving the process of valuing non-market benefits: combining citizens’ juries with choice modelling. Land Econ 82(3): 465–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB, Hacker S, Kennedy C, Koch E, Stier A, Silliman B (2011) The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol Monogr 81(2): 169–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry L, van Rensburg T, Hynes S (2011) Improving the recreational value of Ireland’s coastal resources: a contingent behavioural application. Mar Policy 35: 764–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton D, Mourato S (2003) Transferring the benefits of avoided health Effects from Water pollution between Portugal and Costa Rica. Environ Dev Econ 8: 351–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman I, Ennew C, Lovett A, Rayner A (1999) Modelling and mapping agricultural output values using farm specific details and environmental databases. J Agric Econ 50: 488–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman I, Jones A, Nishikawa N, Brouwer R (2000) Benefits transfer in theory and practice: a review and some new studies. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE) and School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman I, Day B, Georgiou S, Lake I (2006) The aggregation of environmental benefit values: welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP. Ecol Econ 60: 450–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman I, Brouwer R, Cranford M, Hime S, Ozdemiroglu E, Phang Z, Provins A (2009) Valuing environmental impacts: practical guidelines for the use of value transfer in policy and project appraisal. Value transfer guidelines. Eftec, London. Submitted to Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), Dec 2009. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/policy/natural-environ/using/valuation/index.htm

  • Beaumont NJ, Austen MC, Atkins JP, Burdon D, Degraer S, Dentinho TP, Derous S, Holm P, Horton T, van Ierland E, Marboe AH, Starkey DJ, Townsend M, Zarzycki T (2007) Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: implications for the ecosystem approach. Mar Pollut Bull 54: 253–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blamey R, Common M, Quiggin J (1995) Respondnts to contingent valuation surveys: consumers or citizens?. Aust J Agric Econ 39: 263–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner J, Jiménez J, Sardá R, Garola A (2010) An assessment of the nonmarket value of the ecosystem services provided by the Catalan coastal zone, Spain. Ocean Coast Manag 53: 27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brondizio E, Gatzweiler F, Zagrafos C et al (2010) Socio-cultural context of ecosystem and biodiversity valuation. In: McNeely J et al (ed) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity (TEEB). United Nations Environmental Programme and the European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2000) Directive of the European parliament and of the council 2000/60/EC establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Communities L327/1:72

  • Colombo S, Hanley N (2008) How can we reduce the errors from benefits transfer? An investigation using the choice experiment method. Land Econ 84: 128–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neil R, Paruelo J, Raskin R, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSO (2010) Cenus 2006—interactive tables. http://www.cso.ie/census/. Accessed 28 June 2010

  • Devillers P, Devillers-Terschuren J, Ledant J (1991) CORINE biotopes manual: a method to identify and describe consistently sites of major importance for nature conservation. Data specifications—part 2 (EUR 12587/3 EN). Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Fitzgerald A, Shwom R (2005) Environmental values. Ann Rev Environ Resour 30: 335–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) (2004) A national survey of water-based leisure activities in Ireland 2003. http://www.esri.ie/publications/search_for_a_publication/search_results/view/index.xml?id=1941. Accessed 17 July 2010 (online)

  • Failte Ireland (2011) Tourism regions data. http://www.failteireland.ie/Research-Statistics/Tourism-Facts/Tourism-Regions Accessed 12 Aug 2011 (online)

  • Furnham A, Kirkcaldy B, Lynn R (1994) National attitudes to competitiveness, money and work amongst young people: first, second and third world differences. Hum Relat 47: 119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garpe K (2008) Ecosystem services provided by the Baltic Sea and Skagerrak. Swedish EPA, Naturvårdsverket, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghermandi A, van den Bergh J, Brander L, de Groot H, Nunes P (2010) The values of natural and human-made wetlands: a meta-analysis. Water Resour Res 46: W12516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley N, Barbier E (2009) Pricing nature: cost-benefit analysis and environmental policy-making. Edward Elgar, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley N, Ready R, Colombo S, Watson F, Stewart M, Bergmann EA (2008) The impacts of knowledge of the past on preferences for future landscape change. J Environ Manag 90: 1404–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Camerer C, Fehr E, Gintis H, McElreath R (2001) In search of homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Am Econ Rev 91: 73–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornborg A, McNeill J, Martinez-Alier J (2007) Rethinking environmental history: world-system history and global environmental change. Altamira Press, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • House R, Hanges P, Javidan M, Dorfman P, Gupta V (2004) Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Howley P, Hynes S, O’Donoghue C (2010) The citizen versus consumer distinction: An exploration of individuals’ preferences in contingent valuation studies. Ecol Econ 69: 1524–1531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyos D, Mariel P, Fernandez-Macho J (2009) The influence of cultural identity on the WTP to protect natural resources: some empirical evidence. Ecol Econ 68: 2372–2381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain S, Winrow-Griffen A, Moran D, Robinson L, Fofana A, Paramor O, Frid C (2010) An ex ante ecological economic assessment of the benefits arising from marine protected areas in the UK. Ecol Econ 69: 828–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes S, Hanley N, O’Donoghue C (2007) Using spatial microsimulation techniques in the aggregation of environmental benefit values: an application to corncrake conservation on Irish farmland. In: Envecon 2007: applied environmental economics conference, organised by the UK Network of Environmental Economists (UKNEE), London, Friday, 23 March 2007

  • Hynes S, Hanley N, O’Donoghue C (2010) A combinatorial optimization approach to non-market environmental benefit aggregation via simulated populations. Land Econ 86: 345–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes S, Scully C, Browne A (2011) Valuing marine environmental characteristics associated with changes to the EU bathing water directive. Paper presented at the 3rd annual Beaufort marine socio-economic symposium, at the National University of Ireland, Galway, 11 Nov 2011

  • Inglehart R, Baker W (2000) Modernization, cultural change and the persistence of traditional values. Am Sociol Rev 65: 19–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen JB, Hanley N (2009) Are there income effects on global willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation?. Environ Resour Econ 43: 137–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston R, Rosenberger R (2010) Methods, trends and controversies in contemporary benefit transfer. J Econ Surv 24: 479–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindhjem H, Navrud S (2009) Asking for individual or household willingness to pay for environmental goods? Implications for aggregate welfare measures. Environ Resour Econ 43: 11–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S (2007) Valuing ecosystem services: an ecological economic approach. PhD thesis, Faculty of the Graduate College, The University of Vermont

  • Loomis J (1992) The evolution of a more rigorous approach to benefit transfer: benefit function transfer. Water Resour Res 28: 701–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McVittie A, Moran D (2010) Valuing the non-use benefits of marine conservation zones: an application to the UK Marine Bill. Ecol Econ 70: 413–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEA: (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • NPWS (National Parks and Wildlife Services) (2005) Surveys of sensitive subtidal benthic communities in Kilkieran Bay and Islands SAC and Kingstown Bay SAC. Report prepared by MERC Consultants. http://www.npws.ie/en/media/NPWS/Publications/Marine/Media,6636,en.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2010 (online)

  • NPWS (National Parks and Wildlife Services) (2010) Galway—special areas of conservation. http://www.npws.ie/en/en/ProtectedSites/SpecialAreasofConservationSACs/. Accessed 23 July 2010

  • Navrud S (2007) Practical tools for benefit transfer in Denmark—guidelines and examples. Report to the Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen

  • Navrud S, Ready R (2007) Environmental value transfer: issues and methods. Springer, Kluwer, Dordrect

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes PALD, Blaeij A, ven den Bergh J (2009) Decomposition of warm glow for multiple stakeholders: stated choice valuation of shellfish policy. Land Econ 85(3): 485–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojea E, Loureiro M (2007) Altruistic, egoistic and biospheric values in willingness to pay (WTP) for wildlife. Ecol Econ 63: 807–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D (2003) conceptual framework for analysing the distributive impacts of environmental policies. Report prepared for the OECD Environment Directorate workshop on the distribution of benefits and costs of environmental policies, Paris, March 2003. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~uctpa36/oecd%20distribution.pdf. Accessed 23 Aug 2011

  • Posthuma R (2009) National culture and union membership: a cultural-cognitive perspective. Ind Relat 64: 507–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouta E (2004) Attitude and belief questions as a source of context effect in a contingent valuation survey. J Econ Psychol 25: 229–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ready R, Navrud S, Day B, Dubourg R, Machado F, Mourato S, Spanninks F, Rodriquez M (2004) Benefit transfer in Europe: how reliable are transfers between countries?. Environ Resour Econ 29: 67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronen S, Shenkar O (1985) Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: a review and synthesis. Acad Manag Rev 10: 435–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberger R, Stanley T (2006) Measurement, generalization, and publication: sources of error in benefit transfers and their management. Ecol Econ 60: 372–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozan A (2004) Benefit transfer: a comparison of WTP for air quality between France and Germany. Environ Resour Econ 29: 295–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi X, Wang J (2011) Cultural distance between China and US across GLOBE model and the Hofstede model. Int Bus Manag 2: 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha R, Loomis J (2001) Testing a meta-analysis model for benefit transfer in international outdoor recreation. Ecol Econ 39: 67–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P (2002) Culture’s consequences: something old and something new. Hum Relat 55: 119–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Spash C (2000) Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: the case of wetland recreation. Ecol Econ 34: 195–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spash CL, Vatn A (2006) Transferring environmental value estimates: issues and alternatives. Ecol Econ 60: 379–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern P, Dietz T, Guagnano G (1995) The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. J Environ Econ Manag 26: 271–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Troy A, Wilson MA (2006) Mapping ecosystem services: practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. Ecol Econ 60: 435–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner R, Bateman I, Adger W (2000) Economics of coastal and water resources: valuing environmental function, studies in ecological economics series, vol 3. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilk R, Cliggett L (2006) Economies and cultures: foundations of economic anthropology. Westview Press, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson M, Liu S (2008) Evaluating the non-market value of ecosystem goods and services provided by coastal and nearshore marine systems. In: Patterson M, Glavovic B (eds) Ecological economics of the oceans and coasts. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • World Values Survey Association (2009) World values survey 1981–2008 official aggregate v.20090901. Aggregate file producer: ASEP/JDS, Madrid. www.worldvaluessurvey.org

  • Zhai G, Suzuki T (2009) International benefit transfer related to coastal zones: evidence from Northeast Asia. Mar Resour Econ 24: 171–186

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SEMRU (Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit), J.E. Cairnes School of Business and Economics, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland

    Stephen Hynes & Daniel Norton

  2. Division of Economics, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK 94LA, Scotland

    Nick Hanley

Authors
  1. Stephen Hynes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Norton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nick Hanley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Hynes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hynes, S., Norton, D. & Hanley, N. Adjusting for Cultural Differences in International Benefit Transfer. Environ Resource Econ 56, 499–519 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9572-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9572-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation