Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Privatizing Climate Change Policy: Is there a Public Benefit?

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) and the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) are two private voluntary initiatives aimed at reducing carbon emissions and improving carbon management by firms. I sample power plants from firms participating in each of these programs, and match these to plants belonging to non-participating firms, to control for differences between participating and non-participating plants. Using a difference-in-differences model to control for unobservable differences between participants and non-participants, and to control for the trajectory of emissions prior to program participation, I find that the CCX is associated with a decrease in total carbon dioxide emissions for participating plants when non-publicly traded firms are included in the sample. Effects are produced largely by decreases in output. CCX participation is associated with increases in carbon dioxide intensity. The CDP is not associated with a decrease of carbon dioxide emissions or electricity generation, and program participation is associated with an increase in carbon dioxide intensity. I explore these results within the context of voluntary environmental programs to address carbon emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison PD (1990) Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociol Methodol 20: 93–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ananathanarayanan A (1998) Is there a green link? A panel data value event study of the relationship between capital markets and toxic releases. Department of Economics Rutgers University, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Arimura TH, Hibiki A, Katayama H (2008) Is a voluntary approach an effective environmental policy instrument?: a case for environmental management systems. J Environ Econ Manag 55(3): 281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry W, Fording RC (1997) Measuring state tax capacity and effort. Soc Sci Q 78(1): 158–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd G, McClelland JD (1999) The impact of environmental constraints on productivity improvement in integrated paper plants. J Environ Econ Manag 38: 121–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caliendo M, Kopeinig S (2008) Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. J Econ Surv 22(1): 31–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Hettige H, Wheeler D (1997) What improves environmental performance: evidence from mexican industry. World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehejia RH, Wahba S (2002) Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Rev Econ Stat 84(1): 151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DSIRE (2009) Rules, regulations, and policies for renewable energy. Retrieved 17 Sept 2009

  • Feldman SJ, Soyka P, Ameer P (1996) Does improving a firm’s environmental management system and environmental performance result in a higher stock price? ICF Kaiser International, Inc., Fairfax, VA

  • Gray W, Shadbegian R (2003) Environmental regulation, investment timing, and technology choice. J Ind Econ 46(2): 235–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall B, Kerr ML (1991) Green index: a state-by-state guide to the nation’s environmental health. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JT (1995) Pollution as news: media and stock market reactions to the toxic release inventory data. J Environ Econ Manag 28: 98–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J, Robb R (1986) Alternative methods for solving the problem of selection bias in evaluating the impact of treatments on outcomes. In: Wainer H (ed) Drawing inferences from self-selected samples. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, New Jersey, pp 63–107

  • Heckman J, Ichimura H, Smith J, Todd P (1996) Sources of selection bias in evaluating social programs: an interpretation of conventional measures and evidence on the effectiveness of matching as a program evaluation? method. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93(23): 13416–13420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J, Ichimura H, Todd P (1997) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Rev Econ Stud 64: 605–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J, LaLonde RJ, Smith JM (1999) The economics and econmetrics of active labor market policies. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) The handbook of labor economics, vol 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1865–2097

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ho DE, Imai K, King G, Stuart E (2007) Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Anal 15(3): 199–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho DE, Kosuke I, King G, Stuart E (2007) Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Anal 15(3): 199–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung H, Pirog M (2011) Non-experimental impact evaluations. In: Besharov DJ, Cottingham PH (eds) The workforce investment act: Implenetation Experiences and evaluation findings. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. Kalamazoo, Michigan, WE, pp 407–430

  • Khanna M (2001) Non-mandatory approaches to environmental protection. J Econ Surv 15(3): 291–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim E-H, Lyon TP (2011a) Strategic environmental disclosure: evidence from the DOE’s voluntary greenhouse gas registry. J Environ Econ Manag 61(3): 311–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim E-H, Lyon TP (2011b) When does institutional investor activism increase shareholder value?: the carbon disclosure project. BE J Econ Anal Policy 11(1)

  • King A, Lenox M (2000) Industry self-regulation without sanctions: the chemical industry’s repsonsible care program. Acad Manag J 43(4): 698–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk A, Levy D, Pinske J (2008) Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: the institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure. Eur Account Rev 17(4): 719–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk A, Pinske J (2005) Business responses to climate change: identifying emergent strategies. Calif Manag Rev 47(3): 6–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaLonde RJ (1986) Evaluating the econometric evaluations of training programs with experimental data. Am Econ Rev 76(4): 604

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuven E, Sianesi B (2012) PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. http://EConpapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:bocode:s432001

  • Lyon TP, Maxwell JW (2004) Corporate environmentalism and public policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon TP, Maxwell JW (2007) Environmental public voluntary programs reconsidered. Policy Stud J 35(4): 723–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matisoff DC (2008) The adoption of state climate change policies and renewable portfolio standards: regional diffusion or internal determinants?. Rev Policy Res 25(6): 527–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matisoff DC (2010) Making cap-and-trade work: lessons from the European Union Experience. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 52(1): 10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffit R (1991) Program evaluation with nonexperimental data. Eval Rev 15(3): 291–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan S, Winship C (2007) Counterfactuals and causal inference: methods and principals for social research. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern R, Pizer W (eds) (2007) Reality check: the nature and performance of voluntary environmental programs in the United States, Europe, and Japan. Resources For the Future, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern R, Pizer W, Shih J-S (2007) Evaluating voluntary US climate programs: the case of climate wise. In: Pizer W, Morgenstern R (eds) Reality check: the nature and performance of voluntary environmental programs in the United States, Europe, and Japan. RFF, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizer WA, Morgenstern R, Shih J-S (2011) The performance of industrial sector voluntary climate programs: climate Wise and 1605(b). Energy Policy 39(12): 7907–7916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potoski M, Prakash A (2005) Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities’ environmental performance. J Policy Anal Manag 24(4): 745–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potoski M, Prakash A (2005) Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms’ regulatory compliance. Am J Political Sci 49(2): 235–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potoski M, Prakash A (2005) Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms’ regulatory compliance. Am J Political Sci 49(2): 235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash A, Potoski M (2006) The voluntary environmentalists: green clubs, ISO 14001, and voluntary environmental regulations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers (2008) Carbon disclosure project report 2008: global 500. Carbon Disclosure Project, London

  • Reid EM, Toffel MW (2009) Responding to public and private politics: corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strateg Manag J 30(11): 1157–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards K (2000) Framing environmental policy instrument choice. Duke Environ Law Policy Forum 10: 221–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringquist EJ (1993) Environmental protection at the state level. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera J, De Leon P, Koerber C (2006) Is greener whiter yet? The sustainable slopes program after five years. Policy Stud J 34(2): 195–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadbegian R, Gray W (2006) Assessing multi-dimensional performance: environmental and economic outcomes. J Prod Anal 26: 213–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J, Todd P (2005) Does matching overcome LaLonde’s critique of nonexperimental methods. J Econom 125: 305–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J, Todd P (2005) Rejoinder. J Econom 125: 365–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J, Zhang Y. (2009) The variety of balancing tests. Paper presented at the Association for Public Administration and Management, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor D, House JC, Joy S (2005) A Madisonian approach to climate policy. Science 309(5742): 1820–1821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidovic M, Khanna N (2007) Can voluntary pollution prevention programs fulfill their promises? Further evidence from the EPA’s 33/50 program. J Environ Econ Manag 53: 180–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch E, Barnum D (2009) Joint environmental and cost efficiency analysis of electricity generation. Ecol Econ 68(8-9): 2336–2343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch E, Mazur A, Bretschneider S (2000) Voluntary behavior by electric utilities: levels of adoption and contributions of the climate challenge program to the reductions of carbon dioxide. J Policy Anal Manag 19: 407–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, 685 Cherry St., Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA

    Daniel C. Matisoff

Authors
  1. Daniel C. Matisoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel C. Matisoff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matisoff, D.C. Privatizing Climate Change Policy: Is there a Public Benefit?. Environ Resource Econ 53, 409–433 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9568-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9568-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation