On the Uncertainty About the Total Economic Impact of Climate Change
- 2.2k Downloads
This paper uses a vote-counting procedure to estimate the probability density function of the total economic impact as a parabolic function of global warming. There is a wide range of uncertainty about the impact of climate change up to 3°C, and the information becomes progressively more diffuse beyond that. Warming greater than 3°C most likely has net negative impacts, and warming greater than 7°C may lead to a total welfare loss. The expected value of the social cost of carbon is about $29/tC in 2015 and rises at roughly 2% per year.
KeywordsClimate change Economic impact Meta-analysis Social cost of carbon
This paper benefitted from discussions with and comments by David Anthoff, Trudy Ann Cameron, Bill Cline, Sam Fankhauser, Sean Lyons, David Maddison, Rob Mendelsohn, Bill Nordhaus, Steve Pacala, David Pearce, Katrin Rehdanz, Till Requate, Joel Smith, Jeremy Stein, Timothy Taylor, John Weyant and Gary Yohe. Three anonymous referees had excellent comments on an earlier version. The Climate Cost project (CEC DG Research FP7) provided welcome financial support. All errors and opinions are mine.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
- Fankhauser S (1995) Valuing climate change—the economics of the greenhouse, 1st edn. EarthScan, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Freeman MC, Groom B (2010) Gamma discounting and the combination of forecasts. Soc Sci Res Netw. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1676793
- Hope CW (2006) The marginal impact of CO2 from PAGE2002: an integrated assessment model incorporating the IPCC’s five reasons for concern. Integr Assess J 6(1): 19–56Google Scholar
- Nordhaus WD (1994a) Expert opinion on climate change. Am Sci 82(1): 45–51Google Scholar
- Nordhaus WD (1994b) Managing the global commons: the economics of climate change. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Nordhaus WD, Boyer JG (2000) Warming the world: economic models of global warming. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Nordhaus WD, Yang Z (1996) RICE: A regional dynamic general equilibrium model of optimal climate-change policy. Am Econ Rev 86(4): 741–765Google Scholar
- Smith JB, Schellnhuber H-J, Mirza MQ, Fankhauser S, Leemans R, Erda L, Ogallo L, Pittock AB, Richels RG, Rosenzweig C, Safriel U, Tol RSJ, Weyant JP, Yohe GW et al (2001) Vulnerability to climate change and reasons for concern: a synthesis. In: McCarthy JJ (eds) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, pp 913–967Google Scholar
- Stern NH, Peters S, Bakhski V, Bowen A, Cameron C, Catovsky S, Crane D, Cruickshank S, Dietz S, Edmondson N, Garbett S-L, Hamid L, Hoffman G, Ingram D, Jones B, Patmore N, Radcliffe H, Sathiyarajah R, Stock M, Taylor C, Vernon T, Wanjie H, Zenghelis D (2006) Stern review: the economics of climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Tol RSJ (2008) The social cost of carbon: trends, outliers and catastrophes. Econ Open-Access Open-Assess E-Journal 2(25): 1–24Google Scholar
- Yohe GW, Lasco RD, Ahmad QK, Arnell NW, Cohen SJ, Hope CW, Janetos AC, Perez RT et al (2007) Perspectives on climate change and sustainability. In: Parry ML (ed) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability—contribution of working ii to the fourth assessment report on the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 811–841Google Scholar