Advertisement

Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 249–264 | Cite as

When are Forest Visits Valued the Most? An Analysis of the Seasonal Demand for Forest Recreation in Poland

  • Anna Bartczak
  • Jeffrey Englin
  • Arwin Pang
Article

Abstract

While the demand for forest recreation has been a topic covered in many studies, little attention has been paid so far to seasonal demand. In a forest context, the seasonal analysis is particularly interesting because of inter-temporal change in forest attributes throughout the year which can influence trip-taking behavior. In this paper, the model of seasonal forest visitation is developed to provide a richer understanding of the role played by seasonal fluctuation on a distribution of forest social benefits. The analysis is based on an on-site survey conducted in four forests in Poland. Results show that the most valuable forest trips are those taken in fall and that seasonal trips are separable.

Keywords

Exponential distribution Forest visitation Poisson distribution Seasonal demand Travel cost method 

Abbreviations

CS

Consumer surplus

CV

Contingent valuation

OLS

Ordinary least squares

TC

Travel cost

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bartczak A, Lindhjem H, Navrud S, Zandersen M, Zylicz T (2008) Valuing forest recreation on the national level in a transition economy: the case of Poland. For Policy Econ 10: 467–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brainard J, Bateman I, Lovett A (2001) Modelling demand for recreation in English woodlands. Forestry 74(5): 423–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burt O, Brewer D (1971) Estimation of the net social benefits from outdoor recreation. Econometrica 39: 813–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Croitoru L (2007) How much are Mediterranean forests worth. For Policy Econ 9: 536–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Englin J, Nalle L (2005) Continuous endogenously stratified and truncated models. Paper presented at the methodological developments in revealed preference modeling for non-Market Valuation session at the American Association of agricultural economist’s meeting in Providence, Rhode Island, July 2005Google Scholar
  6. Englin J, Lambert D (1995) Measuring angling quality in count data models of recreational fishing: a non-nested test of three approaches. Environ Resour Econ 6: 389–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Englin J, Shonkwiler JS (1995a) Estimating social welfare using count data models: an application to long-run recreation demand under conditions of endogenous stratification and truncation. Rev Econ Stat 77(1): 104–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Englin J, Shonkwiler JS (1995b) Modelling recreation demand in the presence of unobservable travel costs: toward a travel price model. J Environ Econ Manage 29: 368–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Englin J, Boxall P, Watson D (1998) Modelling recreation demand in a Poisson system of equations: an analysis of the impact of international exchange rates. Am J Agric Econ 80: 255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glowny Urzad Statystyczny, GUS (2009) Ochrona Srodowiska 2009, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  11. Scarpa R, Chilton SM, Hutchinson WG, Buongiorno J (2000) Valuing the recreational benefits from the creation of nature reserves in Irish forests. Ecol Econ 33(2): 237–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shaw D (1988) On-site samples’ regression: problems of non-negative integers, truncation and endogenous stratification. J Econ 37: 211–223Google Scholar
  13. Von Haefen RH (2002) A complete characterization of the linear, log-linear, and semi-log incomplete demand system models. J Agric Resour Econ 27(2): 281–319Google Scholar
  14. Vuong Q (1989) Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and nonnested hypotheses. Econometrica 57: 307–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zandersen M, Tol RSJ (2009) A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe. J For Econ 15: 109–130Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Warsaw Ecological Economics Center, Faculty of Economic SciencesUniversity of WarsawWarszawaPoland
  2. 2.Morrison School of Agribusiness and Resource ManagementArizona State UniversityMesaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Public FinanceFeng Chia UniversitySeatwen, TaichungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations