Abstract
The paper introduces a simple framework for analyzing the environmental effects of local transportation policies, and it reviews some evidence. In several cases, subsidies for local public transportation have led to substantial reductions in road transportation and have thereby reduced externalities. Some but not all estimates suggest positive overall welfare effects of such policies. In the rare cases where road pricing has been applied, it has helped to reduce automobile transportation, and it has led to environmental improvements. The experience with specific driving restrictions like “days without cars” and “low emission zones” has been mixed. Local transportation policy can have a useful role to play as a complement to national policy instruments, but neither efficiency nor effectiveness can be taken for granted.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allianz pro Schiene (2010) 16 Beispiele erfolgreicher Bahnen im Nahverkehr, available at http://www.allianz-pro-schiene.de/publikationen/stadt-land-schiene/
ARE (Bundesamt für Raumentwicklung) (2008) Volkswirtschaftliche Auswirkungen der LSVA mit höherer Gewichtslimite—Schlussbericht
Beevers SD, Carslaw DC (2005) The impact of congestion charging on vehicle emissions in London. Atmos Environ 39: 1–5
Chen Y, Whalley A (2010) Green machines: The effects of Urban mass transit on air quality. Working Paper, University of California, Merced.
Chin ATH (1996) Containing air pollution and traffic congestion: transport policy and the environment in Singapore. Atmos Environ 30: 787–801
Christainsen GB (2006) Road pricing in Singapore after 30 years. Cato J 26: 71–88
Currie J, Walker R (2009) Traffic congestion and infant Health: Evidence from Z-Pass. NBER Working Paper 15413
Davis LW (2008) The effect of driving restrictions on air quality in Mexico City. J Polit Econ 116: 38–81
Dodgson JS (1986) Benefits of changes in urban public transport subsidies in the major Australian cities. Econ Rec 62: 224–235
EPA: (2004) Air quality criteria for particulate matter (final report). US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington
Eskeland GS, Feyzioglu T (1997) Rationing can backfire: the “day without a car” in Mexico City. World Bank Econ Rev 11(3): 383–408
Evans JH (2004) Transit scheduling and frequency, traveler response to transportation system changes. TCRP Report 95, Chapter 9; <http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/tcrp/tcrp_rpt_95c9.pdf>
FitzRoy F, Smith I (1998) Public transport demand in Freiburg: why did it double within a decade. Transp Policy 5: 163–173
Glaister S (1984) The allocation of urban public transport subsidy. In: LeGrand J, Robinson R (eds) Privatisation and the Welfare state. Allen and Unwin, London, pp 177–200
Glaister S, Lewis D (1978) An integrated fares policy for transport in London. J Public Econ 9: 341–355
IFEU (2010) Fortschreibung und Erweiterung ’Daten- und Rechenmodell: Energieverbrauch und Schadstoffemissionen des motorisierten Verkehrs in Deutschland 1960–2030 (TREMOD, Version 5)’, Heidelberg
Infras (2010) Handbook of road emission factors, Zürich
Ison S, Rye T (2005) Implementing road user charging: the lessons learnt from Hong Kong, Cambridge and Central London. Transp Rev 25: 451–465
Lalive R, Schmutzler A (2008) Exploring the effects of competition for railway markets. Int J Ind Organ 26: 443–458
Lalive R, Schmutzler A (2010) Auctions vs. negotiations in public procurement—evidence from railway markets. Paper presented at the workshop of the Center for Industrial Economics, Copenhagen
Lalive R, Lüchinger S, Schmutzler A (2011) The effects of railroad subsidies on the environment: evidence from Germany. (Work in Progress)
Leape J (2006) The London congestion charge. J Econ Persp 20(4): 157–176
Parry IWH, Small KA (2009) Should urban transit subsidies be reduced. Am Econ Rev 99: 700–724
Perry L, Wolff H (2009) Air pollution, traffic restrictions and low emission zones. Evidence from Germany, mimeo
Pratt RH (2000) Texas Transportation Institute, Cambridge Systematics, Parsons Brinkerhoff Quade & Douglas, SG Associates, and McCollom Management Consulting. 2000. Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes: Interim Handbook. Transportation Research Board, Transit Cooperative Research Program Web Document 12 (March)
Pucher J, Kurth S (1996) Verkehrsverbund: the success of regional public transport in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Transp Policy 2: 279–291
Santos G, Fraser G (2006) Road pricing: lessons from London. Econ Policy 21: 263–310
Savage I (1997) Evaluating transit subsidies in Chicago. J Public Transp 1: 93–117
Tonne C, Beevers S, Armstrong B, Kelly F, Wilkinson P (2008) Congestion charge: spatial and socioeconomic inequalities. Occup Environ Med 65: 620–627
Vickrey WS (1963) Pricing in urban and suburban transport. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 53(2): 452–465
Watson PL, Holland EP (1978) Relieving traffic congestion: the Singapore area licensing scheme. World Bank Staff Working Paper No. 281
Winston C, Maheshri V (2007) On the social desirability of urban rail systems. J Urban Econ 62: 362–382
Winston C, Shirley C (1998) Alternative route: toward efficient urban transportation. Brookings Institution, Washington
Wolff H, Perry L (forthcoming) Trends in clean air legislation in Europe: particulate matter and low emission zones. Rev Environ Econ Policy
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I am grateful to Adrian Müller, Max Pfister and an anonymous referee for helpful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmutzler, A. Local Transportation Policy and the Environment. Environ Resource Econ 48, 511–535 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9447-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9447-5