Abstract
The theory of livestock as a buffer stock predicts that agropastoralists facing substantial risks will typically use liquid assets such as livestock for self-insurance to smooth consumption. This paper examines this hypothesis for reindeer herders in Norway where the herders, in contrast to pastoralists in, say, sub-Saharan Africa, face well-functioning credit markets. Using survey data including slaughter responses to a hypothetical meat price increase, we test whether keeping reindeer as insurance against risks affects the slaughter response. Furthermore, we examine whether status motives for keeping large herds affect the harvest response to a changing slaughter price. As a background to the empirical analysis, a stochastic bioeconomic model describing Saami reindeer herding is formulated.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Austenå T, Sandvik G (1998) The legal status of rights to the resources of Finnmark with reference to previous regulations of the use of nonprivate resources. In: Berge Em, Stenseth NC (eds) Law and the governance of renewable resources—studies from northern Europe and Africa. ICS Press, California
Austrheim G, Solberg E, Mysterud A, Daverdin M, Andersen R (2008) Cervid and livestock herbivory in Norwegian outlying land from 1949 to 1999. Report Serie 2008:2 NTNU-Vitenskapsmuseet Trondheim
Binswanger HP, McIntire J (1987) Behavioral and material determinants of production relations in land-abundant tropical agriculture. Econ Dev Cult Change 36: 73–99
Bostedt G (2005) Pastoralist economic behaviour: empirical results from reindeer herders in Northern Sweden. J Agric Resour Econ 30: 381–396
Brekke KA, Howarth RB (2002) Status, growth and the environment: goods as symbols in applied welfare economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Chang C, Toutellotte PA (1993) Ethnoarchaeological survey of pastoral transhumance sites in the Grevena Region, Greece. J Field Archaeol 20: 249–264
Clark CW (1990) Mathematical bioeconomics. Wiley Interscience, New York
Dasgupta P, Mäler K-G (1995) Poverty, institutions and the environmental resource-base. Handb Dev Econ 3: 2371–2463
Doran HM, Low ARC, Kemp RL (1979) Cattle as a store of wealth in Swaziland. Am J Agric Econ 61: 41–47
Fafchamps M (1998) The tragedy of the commons, livestock cycles and sustainability. J Afr Econ 7: 384–423
Fafchamps M, Udry C, Czukas K (1998) Drought and saving in West-Africa: are livestock a buffer stock?. J Dev Econ 55: 273–305
Fraser I, Chisholm T (2000) Conservation or cultural heritage?, Cattle grazing in the Victoria Alpine National Park. Ecol Econ 33: 63–75
Jarvis LS (1974) Cattle as capital goods and ranchers as portfolio managers: an application to the Argentine cattle sector. J Polit Econ 82: 489–520
Johannesen AB, Skonhoft A (2009) Local common property exploitation with rewards, Land Economics. Land Econ 85: 637–654
Johansen B, Karlsen SR (2005) Monitoring vegetation changes on Finnmarksvidda, Northern Norway, using Landsat MSS and Landsat TM/ETM+ satellite images. Phytocoenologia 35: 969–984
Johnston J, Dinardo J (1997) Econometric methods. McGraw Hill, Singapore
Labba N, Granefjell S-O, Linder B, Riseth JÅ (2006) Analyse av den samiske reindriftens økonomiske tilpasning (in Norwegian). Nordisk Samisk Institutt, Kautokeino
McPeak J (2004) Contrasting income shocks with asset shocks: livestock sales in northern Kenya. Oxford Econ Pap 56: 263–284
Norwegian Reindeer Husbandry Administration (NRHA) (2007) Ressursregnskap for reindriftsnæringen (in Norwegian), Alta
Perrings C (1994) Stress, shock, and sustainability of resource use in semi-arid environments. Ann Reg Sci 28: 31–53
Perrings C, Walker BW (1995) Biodiversity loss and the economics of discontinuous change in semiarid rangelands. In: Perrings C, Mäler K-G, Folke C, Holling CS, Jansson B-O (eds) Biodiversity loss. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Reed WJ (1979) Optimal escapement levels with stochastic and deterministic harvesting models. J Environ Econ Manage 6: 350–363
Riseth JÅ, Vatn A (2009) Modernization and pasture degradation: a comparative study of two Sámi reindeer pasture regions in Norway. Land Econ 85: 87–106
Rosen S (1987) Dynamic animal economics. Am J Agric Econ 69: 547–557
Skonhoft A (1999) Exploitation of an unmanaged local common. On the proplems of overgrazing, regulation and distribution. Nat Resour Model 12: 461–479
Skonhoft A, Johannesen AB (2000) On the problem of overgrazing (in Norwegian). Norsk Økonomisk Tidsskrift 2: 65–86
St. prp. nr. 1 (2007–2008), white paper Department of agriculture and food (in Norwegian) kapittel 1151 Til Gjennomføring, Landbruks- og matdepartementet, Oslo
St. prp. nr. 76 (2008–2009), white paper Department of agriculture and food (in Norwegian) Om reindriftsavtalen 2009/2010, Landbruks- og matdepartementet, Oslo
Walker B (1993) Rangeland ecology: understanding and managing change. Ambio 22: 80–87
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Johannesen, A.B., Skonhoft, A. Livestock as Insurance and Social Status: Evidence from Reindeer Herding in Norway. Environ Resource Econ 48, 679–694 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9421-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9421-2