Skip to main content
Log in

The Market Instinct: The Demise of Social Preferences for Self-Interest

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environmental policy design has much to gain from a better understanding of existing voluntary behaviour and motivations. In laboratory experiments, participants often exhibit social preferences such as altruism, spite, reciprocity and notions of fairness. In contrast, traditional neoclassical theory assumes that people act rationally in a way that maximises their self-interest. In environmental markets, social preferences and self-interest interact. We apply experimental economics to test the hypothesis that social preferences are not maintained in the presence of a competitive market institution. In the initial public goods game, many participants were prepared to make costly voluntary contributions. However the introduction of the market institution triggered a ‘market instinct’ in experimental participants. They abandoned the social preferences they were previously expressing and became self-interested profit maximisers. This self-interested behaviour persisted even after the market institution was discontinued. These findings are important to understanding the role and impact of markets for environmental policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asheim GB (2010) Strategic use of environmental information. Environ Resour Econ 46: 207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles S (1998) Endogenous preferences: the cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions. J Econ Lit 36: 75–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2003) Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 425: 297–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk A, Fischbacher U (2006) A theory of reciprocity. Games Econ Behav 54: 293–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2002) Why social preferences matter—the impact of non-selfish motives on competition, cooperation and incentives. Econ J 112: C1–C33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarter J Econ 114: 817–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS (1997) Not just for the money: an economic theory of personal motivation. Edward Elgar, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS (2001) Inspiring economics: human motivation in political economy. Edward Elgar, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Gneezy U, Haruvy E, Yafe H (2004) The inefficiency of splitting the bill: a lesson in institution design. Econ J 114: 265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2000) A fine is a price. J Legal Stud 29: 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman E, McCabe K, Shachat K, Smith V (1994) Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games Econ Behav 7: 346–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson-Stenman O, Konow J (2010) Fair air: distributive justice and environmental economics. Environ Resour Econ 46: 147–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latacz-Lohmann U, Van der Hamsvoort CPCM (1998) Auctions as a means of creating a market for public goods from agriculture. J Agricult Econ 49: 334–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt SD, List JA (2007) What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world?. J Econmic Perspect 21: 153–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List JA (2003) Does market experience eliminate market anomalies? Quarter J Econ, pp 41–71

  • List JA (2004) Neoclassical theory versus prospect theory: evidence from the marketplace. Econometrica 72: 615–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List JA (2006) The behavioralist meets the market: measuring social preferences and reputation effects in actual transactions. J Polit Econ 114: 1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillutla MM, Chen XP (1999) Social norms and cooperation in social dilemmas: the effects of context and feedback. Org Behav Human Decision Proc 78: 81–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeson AF, Tisdell JG (2008) Institutions, motivations and public goods: an experimental test of motivational crowding. J Econ Behav Org 68: 273–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth AE, Prasnikar V, Okuno-Fujiwara M, Zamir S (1991) Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: an experimental study. Am Econ Rev 81: 1068–1095

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilizzi S (2004) Should equity concerns impose limits on the use of market based instruments? In: Whitten S, Carter M, Stoneham G (eds), Market-based tools for environmental management, RIRDC Publication no. 04/142, Canberra, Australia, pp 132–151

  • Shogren J, Parkhurst G, Banerjee P (2010) Two cheers and a qualm for behavioral environmental economics. Environ Resour Econ 46: 235–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel J (2005) Interdependent preferences and reciprocity. J Econ Lit 43: 392–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoneham G, Chaudhri V, Ha A, Strappazzon L (2003) Auctions for conservation contracts: an empirical examination of Victoria’s Bushtender trial. Austr J Agricult Resour Econ 47: 477–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew F. Reeson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reeson, A.F., Tisdell, J.G. The Market Instinct: The Demise of Social Preferences for Self-Interest. Environ Resource Econ 47, 439–453 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9387-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9387-0

Keywords