Skip to main content
Log in

A Pollution Offset System for Trading Non-Point Source Water Pollution Permits

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water pollution from non-point sources is a global environmental concern. Economists propose tradable permit systems as a solution, but they are difficult to implement due to the nature of non-point sources. We present a pollution offset system for trading non-point source water pollution permits. Conventional pollution offset systems suffer from thin markets and transaction costs. In this paper, we show how to overcome these problems with a centrally managed common-pool market. We define permits as allowable nitrate loading to a groundwater aquifer. This trading system utilizes estimates of potential nitrate leaching from land uses, a set of transport coefficients generated from a simulation of nitrate transport in groundwater, an online trading system, and a linear program to clear the market. We illustrate the concept using a hypothetical case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3(1): 1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dales JH (1968) Land, water and ownership. Can J Econ 1(4): 791–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eheart JW, Brill ED, Lence BJ, Kilgore JD, Uber JG (1987) Cost efficiency of time-varying discharge permit programs for water quality management. Water Resour Res 23(2): 245–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Waikato (2008) Nitrate contamination of groundwater. Retrieved 26 December 2008, from http://www.ew.govt.nz/Environmental-information/groundwater/Monitoring-groundwater-quality/Nitrate-contamination-of-groundwater/

  • Ermoliev Y, Michalevich M, Nentjes A (2000) Markets for tradable emission and ambient permits: a dynamic approach. Environ Resour Econ 15(1): 39–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harbaugh BAW, Banta ER, Hill MC, McDonald MG (2000) MODFLOW-2000: The U.S. Geological Survey Modular Groundwater Model. U.S. Geological Survey

  • Hogan WW, Read EG, Ring BJ (1996) Using mathematical programming for electricity spot pricing. Int Trans Oper Res 3: 243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horan RD, Shortle JS, Abler DG (2002) Point-nonpoint nutrient trading in the susquehanna river Basin. Water Resour Res 38(5):8:1–8:12

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung MF, Shaw D (2005) A trading-ratio system for trading water pollution discharge permits. J Environ Econ Manage 49(1): 83–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr S, Rutherford K, Lock K (2007) Nutrient trading in Lake Rotorua: goals and trading caps. Motu Economic and Public Policy Research

  • King DM, Kuch PJ (2003) Will Nutrient Credit Trading Ever Work? An assessment of supply and demand problems and institutional obstacles. Environmental Law Reporter. News and Analysis, 5-2003

  • Krupnick A, Oates W, Verg EVD (1983) On marketable air pollution permits: the case for a system of pollution offset. J Environ Econ Manage 10: 233–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leston D (1992) Simulation of a two-pollutant, two-season pollution offset system for the Colorado river of Texas below Austin. Water Resour Res 28(5): 1311–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lock K, Kerr S (2007) Nutrient trading in Lake Rotorua: where are we now. Motu Economic and Public Policy Research

  • Martin KC, Joskow PL, Ellerman AD (2007) Time and location differentiated NOx control in competitive electricity markets using cap-and-trade mechanisms. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research

  • McGartland A (1988) A comparison of two marketable discharge permit systems. J Environ Econ Manage 15: 35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGartlend AM, Oates WE (1985) Marketable permits for prevention of environmental deterioration. J Environ Econ Manage 12: 207–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montero JP (2008) A simple auction mechanism for the optimal allocation of the commons. Am Econ Rev 98(1): 496–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery WD (1972) Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. J Econ Theory 5(3): 395–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan DS, Everett R (2005) Application of simulation-optimization methods for management of nitrate loading to groundwater from decentralized wastewater treatment systems near La Pine, Oregon. US Geological Survey Oregon Water Science Centre

  • Morgan CL, Coggins JS, Eidman VR (2000) Tradable permits for controlling nitrates in groundwater at the farm level: a conceptual model. J Agric Appl Econ 32(2): 249–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Neil WO, David M, Moore C, Joeres E (1983) Transferable discharge permits and economic efficiency: the Fox River. J Environ Econ Manage 10(4): 346–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea L (2002) An economic approach to reducing water pollution: point and diffuse sources. Sci Total Environ 282(283): 49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revenga C, Mock G (2000) Dirty water: pollution problems persist. World Resources Institute

  • U.S. Geological Survey (1999) The quality of our nation’s waters: nutrients and pesticides. U.S. Geological Survey

  • U.S. Geological Survey (2006) Data input instructions for groundwater transport process (GWT). Reston, Virginia

  • Weber ML (2001) Markets for water rights under environmental constraints. J Environ Econ Manage 42: 53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng C (1990) MT3D—a modular three-dimensional transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reaction of contaminants in groundwater systems. The United States Environmental Protection Agency-Robert S. Kerr Enivronmental Research Laboratory, Ada, Oklahoma

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. A. Ranga Prabodanie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prabodanie, R.A.R., Raffensperger, J.F. & Milke, M.W. A Pollution Offset System for Trading Non-Point Source Water Pollution Permits. Environ Resource Econ 45, 499–515 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9325-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9325-1

Keywords

Navigation