We analyze ecosystem management under ‘unmeasurable’ Knightian uncertainty or ambiguity which, given the uncertainties characterizing ecosystems, might be a more appropriate framework relative to the classic risk case (measurable uncertainty). This approach is used as a formal way of modelling the precautionary principle in the context of least favorable priors and maxmin criteria. We provide biodiversity management rules which incorporate the precautionary principle. These rules take the form of either safety margins and minimum safety standards or optimal harvesting under precautionary approaches.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Arrow K, Cropper M, Eads G, Hahn R, Lave L, Noll R, Portney P, Russel M, Schmalensee R, Kerry Smith V, Stavins R (1996) Benefit-cost analysis in environmental, health and safety. American Enterprise Institute, The Annapolis Center, and Resources for the Future
Brock W, Xepapadeas A (2002) Biodiversity management under uncertainty. In: Dasgupta P, Kriström B, Lofgren K-G (eds). Economic theory for the environment: essays in honour of K-G. Mäler, Edward Elgar
Brock W, Xepapadeas A (2003) Regulating nonlinear environmental systems under Knightian uncertainty. In: Arnott R, Greenwald B, Kanbur R, Nalebuff B(eds) Economics for an imperfect world: essays in honor of Joseph Stiglitz. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Chen Z, Epstein L (2002) Ambiguity risk and assets returns in continuous time. Econometrica 70(4): 1403–1443
Elsberg D (1961) Risk ambiguity and the savage axioms. Q J Econ 75: 643–669
Epstein L, Wang T (1994) Intertemporal asset pricing under Knightian uncertainty. Econometrica 63: 283–322
Epstein L, Wang T (1995) Uncertainty, risk-neutral measures and security price booms and crashes. J Econ Theory 67: 40–80
Fellner W (1961) Distortion of subjective probabilities as a reaction to uncertainty. Q J Econ 75: 670–689
Fleming W (1971) Stochastic control for small noise intensities. SIAM J Control 9(3): 473–517
Fleming W, Souganidis P (1989) On the existence of value function of two-player, zero sum stochastic differential games. Indiana Univ Math J 3: 293–314
Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (1989) Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J Math Econ 18: 141–153
Hansen L, Sargent T (2001) Robust control and model uncertainty. Am Econ Rev 91(3): 60–66
Hansen L, Sargent T, Turmuhambetova G, Williams N (2002) Robust control and model uncertainty, Working Paper, University of Chicago
Holt A, Tisdell C (1993) How useful are environmental safety standards in economics? The example of safe minimum standard for protection of species. Biodivers Conserv 2: 2
Knight F (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Miffin, USA
Magill M (1977) A local analysis of N-sector capital accumulation under uncertainty. J Econ Theory 15: 211–219
Marchant G (2003) From general policy to legal rule: aspirations and imitations of the precautionary principle. Environ Health Perspect 111: 1799–1803
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2005a) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2005b) Ecosystems and human well-being: our human planet, summary for decision makers. Island Press, Washington, DC
Oksendal B (2000) Stochastic differential equations. Springer–Verlag, Berlin
Onatski A, Williams N (2003) Modeling model uncertainty. NBER Working Paper 9566
Savage LJ (1954) The foundations of statistics. Wiley, New York
Vardas G, Xepapadeas A (2007) Robust control uncertainty aversion and asset holdings with stochastic investment opportunity set. Int J Theo App Finance 10(6): 985–1014
Wald A (1950) Statistical decision functions. Wiley, New York
Authors would like to thank the Greek State Scholarship Foundation and the Marie Curie program of the EU. We would like to thank an anonymous referee for valuable comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
About this article
Cite this article
Vardas, G., Xepapadeas, A. Model Uncertainty, Ambiguity and the Precautionary Principle: Implications for Biodiversity Management. Environ Resource Econ 45, 379–404 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9319-z
- Knightian uncertainty
- Precautionary principle
- Biodiversity management
- Optimal harvesting
- Robust control