Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Convergent Validity of Contingent Behavior Responses in Models of Recreation Demand

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recreation demand modeling efforts are often limited by the range of variation in observed environmental quality. To address this limitation, the practitioners increasingly make use of contingent behavior (CB) data; i.e., asking survey respondents to forecast their trip patterns under hypothetical quality conditions. However, relatively little is known as to whether these stated responses are consistent with how households response to actual quality variation. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the convergent validity of CB data with observed trip patterns. Toward this end, we jointly model recreational lake usage in Iowa using observed and CB trip data collected from the 2004 Iowa Lake Survey. The Iowa lakes Survey collected three sets of trip data for 131 lakes in the state: (a) actual trips in 2004, (b) anticipated trips in 2005 to the same lakes given current lake conditions and (c) anticipated trips in 2005 given hypothetical improvements to a subset of the lakes. The three types of recreation demand data provide a unique opportunity to investigate the convergent validity of individual responses to actual versus hypothetical environmental conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamowicz W, Louviere J, Williams M (1994) Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. J Environ Econ Manage 26: 271–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adamowicz W, Swait J, Boxall P, Louvier J, Williams M (1997) Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation. J Environ Econ Manage 32: 65–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo CD, Herriges JA, Kling CL (2003) Combining revealed and stated preference: consistency tests and their interpretations. Am J Agric Econ 85: 525–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva M, T. Morikawa (1990) Estimation of switching models from revealed pereferences and stated intentions.. Transp Res 24: 485–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron TA, Shaw WD, Ragland SE, Callaway JM, Keefe S (1996) Using actual and contingent behavior data with differing levels of time aggregation to model recreation demand. J Agri Resour Econ 21(1): 130–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan KJ, Herriges JA, Kling CL, Downing JA (2008) Recreational demand using physical measures of water quality. Am J Agri Econ (forthcoming)

  • Englin J, Cameron TA (1996) Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behavior data: poisson regression analyses with individual panel data. Environ Resour Econ 7: 133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grijalva C, Berrens RP, Bohara AK, Shaw WD (2002) Testing the validity of contingent behavior trip responses. Am J Agri Econ 84: 401–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herriges JA, Phaneuf D (2002) Introducing patterns of correlation and substitution in repeated logit models of recreation demand. Am J Agri Econ 84: 1076–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layman R, Boyce R, Criddle K (1996) Economic valuation of the chinook salmon sport fishery of the Gulkana River, Alaska, under current and alternate management plans. Land Econ 72: 113–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JB (1997) Panel estimators to combine revealed and stated preference dichotomous choice data. J Agri Resour Econ 22: 233–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JB, Richardson RB (2006) An external validity test of intended behavior: comparing revealed preference and intended visitation in response to climate change. J Environ Plann Manage 49(4): 621–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D, K Train (2000) Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J Appl Econom 15(5): 447–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell R, R. Carson (1986) Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Revelt D, Train K (1998) Mixed logit with repeated choices: households’ choices of appliance efficiency level. Rev Econ Stat 80: 647–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Train K (1998) Recreation demand models with taste differences over people. Land Econ 74(2): 230–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Train K (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead JC, Phaneuf DJ, Dumas CF, Herstine J, Hill J, Buerger B, (2007) Convergent validity of revealed and stated recreation behavior with quality change: a comparison of multiple and single site demands, Working paper, September

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph A. Herriges.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeon, Y., Herriges, J.A. Convergent Validity of Contingent Behavior Responses in Models of Recreation Demand. Environ Resource Econ 45, 223–250 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9313-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9313-5

Keywords

Navigation