Advertisement

Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 509–534 | Cite as

A Spatial Hedonic Approach to Assess the Impact of Swine Production on Residential Property Values

  • Jungik Kim
  • Peter Goldsmith
Article

Abstract

A spatial hedonic model is developed to assess monetary harm of confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) on property values, taking explicitly into account spatial dependence in property values. Spatial autocorrelation was found in the form of spatial lag dependence, not spatial error dependence. When spatial lag dependence is explicitly taken into account, on average the impact coefficient estimate of a CAFO is reduced by 18%. For example, the impact on the value of the median house ($63,520) 1 mile from a swine facility with 10,000 head fell from  − $6,800 to  − $5,200, or 23.5%. The magnitude of the spatial autoregressive parameter was about 0.2 for the 1-mile distance band, meaning one-fifth of the house value could be explained by the values of the neighboring houses.

Keywords

Spatial hedonics Spatial autocorrelation Housing values Hog farms Pigs Odor Confined animal feeding operations CAFO 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen PR, Shilling JD, Sirmans CF (1986) Sales concessions and market value: solving the appraiser’s dilemma. Appraisal J 54(2): 205–213Google Scholar
  2. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 304 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselin L (2001a) Spatial econometrics. In: Baltagi B (eds) Companion to theoretical econometrics. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 310–330Google Scholar
  4. Anselin L (2001b) Rao’s score test in spatial econometrics. J Statist Plann Inference 97: 113–139 doi: 10.1016/S0378-3758(00)00349-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anselin L (2002) Under the hood: issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agric Econ 27: 247–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00120.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anselin L, Bera AK (1998) Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In: Ullah A, Giles DEA (eds) Handbook of applied economic statistics. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 237–289Google Scholar
  7. Basu S, Thibodeau TG (1998) Analysis of spatial autocorrelation in house prices. J Real Estate Econ 17: 61–85. doi: 10.1023/A:1007703229507 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benson ED, Hansen JL, Schwartz AL Jr, Smersh GT (1998) Pricing residential amenities: the value of a view. J Real Estate Finance Econ 16: 55–72. doi: 10.1023/A:1007785315925 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beron KJ, Hanson Y, Murdoch J, Thayer M (2004) Hedonic price functions and spatial dependence: implications for the demand for urban air quality. In: Anselin L, Florax R, Rey S (eds) Advances in spatial econometrics. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 513 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Boxall PC, Chan WH, McMillan ML (2005) The impact of oil and natural gas facilities on rural residential property values: a spatial hedonic analysis. Resour Energy Econ 27(3): 248–269. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2004.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boyle KJ, Taylor LO (2001) Does the measurement of property and structural characteristics affect estimated implicit prices for environmental amenities in a hedonic model?. J Real Estate Finance Econ 22: 303–318. doi: 10.1023/A:1007855901029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cameron TA (2006) Directional heterogeneity in distance profiles in hedonic property value models. J Environ Econ Manage 51: 26–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2005.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Can A (1990) The measurement of neighborhood dynamics in urban house prices. Econ Geogr 66: 203–222. doi: 10.2307/143400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Can A, Megbolugbe I (1997) Spatial dependence and house price index construction. J Real Estate Finance Econ 14: 203–222. doi: 10.1023/A:1007744706720 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clapp JM, Giaccotto C (1992) Estimating price indices for residential property: a comparison of repeat sales and assessed value methods. J Am Stat Assoc 87: 300–306. doi: 10.2307/2290260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cole R, Guikey D, Miles M (1986) Toward an assessment of the reliability of commercial appraisals. Appraisal J 54(3): 422–432Google Scholar
  17. Cressie NA (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York, 928 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Day B, Bateman IJ, Lake I (2007) Beyond implicit prices: recovering theoretically consistent and transferable values for noise avoidance from a hedonic property price model. Environ Resour Econ 37(1): 211–232. doi: 10.1007/s10640-007-9121-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dubin RA (1998) Predicting house prices using multiple listings data. J Real Estate Finance Econ 17: 35–59. doi: 10.1023/A:1007751112669 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dubin R, Pace RK, Thibodeau TG (1999) Spatial autoregression techniques for real estate data. J Real Estate Lit 7: 79–95. doi: 10.1023/A:1008690521599 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freeman AM III (1993) The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods. Resources for the Future, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. Herriges JA, Secchi S, Babcock BA (2005) Living with hogs in Iowa: the impact of livestock facilities on rural residential property values. Land Econ 81(4): 530–545Google Scholar
  23. Hite D, Chern W, Hitzhusen F, Randall A (2001) Property-value impacts of an environmental disamenity: the case of landfills. J Real Estate Finance Econ 22: 185–202. doi: 10.1023/A:1007839413324 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Isard W (1962) Methods of Regional Analysis: an Introduction to Regional Science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  25. Janssen C, Söderberg B (1999) Estimating market prices and assessed values for income properties. Urban Stud 36: 359–376. doi: 10.1080/0042098993646 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kiel K, Zabel J (2001) Estimating the economic benefits of cleaning up superfund sites: the case of Woburn, Massachusetts. J Real Estate Finance Econ 22: 163–184. doi: 10.1023/A:1007835329254 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim J, Goldsmith PD (2006) Can assessed values tell something that sale prices don’t? The case of rural hedonic settings. Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim J, Goldsmith PD (2007) Economic impact and public costs of confined animal feeding operations at the parcel level of Craven County, North Carolina. J Agric Human Values. Under RevisionGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim CW, Phipps TT, Anselin L (2003) Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach. J Environ Econ Manage 45: 24–39. doi: 10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00013-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kohlhase JE (1991) The impact of toxic waste sites on housing value. J Urban Econ 30: 1–26. doi: 10.1016/0094-1190(91)90042-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lusht KM (2000) Real estate valuation: principles and applications. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. NASS (National Agricultural Statistics Service) Agricultural Statistics Data Base (2003) “Hogs and pigs: inventory,” “Hogs and pigs: operations numbers by size group,” “Hogs and pigs: percent of inventory by size group”. Available online at http://www.nass.usda.gov:81/ipedb/. Accessed January 2003
  33. Okun MF (1999) The public health issues of North Carolina’s hog industry. Environmental Resource Program, School of Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Available online at http://checc.sph.unc.edu/rooms/library/hogs/hogmainpage.htm. Accessed February 2003
  34. Pace RK, Gilley OW (1997) Using the spatial configuration of the data to improve estimation. J Real Estate Finance Econ 14: 333–340. doi: 10.1023/A:1007762613901 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pace RK, Barry R, Clapp JM, Rodriquez M (1988) Spatiotemporal autoregressive models of neighborhood effects. J Real Estate Finance Econ 17: 5–13. doi: 10.1023/A:1007783811760 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Palmquist RB, Roka FM, Vukina T (1997) Hog operations, environmental effects, and residential property values. Land Econ 73: 114–124. doi: 10.2307/3147081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Periera F, Goldsmith PD (2005) From negative externalities to industrial illegitimacy. An empirical analysis of the Illinois livestock industry. Working Paper, Presented at the Eastern Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Springfield, Massachusetts, MayGoogle Scholar
  38. Petts J, Eduljee G (1994) Environmental impact assessment for waste treatment and disposal facilities. Wiley, Chichester, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  39. Ready RC, Abdalla CW (2005) The amenity and disamenity impacts of agriculture: estimates from a hedonic pricing model. Am J Agric Econ 87(2): 314–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00724.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosen S (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J Polit Econ 81: 34–55. doi: 10.1086/260169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rush R, Bruggink TH (2000) The value of ocean proximity on barrier island houses. Appraisal J 68: 142–150Google Scholar
  42. Schiffman SS, Sattely Miller EA, Suggs MS, Graham BG (1995) The effects of environmental odors emanating from commercial swine operations on the mood of nearby residents. Brain Res Bull 37: 369–375. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(95)00015-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schuler FG (1990) Econometric analysis of house prices. Real Estate Appraiser Analyst 56: 20–32Google Scholar
  44. Smolen GE, Hambleton DC (1997) Is the real estate appraiser’s role too much to expect. Appraisal J 65(1): 9–17Google Scholar
  45. Thu K, Donham K, Ziegenhorn S, Reynolds S, Thorne PS, Subramanian P et al (1997) A control study of the physical and mental health of residents living near a large-scale swine operation. J Agric Saf Health 3: 13–26Google Scholar
  46. University of Iowa and Iowa State University Iowa Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation Air Quality Study (2002) Available online at http://www.public-health.uiowa.edu/ehsrc/CAFOstudy.htm. Accessed February 2003
  47. Wing S, Wolf S (2000) Intensive livestock operations, health, and quality of life among Eastern North Carolina residents. Environ Health Perspect 108: 223–238Google Scholar
  48. Wolverton ML (2000) Self-perceptions of the role of the appraiser: objective opinions or price validations? Appraisal J (July):272–282Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Urban Regeneration Research TeamKorean Land CorporationSeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural and Consumer EconomicsUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  3. 3.National Soybean Research LaboratoryUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations