Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Willingness to Pay for Car Safety: Evidence from Sweden

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study estimates a marginal willingness to pay (WTP) function for a road-mortality risk reduction. Observed marginal WTP from the Swedish car market is used and found to be positively correlated with the baseline risk of the cars. No statistically significant relationships between examined owner attributes, e.g. wealth and background risk, and marginal WTP are found. When comparing the estimated monetary value of a non-marginal risk reduction derived from the integral of the marginal WTP-function with an estimate based on marginal WTP we find, in line with expectations, that the difference between the estimates is negligible for smaller risk reductions and small, 4–10%, also for relatively large risk reductions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberini A, Cropper M, Krupnick A, Simon NB (2004) Does the value of a statistical life vary with the age and health status?: evidence from the USA and Canada. J Environ Econ Manag 48(1): 769–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberini A, Hunt A, Markandya A (2006) Willingness to pay to reduce mortallity risks: evidence from a three-country contingent valuation study. Environ Resour Econ 33(2): 251–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldy JE, Viscusi WK (2007) Age differences in the value of statistical life: revealed preference evidence. Rev Environ Econ Policy 1(2): 241–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson H (2005a) The value of safety as revealed in the Swedish car market: an application of the hedonic pricing approach. J Risk Uncertain 30(3): 211–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson H (2005b) Willingness to pay for a reduction in road mortality risk: evidence from Sweden. Ph.D. Thesis, Lund Economic Studies 126, Department of Economics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

  • Andersson H (2007) Willingness to pay for road safety and estimates of the risk of death: evidence from a Swedish contingent valuation study. Accid Anal Prevention 39(4): 853–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson H, Treich N (2008) The value of a statistical life. In: de Palma A, Lindsey R, Quinet E, Vickerman R (eds), Handbook transport economics. Edward Elgar, Forthcoming.

  • Armantier O, Treich N (2004) Social willingness to pay, mortality risks and contingent valuation. J Risk Uncertain 29(1): 7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson SE, Halvorsen R (1990) The valuation of risks to life: evidence from the market for automobiles. Rev Econ Stat 72(1): 133–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartik TJ (1987a) Estimating hedonic demand parameters with single market data: the problem caused by unobserved tastes. Rev Econ Stat 69(1): 178–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartik TJ (1987b) The estimation of demand parameters in hedonic models. J Polit Econ 95(1): 81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleichrodt H, Eeckhoudt L (2006) Willingness to pay for reductions in health risks when probabilities are distorted. Health Econ Lett 15(2): 211–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JN, Rosen HS (1982) On the estimation of structural hedonic price models. Econometrica 50(3): 765–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day B, Bateman I, Lake I (2007) Beyond implicit prices: recovering theoretically consistent and transferable values for noise avoidance from a hedonic property price model. Environ Resour Econ 37(1): 211–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond DB, Smith BA (1985) Simultaneity in the market for housing characteristics. J Urban Econ 17(3): 280–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus MK, Viscusi WK (1995) Rates of time preference and consumer valuations of automobile safety and fuel efficiency. J Law Econ 38(1): 79–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dréze J (1962) L’Utilité Sociale d’une Vie Humaine. Revue Française de Reserche Opérationnelle 6: 93–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt LR, Hammitt JK (2001) Background risks and the value of a statistical life. J Risk Uncertain 23(3): 261–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt LR, Hammitt JK (2004) Does risk aversion increase the value of mortality risk?. J Environ Econ Manag 47(1): 13–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekeland I, Heckman JJ, Nesheim L (2002) Identifying hedonic models. Am Econ Rev 92(2): 304–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekeland I, Heckman JJ, Nesheim L (2004) Identification and estimation of hedonic models. J Polit Econ 112(1): 60–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epple D (1987) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: estimating demand and supply functions for differentiated products. J Polit Econ 95(1): 59–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshet T, Baron MG, Shechter M (2007) Exploring benefit transfer: disamenities of waste transfer stations. Environ Resour Econ 37(3): 521–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman AM (1974) Air pollution and property values: a further comment. Rev Econ Stat 56: 554–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman AM (2003) The measurement of environmental and resource values, 2nd edn. Resources for the Future, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayer T, Hamilton JT, Viscusi WK (2000) Private values of risk tradeoffs at superfund sites: housing market evidence on learning about risk. Rev Econ Stat 82(3): 439–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakes JK, Viscusi WK (2004) Dead reckoning: demographic determinants of the accuracy of mortality risk perception. Risk Anal 24(3): 651–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammitt JK (2000a) Evaluating contingent valuation of environmental health risks: the proportionality test. AERE Newsl 20(1): 14–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammitt JK (2000b) Valuing mortality risk: theory and practice. Environ Sci Technol 34(8): 1396–1400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammitt JK (2002) QALYs versus WTP. Risk Anal 22(5): 985–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammitt JK, Graham JD (1999) Willingness to pay for health protection: inadequate sensitivity to probability?. J Risk Uncertain 18(1): 33–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammitt JK, Zhou Y (2006) The economic value of air-pollution-related health risks in China: a contingent valuation study. Environ Resour Econ 33(3): 399–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson P-O (2002) On the definition and age-dependency of the value of a statistical life. J Risk Uncertain 25(3): 251–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson-Stenman O, Martinsson P (2006) Honestly, why are you driving a BMW?. J Econ Behav Organ 60(2): 129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Lee MW (1974) The value of changes in the probability of death or injury. J Polit Econ 82(4): 835–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn S, Lang K (1988) Efficient estimation of structural hedonic systems. Int Econ Rev 29(1): 157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Krupnick A (2007) Mortality risk valuation and age: stated preference evidence. Rev Environ Econ Policy 1(2): 261–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Goffe P (2000) Hedonic pricing of agriculture and forestry externalities. Environ Resour Econ 15(4): 397–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, Fischoff B, Layman M, Combs B (1978) Judged frequency of lethat events. J Exp Psychol: Human Learn Memory 4(6): 551–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mrozek JR, Taylor LO (2002) What determines the value of life? a meta-analysis. J Policy Anal Manag 21(2): 253–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohsfeldt RL, Smith BA (1985) Estimating the demand for heterogenous goods. Rev Econ Stat 67(1): 165–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmquist RB (1991) Hedonic methods. In: Braden JB, Kolstad CD(eds) Measuring the demand for environmental quality.. Elsevier Science Publishers (North-Holland), Amsterdam, pp 77–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson U, Norinder A, Hjalte K, Gralén K (2001) The value of a statistical life in transport: findings from a new contingent valuation study in Sweden. J Risk Uncertain 23(2): 121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt JW, Zeckhauser RJ (1996) Willingness to pay and the distribution of risk and wealth. J Polit Econ 104(4): 747–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prelec D (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66(3): 497–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen S (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J Polit Econ 82(1): 34–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen S (1988) The value of changes in life expectancy. J Risk Uncertain 1(3): 285–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCB and SIKA (1999) Vägtrafikskador 1998. Sveriges officiella statisitk, SCB (Statistics Sweden) and SIKA (Swedish Institute for Transport and Communications Analysis). ISSN 1404-4625

  • Shepard DS, Zeckhauser RJ (1984) Survival versus consumption. Manag Sci 30(4): 423–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan FA, Viscusi WK, Chesson HW, Conover CJ, Whetten-Goldstein K (1998) Alternative approaches to valuing intangible health losses: the evidence for multiple sclerosis. J Health Econ 17(4): 475–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith VK, Evans MF, Kim H, Taylor DH (2004) Do the near-elderly value mortality risks differently?. Rev Econ Stat 86(1): 423–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strand J (2006) Valuation of environmental improvements in continouos time with mortality and morbidity effects. Resour Energy Econ 28(3): 229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tauchen H, Witte AD (2001) Estimating hedonic models: implications of the theory. Technical Working Paper Series 271, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge

  • Viscusi WK (1992) Fatal tradeoffs: public & private responsibilities for risk. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi WK, Aldy JE (2003) The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world. J Risk Uncertain 27(1): 5–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi WK, Evans WN (1990) Utility functions that depend on health status: estimates and economic implications. Am Econ Rev 81(3): 353–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi WK, Magat WA (1987) Learning about risk: consumer and worker response to hazard warnings. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1953) Theory of games and economic behavior, 3rd edn. Princeton University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein MC, Shepard DS, Pliskin JS (1980) The economic value of changing mortality probabilities: a decision-theoretic approach. Q J Econ 94(2): 373–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelmsson M (2000) The impact of traffic noise on the values of single-family houses. J Environ Plan Manag 43(6): 799–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge JM (2003) Introductory econometrics: a modern approach, 2nd edn. Thomson, Mason

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henrik Andersson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andersson, H. Willingness to Pay for Car Safety: Evidence from Sweden. Environ Resource Econ 41, 579–594 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9213-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9213-0

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation