Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Did the Invisible Hand Need a Regulatory Glove to Develop a Green Thumb? Some Historical Perspective on Market Incentives, Win-Win Innovations and the Porter Hypothesis

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The idea that properly designed environmental regulations can improve a firm’s competitiveness while simultaneously contributing to a cleaner environment through the development of so-called ‘win-win’ innovations (i.e., that reduce environmental damage while simultaneously increasing profits) is usually credited to Porter (1991). Numerous studies have since attempted to assess the validity of the concept, with mixed results. This paper contributes to this debate by surveying a nearly forgotten body of literature written in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century that discussed the impact of market incentives on the development of valuable by-products out of industrial waste. Based on the opinions held by several industrial chemists, engineers, technical journalists and economists, the development of ‘win-win’ manufacturing practices seems to have been primarily the result of the profit motive, although actual or potential legal actions based on private property rights and/or government regulations occasionally triggered this process. After reviewing some important historical writings on the latter issue, a suggestion is made that perhaps the best way to craft ‘well-designed’ environmental regulations is to return to a private property rights approach to mitigating pollution problems whenever possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anex RP (2000) Stimulating innovation in green technology. Am Behav Sci 44(2): 188–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1911) Charles Louis de Saulces de Freycinet. Encyclopedia Britannica http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Charles_Louis_de_Saulces_de_Freycinet

  • Anonymous (1953) Robert Murray Haig. Pol Sci Q 68(3):479–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2001) Allen Kneese. The Economist (March 24):129

  • Asafu-Adjave J (2000) Environmental economics for non-economists. World Scientific Publishing Co., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashford N (2000) An innovation-based strategy for a sustainable environment. In: Hemmelskamp J, Rennings K, Leone F (eds) Innovation-oriented environmental regulation. Theoretical approaches and empirical analysis. Physica-Verlag, New York, pp 67–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel J (1998) The environment for future business. Efficiency will win. Pollut Prev Rev 8((1): 39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres RU (2004) On the life cycle metaphor: where ecology and economics diverge. Ecol Econ 48(4): 425–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres RU, Ayres LW (2002) A handbook of industrial ecology. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbage C (1835/1832) On the economy of machinery and manufacture. Charles Knight, London 〈non-paginated version available at http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/babbage/index.html〉

  • Barnett DE (undated) Zimmermann, Erich Walter (1888–1961). Handbook of Texas online 〈http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/articles/ZZ/fzi2.html〉

  • Baumgärtner S, Dyckhoff H, Faber M, Proops J, Schiller J (2001) The concept of joint production and ecological economics. Ecol Econ 36(3): 365–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bethnal Green Branch of the South Kensington Museum (1875) Descriptive catalogue of the collection illustrating the utilization of waste products. George E. Eyre and William Spottiswoode for Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London

  • Breger M, Stewart RB, Elliott DE, Hawkins D (1991) Providing economic incentives in environmental regulation. Yale J Regul 8: 463–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner JF (1974) Nuisance law and the industrial revolution. J Legal Stud 3(2): 403–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley DW (ed) (1996) The handbook of environmental economics. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker E (1995) Property rights in the defence of nature. Earthscan Publications Limited, Toronto. Available at http://www.environmentprobe.org/enviroprobe/pridon/index.html

  • Brubaker E (1998) The common law and the environment: the Canadian experience. In: Hill PJ, Meiners RE (eds) Who owns the environment?. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc., New York, pp 87–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker E (2007) Greener pastures: decentralizing the regulation of agricultural pollution. University of Toronto Centre for Public Management Monograph Series, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannan E (1901) Review of political economy by Charles S. Devas. Econ J 11(43): 379–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clapp BW (1994) An environmental history of Britain since the industrial revolution. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chertow MR (2000) Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25: 313–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JM (1930) By-product. In: Johnson AS, Seligman ERA (eds) Encyclopedia of the social sciences, vol 3. MacMillan, New York, pp 129–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemen RA (1923) The American livestock and meat packing industry. Ronald Press Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemen RA (1927) By-products in the packing industry. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Available at http://historical.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/cul.neh/docviewer?did=clemen

  • Commons JR (1904) Labor conditions in meat packing and the recent strike. Q J Econ 19(1): 1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Considine TJ, Jablonowsky C, Considine DMM (2001) The environment and new technology adoption in the US steel industry. Final report to the National Science Foundation and Lucent Technologies Industrial Ecology Research Fellowship. Available at http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/c/p/cpw/resume/NSFFinalReportBES9727297.pdf

  • Cross FB (1999) Common law conceits: a comment on Meiners and Yandle. George Mason Law Rev 7(4): 965–982

    Google Scholar 

  • de Freycinet C (1870) Traité d’assainissement industriel, comprenant la description des principaux procédés employés dans les centres manufacturiers de l’Europe occidentale pour protéger la santé publique et l’agriculture contre les effets des travaux industriels. Dunod, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • de Freycinet C (1907) Souvenirs 1848–1878. Librairie Ch. Delagrave, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers P (2002) Industrial ecology and the rediscovery of inter-firm recycling linkages: historical evidence and policy implications. Ind Corp Change 11(2): 1031–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers P (2007) How did the invisible hand handle solid waste? By-product development before the modern environmental era. Enterp Soc 8(2): 348–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devas CS (1901) Political economy, 2nd edn. Longmans, Green, and Co., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingle AE (1982) The monster nuisance of all: landowners, alkali manufacturers, and air pollution, 1828–64. Econ Hist Rev 35(4): 529–548

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly J (1994) Consultants, managers, testing slaves: changing roles for chemists in the British alkali industry, 1850–1920. Technol Cult 35(1): 100–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds RH (1904) The utilization of southern wastes. Publ Am Econ Assoc, 3rd series 3(1): 162–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards TG (2001) Tradition in a turbulent age. Whitman College 1925–1975. Whitman College, Walla Walla, WA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethridge D (1973) The inclusion of wastes in the theory of the firm. J Polit Econ 81(6): 1430–1441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fieldner AC (1925) Significant progress in research on fuels. Ann Am Acad Polit Social Sci 119: 13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorino DJ (2006) The new environmental regulation. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton D, Stavins R (1998) How economists see the environment. Nature 395(6701): 433–434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garwood C (2004) Green crusaders or captives of industry? The British alkali inspectorate and the ethics of environmental decision making, 1864–95. Ann Sci 61(1): 99–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greysmith D (2004) Simmonds, Peter Lund (1814–1897). In: Oxford dictionary of national biography. Oxford University Press 〈http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/41011〉. Accessed 15 Dec 2006

  • Haig RM (1926) Toward an understanding of the metropolis. 1. Some speculation regarding the economic basis of urban concentration. Q J Econ 40(1): 179–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardie DW, Pratt JD (1966) A history of the modern British chemical industry. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal G (2007) A celebration of environmental and resource economics. Rev Environ Econ Policy 1(1): 7–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmelskamp, J, Rennings, K, Leone, F (eds) (2000) Innovation-oriented environmental regulation. Theoretical approaches and empirical analysis. Physica-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson JA (1917) The evolution of modern capitalism. A study of machine production. Charles Scribner, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe AB, Newell RG, Stavins RN (2002) Environmental policy and technological change. Environ Resour Econ 22: 41–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe AB, Newell RG, Stavins RN (2005) A tale of two market failures: technology and environmental policy. Ecol Econ 54(2–3): 164–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keir M (1919) The localization of industry. Scientific Monthly 8(1): 32–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw JBC (1928) The recovery and use of industrial and other waste. Ernest Benn Limited, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjellingbro PM, Skotte M (2005) Environmentally harmful subsidies. Linkages between subsidies, the environment and the economy. Environmental Assessment Institute, Copenhagen (DK). Available at http://imv.net.dynamicweb.dk/Admin/Public/Download.aspx?file=files/filer/rapporter/diverse/harmful_subsidies.pdf

  • Kneese AV (1998) Industrial Ecology and ‘Getting the Prices Right.’ Resources (Winter):10–13. Available at 〈http://www.rff.org/Documents/RFF-Resources-130-price-right.pdf〉

  • Koller T (1918) The utilization of waste products: a treatise on the rational utilization, recovery, and treatment of waste products of all kinds, 3rd revised edition, translated from the 2nd revised German edition. D. Van Nostrand Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurz HD (1986) Classical and early neoclassical economists on joint production. Metroeconomica 38(1): 1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurz HD (2006) Goods and bads: sundry observations on joint production, waste disposal, and renewable and exhaustible resources. Prog Ind Ecol 3(4): 280–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson A, Rasmussen C, Stæhr K, Wrang K (2006) Framework paper: what are the linkages between environmental policies, economic growth and employment? Green roads to growth project. Danish Environmental Assessment Institute, Copenhagen. http://imv.net.dynamicweb.dk/Default.aspx?ID=579

  • Lipsett C (1963/1951) Industrial waste and salvage. Atlas Publishing Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A (1932/1919) Industry and trade. The MacMillan Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A (1950/1920) Principles of economics, 8th edn. The MacMillan Company, New York (Available at http://www.econlib.org/library/Marshall/marPtoc.html)

  • Marx K (1909/1894) Capital, volume III: the process of capitalist production as a whole (trans: Untermann E). Charles H. Kerr and Co., Chicago, 1909. 〈non paginated version available at http://www.econlib.org/library/YPDBooks/Marx/mrxCpC.html〉

  • McDonald SL (1995) Erich W. Zimmermann: the dynamics of resourceship. In: Philips RJ (ed) Economic mavericks: the Texas institutionalists. JAI Press Inc., Greenwich (CT), pp 151–183

  • Meiners RE, Morriss AP (eds) (2000) The common law and the environment. Rethinking the statutory basis for modern environmental law. Rowan & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiners RE, Yandle B (1999) Common law and the conceit of modern environmental policy. George Mason Law Rev 7(4): 923–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr RD (2002) Technical change, external economies, and the Porter hypothesis. J Environ Econ Manage 43(1): 158–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muravchik J (2002) Heaven on Earth: The rise and fall of socialism. Encounter Books, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2006) Subsidy reform and sustainable development: economic, environmental and social aspects. OECD, Paris. Partly available at http://www.oecd.org/document/1/0,2340,en 26493742 5365 6691311137425,00.html

  • Palmer K, Oates WE, Portney PR (1995) Tightening environmental standards: the benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm?. J Econ Persp 9(4): 119–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D (2002) An intellectual history of environmental economics. Annu Rev Energy Environ 27: 57–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce DW, Turner RK (1990) Economics of natural resources and the environment. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Playfair L (1852) On the chemical principles involved in the manufactures of the exhibition as indicating the necessity of industrial instruction. Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontin B (1998) Tort law and Victorian government growth: the historiographical significance of tort in the shadow of chemical pollution and factory safety regulation. Oxf J Leg Stud 18(4): 661–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M (1991) America’s green strategy. Sci Am 264(4): 168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M, van der Linde C (1995) Towards a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Persp 9: 97–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Press D (2007) Industry, environmental policy, and environmental outcomes. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32: 317–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser WL (1966) Private action for public nuisance. VA Law Rev 52(6): 997–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond WH (1978) John A. Hobson: economic heretic. Am J Econ Sociol 37(3): 283–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger-Schluga T (2002) The stringency of environmental regulation and the ‘Porter hypothesis’. In: Marsiliani L, Rauscher M, Withagen C (eds) Environmental economics and the international economy. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordretch, pp 123–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen CM (2003) ‘Knowing’ industrial pollution: nuisance law and the power of tradition in a time of rapid economic change, 1840–1864. Environ Hist 8(4):565–597. http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/eh/8.4/rosen.html

  • Rosenberg N (1994a) Energy-efficient technologies: past and future perspectives. In: Rosenberg N (eds) Exploring the black box. Technology, economics, and history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 161–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg N (1994b) Charles Babbage: pioneer economist. In: Rosenberg N (eds) Exploring the black box. Technology, economics and history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 24–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross EA (1896) The location of industries. Q J Econ 10(2): 247–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell CA (ed) (2000) Chemistry, society and environment. A new history of the British chemical industry. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Shute L (1997) John Maurice Clark. A social economics for the twenty-first century. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds PL (1862) Waste products and undeveloped substances; or, hints for enterprise in neglected fields. Robert Hardwicke, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds PL (1876/1873) Waste products and undeveloped substances: a synopsis of progress made in their economic utilisation during the last quarter of a century at home and abroad, 3rd edn. Hardwicke and Bogue, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds PL (1883) The savings of science. Pop Sci Mon 28: 798–811

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson RD (ed) (1999) Productivity in natural resource industries: improvement through innovation. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith VK, Walsh R (2000) Do painless environmental policies exist?. J Risk Uncertain 21(1): 73–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spellman WE (1979) The economics of Edward Alsworth Ross. Am J Econ Sociol 38(2): 129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavins RN (2004) The myth of the universal market. Environ Forum 21(3): 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot FA (1920) Millions from waste. J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Taussig FW (1920) Principles of economics, 2nd edn revised. The MacMillan Company, New York

  • Tietenberg T (1996) Environmental and natural resource economics, 4th edn. HarperCollins College Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner RK (2000) Waste management. In: Henk F, Gabel HL (eds) Principles of environmental and resource economics. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK, pp 700–744

  • van den Bergh JCJM, Janssen MA (2004) The interface between economics and industrial ecology: a survey. In: van den Bergh JCJM, Janssen MA (eds) (2004a) Economics of industrial ecology. Materials, structural change, and spatial scales. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp 13–54

  • Wagner M (2003) The Porter hypothesis revisited: a literature review of theoretical models and empirical tests. Centre for Sustainability Management, Lünenburg University, CSM Working Paper, December

  • Zimmermann E (1933) World resources and industries. A functional appraisal of the availability of agricultural and industrial resources. Harper & Brothers Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Toronto Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road North, Mississauga, ON, Canada, L5L 1C6

    Pierre Desrochers

Authors
  1. Pierre Desrochers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Desrochers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Desrochers, P. Did the Invisible Hand Need a Regulatory Glove to Develop a Green Thumb? Some Historical Perspective on Market Incentives, Win-Win Innovations and the Porter Hypothesis. Environ Resource Econ 41, 519–539 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9208-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9208-x

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Search

Navigation