Skip to main content
Log in

Economic Benefits of Management Reform in the Gulf of Mexico Grouper Fishery: A Semi-parametric Analysis

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses a semi-parametric empirical model to estimate the economic benefits of adopting a property rights-based management program in the Gulf of Mexico grouper fishery. The analysis predicts that a rights-based fleet will be comprised of fewer, more cost efficient boats than under the current controlled access management program. Results indicate that in the year of our data, 1993, the smaller, more productive fleet could harvest the allowable reef fish catch at a cost saving of $2.92–$7.07  million, 12–30% less than under controlled access management. Recent tightening of controlled access regulations suggest that the benefits from management reform could be even larger in the current day fishery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumol WJ, Panzar JC and Willig RD (1982). Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers RG, Chung Y, Färe R (1996) Benefit and distance functions. J Econ Theory 7:407–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers RG, Chung Y, Färe R (1998) Profit, directional distance functions and Nerlovian efficiency. J Optim Theor Appl 98:351–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark CW (1990). Mathematical bioeconomics: the optimal management of renewable resources, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli T, Rao DSP and Battese G (1998). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Kluwer, Norwell, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupont D (2000). Individual transferable vessel quotas and efficient restructuring of the primary harvesting sector. Ann Oper Res 94: 275–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R and Grosskopf S (2000). Theory and application of directional distance functions. J Productiv Anal 13: 93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S and Knox Lovell CA (1994). Production frontiers. Cambridge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafton Q, Squires D and Fox K (2000). Private property and economic efficiency: a study of a common-pool resource. J Law Econ 63: 679–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (2007) Briefing book. Unpublished document, Available at http://www.gulfcouncil.org/

  • Kirkley J, Morrison Paul CJ and Squires D (2002). Capacity and capacity utilization in common-pool resource industries. Environ Resour Econ 22: 71–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar SC and Knox Lovell CC (2000). Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard RW (1970). Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Simar L, Wilson PW (2000) Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: the state of the art. J Prod Anal 13:49–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Simar L and Wilson PW (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi parametric models of production processes. J Econom 136: 31–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squires D and Kirkley J (1995). Resource rents from single and multispecies individual transferable quota programs. ICES J Marine Sci 52: 153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squires D and Kirkley J (1996). Individual transferable quotas in a multiproduct common property industry. Can J Econ 24: 318–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squires D and Kirkley J (1999). Skipper skill and panel data in fishing industries. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56: 2011–2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squires D, Alauddin M and Kirkley J (1994). Individual transferable quota markets and investment decisions in the fixed gear sablefish industry. J Environ Econ Manage 27: 185–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart J, Walshe K (2008) Compliance costs and the small fisher: a study of exiters from the New Zealand Fishery. Mar Policy 32(1):120–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart J, Walshe K and Moodie B (2006). The demise of the small fisher? A profile of exiters from the New Zealand Fishery. Mar Policy 30: 328–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner M and Weninger Q (2005). Meetings with costly participation: an empirical analysis. Rev Econ Stud 72: 247–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vestergaard N, Jensen F and Jorgensen HP (2005). Sunk cost and entry-exit decisions under individual transferable quotas: why industry restructuring is delayed. Land Economics 81: 363–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Walden J (2006). Estimating vessel efficiency using a bootstrapped data envelopment analysis model. Mar Resour Econ 21: 181–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters JR (1996) An economic survey of commercial reef fish vessels in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Unpublished Report

  • Weninger Q and Just RE (1996). An analysis of transition from limited entry to transferable quota: non-marshallian principles for fisheries management. Nat Resour Model 10: 53–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Weninger Q and Waters J (2003). Economic benefits of management reform in the northern Gulf of Mexico reef fish fishery. J Environ Econ Manage 46: 207–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Quinn Weninger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weninger, Q. Economic Benefits of Management Reform in the Gulf of Mexico Grouper Fishery: A Semi-parametric Analysis. Environ Resource Econ 41, 479–497 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9203-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9203-2

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation